MI5 SUSPECTS ISLAMIST TERRORISTS HAVE INFILTRATED THE POLICE

The policemen lost their jobs when their security clearance was revoked by senior officers after checks were carried out because of fears of “sleepers” in the ranks.

The Sunday Telegraph can also disclose today the identity of one of the policemen suspected of being at a terror camp in 2001.

Abdul Rahman had been a constable for almost three years when MI5 warned that he might have visited a training camp in Pakistan when he travelled there.

He resigned rather than be dismissed from the force and is now suing Scotland Yard for compensation. He says he is entirely innocent and has never been to a terrorist training camp.

His lawyers say he has never been questioned, arrested or charged under terrorism legislation.

Mr Rahman, 33, is the first British policeman ever disclosed to have failed counter-terrorism checks.

Scotland Yard submitted in legal documents that it acted against Mr Rahman “for the purpose of safeguarding national and public security”. A source familiar with the case said there were either one or two other officers who had also lost their jobs because of MI5’s suspicion that they might have trained as terrorists.

“There was concern that these people had come into the force under false pretences,” the senior Metropolitan Police source said. “There were two or three cases at the same time that were of a similar nature, where there were concerns about potential terrorist links.”

The development raises concerns about the ease with which potential terrorists might infiltrate the police and compromise national security.

It is believed that Mr Rahman’s clearance was revoked as part of a root-and-branch security review carried out by MI5 after the July 7, 2005 terrorist attack, and the subsequent failed July 21 bombings.

The fact that he was under MI5 suspicion was disclosed in court documents made public as he fights a lengthy legal case over his departure from the force.

The case is so sensitive that it is being heard by a security-vetted judge.

Mr Rahman, a Muslim who was born in Bangladesh before being raised in London and becoming a British citizen, does not dispute that he went to Pakistan in 2001.

However, his lawyers say he has been “tangled up” in national security legislation.

Mr Rahman became a probationary constable in the Metropolitan Police in September 2003 then attended Hendon Police College, completing his initial training in March 2004.

His passing out parade, at Hendon, was reviewed by the former Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, who at the time was Britain’s most senior counter-terrorism police officer.

As part of his recruitment Mr Rahman underwent a process of security vetting known as a counter-terrorist check (CTC).

However, his security clearance was suspended on June 22, 2006. He was interviewed three times — most probably by counter-terrorism officers — in the following months.

In November 2006 he was told by Det Chief Supt Robert Sait — a senior officer in the Metropolitan Police’s specialist operations directorate, which includes the counter-terrorism command — that his CTC vetting clearance had been revoked.

Mr Rahman was told that he had an internal right of appeal against the decision, which he decided to exercise.

A week before the appeal hearing in June 2007 he was told that if the hearing confirmed the removal of his CTC clearance he was likely to be dismissed.

The appeal hearing was conducted by Mr Clarke, who upheld the decision to remove his CTC clearance. Mr Rahman resigned immediately.

Shortly before Mr Rahman’s clearance was suspended, MI5 rechecked details of officers and civilian staff at the Met, and other forces, against their records of suspects who had been to Pakistan or Afghanistan and who it suspected might have attended terrorist training camps or madrassas — Islamic schools — run by extremists. Mr Rahman, who is married with four children, declined to comment on the case. He claims he is the victim of racial and religious discrimination.

His lawyer, Jasmine van Loggerenberg, of Russell Jones and Walker, said: “My client absolutely denies the allegations against him and this forms the basis of his claims against the police.

“It’s important to stress that this is a case being brought by Mr Rahman, not by the Metropolitan Police.

“There are no criminal proceedings against him. Mr Rahman has never been arrested, questioned or charged in a criminal context in relation to these proceedings.”

Mr Rahman’s father, who lives in Poplar, east London, said: “He is a very genuine and very honest man. He has nothing to hide. He is a family man.

