THE GREAT ENOCH POWELL

It's not often that I have heard a speech which raised the hairs on the back of my neck, so in tune was it with my own thoughts and beliefs than when I heard the speech by Enoch Powell who was born one hundred years ago today.

I had during my medical training made many friends from India and Pakistan and other countries and even had one staying with me for a month, so I was not "racist" in any way. But I believed this was my country and they had theirs to which they should return and my friends agreed.
I have to accept I knew no people of African origin but when I heard his speech I was elated that a senior member of the government felt the way I and millions of others felt.
It was not the individuals we objected to but the mass settlements of foreigners with different traditions in our crowded country.

I believed  in the people of our country, and that we could survive and thrive in the new conditions prevailing then as I do now.
I was concerned at the mass influx of settlers, not visitors seeking education and then returning home which I believed would alter my country for the worse.
In his oft misquoted "rivers of blood" (he never said those words) speech he warned of the social divisions which would inevitably follow mass immigration.

AND HE WAS PROVED RIGHT.
Right when he said the black man would have the whiphand and our country would become ghettoised.

But unfortunately his boss the Prime Minister was the biggest traitor our country has had the misfortune to suffer (and that takes some doing) Heath.
This closet pervert had the ambition of destroying our country as an independent democracy and replacing it as a subservient satellite to the EU.

Of course it was called the "Common Market" to lull us into thinking it was just a free trade area rather than a political concept designed to subvert the nation states of Europe into the undemocratic  monolith which we now have.

Powell saw and understood this, and perhaps that is why Heath saw an opportunity to sack him.
Almost unique among politicians Powell stood by his beliefs and campaigned against the concept, even deserting the Tory Party advising people to vote Labour. Later he went to Northern Ireland and sat as a Unionist MP.

A man of foresight and integrity he put personal preferment and money aside to stand by what he believed was best for his country.

HE WAS UNCORRUPTIBLE---AND RIGHT.

His prophesies have been proved correct. We have racial conflict and the possibility of inter racial violence.
The black man does have the whip hand, aided by the anti British race laws.

AND the EU which the Common Market has morphed into (as he foretold) is a disaster and has caused a decline in the standard of living in Britain and other European countries.

The above issues and consequences above which he foretold have come to pass.

He was a great man to whom the truth was more important than monetary gain or status.

AN HONEST POLITICIAN and a visionary.

Where among the present political classes can we find such a statesman?

No chance, they are all avaricious pygmies.
But we need such a man NOW-- AND SOON.

Will we find one? I hope so.

OUR NEED IS DESPERATE.

DOES HE KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING?

The Chancellor's decision to "kick start" the economy by lending the banks £140 billion shows how incompetent he is, or maybe how under the influence of the malign banking system which fund the Tory Party.

I do not know what they teach in university economic lectures but it certain does not seem to be common sense.

All are agreed the British economy needs rapid overhaul but those in charge do not have a clue as to how it should be done.

One of Osborne's ideas is to make mortgages easier to obtain which sounds good to people who do not think it through but a moment's reflection reveals that with houses in short supply all this will do is put the price up. Thus first time buyers will have to pay more and saddle themselves with more debt, while existing property owners reap an unearned reward.

These inflated "assets" can then be used to buy more goods and benefit "the high street" controlled in most part by big business. Also most of the products they sell are imported so causing our debt to rise.
But is this the intent?
The banks make money they have been given by lending it out at high interest rates and the City of London makes its profit at every turn, and will continue to reward the Tory party.

It will not do the average British person any good at all.

Here are two suggestions from me, on how to use this £140 billion conjured out of thin air.(I have many more but for now just these two).

Cut National insurance for employers which will encourage them to take people on.

CUT THE BANKS OUT OF THIS LENDING. The present scheme will only make them richer and produce nothing of value.
Put the money into sorting the infrastructure of this country out which would be creating USEFUL jobs and allow the money to be spread around the country by the use of sub contractors and British manufactured products. That way unemployment would be cut and the tax take would rise and expenditure on welfare decrease.

Any money left should be lent to small business direct, cutting out the banks and their interest demands cutting overheads and making them more competitive internationally.

