The shock election of George Galloway in Bradford West is with hindsight not really surprising.
PC commentators have stated that his election was owing to dissatisfaction caused by government "cuts", but that does not explain the fact that he overturned a large Labour majority.
If voters were protesting against government policies why did they not vote Labour?
Galloway was originally from the far left of Labour and could have made some progress in elections elsewhere.
There are many all over the country who disagree with the foreign wars Labour and the Tories have got us involved in, and many voters of the far left scattered around the country.
So why did he chose Bradford?
Simple because of the muslim vote concentrated in areas of Bradford now reduced to third world slums.
He is an unapologetic muslimist who has cosied up to such paragons of virtue as Saddam Hussein and has made inflammatory anti British speeches in other muslim ghettos in England.
Just the man to represent a once proud city now descending into slumdom.
His election material has been unapologetically aimed at muslims and they have responded to his anti British sentiments.
His postal votes were massive and going on past experience many will be fraudulent. This scam brought in by Labour to boost its vote has come round to bite that party on the backside.
Of course the cast votes massively favoured Galloway showing not so much political beliefs, left or right but, muslim solidarity and by extension an anti British mindset.
So what could be done to halt and reverse this take over of our country aided and abetted by traitors such as Galloway?
Stop ALL immigration, that goes without saying.
Abolish the fraudulent postal voting scam.
Restrict child credit to the first two children, which would hit large muslim families and hopefully stop them breeding the British people into extinction.
Enact laws which give the native people primacy in our own land.
These alone are not enough or this disaster will repeat itself in other towns and cities, there are many other policies which I will not detail here.
But will the main parties do anything to halt our indigenous demise?
I doubt it.
They will try to appease the muslim "communities" by subsidy and "positive discrimination".
Patriots will continue to be harrassed and muslims left unpunished for their crimes.
And we will sink further into the abyss.
ON THE OTHER HAND--
The result may provide a wake up call for all British people and show them the dangers of the muslim menace. It may induce people to vote for nationalist parties, even if they are as wet as UKIP but even that would be a step but only a step in the right direction.
Anything is better than the status quo.
In the meantime ALL Nationalists should put aside their petty differences and unite against the common enemy, and we need a new leader who can unite us.
I have to give it to Galloway, he is a fantastic orator and motivator of his potential voters.
We need his patriotic equivalent, a man who can unite and inspire his followers, or we will in future be governed and bossed by traitors such as Galloway and his alien supporters.
WHERE IS THAT MAN who can inspire all patriots to rise and take our country back?
WE NEED HIM, and quickly.
A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)

Friday, 30 March 2012
GEORGE GALLOWAY JUST ANOTHER TRAITOR
A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.
The only words that need saying.
Marcus Tullius Cicero
The only words that need saying.
Thursday, 29 March 2012
THEY COULDN'T RUN A PIE SHOP
Don't panic, don't panic says the government. All fill up with fuel in case we run out because of a strike which has not happened.
What did they expect. Everybody did panic and queues developed at petrol stations around the land.
Are they so thick that they use Dad's Army type messages to run the country.
It could be a ruse to put the blame on the tanker drivers who MAY have come out on strike.
I don't know all the issues but I do not believe the drivers that it was about safety.
I believe it is because cheap foreign drivers are being brought in to undercut conditions and the unions can not bring themselves to say it.
If it is not a ruse to attack the unions in the propaganda stakes it shows ineptitude and a failure to realise how the average person thinks.
They have to get to work. They want to go on holiday over Easter and want to make sure that they are able to do it and buy food
What do the government expect them to do?
Cease work or not go on holiday or starve?
That they are completely out of touch was shown yesterday when Cameron tried to remember where he last had a pasty, AND GOT IT WRONG.
He tried to say he was a fan of pasties but said he had eaten a pasty LAST SUMMER in a pasty shop which had CEASED TRADING.
HE IS A LIEING HYPOCRITE
It is coming to something when a government's reputation has been harmed over the issue of a pasty.
Of course they never eat pasties or pies. They eat in posh restaurants and would not venture into a pie shop unless electioneering and attempting to show "the common touch"
Pies and pasties are what manual workers eat for their dinner (not lunch). They have been up to now cheap and quick to consume and they are quickly back at work.
No posh meals in restaurants, not enough time and too dear
I do not think the chancellor deliberately attacked manual workers, I think that he has not a clue what goes on in the real world and how the actual PRODUCERS live.
It's no good Cameron showing his green credentials by using fuel to go to the North Pole or riding his bike while having his suit taken in a car following.
It's no good pretending he goes to a pie shop when he evidently does not.
All he does is show himself to be a hypocrite,pretending to be a man of the people. He is not, he is completely out of touch with ordinary life and yet he presumes to rule us in a so called democratic society.
Who in their right mind could believe anything he says?