“The allegations against him are untrue. He is very pious, he prays five times a day and I think he didn’t fit in in the police because of that.”

Last month, after a five-year legal battle, the Employment Appeal Tribunal ruled that his case could be held in secret although Mr Rahman had wanted a public hearing. Mr Justice Mitting, a High Court judge who also specialises in terror cases in his role as

chairman of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, ruled that Mr Rahman and his legal team would be banned from parts of the hearing that concerned issues of national security.

Scotland Yard applied to have Mr Rahman’s case heard in secret because it is keen to protect intelligence sources which provide highly-sensitive information.

These sources might be compromised if the sensitive evidence emerges in open court. Some of the information might have come from overseas security services, such as the CIA.

Instead, a security-cleared “special advocate”, rather than his own lawyer, will be appointed on Mr Rahman’s behalf.

However, he will be banned from discussing the case with Mr Rahman and his lawyers. Mrs van Loggerenberg said that it was Mr Rahman’s position that questions of national security could “override natural justice”.

Mrs van Loggerenberg said: “This case also raises important issues on whether practices which disadvantage innocent people on the basis of their ethnic or religious background can ever be justified, when the allegations that result are so serious.”

Scotland Yard’s vetting unit is regarded as one of the best in Britain, mainly because the force has countrywide responsibilities in counter-terrorism.

However, it is understood that there are difficulties carrying out full checks on applicants born abroad or who have spent a long time living outside Britain.

MI5 carries out the CTC vetting on behalf of the Met, other police forces and government departments.

It is the lowest of three levels of vetting under the Cabinet Office’s Security Policy Framework. However, individuals who pass the CTC procedure are allowed access to documents classified as “confidential” and can be granted occasional access to “secret” documents.

They also have access to areas where classified papers are stored.

CTC applicants must fill in a detailed form. They are required to declare whether they have ever spent significant time outside Britain.

MI5 checks the applicant against its databases, and the person’s name is also run through the Police National Computer.

The process also includes checks to verify a person’s identity and their employment and education references.

It can take up to six months to complete vetting and clearance is valid for three years.

“If police officers lose their CTC they are effectively unemployable,” said a police source.

“They cannot be allowed to access the Police National Computer, or other vital things in the course of their day-to-day work.”

James Cleverly, a Conservative member of the London Assembly committee that oversees the Met’s work, said: “The fact is that this was flagged up and the security clearance was rescinded, showing the Met is not blase about such issues.

“The system seems to have worked at that level.”

A spokesman for Scotland Yard said: “Mr Rahman, a former police constable, is bringing two employment tribunal claims against the Metropolitan Police Service alleging race discrimination and employment equality.

“A full merits hearing is yet to be listed.”

The Government introduced new laws making it a criminal offence to attend a terrorist training camp as part of the Terrorism Act 2006. The offence carries a maximum penalty of 10 years’ imprisonment.

The first convictions under the new offence were secured in 2008.

A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers said: “All police employees undergo a range of security checks when they join the service and, as necessary, these are reviewed through the course of their career depending on where they work and the nature of the material they are dealing with.”

--------------------------

The REAL ENEMY of the BRITISH are sitting in the Houses of Parliament and Lords.

If these EVIL CREATURES had not committed TREASON our country would be a beautiful place to live.

Now, what I really want to know is..WHERE ARE OUR SPECIAL FORCES ?

They could have taken these TRAITORS OUT a long time ago.

Our enemy within, or 5th Column are the MPs of the LIB/LAB/CON and the communist UNION LEADERS.

Come on guys, your supposed to PROTECTING US not going around the world as hired Mercenaries for the LIB/LAB/CON.

