WHITE BRITISH NOW A MINORITY AT LEAST 4 CITIES IN THEIR HOMELAND - TIME FOR CIVIL WAR ?

Today we learn that the INDIGENOUS WHITE BRITISH are now a MINORITY in at least four Cities in their motherland.

We, as INDIGENOUS NATIONALISTS, have been warning that the INDIGENOUS WHITE BRITISH POPULATION WILL BECOME A MINORITY IN THEIR HOMELAND, due to the TREASONOUS BETRAYAL by NEW LABOUR, LIBERAL DEMOCRATS AND CONSERVATIVES.

We know that NEW LABOUR BETRAYED US due to the INDIGENOUS WHITE WORKING CLASS refusing to vote for them. To counter this NEW LABOUR opened BRITAINS BORDERS to all and sundry from the third world.
Even going as far as advertising that IF the THIRD WORLD came to BRITAIN they would be given MORE BENEFITS THAN THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION, HOUSING, CLOTHING, MONEY, FREE HEALTH CARE, ENERGY BILLS PAID FOR
AND ALL MOD-CONS.Creating JOB CENTERS in THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES for jobs which are now denied to the WHITE WORKING CLASS due to the TREASONOUS LAWS created to PUNISH THE INDIGENOUS WHITE WORKING CLASS by NEW LABOUR.

ARE YOU UNEMPLOYED?
ARE YOU IN DEBT ?
CAN'T AFFORD A CAR ?
CAN'T AFFORD HOLIDAYS?

Well, now you know why you and yours are at the botom of the list.

The question is...................WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT ?

White Britons a minority in Leicester, Luton and Slough

 White Britons are now a minority in three towns and cities outside London, according to a new report. 

White Britons could also become a minority in Birmingham by the end of the decade.

Large numbers of Eastern European immigrants could be behind the transformation of Leicester, Luton and Slough, the University of Manchester study said.

In Luton, white Britons comprise 45 per cent of the population, Pakistanis make up 14 per cent and Bangladeshis seven per cent.

While in Leicester, 45 per cent are white British, 28 per cent are Indian and other Asians and Africans comprise eight per cent.

The figures, based on the 2011 census, showed Slough comprises 35 per cent white British, 18 per cent Pakistanis and 16 per cent Indian.

However, the report said that despite cities become more ethnically diverse, a large majority of people identify themselves as British.

In Luton, 81 per cent of people said they identified as British.
The report said: “We already know from other sources that British identity is felt at least as strongly by those of minority ethnicity as those of white British ethnicity.
This is the case for people of similar age and background born in the UK.”

The transformation of Luton and Leicester was shown by the study to be partly due to the expansion of the EU. In Leicester, more than 30 per cent of the 110,000 people born abroad arrived after 2004, when eight former Soviet bloc states joined the Union.

The 2011 census revealed that white Britons were outnumbered in London, accouting for 44.9 per cent of the population.
The study also found that the number of white Britons in Birmingham may fall below 50 per cent within seven years.

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9792392/White-Britons-a-minority-in-Leicester-Luton-and-Slough.html

---------------

 "However, the report said that despite cities become more ethnically diverse, a large majority of people identify themselves as British."

That may be the case but THEY ARE NOT BRITISH, THEY ARE FOREIGNERS, IMMIGRANTS AND THE DREGS OF THE THIRD WORLD.

We, the WHITE INDIGENOUS POPULATION WILL HAVE OUR REVENGE.

 

 

ANTIWHITE RACISM AT THE NUJ (NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS)

Something WE didn't already know. Just a pity it was the FALSE NATIONALIST, ANTI-TRUE NATIONALIST UKIP which made the video. Nevertheless it doesn't make it any less truthful

MATT FORDE (NEW LABOUR COMEDIAN) EXPOSES UKIP FALSE FLAG, 5th COLUMN, FALSE NATIONALIST PARTY WITH LAVISH PRAISE.

