A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)

Monday, 2 April 2012
UK Government Complicit In Massive Paedophile Cover-Up 2012
In the summer of 2000, Hollie told her mother, Anne, that she had been repeatedly sexually abused by her father, Denis Charles Mackie and brother Greg. The abuse had begun when Hollie was just six years` old. Hollie said that Greg had also been abused by his father.
Anne Greig reported this immediately to the local police station in Aberdeen. During the course of that summer, Hollie, who has Down`s Syndrome, began to provide more names of abusers. It transpired that Denis Mackie had been sharing his daughter with a ring of sexual abusers, which included a serving police officer with the Grampian force, Terry Major and an Aberdeen sheriff, Graeme Buchanan.
Medical and other evidence supported Hollie`s account and Grampian Police accepted the truth of Hollie`s statement. Nonetheless, no action was taken by Grampian Police against the perpetrators and despite Anne Greig`s persistence, the Procurator Fiscal, now Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini prevented any police action taking place.
In fact, the authorities instead attempted to discredit and intimidate Anne by having her forcibly taken to a mental institution, with the intention of handing Hollie back to her abuser father. Fortunately, Anne Greig had the presence of mind to have herself checked by a leading psychiatrist, who proclaimed her perfectly sane, a view with which even the institution were forced to concur.
In the years that have followed, Anne Greig has persisted in her attempts to bring the abusers to justice, not only for the sake of her own children, but also to prevent these dreadful practices continuing against others, which includes adults with learning difficulties as well as children.
It was only in 2009, when the News Of The World courageously broke the story, concentrating on the hitherto unheard of fact that Hollie had received payments from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority for crimes that have not even been investigated.
The measures to cover up this terrible story continue unbounded by the authorities.
Several years ago, Denis and Greg Mackie went to live in Portugal. On 8th May 2007, immediately following Madeleine McCann`s disappearance, Anne Greig, accompanied by a victim`s support witness, went to her now local police station in Shrewsbury to tell them to alert the Portuguese Police, as despite the proven case of paedophile abuse, neither of the Mackies had a record of any kind. The McCann team has accepted that the Mackies ought to have been questioned immediately. It is now understood that the British Police failed to pass on these details to their Portuguese counterparts.
Hence, the official cover up has even extended to detracting from the Madeleine McCann investigation.
Investigators have already informed us that discoveries of other paedophile rings in Scotland has been discovered, but it is clear that certain senior figures of authority are prepared to obstruct the course of justice and allow the known sexual abuse of some of society`s most vulnerable people to continue unabated, just to save their own skins.
The Hollie Greig story is now widely known by the media, police, legal, medical and political professions.
The facts are beyond dispute.
The only question that remains will be as to who has sufficient decency and courage to bring this and other issues to a just conclusion.
http://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gif
Robert Green
Investigator
You can view the video – About Hollie Greig with this link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6mmjZ2Aew4
PEAK OIL OR ABIOTIC (RENEWABLE) OIL ?
Abiotic Oil
a Theory Worth Exploring
September 14, 2011It's our nature to sort, divide, and classify. We label ourselves to identify political leanings, religious beliefs, the food we enjoy, and the sports teams we cheer. The oil industry too has its own distinct labels which include the "Peak Oil" theorists, those who believe the world is fast depleting the finite supply of fossil fuel; and the pragmatists, those who recognize that engineering and technological advances in oil drilling and extraction continuously identify new reserves that make oil plentiful.
And there's a third group you may not know. These people are deeply interested in oil and its origins, but their advocacy of "abiotic theory" has many dismissing them as heretics, frauds, or idealists. They hold that oil can be derived from hydrocarbons that existed eons ago in massive pools deep within the earth's core. That source of hydrocarbons seeps up through the earth's layers and slowly replenishes oil sources. In other words, it turns the fossil-fuel paradigm upside down.
[Read: How Much Oil is There?]