Now I have to admit I do not visit pie shops often as I am retired and live at home, but occasionally do buy from Galloways or Greenhalghes when in town and do not remember EVER visiting Greggs although I may have done.
The point is I do not pretend to be a pie eater, even though as Wiganer I should be.
I am happy to say what I do and eat without pretending to be something I am not.
But is it not a sorry state of affairs when at a time of national bankruptsy a large part of the budget discussions revolves round pasties and pies.
I believe know why the chancellor made this change.
Big firms like KFC and Macdonalds will have complained that their overpriced rubbish is unfairly taxed and big firms have clout, unlike small bakers (or manual workers).
The chancellor said he wanted his budget to promote industry and jobs and small firms, an aim with which I agree.
So why did he reduce the top rate of tax?
It would have been better to reduce National Insurance which would have made it pay for small employers to take on staff and reduce unemployment.
But what did he do for industry? Reduce corporation tax which small businesses do not pay but his rich friends do.
It will help a bit on the jobs front but not nearly as much as a reduction in national Insurance which would help businesses large and small.
I know in this blog I am rambling on a bit, but there is so much which could be done and the government are so out of touch and incompetent it is difficult to know where to start.
They are supposed to be running the country but have shown in recent days they are incapable of running a pie shop.
We need a government which knows what makes the country tick if we are ever to get out of the mess left by Labour.
But do they want to OR DO THEY CARE?
I'M BEGINNING TO THINK NOT.
What did they expect. Everybody did panic and queues developed at petrol stations around the land.
Are they so thick that they use Dad's Army type messages to run the country.
It could be a ruse to put the blame on the tanker drivers who MAY have come out on strike.
I don't know all the issues but I do not believe the drivers that it was about safety.
I believe it is because cheap foreign drivers are being brought in to undercut conditions and the unions can not bring themselves to say it.
If it is not a ruse to attack the unions in the propaganda stakes it shows ineptitude and a failure to realise how the average person thinks.
They have to get to work. They want to go on holiday over Easter and want to make sure that they are able to do it and buy food
What do the government expect them to do?
Cease work or not go on holiday or starve?
That they are completely out of touch was shown yesterday when Cameron tried to remember where he last had a pasty, AND GOT IT WRONG.
He tried to say he was a fan of pasties but said he had eaten a pasty LAST SUMMER in a pasty shop which had CEASED TRADING.
HE IS A LIEING HYPOCRITE
It is coming to something when a government's reputation has been harmed over the issue of a pasty.
Of course they never eat pasties or pies. They eat in posh restaurants and would not venture into a pie shop unless electioneering and attempting to show "the common touch"
Pies and pasties are what manual workers eat for their dinner (not lunch). They have been up to now cheap and quick to consume and they are quickly back at work.
No posh meals in restaurants, not enough time and too dear
I do not think the chancellor deliberately attacked manual workers, I think that he has not a clue what goes on in the real world and how the actual PRODUCERS live.
It's no good Cameron showing his green credentials by using fuel to go to the North Pole or riding his bike while having his suit taken in a car following.
It's no good pretending he goes to a pie shop when he evidently does not.
All he does is show himself to be a hypocrite,pretending to be a man of the people. He is not, he is completely out of touch with ordinary life and yet he presumes to rule us in a so called democratic society.
Who in their right mind could believe anything he says?
Now I have to admit I do not visit pie shops often as I am retired and live at home, but occasionally do buy from Galloways or Greenhalghes when in town and do not remember EVER visiting Greggs although I may have done.
The point is I do not pretend to be a pie eater, even though as Wiganer I should be.
I am happy to say what I do and eat without pretending to be something I am not.
But is it not a sorry state of affairs when at a time of national bankruptsy a large part of the budget discussions revolves round pasties and pies.
I believe know why the chancellor made this change.
Big firms like KFC and Macdonalds will have complained that their overpriced rubbish is unfairly taxed and big firms have clout, unlike small bakers (or manual workers).
The chancellor said he wanted his budget to promote industry and jobs and small firms, an aim with which I agree.
So why did he reduce the top rate of tax?
It would have been better to reduce National Insurance which would have made it pay for small employers to take on staff and reduce unemployment.
But what did he do for industry? Reduce corporation tax which small businesses do not pay but his rich friends do.
It will help a bit on the jobs front but not nearly as much as a reduction in national Insurance which would help businesses large and small.
I know in this blog I am rambling on a bit, but there is so much which could be done and the government are so out of touch and incompetent it is difficult to know where to start.
They are supposed to be running the country but have shown in recent days they are incapable of running a pie shop.
We need a government which knows what makes the country tick if we are ever to get out of the mess left by Labour.
But do they want to OR DO THEY CARE?
I'M BEGINNING TO THINK NOT.
Tuesday, 27 March 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)