Wednesday, 13 June 2012
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE - THE USE OF CHILDREN FOR SEX BY THE US ELITE
Conspiracy of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Based on DeCamp's riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, Conspiracy of Silence begins with the shut-down of Nebraska's Franklin Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child sex abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee's chief investigator died suddenly and violently. A dozen others linked to the Franklin case investigation died strange and mysterious deaths.
So why have you never heard of the Franklin cover-up? Originally scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel, Conspiracy of Silence was yanked at the last minute due to formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful people did not want you to watch this documentary. Thanks to the power of the Internet, you can now view this eye-opening documentary.
You may find yourself becoming angry or upset while watching Conspiracy of Silence. Many people do. Let us take this information not only as a call to stop this kind of abuse at the nationwide and global level, but also as a call to examine ourselves and make a commitment to deep honesty and integrity in our own lives. Thanks for caring, and may we all work together to build a brighter future for our world.
IS LEVESON WORTH IT?
The Leveson enquiry rumbles on making vast amounts of money for the lawyers and costing millions of hours of police time.
So is it worth it?
YES.
It is nice to see members of the government and opposition squirm on being questioned over their dubious relationship to newspaper proprietors. The government must regret having set up the enquiry having initially thought that it would be the usual whitewash and cover up that most previous enquiries have produced.
It is ironic that the whole process was prompted by public reaction and disgust the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone, a sick action too far. The initial enquiry was supposed to expose certain journalists and bent coppers who could be used as scapegoats, and life and the cosy relationship between politicians and the press carried on as before.
Unfortunately for the cheats in government it has opened a can of worms.
So what do the findings so far show?
We knew Murdoch had influence when Blair flew to Australia to see him on his election but did not realise how much power he really had.
It has been demonstrated that the Tories encouraged Murdoch's take over efforts of BSky B as phone and e mail records have shown.
But Why?
Yes we know they are in hock to the big city bankers who finance their undemocratic policies but they feared Murdoch more than any of these people.
And who is Murdoch? Just someone who has made a lot of money with newspapers.
Why should a newspaperman have such power?
After the Sun's slating of Kinnock all senior politicians have feared him. He only needed to threaten to run articles attacking proposed policies and the politicians gave in.
In effect one businessman, with no special allegiencies was running the country according to his wishes.
He had more power than the Prime Minister.
What could the Prime Minister do? He was supposedly running the country and could have publicised this underhand influence as he resisted it. But no. Cameron and his Labour predecessors rolled over in the hope of further favours, crumbs from the rich paper boss's table if they played ball.
What whimps these politicians are. They were elected to protect the interests of the people and yet they allowed themselves to be ruled by a newspaper man.
They are supposed to lead our country but instead are led by a greedy selfish foreign capitalist who until now has run roughshod over all opposition.
The evidence of collusion between government and Murdoch is slowly being teased out, but there will be much that is never unearthed.
Although Murdoch is the worst offender the other newspaper proprietors are not immune to dirty tricks and inside influence.
The freedom of the press is an important guarantor of a free society and must be preserved, but it is not now free but controlled by an oligarchy of press barons. Fortunately their influence is being eroded by the internet and foreign television stations.
But it is still important and it is ironic that it's dirty underside has been exposed by the criminal exploitation of the murder of a little girl.
Heads should roll and they possibly will but I fear it will be the wrong heads, and the life and corruption of the Westminster bubble will continue until the looming financial storm hits us.
AND THEN WHO WILL PROTECT THEM?
So is it worth it?
YES.
It is nice to see members of the government and opposition squirm on being questioned over their dubious relationship to newspaper proprietors. The government must regret having set up the enquiry having initially thought that it would be the usual whitewash and cover up that most previous enquiries have produced.
It is ironic that the whole process was prompted by public reaction and disgust the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone, a sick action too far. The initial enquiry was supposed to expose certain journalists and bent coppers who could be used as scapegoats, and life and the cosy relationship between politicians and the press carried on as before.
Unfortunately for the cheats in government it has opened a can of worms.
So what do the findings so far show?
We knew Murdoch had influence when Blair flew to Australia to see him on his election but did not realise how much power he really had.
It has been demonstrated that the Tories encouraged Murdoch's take over efforts of BSky B as phone and e mail records have shown.
But Why?
Yes we know they are in hock to the big city bankers who finance their undemocratic policies but they feared Murdoch more than any of these people.
And who is Murdoch? Just someone who has made a lot of money with newspapers.
