The shootings in Toulouse the other day have been shown to be the actions of a muslim extremist, and not by a member of the "extreme right", that's folks like you fellow nationalists.
So people who believe as we do are not to blame. Blame must be put on the muslim invaders who were involved.
NOT SO FAST!
It is the action of the right wing anti immigrant people who made this madman feel "excluded" when his beliefs were not catered for.
Thus we are to blame even for muslim atrocities.
But you can't blame all muslims for this. This was the action of a lone gunman.
But hold on.
When Brevik went on the rampage the lefty media tried to blame all patriots even though Brevik was not a nationalist but just anti immigrant.
Similarly any wrong action by nationalists is taken to reflect on us all and nationalism itself.
But wrongdoing by ordinary members of the other parties , Labour and Tories is never taken as a reflection of those party's principles (if they have any), but let a nationalist commit an offence and the media come down on us all like a ton of bricks as if we are all resposible for the actions of a single person.
So there you have it.
If a right wing nutter commits a crime it is the fault of all nationalists, but if a muslim assassin kills children it does not reflect on the others of his medieval ideology, it is again our fault for not accomodating this "religion of peace" which is increasingly imposed on the people of Europe.
Stupid sentiments but that is what the left wing media wishes to show.
Friday, 23 March 2012
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
SO IT'S NOT THE "FAR RIGHT" IT'S A MUSLIM AGAIN.
As I thought all along, the gunman who murdered the children and adult in the Jewish school and the French army men was an islamic extremist.
How disappointing for the Left wing media, the BBC and Guardian etc to find this was the case.
All day yesterday they were saying the murders were the doing of the "extreme Right".
Vague descriptions of the murderer were given out, one that he probably had a tattoo, this obviously linking him to the "far Right", but no mention of his skin colour. That immediately made me think he was an immigrant to France as if he had been obviously white skinned it would have been mentioned immediately as it is in our country where the skin colour of a felon is only mentioned if he is white.
Surely the Left wing media thought, nobody of" the religion of peace" would perpetrate such a cruel crime. Only somebody of the "extreme Right" would do such a thing.
These commentator's Left wing views blind themselves to the facts of recent history.
95% of atrocities in Europe in the last 20 years have been perpetrated by muslims, from Russia (Beslan and Moscow) to Spain (Madrid bombings) to the London tube bombings and the attempts to blow up planes and other targets which fortunately failed.
Few attacks on innocent people have been perpetrated by thr "Right" with the notable exception of Brevik in Norway, but he was a paranoid nutter and never represented mainstream patriotic views, however much the media try to make it seem he did.
The authorities spend millions of pounds monitoring these members of the religion of peace, in spite of saying that the expenditure is to stop the threat of nationalist attacks.
In other words muslims are always appeased in case they react. The government is already afraid of them, but still they are allowed to come in to the country.
The powers that be must realise the danger of allowing millions of these believers of their mediaval cult here. They can not be so thick so why do they not do what the people want and STOP any more of these people coming here?
It is difficult not to think that it is a deliberate plot by the government aided by the Left wing media to destroy our country and people to forward their globalist agenda.
Hopefully these cruel outrages will open the eyes of the French voters to the incompatibility of the multicultural agenda and Mme Le Pen will get an increased vote.
Events are slowly showing the people of Europe to the dangers of muslims living in Europe and this tragic outrage will hopefully serve as a wake up call to the French voters.
Tragic as these events have been to those killed, it's an ill wind that blows nobody any good.
Lives can be saved in the future if the French vote the right way.
LET'S HOPE THEY DO!
How disappointing for the Left wing media, the BBC and Guardian etc to find this was the case.
All day yesterday they were saying the murders were the doing of the "extreme Right".
Vague descriptions of the murderer were given out, one that he probably had a tattoo, this obviously linking him to the "far Right", but no mention of his skin colour. That immediately made me think he was an immigrant to France as if he had been obviously white skinned it would have been mentioned immediately as it is in our country where the skin colour of a felon is only mentioned if he is white.