You should HANG YOU HEADS IN SHAME, or do you think the terrorists won't attack your area, family and home ?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/9262379/MI5-feared-British-police-attended-terrorist-camps.html

MORE BENEFITS OF DIVERSITY

Reports have indicated that police are investigating a new case of child grooming and abuse by alien muslim perverts in Rochdale.
I'm not surprised, there will be many more cases of such abuse in Rochdale and other muslim infested towns.
It's taken a long time to induce the police to get a grip and overcome their fear of being accused of "racism" instead reverting to their PC default position.
The Charlene Downes case is one the authorities wish us to forget especially since the case was dismissed owing to police incompetence.

Now in the Black Power activist and thug St Stephen Lawrence case, the law was  changed in order to gain a conviction, so determined were the authorities and police to push their agenda.
Up to now this double jeapordy law has not been used in Charlene's case. We can only hope.

The extent of muslim grooming which most knew about had been swept under the carpet until it became too severe to ignore further and the floodgates open.

The authors of the Mc Pherson report and their idiotic term "institutionalised racism" have a lot to answer for, many cases of abuse and even deaths. If justice were done they would be prosecuted for crimes against our people, but that will never happen.

On Question Time last Thursday panellists and audience tried to move the blame from the muslims and on to the children. The victims were it seems at fault.
I was particularly sickened by a vicar who blamed the girls and I switched off at that moment. No wonder the Cof E is such a laughing stock when its clergy take the side of the opposition.
How long before they cease to exist?

However there is a point that many of these young girls were in care and ran wild in spite of the care homes being lavishly paid to look after them.
It seems profit was all that counted and like many government organisations their actions were not "as stated on the tin",THEY DID NOT CARE.
These failing organisations have much to answer for.

A whole generation of young people have been betrayed by the authorities, Social Services, the police and educationalists and it is they who pay the price.
If a parent or teacher physically restrains a young person they can end up with a criminal conviction. There is no sanction for disobedience. Physical punishment is banned and young people prescribed drugs instead.
I do not see how years of being drugged up on Ritalin is preferable to a slap which is over in a moment.
It's the law of unintended consequences again.

But these deficiencies in the education of childern do not excuse their abuse at the hands of frustrated muslims. It is noteworthy that all these cases involve members of this pestilential creed.
Let's face it, they hold us and our society in contempt even as they avail themselves of our welfare provision and abuse our children.

It is no good the PC people in the media and goverment agencies trying to cover this up.
The cat is well and truly out of the bag and other convictions will follow and there is a head of resentment building up, in spite of the media not allowing comments.

Something will have to give and soon to at least stop the rot and begin to rid our country of this infection which threatens to kill our society, or-

THERE WILL BE TROUBLE AHEAD.

ARAB UNDERPANTS AND THE BNP CONNECTION

The foiling of the "underpants" plot to blow up a plane by a double agent will reassure us all that the secret services are working to protect us.
It gives a different meaning to the old term "Arabs underpants"which previously denoted filth and unpleasantness but now it seems could mean danger.

The works of the secret services must remain by definition secret and is possibly a reason for the reluctance of MI5 to be more open about the "spy in the bag" case.

Although essential for our protection it should be borne in mind that this department is also used by the State to interrupt and foil people and opinions they do not like.
They have been found to be involved in infiltrating the "Green" movement and the IRA often using very sophisticated methods.

Which brings me to Mr Griffin.

As I said two days ago it seems incredible that a Cambridge trained lawyer could predjudice the trial of muslim perverts and cause one defendent to appeal on the grounds that there could be "a BNP mole" in court.
He of all people should have known the danger of this action.

I then thought about his actions over the past three years.

Jim Dowson we were told raised £1.6 million before the General Election, little of which was spent on that election.
Two months after we were told that the party was £600,000 in debt and that creditors would have to accept 20% of what they were owed.

However, in spite of the party haemorrhaging members and donations and being engaged in other ill advised legal cases, suddenly all the debts had been paid off.
A bequest we are told.

There may have been a bequest or bequests but it would be good if we had some more information about these, together with properly audited accounts of the Party's financial situation.
Such openness would reassure those supporters and bring them back into the fold.
But is there anything to hide in the source of these financial windfalls? I don't know but it would be nice to know.