Why should a newspaperman have such power?
After the Sun's slating of Kinnock all senior politicians have feared him. He only needed to threaten to run articles attacking proposed policies and the politicians gave in.
In effect one businessman, with no special allegiencies was running the country according to his wishes.
He had more power than the Prime Minister.
What could the Prime Minister do? He was supposedly running the country and could have publicised this underhand influence as he resisted it. But no. Cameron and his Labour predecessors rolled over in the hope of further favours, crumbs from the rich paper boss's table if they played ball.
What whimps these politicians are. They were elected to protect the interests of the people and yet they allowed themselves to be ruled by a newspaper man.
They are supposed to lead our country but instead are led by a greedy selfish foreign capitalist who until now has run roughshod over all opposition.
The evidence of collusion between government and Murdoch is slowly being teased out, but there will be much that is never unearthed.
Although Murdoch is the worst offender the other newspaper proprietors are not immune to dirty tricks and inside influence.
The freedom of the press is an important guarantor of a free society and must be preserved, but it is not now free but controlled by an oligarchy of press barons. Fortunately their influence is being eroded by the internet and foreign television stations.
But it is still important and it is ironic that it's dirty underside has been exposed by the criminal exploitation of the murder of a little girl.
Heads should roll and they possibly will but I fear it will be the wrong heads, and the life and corruption of the Westminster bubble will continue until the looming financial storm hits us.
AND THEN WHO WILL PROTECT THEM?
Tuesday, 12 June 2012
CHEAPEST PETROL WITHIN 5 MILES OF WIGAN TOWN CENTRE
130.7p Asda Golborne
Edge Green Lane, Golborne, Warrington, WA3 3SP
Asda, 4.65 miles away, last updated on 9 June
131.7p Asda Wigan Automat
Robin Park Road, Wigan, WN6 7TL
Asda, 1.67 miles away, last updated on 7 June
131.9p Tesco Wigan Extra
Central Park Way, Water Heyes, Wigan, WN1 1XE
Tesco, 0.32 miles away, last updated on 10 June
131.9p Morrisons Ince
Makerfield Way, Ince, Wigan, WN2 2ER
Morrisons, 2.42 miles away, last updated on 10 June
131.9p Sainsburys Wigan
Warrington Road, Goose Green, Wigan, WN3 6XA
Sainsburys, 2.55 miles away, last updated on 10 June
Edge Green Lane, Golborne, Warrington, WA3 3SP
Asda, 4.65 miles away, last updated on 9 June
131.7p Asda Wigan Automat
Robin Park Road, Wigan, WN6 7TL
Asda, 1.67 miles away, last updated on 7 June
131.9p Tesco Wigan Extra
Central Park Way, Water Heyes, Wigan, WN1 1XE
Tesco, 0.32 miles away, last updated on 10 June
131.9p Morrisons Ince
Makerfield Way, Ince, Wigan, WN2 2ER
Morrisons, 2.42 miles away, last updated on 10 June
131.9p Sainsburys Wigan
Warrington Road, Goose Green, Wigan, WN3 6XA
Sainsburys, 2.55 miles away, last updated on 10 June
Friday, 8 June 2012
I'M SICK OF RACISM (AND FOOTBALL)
I am sick of racism. I am also sick of the football contest in Poland and the Ukraine.
The peoples of these countries are accused of racism because some football fans threw bananas at black people and chanted monkey noises.
What horrible people they must be.
NO
I have been to both countries and found them very friendly. I visited Odessa and was regailed with wine, and in Cracow and Warsaw found the people to be excetionally friendly.
In the square in Cracow we sat and listened to a rock band while having a drink.
BUT they do not seem to like black men in their country. Well neither do I in my country.
Both our countries have had vastly different histories and the Poles and Ukranians have suffered invasions and slaughter, much of it at the hands of the Soviets but also the Nazis.
One can therefore understand their antipathy to foreigners, but having been fortunate not to hacve been invaded by Africans do not want that disaster to occur in their countries.
I accept that politeness should rule in international football contests but there will always be rivalries, and when alien races are involved thjose rivalries become more intense.
African "students" in the Ukraine complain of racist abuse.
Aw diddums. They should perhaps return to their own continent, but then how could they learn.
The trouble with the black's touchyness is that it is too near the truth for them to abide.
Asians and Chinese are possibly skitted, as we would possibly be, but not in such a demeaning way because they are clever and have a glorious past.