Surely the Left wing media thought, nobody of" the religion of peace" would perpetrate such a cruel crime. Only somebody of the "extreme Right" would do such a thing.
These commentator's Left wing views blind themselves to the facts of recent history.
95% of atrocities in Europe in the last 20 years have been perpetrated by muslims, from Russia (Beslan and Moscow) to Spain (Madrid bombings) to the London tube bombings and the attempts to blow up planes and other targets which fortunately failed.
Few attacks on innocent people have been perpetrated by thr "Right" with the notable exception of Brevik in Norway, but he was a paranoid nutter and never represented mainstream patriotic views, however much the media try to make it seem he did.
The authorities spend millions of pounds monitoring these members of the religion of peace, in spite of saying that the expenditure is to stop the threat of nationalist attacks.
In other words muslims are always appeased in case they react. The government is already afraid of them, but still they are allowed to come in to the country.
The powers that be must realise the danger of allowing millions of these believers of their mediaval cult here. They can not be so thick so why do they not do what the people want and STOP any more of these people coming here?
It is difficult not to think that it is a deliberate plot by the government aided by the Left wing media to destroy our country and people to forward their globalist agenda.
Hopefully these cruel outrages will open the eyes of the French voters to the incompatibility of the multicultural agenda and Mme Le Pen will get an increased vote.
Events are slowly showing the people of Europe to the dangers of muslims living in Europe and this tragic outrage will hopefully serve as a wake up call to the French voters.
Tragic as these events have been to those killed, it's an ill wind that blows nobody any good.
Lives can be saved in the future if the French vote the right way.
LET'S HOPE THEY DO!
Tuesday, 20 March 2012
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL BENT BOBBY
Who do you call for assistance when a crime has been committed ?
YOUR LOCAL FRIENDLY RAPIST, THIEF, CONMAN,PAEDOPHILE,DRUG DEALER,MURDERER
This makes third world police forces look honest and fair compared to Britains corrupted (PC) communist police force.
Click on image/s for a full readable image.
Hat tip - Griffin watch
http://griffinwatch-nwn.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/bent-coppers-named-and-shamed.html
Click on image/s for a full readable image.
Hat tip - Griffin watch
http://griffinwatch-nwn.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/bent-coppers-named-and-shamed.html
Monday, 19 March 2012
IS THIS FREEDOM?
The tragic heart attack of the Bolton player Fabrice Muamba has shown how even fit people, even athletes can without warning be struck down.
Apart from his talent as a footballer common humanity should cause all to wish him a speedy recovery.
I wholeheartedly condemn the offensive comments put by a student in South Wales on Twitter . These comments were uncalled for and show a lack of compassion whatever the twitterer thinks about people from abroad.
BUT.
Offensive as his comments were do they justify police action?
He did not as far as I know incite violence as many muslims do, he just stated his opinion offensive as that was.
I believe in free speech and much as I deprecate his comments I think he is entitled to say what he thinks.
If free speech which may not conform to the norms of society is to be prosecuted what does that say about that freedom.
It seems that we are entering an Orwellian society in which thoughts and comments which even though they pose no danger to the state are not allowed to be expressed.
If a person has a racist point of view in a supposedly free country he should be free to express it.
OR THERE IS NO FREEDOM.
Apart from his talent as a footballer common humanity should cause all to wish him a speedy recovery.
I wholeheartedly condemn the offensive comments put by a student in South Wales on Twitter . These comments were uncalled for and show a lack of compassion whatever the twitterer thinks about people from abroad.
BUT.
Offensive as his comments were do they justify police action?
He did not as far as I know incite violence as many muslims do, he just stated his opinion offensive as that was.
I believe in free speech and much as I deprecate his comments I think he is entitled to say what he thinks.
If free speech which may not conform to the norms of society is to be prosecuted what does that say about that freedom.
It seems that we are entering an Orwellian society in which thoughts and comments which even though they pose no danger to the state are not allowed to be expressed.
If a person has a racist point of view in a supposedly free country he should be free to express it.
OR THERE IS NO FREEDOM.