UKIP: 5TH, COLUMN, FALSE FLAG, NATIONALIST PARTY ENGULFED WITH PRAISE AND ENTHUSIAM BY NEW LABOUR COMEDIAN MATT FORDE (TRAITOR)EXPOSED LIVE ON SKY NEWS.

Just caught a glimpse of Sky News' "Press Preview" 23:30-00:00.

One of the Headlines and News stories Previewed was the Daily Telegraphs CAMERON: UKIP SUPPORTERS ODD INSULT.

The New Labour Lefty Traitor  matt forde (Who he ? (Comedian?)) Couldn't throw enough praise at how well Farage has done  and the success of UKIP in denying the BNP (British National Party) from having more success then they had, and that's despite all the efforts of the whole TV NEWS PROPAGANDA MACHINES, NEWSPAPER PROPAGANDA, LIES,SMEARS and VIOLENT HATE FROM THE UAF.

Laughing Boy couldn't stop slavering and drooling over the success the 5TH COLUMN civic nationalist UKIP in denying NATIONALIST VICTORY, espousing the fantastic work done by the QUISLING FARAGE in containing our vote.

This should now have the UKIP  5TH COLUMN,

 FALSE NATIONALIST SPOILER PARTY

Created by TRAITORS to take wavering, angry BRITISH and wavering NATIONALIST VOTERS from the BNP.

 "He showed early promise and performed occasionally in the midlands until reaching the later stages of many new act competitions including the So You Think You are Funny? semi finals in Edinburgh in 2002.Matt’s love of politics then interrupted his stage career and he spent the next few years working for MPs, The Labour Part.
This love of politics & comedy and a short stint commentating on Mansfield FM"
The big time calls...................................................................to tell him to fuck off.

A success as we can see.Thanks new labour.

UKIP are a FALSE FLAG PARTY, designed to con PATRIOTS from voting for their BROTHERS and SISTERS who have only the BEST INTERESTS OF THE BRITISH ABORIGINES AT HEART.

But, due to the success of the BNP and the hard work put in by ALL BRITISH NATIONALISTSin  extending a hand out to our people.
despite the effort of the whole british media and state apparatus lined up against us, we snatched VICTORY FROM DEFEAT.

AND WE CAN WIN AGAIN.

WITHOUT THE BAGGAGE OF TRAITORS, LIARS, CONMEN AND THIEVES.

THE PEOPLE WILL COME.

We, as INDIGENOUS NATIONALIST PATRIOTS can help speed up the voter transition period by offering a REAL HELPING HAND.

DONATE FOOD FOR THE ELDERLY, DISABLED AND POOR, collected by ALL NATIONALISTS.

NEW quality, practical items of clothing donated and.

Have "Pensioner  Donations" .
For helping a few INDIGENOUS ELDERLY a few pounds towards their Winter Heating Bills. 
I'm sure that over a quarterly/winter Bill Payment giving a few of OUR ELDERLY and INFIRM £20/£30 towards their bill would be gratefully accepted.

A "RANDOM ACT OF KINDNESS" day. 
Such as, offering a young MARRIED INDIGENOUS COUPLE with Child to decorate the babies bedroom (in traditional colours ?)
Offer to help INDIGENOUS HOMES with their Gardens.

Offer a FREE NIGHT BINGO TAXI once a month.
Give a few indigenous mothers a chance to get out for a night just once.

Just IDEAS.

It's the little things NATIONALISTS CAN DO which will quicken the enlightenment of  the INDIGENOUS POPULATION (through word of mouth) what NATIONALISTS are all about.
We also get a chance to talk to these people.