Perhaps the breakthrough for this theory came when Chris Cooper's story appeared April 16, 1999, in The Wall Street Journal about an oil field called Eugene Island. Here's an excerpt:
Production at the oil field, deep in the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, was supposed to have declined years ago. And for a while, it behaved like any normal field: Following its 1973 discovery, Eugene Island 330's output peaked at about 15,000 barrels a day. By 1989, production had slowed to about 4,000 barrels a day.
Then suddenly—some say almost inexplicably—Eugene Island's fortunes reversed. The field, operated by PennzEnergy Co., is now producing 13,000 barrels a day, and probable reserves have rocketed to more than 400 million barrels from 60 million. Stranger still, scientists studying the field say the crude coming out of the pipe is of a geological age quite different from the oil that gushed 10 years ago.
According to Cooper,
Thomas Gold, a respected astronomer and professor emeritus at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY, has held for years that oil is actually a renewable, primordial syrup continually manufactured by the Earth under ultrahot conditions and tremendous pressures. As this substance migrates toward the surface, it is attacked by bacteria, making it appear to have an organic origin dating back to the dinosaurs, he says.
All of which has led some scientists to a radical theory: Eugene Island is rapidly refilling itself, perhaps from some continuous source miles below the Earth's surface. That, they say, raises the tantalizing possibility that oil may not be the limited resource it is assumed to be.
More recently, Forbes presented a similar discussion. In 2008 it reported a group of Russian and Ukrainian scientists say that oil and gas don't come from fossils; they're synthesized deep within the earth's mantle by heat, pressure, and other purely chemical means, before gradually rising to the surface. Under the so-called abiotic theory of oil, finding all the energy we need is just a matter of looking beyond the traditional basins where fossils might have accumulated.
[Read the U.S. News debate: Should offshore drilling be expanded?]
The idea that oil comes from fossils "is a myth" that needs changing according to petroleum engineer Vladimir Kutcherov, speaking at the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. "All kinds of rocks could have oil and gas deposits."
Alexander Kitchka of the Ukrainian National Academy of Sciences estimates that 60 percent of the content of all oil is abiotic in origin and not from fossil fuels. He says companies should drill deeper to find it.
Is abiotic theory the real deal? Is Eugene Island "Exhibit A?" Look how long it's taken for this conversation to reach a tipping point!
----------------------------------------------
Not a ‘Police State’ a ‘Private Police State’

Once again, just like water, gas, telecommunications, railways and potentially large parts of the NHS, a Conservative government is about to privatise a public sector service provider. This time, it is far more sinister because it is the police. On a personal level, this is not a bad thing for me. When I retire, I can take one of these jobs and add the salary to my pension. So I am not complaining about this because I will suffer. Far from it. I simply do not believe that the things we do should be done for profit.
Ministers have promised that frontline warranted police officer roles will not be undertaken by private companies for profit. The picture above shows that this is clearly untrue. You could be convicted and sent to prison on the strength of the evidence gathered by a for-profit corporate investigator.
Police target culture is bad enough; how do you feel about those investigators being under pressure to get results by shareholders and sales managers? People are concerned by senior Met Police officers having dinner with tabloid journalists; how would you feel if news corporations owned large shareholdings in these private security companies? Who owns G4S anyway?
Or is the whole thing so sad simply because it represents yet another example of selling the family silver for the short-term gain of a few privileged people? I believe it is far more sinister this time. Law & Order is not trains, water, electricity, telecommunications or roads.
It is time for Yvette Cooper to clearly state that the legislation which allows all this nonsense will be repealed under the next government.
As for Lincolnshire Police Authority and the Lincs chief officers who enabled this; they should hang their heads in shame. At least their names will forever be associated with the selling of British policing.
Taken from a Police Blog called Inspector Gadget -
http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2012/04/02/not-a-police-state-a-private-police-state/
Sunday, 1 April 2012
A LESSON FROM GALLOWAY
It could always be seen that he would do well in a muslim constituency with his anti British pro muslim platform.
But the Labour candidate was also a muslim, so why when we have such an out of touch and incompetent government did people not vote Labour?