OBESITY NOT THE MAIN TROUBLE WITH THE POLICE
The recent lengthy report by Tom Windsor on failings of the police "service" needs studying.
He says 50% are overweight, a claim that was instantly proved incorrect as it covered only the Met and concentrated on those who were off sick and or attended weight reduction courses.
Many of the so called overweight cops were muscular rugby prop forward types. Their body mass index may have been high but their strength is above average.
Do we really want puny cops?
I know that the old height requirement was reduced to enable more asians and women to become cops and thus render the force more "inclusive"
One may notice club doormen tend to have a high BMI and those with the sense to see it would realise that these people have to be able to take care of themselves, as often do the police.
The idea that graduates be fast tracked to senior positions without time on the beat is also misguided.
By all means have graduates but a bit of "street wisdom" is also essential.
Many of these graduates have qualifications in social studies, courses infested by political correctness and bring these attitudes to policing. They will of course tend to be of the left and can be counted on to promote the latest lefty fads.
Motorists will be targetted and the requisite box ticking performed to show progress. Racist speech will be stamped on (if spoken by whites) and muslim "communities" will be assisted to promote social harmony and "inclusiveness". Efforts will and are being made to reduce the prosecution of muslims and blacks.
In other words the priorities will be all wrong and bureaucracy will prevail and the average Brit persecuted, (especially if they find he is in the BNP). This has happened already and is one of the reasons the police have lost much of their respect.
So what is needed?
Streetwise bobbies without a head full of trendy theories, yes and fit and STRONG as well.
No promotion to senior position without experience on the beat.
Senior policemen to reallocate their priorities to tackle crime rather than PC and motoring infringements.
Scrap diversity and gay outreach officers. Yes the force is riddled with them and if numbers of officers are cut their positions are secure.
BUT the only way to cut crime is for more severe sentencing. The present shambles is as a result of the judiciary who fail to match the punishment to the crime.
How to cut costs?
Scrap the PCSOs who have no powers of arrest and if they had would be generally too slight to arrest anyone. They are a complete waste of time.
Our police WERE the best in the world but in recent years the standard has deteriorated largely due to measures similar to those Tom Windsor considers we need more of.
So stop all this PC nonsense and let the police do the job the people want them to.
PROTECT US. That's what we pay them for.
He says 50% are overweight, a claim that was instantly proved incorrect as it covered only the Met and concentrated on those who were off sick and or attended weight reduction courses.
Many of the so called overweight cops were muscular rugby prop forward types. Their body mass index may have been high but their strength is above average.
Do we really want puny cops?
I know that the old height requirement was reduced to enable more asians and women to become cops and thus render the force more "inclusive"
One may notice club doormen tend to have a high BMI and those with the sense to see it would realise that these people have to be able to take care of themselves, as often do the police.
The idea that graduates be fast tracked to senior positions without time on the beat is also misguided.
By all means have graduates but a bit of "street wisdom" is also essential.
Many of these graduates have qualifications in social studies, courses infested by political correctness and bring these attitudes to policing. They will of course tend to be of the left and can be counted on to promote the latest lefty fads.
Motorists will be targetted and the requisite box ticking performed to show progress. Racist speech will be stamped on (if spoken by whites) and muslim "communities" will be assisted to promote social harmony and "inclusiveness". Efforts will and are being made to reduce the prosecution of muslims and blacks.
In other words the priorities will be all wrong and bureaucracy will prevail and the average Brit persecuted, (especially if they find he is in the BNP). This has happened already and is one of the reasons the police have lost much of their respect.
So what is needed?
Streetwise bobbies without a head full of trendy theories, yes and fit and STRONG as well.
No promotion to senior position without experience on the beat.
Senior policemen to reallocate their priorities to tackle crime rather than PC and motoring infringements.
Scrap diversity and gay outreach officers. Yes the force is riddled with them and if numbers of officers are cut their positions are secure.
BUT the only way to cut crime is for more severe sentencing. The present shambles is as a result of the judiciary who fail to match the punishment to the crime.
How to cut costs?
Scrap the PCSOs who have no powers of arrest and if they had would be generally too slight to arrest anyone. They are a complete waste of time.