Our time should have been now. What Nick Griffin forecast has at last come to light. We should have been able to capitalise on these horrific events, but the BNP has been denuded of most of its power and influence and its best people.
It has become an irrelevence.

Yes Clive Jefferson was arrested, a token gesture by the PC police of Liverpool which they would not have dared three years ago when hundreds could have been and were mobilised at the "Liverpool Thirteen" demonstration.
What a demonstration of the lack of influence in three short years!

I believe secret forces of the State have had some bearing on this.

I am also suspicious of Griffin's long standing leadership of the BNP, a tenure he has held while Blair, Brown, Howard,Hague,and now even Cameron is said to be vulnerable.
Abroad Sarkozy and the leaders of Greece and Italy have gone as have various Middle East dictators,

BUT GRIFFIN SEEMINGLY GOES ON FOR EVER, in spite of him promising originally to step down.
Why the change of mind? I do not believe his lame reason that it was by popular demand.
Why did he go against Conference wishes and fail to have a democratic constitution?

It is known that the BNP is infiltrated by the State but the question has to be asked who these destroyers are.

Nobody has done more to destroy the party more than Griffin so could one of these infiltrators be him?

Our time should have been now. Why have we not been able to capitalise on recent events?
It all seems to point in one direction.

BUT events are moving in Nationalist's favour.
What we need is a new clean leader to unite us, free from the old guard who could probably be compromised by the State.
I BELIEVE THAT PERSON WILL EMERGE.
Hard times are ahead for our country, both socially and economically and

WE MUST BE READY.

BNP INCOMPETENCE OVER ISLAM

The conviction  at long last of the muslim paedophile perverts from the Rochdale area who preyed on young children should be a lesson for the police and government.

Although DNA evidence implicating two of these animals two years ago it was not acted uopn.
You ask why? The police say it was nothing to do with fear of being accused of racism, but this argument does not hold as it is accepted as a uniquely muslim phenomenon even by some muslim groups.

To label these people as Asians is an insult to the law abiding Hindu and Chinese people who, even though they are alien to this land would not stoop so low.
It is the fact that the muslim religion holds non muslims in contempt and especially teenage white girls which is the driving factor in this abuse.

I do not know what the sentences for these crimes will be, but whatever they are they will be as nothing compared to what punishment they would receive if I found out that any of my grandchildren had been abused. I would not have waited for the PC police, hamstrung by fears of being called racist.

This muslim abuse is widespread and cases are pending in other towns discretely ignored by the press and more convictions will inevitably follow.
It is interesting that many newspaper comment facilities have been disabled over this matter, the editors wanting to keep this festering alien sore under wraps.
Free speech again shown to be secondary to muslim appeasement.

Let us hope that these alien perverts will be deported together with their families when their sentences are completed, but I doubt that will happen.

A few years ago Nick Griffin was tried TWICE for stating the facts about muslim grooming of children. It was known about then but the authorities wanted to hush it up.

However the actions of the BNP leader in posting comments last week on "Twitter" which nearly derailed the trial makes you wonder what his motives are.
He is supposed to have legal training but it seems is ignorant of the dangers of prejudicing a trial.
If he is so unknowledgeable and reckless with his actions he is not fit to be the leader of a political party.

We are all outraged by muslim grooming but justice must be done and seen to be done.
The law must be applied objectively, not subjectively as he should know as a man with a supposed legal degree.

Similarly according to the papers two muslim defence lawyers were assaulted outside the court, it is said by BNP members which caused them to resign from the case and cause a delay and a greater cost to the public. Those who perpetrated this assault should have been disciplined by the party.

Violence is NOT the nationalist way and should be left to the unwashed thugs of the UAF and never instigated by our side. It is only permissable in self defence.