That Labour is also incompetent is not the answer.
So how did he do it?
First he concentrated on Middle East politics ignoring local and national matters. In this he did us all a favour showing that the people of Bradford are not integrated and care more about "far off lands" than they do about Britain.
He gave the opportunity for thousands of aliens to demonstrate their failure to integrate.
He is a good orator but in addition comes over as BELIEVING what he says, however illogical his views are and he showed the Labour candidate as less honest than he portrayed himself.
This gained him votes from real British people sick and tired of the insincerity and lies of the main parties who used the opportunity to give these parties a kicking.
His policies of course have no relevance to Bradford or Britain but he tapped into a cause dear to his alien voters.
He taught us all a lesson in the use of social media, texting and suchlike to mobilise support. To gain such a large vote from a standing start in three weeks shows the effectiveness of his methods, and I am sure his methods will be copied by other parties.
He also showed that you can win votes without a big party machine and large expense, that Labour with their union funding and the Tories sucking up to big business are not invulnerable, in spite of their wealth.
He has shown small parties how it can be done and has negated the advantage of press endorsement and wealth hitherto enjoyed by the big parties.
He has done us a favour and levelled the playing field.
We must take note of his successful methods.
We must in future campaign by text and the internet, cheap and effective.
We must gather names in our phone books and spread our word electronically where a policy can travel virally to thousands of people, and we must have a FEW main policies which resonate with British people.
This worked in the revolutions in North Africa. It can work here, and above all it is cheap.
The BNP has lost ground by being incestuous, small meetings preaching to the converted while attendees are encouraged to "DONATE" giving the impression that we are a money making racket.
A new era has dawned in politics which we could turn to our advantage.There is a strong patriotic electorate which we with our internal squabbles have driven away but WHICH IS STILL THERE TO BE HARVESTED.
Galloway has shown us how to regroup, AND WIN.
WE MUST LEARN THE LESSON.
We can do it and TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.
WOULD YOU TRUST HARRIET HARMEN TO BABYSIT YOUR CHILDREN?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/4949555/Harriet-Harman-under-attack-over-bid-to-water-down-child-pornography-law.html
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/leftwatch/2010/03/harriet-harman-paedophilia-and-double-standards.html
http://eotp.org/2010/01/02/2009-labour-figures-bizarre-link-to-paedophile-groups/
http://order-order.com/2011/08/13/harriet-harman-is-gangsta-mutha-1/
http://www.christianvoice.org.uk/?p=1832
THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG.
To all those who are members, supporters and VOTERS of NEW LABOUR, HOW DO YOU SQUARE THIS WITH YOUR CONSCIENCE, do you inform the electorate about the PAEDOPHILES IN YOUR PARTY ?
Explain to the victims of Paedophiles the reason you support NEW LABOUR.
labour 25 + 10 more PAEDOPHILES
The Labour Party’s Convicted Paedophile List.
2. Stewart BrownLabour Party Lord Mayor Child Pornography | |
4. Nicholas Green Labour Party Lord Mayor Labour Party Councillor 13 rapes & assaults on Children | |
6. Alan Prescott Labour Party Councillor Molesting Children in a ‘Care-Home ‘Where he worked | |
8. Joseph Shaw Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography | |
10. Lee Benson Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography | |
12. Les Sheppard Labour Party Councillor Sex attacks and rapes on Children | |
14. Nelson Bland Labour Party Councillor Child Pornography | |
16. Alec Dyer Atkins Labour Party Councillor Member of the ‘Shadows Brotherhood ‘Peadophile Ring. 42,000 images of Children being abused | |
18. Paul Diggert Labour Party Councillor Grooming children & child pornography | |
20. Mark Trotter Labour Party Member & Super Activist Child rapist with Aids | |
22. Gilbert Benn Labour Party Councillor Molesting a boy | |
24. Mark Tann Labour Party member & Activist Repeatedly raped Two girls under Eight years old. | |
PLUS+
27. Steve Carnell Labour | |
29. Johnathan Phillips | |
|