Our police WERE the best in the world but in recent years the standard has deteriorated largely due to measures similar to those Tom Windsor considers we need more of.
So stop all this PC nonsense and let the police do the job the people want them to.
PROTECT US. That's what we pay them for.
Sunday, 18 March 2012
NW victory for BNP
NW victory for BNP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The British National Party has won two seats in the European Parliament, with its biggest single vote in the North West being cast in Wigan.
There were shock waves across the region as the far right party's leader Nick Griffin picked up a seat in the North West early today, and Andrew Brons won a seat last night in the Yorkshire and Humber region, where Labour lost a seat.
The wins came as the party appeared to attract significant numbers of disaffected Labour voters.
Local MP Andy Burnham, the new Health Secretary, said the result was a "sad moment for British politics".
He said: "It is deeply uncomfortable to see the BNP polling in the numbers they have.
"Whatever the country's problems the BNP are never the answer.
"The BNP is the ultimate protest vote, a two fingered vote and largely a comment on Westminster politics.
"I think the BNP have got very clever in hiding their racist beliefs."
Across the North West the Labour vote in the larger metropolitan areas fell badly compared to the 2004 Euro Elections.
In Liverpool, Labour's vote fell by 15,000, from 38,640 in 2004 to 23,849, and in Manchester from 36,458 to 27,502.
In Bury, Rochdale, and Stockport the Labour vote halved, along with a 13,000 drop in Sefton, 10,000 in St Helens, 15,000 on the Wirral, 10,000 down in Warrington and a 16,000 drop in Wigan.
The BNP vote increased only marginally in Liverpool and Manchester and their biggest single vote came in Wigan with 7,517 votes cast.
Mr Griffin said he was "absolutely delighted".
"It will be a huge change in British politics," he said.
"The most demonised and lied about party in British politics has made a massive breakthrough.
"The public have had their say in a democratic election and we should respect that."
In his victory speech at Manchester Town Hall, Mr Griffin said: "For the last 50 years, more and more of the people of Britain have watched with concern, growing dismay and sometimes anger as an out-of-touch political elite has transformed our country before our very eyes.
"It is not just a matter of mass immigration, although that is an obvious symptom of it, it is handing us over to be ruled by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels, it's turning the common wealth of this country, our public services, into private properties for giant corporations, in banning St George's Day festivals while encouraging everyone else to celebrate their festivals, usually with taxpayers' money.
"In so many ways the liberal elite have transformed this country."
Tony Lloyd, Labour MP for Manchester Central said he was disappointed that some voters had turned to the BNP.
"I am genuinely not just disappointed, I think it is a matter of shame, this country has a deserved reputation for a tolerant society.
"Their (the BNP) vision for Britain is a nightmare for Britain. I think many people will wake up with some sense of shame.
"Two racists is obviously two too many."
Paul Kenny, general secretary of the GMB union, said: "On D-Day, Britain sent an army to Europe to stop the Nazis getting to Britain.
"It is an absolute insult to the memories to those who fought that 65 years later Britain is now sending Nazis to Europe to represent us."
But speaking after his victory Mr Brons said: "I regard this as the first step to the UK getting freedom from the EU dictatorship.
"Despite the headlines, despite the money, despite the misrepresentation we have managed to win through."
Sir Richard Leese, Labour leader of Manchester City Council said: "It is a very sad day for the North West.
"I think it shows the flaws in a system that allows them to get a seat with such a small share of the vote.
"All of us who care about this country, care about our way of life here, care about democracy, will spend the next five years working to make sure the fascists are not returned.""
-------------------------------
If Griffin and his cronies Clive Jefferson and Mike Whitby had an ounce of sense and decency they wouldn't have destroyed WIGAN BNP and many more BNP GROUPS around the country and should of told us, BNP members and activists, the truth about the dire mess the partys finances are in. Then there would of been every chance for getting NICK, (WHO LIED TO BNP MEMBERS ABOUT THE STATE OF THE PARTY FINANCES), re-elected to the EU.