Have you got what it takes to convince strangers that what you have to offer is better than the offer they get with the TRAITOROUS LIB/LAB/CON ?
Dumbed down, illiterate INDIGENOUS CHILDREN. Their EDUCATION sacrificed for the GREATER GOOD OF THE IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY.
The theft of OUR WEALTH AN WORK.
Lack of Benefits and punishments for those on benefits who are INDIGENOUS compared to the Benefits lavished on the Immigrants.
Offer them a few facts on where they are losing out and what the future has in store for them if NATIONALISM FAILS TO BECOME SERIOUS.
Only use facts that remind them how much £££ is being stolen from them how TREASONOUS CRIMINAL USE OF LAW AND TAXATION affect them and the FUTURE OF OUR CHILDREN.

All this can be done by COMMITTED NATIONALISTS offering up a few hours of their time once a month.
ALWAYS KEEP THE GOAL IN MIND never let an opportunity to have a friendly chat with a complete stranger go to waste it costs nothing to have a friendly chat but could be worth everything.




NATIONALISM IS OUR ONLY SAVIOUR FROM THE TRAITORS .

Just think of the gains we could make if we started to help OUR UNFORTUNATE, OUR PEOPLE have a better day, week, month or year. 

Set Examples.

It will pay dividends in the future when UKIP MEMBERS and VOTERS WAKE UP

 

COMING TO MULTICULT WIGAN SOON

LEFT WING GUARDIAN TOILET PAPER EXPRESSESS SUPPORT FOR PADEOPHILES

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM THE LEFT WING, LABOUR SUPPORTING AND FAMILY HATING GUARDIAN ?

READ ON AND HAVE THE SICK BUCKET READY AS YOU READ HOW THE LEFT IS TRYING TO NORMALISE ALL AND ANY IMMORAL, PERVERTED AND DISGUSTING ACTS. 

 

  

Jon Henley (A PAEDOPHILE ?)  

The Guardian, Thursday 3 January 2013

"In 1976 the National Council for Civil Liberties, the respectable (and responsible) pressure group now known as Liberty, made a submission to parliament's criminal law revision committee. It caused barely a ripple. "Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in with an adult," it read, "result in no identifiable damage … The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage."

It is difficult today, after the public firestorm unleashed by revelations about Jimmy Savile and the host of child abuse allegations they have triggered, to imagine any mainstream group making anything like such a claim. But if it is shocking to realise how dramatically attitudes to paedophilia have changed in just three decades, it is even more surprising to discover how little agreement there is even now among those who are considered experts on the subject.

A liberal professor of psychology who studied in the late 1970s will see things very differently from someone working in child protection, or with convicted sex offenders. There is, astonishingly, not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.
So what, then, do we know? A paedophile is someone who has a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children. Savile appears to have been primarily an ephebophile, defined as someone who has a similar preferential attraction to adolescents, though there have been claims one of his victims was aged eight.
But not all paedophiles are child molesters, and vice versa: by no means every paedophile acts on his impulses, and many people who sexually abuse children are not exclusively or primarily sexually attracted to them. In fact, "true" paedophiles are estimated by some experts to account for only 20% of sexual abusers. Nor are paedophiles necessarily violent: no firm links have so far been established between paedophilia and aggressive or psychotic symptoms. Psychologist Glenn Wilson, co-author of The Child-Lovers: a Study of Paedophiles in Society, argues that "The majority of paedophiles, however socially inappropriate, seem to be gentle and rational."
Legal definitions of paedophilia, needless to say, have no truck with such niceties, focusing on the offence, not the offender. The Sex Offenders Act 1997 defined paedophilia as a sexual relationship between an adult over 18 and a child below 16.

There is much more we don't know, including how many paedophiles there are: 1-2% of men is a widely accepted figure, but Sarah Goode, a senior lecturer at the University of Winchester and author of two major 2009 and 2011 sociological studies on paedophilia in society, says the best current estimate – based on possibly flawed science – is that "one in five of all adult men are, to some degree, capable of being sexually aroused by children". Even less is known about female paedophiles, thought to be responsible for maybe 5% of abuse against pre-pubescent children in the UK.