The EU is blamed for much of the current financial malaise and this is partly true but the financial mismanagement of Britain by this and the last governments has made our vulnerability worse.

I believe some of Osborne's action is to protect the banks against a EU breakup.
But the banks having foolishly lent to the EU and made £billions for themselves and their City friends should bear the consequences and if they go broke, so be it, so long as small depositors are protected.
If I lend somebody £1000 and they go broke it's my loss for being so foolish and trusting and I would have to bear the consequences and the banks are no different.

Unfortunately the British economy has been built on this sleazy fast buck system to the detriment of productive industry. The Chancellor should be working to reverse this dependence as quickly as possible, but true to form he is giving the banks more money to dish out at a profit.

What would happen if a bank or banks defaulted on their obligations.
Perhaps nothing much if deposits were guaranteed.
All tangible assets and goods would still be there, the roads, railways airports, houses etc.
It would be just the banks and their wealthy speculators who would lose lines on a computer.Money does not exist.
Our people freed from the debt burden could then thrive as Iceland is doing after defaulting.

Much of the trouble in Britain and the EU is due to the creaming off of wealth by the financial institutions and the people through no fault of their own are paying for it.

IT'S TIME TO REMOVE THIS MILLSTONE.

P S I will give my thoughts on the many other ways for our country to return to prosperity at a later date.

CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE - THE USE OF CHILDREN FOR SEX BY THE US ELITE

Conspiracy of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.

Based on DeCamp's riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, Conspiracy of Silence begins with the shut-down of Nebraska's Franklin Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child sex abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died suddenly and violently. A dozen others linked to the Franklin case investigation died strange and mysterious deaths.

So why have you never heard of the Franklin cover-up? Originally scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel, Conspiracy of Silence was yanked at the last minute due to formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful people did not want you to watch this documentary. Thanks to the power of the Internet, you can now view this eye-opening documentary.
You may find yourself becoming angry or upset while watching Conspiracy of Silence. Many people do. Let us take this information not only as a call to stop this kind of abuse at the nationwide and global level, but also as a call to examine ourselves and make a commitment to deep honesty and integrity in our own lives. Thanks for caring, and may we all work together to build a brighter future for our world.

IS LEVESON WORTH IT?

The Leveson enquiry rumbles on making vast amounts of money for the lawyers and costing millions of hours of police time.

So is it worth it?

YES.
It is nice to see members of the government and opposition squirm on being questioned over their dubious relationship to newspaper proprietors. The government must regret having set up the enquiry having initially thought that it would be the usual whitewash and cover up that most previous enquiries have produced.

It is ironic that the whole process was prompted by public reaction and disgust the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone, a sick action too far. The initial enquiry was supposed to expose certain journalists and bent coppers who could be used as scapegoats, and life and the cosy relationship between politicians and the press carried on as before.

Unfortunately for the cheats in government it has opened a can of worms.

So what do the findings so far show?

We knew Murdoch had influence when Blair flew to Australia to see him on his election but did not realise how much power he really had.
It has been demonstrated that the Tories encouraged Murdoch's take over efforts of BSky B as phone and e mail records have shown.

But Why?
Yes we know they are in hock to the big city bankers who finance their undemocratic policies but they feared Murdoch more than any of these people.
And who is Murdoch? Just someone who has made a lot of money with newspapers.
Why should a newspaperman have such power?

After the Sun's slating of Kinnock all senior politicians have feared him. He only needed to threaten to run articles attacking proposed policies and the politicians gave in.

In effect one businessman, with no special allegiencies was running the country according to his wishes.
He had more power than the Prime Minister.

What could the Prime Minister do? He was supposedly running the country and could have publicised this underhand influence as he resisted it. But no. Cameron and his Labour predecessors rolled over in the hope of further favours, crumbs from the rich paper boss's table if they played ball.

What whimps these politicians are. They were elected to protect the interests of the people and yet they allowed themselves to be ruled by a newspaper man.
They are supposed to lead our country but instead are led by a greedy selfish foreign capitalist who until now has run roughshod over all opposition.
The evidence of collusion between government and Murdoch is slowly being teased out, but there will be much that is never unearthed.

Although Murdoch is the worst offender the other newspaper proprietors are not immune to dirty tricks and inside influence.