Wigan had the highest number of votes cast for Nick Griffin, which enabled him to be elected to the Euro Parliament but, due to his untrustworthiness after telling party members that the only party in the black and without debt was the BNP at the BATTLE FOR BRITAIN ROADSHOW.
Now he has finally admitted the true state of the party finances at a meeting held in Salford where he tells the remaining members that the party was in debt to the tune of just under a MILLION - £800.000+.
If Griffin was willing to lie to the BNP members about the state of the party finances what else is he willing to do ?
WHERE DID THE MILLION/S RAISED BY DOWSON GO TO,
WHERE DID THE BATTLE FOR BRITAIN CASH GO ?
WHERE DID THE TRAFALGAR CLUB MONEY GO?
WHY IS THE PARTYS FINANCES NEARLY A MILLION IN DEBT ?
Wigan BNP never had a penny from the party, and I know of many more Groups/Branches that never received a penny from the party to fight elections.
Wigan BNP candidates for the General Elections paid there own £500.00 deposit, and won it back, all 3 candidates got over 5% of the vote which means the £500.00 deposit was recovered. Wigan BNP didn't have a penny from the party to help fight the elections.
If Nick had of been honest with its members then Wigan BNP would have worked hard to get Nick Griffin elected again, but due to his dishonesty and very very strange decisions you could have thought it was the UAF running the party or Nick Griffin is WORKING FOR THE STATE, the UAF couldn't have done as much to destroy the party as Nick Griffin was doing the work for them. The UAF didn't need to do anything but watch and laugh as Nick Griffin and his henchmen destroyed the party.
So Nick, your chances of being re-elected to the EU are virtually NIL.
You only had to be honest about the state of the party finances but instead you lied, when anyone in the party asked about the state the party finances they were called TROUBLE MAKERS, INFILTRATORS etc.
Many of the top activists have left the party due to NICK and his cronies LIES.
So he shouldn't expect to win an EU seat again, but never mind, he's probably sitting on wads of cash the BNP MEMBERS RAISED for him to live off when asking for donations to fight this and fight that, we need this amount of £££CASH for this and more donations needed for that, and we will win any number of seats in Local Govt and General elections but we need your ££ MONEY to help us.
NICK WE HAD FAITH IN YOU....BUT YOU BETRAYED US....WE HAVE NO FAITH IN YOU OR YOUR YOUR LEADERSHIP.
WHERE THE BUCK STOPS (NO PUN INTENDED) IS WITH NICK GRIFFIN
The Powers that Be are probably happy that Nick is running the BNP, as they know he is unelectable as an MP so they help to keep him as BNP Chairman as they know that without Nick Griffin the BNP could actually win seats in Parliament. The PTB would hate for the BNP Chairman to lose his position within the BNP and are terrified that a NEW UNTAINTED CHAIRMAN could make the BNP LESS TOXIC and more attractive to the voters.
IF NICK WAS A TRUE NATIONALIST HE WOULD NEVER HAVE DONE WHAT HE DID IN RUINING THE NATIONALIST CAUSE THROUGH THE BNP AND IN BRITAIN AND BY STEPPING ASIDE AND RESIGNING HIS CHAIRMANSHIP.
Sometime this month ITN/ITV interviewed the chairman of the BRITISH FREEDOM PARTY (PAUL WESTON) and was broadcast on BRITISH NEWS CHANNELS. They never interviewed GRIFFIN .
I wonder why !
TIME IS RUNNING OUT FOR THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE OF THESE ISLES AND GRIFFIN HAS THROWN AWAY MANY MANY YEARS OF HARD GRAFT BY THE ACTIVISTS AND CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIONS AND PROMOTING THE BNP IN A POSITIVE MANOR.
LOOK AT THE BIGGER PICTURE NICK AND STOP STARING AT YOUR BANK BALANCE.
GRIFFIN HAD NO CHOICE BUT ADMIT THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PARTYS FINANCES BEFORE THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION ANNOUNCED THE TRUTH OF THE DEBT, OTHERWISE WE WOULD STILL BE BEING LIED TO.
http://bnptv.org.uk/2012/02/party-leader-delivers-speech-at-salford-meeting/
Friday, 16 March 2012
DEMOCRACY AND CHINA
Recently there have been several programmes on television about China.