Debate still rages, too, about the clinical definition of paedophilia. Down the years, the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – "the psychiatrist's bible" – has variously classified it as a sexual deviation, a sociopathic condition and a non-psychotic medical disorder. And few agree about what causes it. Is paedophilia innate or acquired? Research at the sexual behaviours clinic of Canada's Centre for Addiction and Mental Health suggests paedophiles' IQs are, on average, 10% lower than those of sex offenders who had abused adults, and that paedophiles are significantly less likely to be right-handed than the rest of the population, suggesting a link to brain development.

MRI scans reveal a possible issue with paedophiles' "white matter": the signals connecting different areas of the brain. Paedophiles may be wired differently.
This is radical stuff. But there is a growing conviction, notably in Canada, that paedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality. Two eminent researchers testified to that effect to a Canadian parliamentary commission last year, and the Harvard Mental Health Letter of July 2010 stated baldly that paedophilia "is a sexual orientation" and therefore "unlikely to change".

Child protection agencies and many who work with sex offenders dislike this. "Broadly speaking, in the world of people who work with sex offenders here, [paedophilia] is learned behaviour," says Donald Findlater, director of research and development at the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, a charity dedicated to preventing child sexual abuse, and, before it closed, manager of leading treatment centre the Wolvercote Clinic. "There may be some vulnerabilities that could be genetic, but normally there are some significant events in a person's life, a sexually abusive event, a bullying environment … I believe it is learned, and can be unlearned."

Chris Wilson of Circles UK, which helps released offenders, also rejects the idea that paedophilia is a sexual orientation: "The roots of that desire for sex with a child lie in dysfunctional psychological issues to do with power, control, anger, emotional loneliness, isolation."

If the complexity and divergence of professional opinion may have helped create today's panic around paedophilia, a media obsession with the subject has done more: a sustained hue and cry exemplified by the News of the World's notorious "name and shame" campaign in 2000, which brought mobs on to the streets to demonstrate against the presence of shadowy monsters in their midst. As a result, paranoia about the danger from solitary, predatory deviants far outweighs the infinitely more real menace of abuse within the home or extended circle. "The vast majority of sexual violence is committed by people known to the victim," stresses Kieran Mccartan, senior lecturer in criminology at the University of the West of England. Only very rarely is the danger from the "stranger in the white van", Mccartan says.

The reclassification of paedophilia as a sexual orientation would, however, play into what Goode calls "the sexual liberation discourse", which has existed since the 1970s. "There are a lot of people," she says, "who say: we outlawed homosexuality, and we were wrong. Perhaps we're wrong about paedophilia."
Social perceptions do change. Child brides were once the norm; in the late 16th century the age of consent in England was 10. More recently, campaigning organisations of the 70s and 80s such as the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) and Paedophile Action for Liberation were active members of the NCCL when it made its parliamentary submission questioning the lasting damage caused by consensual paedophilic relations.
Even now there is no academic consensus on that fundamental question – as Goode found. Some academics do not dispute the view of Tom O'Carroll, a former chairman of PIE and tireless paedophilia advocate with a conviction for distributing indecent photographs of children following a sting operation, that society's outrage at paedophilic relationships is essentially emotional, irrational, and not justified by science. "It is the quality of the relationship that matters," O'Carroll insists. "If there's no bullying, no coercion, no abuse of power, if the child enters into the relationship voluntarily … the evidence shows there need be no harm."

This is not, obviously, a widely held view. Mccartan uses O'Carroll's book Paedophilia: the Radical Case in his teaching as "it shows how sex offenders justify themselves". Findlater says the notion that a seven-year-old can make an informed choice for consensual sex with an adult is "just preposterous. It is adults exploiting children." Goode says simply: "Children are not developmentally ready for adult sexuality," adding that it is "intrusive behaviour that violates the child's emerging self-identity" and can be similar in long-term impact to adults experiencing domestic violence or torture.

But not all experts are sure. A Dutch study published in 1987 found that a sample of boys in paedophilic relationships felt positively about them. And a major if still controversial 1998-2000 meta-study suggests – as J Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, Chicago, says – that such relationships, entered into voluntarily, are "nearly uncorrelated with undesirable outcomes".