But the biggest folly of these actions was that some of these perverts could have been acquitted of their crimes.
 Whatever these incidents show the BNP in a bad light.
It is no use getting in the papers for reasons of stupidity, that does not further the nationalist cause.

Played well this case could have been exploited for our cause and show that we are right about the dangers of allowing these people in our country and trying to appease them.

BUT IT HAS NOT BEEN PLAYED WELL and instead of furthering our cause it has hindered it and given the impression that we are fools and thugs.

IS THIS DELIBERATE? WHOSE SIDE IS GRIFFIN ON?

SOMETIMES ONE MUST ASK.

IMF: ‘No More Payments If Greece Disagrees With the Measures’

The IMF are threatening and trying to blackmail Greece if the new Government does not do what they are told to do by the IMF,and probably a few other NGOs as well.

They are threatening and trying to blackmail Greece into submission

Is the IMF so powerful that it can dictate to Governments and countries around the world?

The IMF is threatening Greece that they will stop paying installments if the new government disagrees with the future austerity measures,” reported an IMF official to the Dow Jones news agency.

According to the news agency, the creditors are willing to wait until Greek parties form the new government, but they do not intend to change their plans. On the contrary, they call on Greeks to obey the ‘rules’ and observe the pledges.

The same official stated that the IMF will visit Greece as soon as there will be a new government and they would then be ready to negotiate. Otherwise, they will not give any more loans to Greece.

Another EU official said that Greece cannot escape the Memorandum measures.

Who knows what will happen; new negotiations always bring new results. Taking into account that Greece did not negotiate in the past and just approved of the measures, the IMF and the EU officials have to face a new reality in Greece.

--------------------------------------

Is this the NWO/EU flexing its muscles and throwing its weight around?

The NWO/EU has replaced the Governments in Greece and Italy with puppets from the EU

We can see the unelected EU is placing its own unaccountable shills into Sovereign Governments, taking over as Prime Ministers and Presidents who are unaccountable for their actions, with an army of unaccountable, faceless bureaucrats within the EU, and from NGOs within and without the EU.

The idiots in the EU have replaced the Prime Minister of Greece,with Shills of their own but they failed in their attempts to bring Greece back into line.

Funny how the replacement could/did not change a thing in Greece, but they were being paid substantial amounts of money for looking at the wreckage, they have done nothing to help the situation in Greece and Italy, because of the size of the debt mountain these countries find themselves in.
No amount of bullying, cajoling, blackmailing and threats to these countries will resolve the situation.

Whose Next inline to be threatened and blackmailed by these NGOs ?

A FAIR DEAL FOR BRITISH PEOPLE

Much comment has been in the media in the last few days over the poor turn out in the local elections.

The question that should be answered  but is not asked is Why?

The reason should be obvious.

We have no one to vote for, no one or party which motivates us to vote, no party which represents the policies which matter to the average British citizen.
When people are motivated turn out is higher as in Bradford when Galloway got the alien voters to the polling booths (and many multiple and dubious postal votes) on account of his statements about Palestinian persecution.
Of course these considerations, unjust as they may be are completely irrelevant to British people, but they motivated his non British voters who in a just world should not have had the right  to vote in our country.

What we THE BRITISH PEOPLE  want is a party WHICH REPRESENTS US, our desires and interests and then people will vote and I am sure vote the right way.

The BNP is talked about as a party which is a spent force, correctly I think, an irrelevence owing to the bad management of the leadership.
It is called "extreme right" by the media but on message boards is said to be extreme left.

Nationalism is in my opinion neither and if we can get together a party with a programme which looks after our interests we can progress.

So what are the policies of a "nationalist" party or nationalists?
Are we Left or Right?

I believe we are neither and that is a strength. We can appeal to people from both sides of the political spectrum if we get our act together as a movement.

To believe in our own country, people and culture is considered to be "right", but to believe in national ownership of public utilities and national resources and fair shares for the average person is considered "left".