Fair enough, China is expected to be the largest economy in the world before long, partially on account of their large population.
Much is made of Chinese competition in the production of manufactured goods and the fact that they work for low wages and thus undercut us.
Chinese wages are roughly on a par of ours fifty years ago and are rising fast.
Comparisons are difficult as exchange rates come into it and the cost of living for the average chinese person is less than it is here as they do not have to pay as much for services which are provided locally.
So what does this mean economically?
It means that chinese people are not much worse off than we are materially.
Their taxes are less and the costs of their essentials sourced internally are low.
Now just look at the average chinese populace. Do they look malnourished or deprived? They all have the latest electronic gear and look healthy and prosperous.
But in these programmes the absence of democracy is mentioned. The Communist Party is supreme and its edicts must be obeyed.
If the state says something must be done it must.
Yes the Chinese government is all powerful but it in general rules with the assent of the people of China. It does clamp down on organisations which threaten the stability of the state, unsurprising in a nation of thirteen hundred million people.
To let things get out of hand would result in chaos and loss of life and be of no benefit to China and its people.
China has shown the way.
Contrast China with India. There is much more poverty and squalour in India. That is because in India there has never been a strong government in control.
The other reason is that in India there are many different religions and sects all of which from time to time cause strife. There is the caste system still influential and hardly democratic.
But above all China works as a united nation,admittedly enforced, but it works.
Look at any picture of groups of chinese people and they look completely unenriched. No blacks, Somalians or other non Chinese.
That is their strength, unity.
No they do not have democracy. But do we?
We put a cross against a party label every five years. These parties all have the same policies and if they get in renage on all their promises and we can do nothing.
The will of the people in Britain counts for no more than the will of the people of China.
BUT the Chinese government, undemocratic as it is supposed to be puts the interests of its own country first, and that is why we are finding it difficult to compete.
Would that we had a government as much in tune with its people's wishes and which put our country first, for without those things the future for our nation looks bleak.
Fair enough, China is expected to be the largest economy in the world before long, partially on account of their large population.
Much is made of Chinese competition in the production of manufactured goods and the fact that they work for low wages and thus undercut us.
Chinese wages are roughly on a par of ours fifty years ago and are rising fast.
Comparisons are difficult as exchange rates come into it and the cost of living for the average chinese person is less than it is here as they do not have to pay as much for services which are provided locally.
So what does this mean economically?
It means that chinese people are not much worse off than we are materially.
Their taxes are less and the costs of their essentials sourced internally are low.
Now just look at the average chinese populace. Do they look malnourished or deprived? They all have the latest electronic gear and look healthy and prosperous.
But in these programmes the absence of democracy is mentioned. The Communist Party is supreme and its edicts must be obeyed.
If the state says something must be done it must.
Yes the Chinese government is all powerful but it in general rules with the assent of the people of China. It does clamp down on organisations which threaten the stability of the state, unsurprising in a nation of thirteen hundred million people.
To let things get out of hand would result in chaos and loss of life and be of no benefit to China and its people.
China has shown the way.
Contrast China with India. There is much more poverty and squalour in India. That is because in India there has never been a strong government in control.
The other reason is that in India there are many different religions and sects all of which from time to time cause strife. There is the caste system still influential and hardly democratic.
But above all China works as a united nation,admittedly enforced, but it works.
Look at any picture of groups of chinese people and they look completely unenriched. No blacks, Somalians or other non Chinese.
That is their strength, unity.
No they do not have democracy. But do we?
We put a cross against a party label every five years. These parties all have the same policies and if they get in renage on all their promises and we can do nothing.
The will of the people in Britain counts for no more than the will of the people of China.
BUT the Chinese government, undemocratic as it is supposed to be puts the interests of its own country first, and that is why we are finding it difficult to compete.
Would that we had a government as much in tune with its people's wishes and which put our country first, for without those things the future for our nation looks bleak.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)