Africans have no history of note, but then they could not write.
There are Asian and Chinese Nobel prize winners but as far as I know no Africans. African people have contributed NOTHING to human knowledge (apart from possibly a spear)
All this does not excuse impoliteness, they can not help their history or deficiencies, but the people of Poland and Ukraine obviously do not want their culture to be diluted with such people and this "racism" will possibly discourage more Africans emigrating to these countries.
If only we had taken this attitude in the past we could have avoided the gang wars and thuggery which was shown yesterday in the papers when several blacks were jailed for their parts in last August's riots in which they shot at the police, (they should have been jailed for being ugly).
It seems insulting blacks is second only to antisemitism in the racist stakes. One race is too thick and can't work, and one too clever and thus rules.
Irrational behaviour we are told, but when one looks deeper there is a rationale behind it.
They want their countries for themselves and to control them themselves as do we.
But we have been sold down the river by our leaders and are now in a country ripe for a civil war Balkan style and can as yet do nothing until the dam bursts which it surely will.
Our country is a tinderbox and the government realises this. That is why they have cut the regular army and are encouraging "ethnics" to enlist. They are doing the same with the police although antagonising the local bobbies could be a bad idea.
Look at Syria, a country divided by various muslim sects but now in a civil war promoted by the West.
THAT IS OUR FUTURE and why they are trying to emasculate and diversify our forces and police because as yet they would be on the side of the people, but in future blessed with diversity do you think they will be on our side, the British people?
I THINK NOT.
The peoples of these countries are accused of racism because some football fans threw bananas at black people and chanted monkey noises.
What horrible people they must be.
NO
I have been to both countries and found them very friendly. I visited Odessa and was regailed with wine, and in Cracow and Warsaw found the people to be excetionally friendly.
In the square in Cracow we sat and listened to a rock band while having a drink.
BUT they do not seem to like black men in their country. Well neither do I in my country.
Both our countries have had vastly different histories and the Poles and Ukranians have suffered invasions and slaughter, much of it at the hands of the Soviets but also the Nazis.
One can therefore understand their antipathy to foreigners, but having been fortunate not to hacve been invaded by Africans do not want that disaster to occur in their countries.
I accept that politeness should rule in international football contests but there will always be rivalries, and when alien races are involved thjose rivalries become more intense.
African "students" in the Ukraine complain of racist abuse.
Aw diddums. They should perhaps return to their own continent, but then how could they learn.
The trouble with the black's touchyness is that it is too near the truth for them to abide.
Asians and Chinese are possibly skitted, as we would possibly be, but not in such a demeaning way because they are clever and have a glorious past.
Africans have no history of note, but then they could not write.
There are Asian and Chinese Nobel prize winners but as far as I know no Africans. African people have contributed NOTHING to human knowledge (apart from possibly a spear)
All this does not excuse impoliteness, they can not help their history or deficiencies, but the people of Poland and Ukraine obviously do not want their culture to be diluted with such people and this "racism" will possibly discourage more Africans emigrating to these countries.
If only we had taken this attitude in the past we could have avoided the gang wars and thuggery which was shown yesterday in the papers when several blacks were jailed for their parts in last August's riots in which they shot at the police, (they should have been jailed for being ugly).
It seems insulting blacks is second only to antisemitism in the racist stakes. One race is too thick and can't work, and one too clever and thus rules.
Irrational behaviour we are told, but when one looks deeper there is a rationale behind it.
They want their countries for themselves and to control them themselves as do we.
But we have been sold down the river by our leaders and are now in a country ripe for a civil war Balkan style and can as yet do nothing until the dam bursts which it surely will.
Our country is a tinderbox and the government realises this. That is why they have cut the regular army and are encouraging "ethnics" to enlist. They are doing the same with the police although antagonising the local bobbies could be a bad idea.
Look at Syria, a country divided by various muslim sects but now in a civil war promoted by the West.
THAT IS OUR FUTURE and why they are trying to emasculate and diversify our forces and police because as yet they would be on the side of the people, but in future blessed with diversity do you think they will be on our side, the British people?
I THINK NOT.
Tuesday, 5 June 2012
HOW FAR HAVE WE FALLEN?
I must state from the start that I am a monarchist but I believe the Queen, although not political should have used her royal perogative and refused to sign the various treaties which have as yet shackled our country to the EU.
This week end I celebrated my twentieth wedding anniversirary and had a big party which made me a bit out of touch with the national celebrations of the Diamond Jubilee. I could not even get to my computer hidden as it was behind the table holding the buffet.