The government is now trying to rescue its failing popularity by ceasing to promote gay marriage and reform of the House of Lords. Yes gay marriage is an oxymoron and anathema to any moral and civilised person and the House of Lords may need reform, but these issues are not the reason why the Tories were rejected and show how out of touch the posh boys of the Tories are.

These issues are peripheral and did not influence the voting numbers.

People voted as they did (or did not) because there is at present no vehicle which represents their legitimate interests.

As nationalists we believe in our nation, its integrity and right to control our own political and economic interests, democracy in other words. This of course means an exit from the clutches of the undemocratic EU.
We believe that the native people of these islands should have priority in our own and only land.

We believe the financial system should be regulated in the interests of the British people rather than international financiers and bankers.

We believe that our industries (such as we have now left) should remain in British control and that endeavours made to bring back into British control those sold abroad.

We believe we are overpopulated and should halt immigration as we have no room. If we need trained people we should train them ourselves by means of a greatly improved educational system which concentrates on subjects that matter to our future prosperity.

We believe native British people should have priority in housing. IT'S OUR LAND, and they are our houses.

We believe that our laws should take priority over those of foreign entities such as the European Court of Human Rights and we should expel those foreign criminals who abuse our country's hospitality.

We believe we should not become involved in foreign wars which do not concern us.

We as democrats believe in free speech and our right to complain about ANYTHING with which we disagree.

We believe that people who are prepared to work hard are entitled to a decent standard of living and that this should be ensured by the government.

These are just a few core nationalist beliefs which are also held by the majority of the people.
If one of the "main" parties promoted these principles they would win a massive majority, SO WHY DON'T THEY?

BECAUSE THEIR AGENDA IS SHAPED BY THE INTERNATIONAL GLOBALIST BANKERS

OUR POLICIES ARE PORTAYED AS EXTREME (or Fascist or Nazi),  by the state and banker controlled media who have their own anti British agenda.

BUT, if a party could stand on these and other suchlike principles I believe it would gain massive support.
People are fed up of politicians using us for their own ends and promoting the interests of their greedy friends and that is why they do not vote.

If we unite under a banner proclaiming these principles , which are neither Left or Right we can influence the politics of our country for the better.

The people are crying out for it, a fair deal. AND WE CAN DO IT.

These wishes are not extreme are they?

SAVAGES - COMING TO A TOWN LIKE YOURS

The gang of savages in this video beat, rob and strip the WHITE victim, for no other reason but racism
How long before it spreads to this town?
(I know this attack to place in the USA but it will spread like a cancer in our society and already is in some areas of Britain)
London sees Black on White racial crime every day, not to mention the Northern Towns and Cities where racial attacks on the WHITE victims are ignored by the powers that be.

Don't worry though as racial attacks on WHITES in our Town will be seen on CCTV and recorded, to put on youtube to help defend the attacker, and humiliate the Victim, in a court of law, if it would ever get there in the first place.

Remember "KILL THE WHITE BITCH" when a WHITE woman was attacked by 3/4 Somali immigrants, they were never sent to prison for the VIOLENT RACIALLY MOTIVATED ATTACK on a WHITE Woman.

Their excuse was that they were drunk due to never having drank alcohol before and were not used to it, because of their religion.

You go into Wigan Town Center get drunk and start a brawl then blame your violent actions on not being used to drinking due to your Strict Christian upbringing and
you will be arrested, charged and found guilty in court for being Violent, breach of the peace etc.

So, according to the PTB WORDS not VIOLENT actions are more likely get you sent to Prison, especially if the remarks are made by WHITES.

The "MY TRAM EXPERIENCE" or the NON racial words put on twitter by a WHITE MAN in regards to a Black footballer who had collapsed whilst playing a football match, both were sent to Prison,and they never mentioned race or skin colour

Only the WHITES receive Prison sentences for not wanting to be enriched by immigrants placed in their Towns and Cities.

How vibrant, how Enriched we will all be when the Savages kick off.