Most people find that idea impossible. But writing last year in the peer-reviewed Archives of Sexual Behaviour, Bailey said that while he also found the notion "disturbing", he was forced to recognise that "persuasive evidence for the harmfulness of paedophilic relationships does not yet exist".
If that assertion does nothing else, it underlines the need for more research on paedophilia – something on which everyone in the field at least is agreed. There is, too, broad consensus around the idea that the approach to paedophilia must be about management and prevention: on stopping potential offenders making that contact (or downloading that image).

Initiatives such as Stop It Now!, which Findlater runs, exemplify this: a telephone helpline offering advice to people worried they may be having inappropriate sexual impulses. A similar German programme, Prevention Project Dunkelfeld, has as its slogan: "You are not guilty because of your sexual desire, but you are responsible for your sexual behaviour. There is help."

For convicted abusers, Circles UK aims to prevent reoffending by forming volunteer "circles of support and accountability" around recently released offenders, reducing isolation and emotional loneliness and providing practical help. In Canada, where it originated, it has cut reoffending by 70%, and is yielding excellent results here too. The goal of all treatment, Findlater says, is "people achieving a daily motivation not to cause harm again. Our goal is self-management in the future."
For Goode, though, broader, societal change is needed. "Adult sexual attraction to children is part of the continuum of human sexuality; it's not something we can eliminate," she says. "If we can talk about this rationally – acknowledge that yes, men do get sexually attracted to children, but no, they don't have to act on it – we can maybe avoid the hysteria. We won't label paedophiles monsters; it won't be taboo to see and name what is happening in front of us."

We can help keep children safe, Goode argues, "by allowing paedophiles to be ordinary members of society, with moral standards like everyone else", and by "respecting and valuing those paedophiles who choose self-restraint". Only then will men tempted to abuse children "be able to be honest about their feelings, and perhaps find people around them who could support them and challenge their behaviour before children get harmed".

DEATH PENALTY FOR PAEDOPHILES AND THEIR SUPPORTERS

LABOUR 25+18 MORE LABOUR PAEDOPHILES

Team Cameron’s big Jewish backers

When the Lib/Lab/con openly admit to being ISRAELI STATE AGENTS then that's the only answer you need when you want to know why the Lib/Lab/con don't give a toss about the INDIGENOUS BRITISH:

"Prominent members of the Jewish community are playing a major role in financing David Cameron’s bid for power, a JC investigation can reveal. The biggest Jewish donor to the party while Mr Cameron has been leader is gaming magnate Lord Steinberg, who has donated £530,000, plus a loan of £250,000.

Hedge-fund owner Stanley Fink has donated £103,000, even though he was a declared supporter of Mr Cameron’s leadership rival, Liam Fox. A further £250,000 has been loaned by philanthropist Dame Vivien Duffield. During Mr Cameron’s campaign to lead his party, Jewish figures gave his team (as opposed to the party) additional donations of more than £60,000.

According to the JC’s inquiries, direct donations to “Team Cameron” in the leadership battle came from philanthropist Trevor Pears (around £20,000), Bicom chair Poju Zabludowicz (£15,000 plus £25,000 to the party), Next chief executive Simon Wolfson (£10,000 plus £50,000 to the party), former Carlton TV boss Michael Green (£10,000) and Tory deputy treasurer and key Cameron fundraiser Andrew Feldman (£10,000 through his family firm, Jayroma).