We did see some of the pageant yesterday, in between clearing up and were impressed.
It was a celebration of unity as a nation. Admittedly the boats were small but the Thames is not big enough for any big naval ships, and if we had any Spithead would have been the better venue.
But we have no navy. We do not rule the waves, nor do we want to but we can not defend ourselves nowadays.
We thought the pageant yesterday was good. The spectators seemed disgustingly white. Admittedly the BBC showed a few selected aliens but if you looked at the crowds you would have thought that this was Britain.
Similarly today on the Mall almost all the celebrants were white. Where were these additions to our culture? No burkas or ugly muslims. It shows where their allegiencies lie.
The concert although well organised was of course politically correect.
The non "musicion" the puff Elton John who can not sing and a gathering of talentless nonentities tried to entertain the crowd and a bored queen who had to put up with such talentless rubbish (Tom Jones excluded). I bet she would have liked to have sat down with a drink and watched it on the telly, but then that is her job, to look interested while watching sh*te. There may have been some entertainers of merit and if there were I could have misses them.
Anyhow, at 10 PM we went to see the beacon lit on our local hill, the highest point of Merseyside.
A large light was visible and my wife thought that was it. No love, that is the Moon.
Well is that other light the beacon?.
No love that is a street light.
I put the photo above on to show how far we have fallen in one hundred years, from a time when Britain was pre eminent in the world.
It is a photo of the bonfire put up by a community of six thousand people, pit men and quarry workers, in 1912 I think.
My grandfather and great grandfather are on the left of the photo, proud members of the community coming from poor beginnings but who believed in our country.
Look at the building of the bonfire, the neatness and its size and remember all this timber was transported by horse.
Such a bonfire would not have been allowed nowadays for health and safety reasons and I do not think even with modern methods they could have built it so neat.
I can guarantee there is no such a bonfire anywhere else. If there is please post a photo.
Whether you are a monarchist or not, look at the present efforts, see the contrast and weep.
How far has our country fallen?.
This week end I celebrated my twentieth wedding anniversirary and had a big party which made me a bit out of touch with the national celebrations of the Diamond Jubilee. I could not even get to my computer hidden as it was behind the table holding the buffet.
We did see some of the pageant yesterday, in between clearing up and were impressed.
It was a celebration of unity as a nation. Admittedly the boats were small but the Thames is not big enough for any big naval ships, and if we had any Spithead would have been the better venue.
We thought the pageant yesterday was good. The spectators seemed disgustingly white. Admittedly the BBC showed a few selected aliens but if you looked at the crowds you would have thought that this was Britain.
Similarly today on the Mall almost all the celebrants were white. Where were these additions to our culture? No burkas or ugly muslims. It shows where their allegiencies lie.
The concert although well organised was of course politically correect.
The non "musicion" the puff Elton John who can not sing and a gathering of talentless nonentities tried to entertain the crowd and a bored queen who had to put up with such talentless rubbish (Tom Jones excluded). I bet she would have liked to have sat down with a drink and watched it on the telly, but then that is her job, to look interested while watching sh*te. There may have been some entertainers of merit and if there were I could have misses them.
Anyhow, at 10 PM we went to see the beacon lit on our local hill, the highest point of Merseyside.
A large light was visible and my wife thought that was it. No love, that is the Moon.
Well is that other light the beacon?.
No love that is a street light.
I put the photo above on to show how far we have fallen in one hundred years, from a time when Britain was pre eminent in the world.
It is a photo of the bonfire put up by a community of six thousand people, pit men and quarry workers, in 1912 I think.
My grandfather and great grandfather are on the left of the photo, proud members of the community coming from poor beginnings but who believed in our country.
Look at the building of the bonfire, the neatness and its size and remember all this timber was transported by horse.
Such a bonfire would not have been allowed nowadays for health and safety reasons and I do not think even with modern methods they could have built it so neat.
I can guarantee there is no such a bonfire anywhere else. If there is please post a photo.
Whether you are a monarchist or not, look at the present efforts, see the contrast and weep.
How far has our country fallen?.
Thursday, 31 May 2012
WeAreChange Proves Tony Blair Lied To Parliament About Bilderberg
Very interesting little video.
BlIar reveals maybe a little more than he intended when put on the spot.
He loves the limelight so much that he can't help but stop to answer questions put to him by the WeAreChange group.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)