The freedom of the press is an important guarantor of a free society and must be preserved, but it is not now free but controlled by an oligarchy of press barons. Fortunately their influence is being eroded by the internet and foreign television stations.

But it is still important and it is ironic that it's dirty underside has been exposed by the criminal exploitation of the murder of a little girl.

Heads should roll and they possibly will but I fear it will be the wrong heads, and the life and corruption of the Westminster bubble will continue until the looming financial storm hits us.

AND THEN WHO WILL PROTECT THEM?

GET OUT OF DEBT FREE - PROMISARY NOTES

CHEAPEST PETROL WITHIN 5 MILES OF WIGAN TOWN CENTRE

130.7p Asda Golborne

Edge Green Lane, Golborne, Warrington, WA3 3SP

Asda, 4.65 miles away, last updated on 9 June


131.7p Asda Wigan Automat

Robin Park Road, Wigan, WN6 7TL

Asda, 1.67 miles away, last updated on 7 June


131.9p Tesco Wigan Extra

Central Park Way, Water Heyes, Wigan, WN1 1XE

Tesco, 0.32 miles away, last updated on 10 June


131.9p Morrisons Ince

Makerfield Way, Ince, Wigan, WN2 2ER

Morrisons, 2.42 miles away, last updated on 10 June


131.9p Sainsburys Wigan

Warrington Road, Goose Green, Wigan, WN3 6XA

Sainsburys, 2.55 miles away, last updated on 10 June

I'M SICK OF RACISM (AND FOOTBALL)

I am sick of racism. I am also sick of the football contest in Poland and the Ukraine.

The peoples of these countries are accused of racism because some football fans threw bananas at black people and chanted monkey noises.
What horrible people they must be.
NO
I have been to both countries and found them very friendly. I visited Odessa and was regailed with wine, and in Cracow and Warsaw found the people to be excetionally friendly.
In the square in Cracow we sat and listened to a rock band while having a drink.

BUT they do not seem to like black men in their country. Well neither do I in my country.

Both our countries have had vastly different histories and the Poles and Ukranians have suffered invasions and slaughter, much of it at the hands of the Soviets but also the Nazis.
One can therefore understand their antipathy to foreigners, but having been fortunate not to hacve been invaded by Africans do not want that disaster to occur in their countries.

I accept that politeness should rule in international football contests but there will always be rivalries, and when alien races are involved thjose rivalries become more intense.
African "students" in the Ukraine complain of racist abuse.
Aw diddums. They should perhaps return to their own continent, but then how could they learn.

The trouble with the black's touchyness is that it is too near the truth for them to abide.
Asians and Chinese are possibly skitted, as we would possibly be, but not in such a demeaning way because they are clever and have a glorious past.
Africans have no history of note, but then they could not write.
There are Asian and Chinese Nobel prize winners but as far as I know no Africans. African people have contributed NOTHING to human knowledge (apart from possibly a spear)

All this does not excuse impoliteness, they can not help their history or deficiencies, but the people of Poland and Ukraine obviously do not want their culture to be diluted with such people and this "racism" will possibly discourage more Africans emigrating to these countries.

If only we had taken this attitude in the past we could have avoided the gang wars and thuggery which was shown yesterday in the papers when several blacks were jailed for their parts in last August's riots in which they shot at the police, (they should have been jailed for being ugly).

It seems insulting blacks is second only to antisemitism in the racist stakes. One race is too thick and can't work, and one too clever and thus rules.
Irrational behaviour we are told, but when one looks deeper there is a rationale behind it.

They want their countries for themselves and to control them themselves as do we.

But we have been sold down the river by our leaders and are now in a country ripe for a civil war Balkan style and can as yet do nothing until the dam bursts which it surely will.

Our country is a tinderbox and the government realises this. That is why they have cut the regular army and are encouraging "ethnics" to enlist. They are doing the same with the police although antagonising the local bobbies could be a bad idea.

Look at Syria, a country divided by various muslim sects but now in a civil war promoted by the West.

THAT IS OUR FUTURE and why they are trying to emasculate and diversify our forces and police because as yet they would be on the side of the people, but in future blessed with diversity do you think they will be on our side, the British people?

I THINK NOT.