Beyond the donors, a small but influential group of Jewish Conservative officials and politicians were also key players in Mr Cameron’s campaign for the leadership. Among them was party treasurer and managing director of Cavendish Corporate Finance, Howard Leigh, who stressed that Mr Cameron was preparing a new policy on political financing. “He is preparing to cap donations at £50,000, combined with some state financing,” Mr Leigh told the JC. “The aim is to prevent people from buying influence. We think a £50,000 cap is reasonable.” Mr Leigh worked closely with Mr Feldman in running the so-called “Team Cameron,” and both will now be charged with broadening the party’s donor base. Mr Feldman is a close friend of Mr Cameron, whom he met as an undergraduate at Oxford University. Other senior figures around the leader include Oliver Letwin, head of policy. A former shadow Home Secretary and shadow Chancellor, Mr Letwin is, like Mr Cameron, an Old Etonian. Welwyn Hatfield MP Grant Shapps, who seconded Mr Cameron’s bid to become Tory leader, decided early on that he was the man “of the future.” He backed his campaign, he told the JC, because “I saw that he had great leadership qualities.” As a vice-chairman of the Conservative Party, he said, he would be taking the Cameron message to supporters around the UK.

Although he is popular with Jewish Tories, Mr Cameron’s criticism of Israel’s actions in Lebanon sparked doubts about his stance — voiced particularly by Tory donor and former party treasurer Lord Kalms. However, Conservative Friends of Israel chair Richard Harrington stressed that the leader had given LFI “every possible access” and had met CFI officials several times. The Key Players Andrew Feldman - Destined to be charged with raising money for the new-look Conservative Party, Andrew Feldman (circled, at the left of the picture), 40, met Mr Cameron (circled, right of picture) at Brasenose College, Oxford. He is a close friend and tennis partner of the leader. Said to be a member of the Tories’ so-called Notting Hill set, he lives in West London with his wife and two children. Mr Feldman attended Haberdashers’ Aske’s school, and, after qualifying as a lawyer, entered the family’s ladieswear firm, Jayroma.

Having acted as fundraiser for Mr Cameron’s leadership campaign, he is now deputy treasurer of the party and is in Mr Cameron’s economic-policy group. Michael Green - Michael Green, former chairman of Carlton Television, gave financial support to David Cameron’s leadership campaign but would not discuss details. “I am a big supporter of David Cameron but I want to make it clear that I have not supported the Tory Party. I have supported David Cameron’s quest to become leader,” he said.

Lord Steinberg - Lord Steinberg — formerly Leonard Steinberg — became a life peer in 2004 and is a major donor to the Conservatives. Raised in Belfast and educated at Royal Belfast Academical Institution, the 70-year-old Baron Steinberg of Belfast was a founder of Stanley Leisure plc, the gaming company, serving as executive chairman from 1957 to 2002 and non-executive chairman since then. He is a former deputy treasurer of the Tory party and is a founder and chairman of his family charitable trust. His political interests are listed in Dod’s, the parliamentary guide, as Northern Ireland, tax and gambling, and Israel.

Simon Wolfson A donor to David Cameron’s leadership campaign and to the Conservative Party, Simon Wolfson, 38, will be continuing a family tradition when he becomes an adviser to Mr Cameron on improving economic competition and wealth creation. The son of Lord Wolfson, who was chief of staff to Margaret Thatcher, Mr Wolfson, chief executive of the Next clothing chain, is one of the youngest advisors to be appointed by Mr Cameron. Along with MP John Redwood, Mr Wolfson will jointly chair the advisory group that will seek to reduce red tape and improve education and skills in the workplace. It will also examine the country’s transport infrastructure.

Grant Shapps MP As vice-chairman of the Conservative Party and seconder to David Cameron’s campaign, backbencher Grant Shapps will find the next few months extremely busy as he tours the constituencies to persuade Tories of the virtues of the new leadership. Speaking to the JC, he acknowledged that there would be doubts in some quarters but he has no doubt that the party has chosen the right man. “I persuaded my colleagues at the parliamentary level and I shall now have to do the same thing all over the country,” said the MP for Welwyn Hatfield. “The thing that people will like about David is that he is very optimistic.”"

Time we got rid of ALL THE JEWS IN THE UK, AGAIN.

From the ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689 -

"And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God.""

It's a Wonderful Anti-White Christmas Story