The days are getting lighter, warmer and spring is on the way and yet,
I'M GETTING EVER MORE DEPRESSED.
Why?
Because of the daily dose of bad news and betrayal of our country by those supposedly running it.
Every day Cameron has a new "initiative" often concerning such matters of importance as racism in football.
I don't give a st**f about either of these topics but am concerned that the MOD has given an order for four RN supply ships worth £400 million to South Korea.
Their excuse is of course economy and they have said that British shipyards did not bid for the order. I don't believe that one.
Possibly some of our shipyards need upgrading but how do they manage that when our own navy will not give them orders?
How will we retain what little engineering skills we have and train new apprentices when we give valuable orders to foreign firms?
The government seems to have found £200 million for Somalia. Surely it could find the money for a tax break to the shipbuilding industry, a break which is a fraction of the bonuses just handed out to our loss making governernment owned banks, or the amount Philip Green "saved" from his business in cheap foreign tat by transferring his tax to his wife in Monaco
Such assistance would be a step to secure PRODUCTIVE jobs and have a multiplier effect in the steel and associated small companies.
But no. All effort is expended on assisting the unemployed to gain employment as shop assistants and burger flippers. One of his latest ideas to combat unemployment was tax breaks for those employing servants,very helpful to city types.
Do they not realise that the money they are spending in Korea or giving to Somalia has to be paid for by production here in Britain and nowadays by borrowing?
Or is it all part of a plan to finally put the last nail in the coffin of our country to satisfy their rich friends in the City and othere who profit at our demise?
I believe it is.
Just think if we had a government which supported, not through subsidies but low taxes for engineering, ships etc, coupled with an efficient management we could be as prosperous as Germany where they put industry as top priority.
But they won't. They will just continue to support the banks at our expense as well as every fly blown terrorist country.
They are quite happy to offshore production in the "interests of efficiency"
Our banks liabilities are unknown but are far bigger than admitted.
A suggestion. Sell RBS to Korea and let them take all their experts and liabilities with them.
But then would Korea want to have these "valuable" assets and the "expertise" they would bring?
They wouldn't touch them with a lifeboat pole from one of the ships they are building "for us"
Friday, 24 February 2012
AN ENJOYABLE REUNION
Last Tuesday I attended a meeting in Tameside to hear Andrew Brons's opinions on the future of nationalism and the form it may take.
A video is on the "Ideas" website.
A highlight of the meeting for me was meeting so many old friends from the BNP before that organisation had been destroyed by the present leadership. It was like a reunion and heartening that though many attendees had become inactive or joined in other organisations the bond of nationalism was still there.
There was a full room in spite of the event being by invitation only in order to avoid disruption by hardened "Griffinites" and was thus low key.
It is a sad state of affairs when long term activists are frightened of their erstwhile colleagues that they fear to publicise such events.
In his speech Andrew was his usual reasonable and moderate self when he put forward the options available to us, the pros and cons of each.
No name calling ("vermin" "scumbag" etc, the language of the gutter). Andrew is far too cultured and polite than that and puts his points over in a reasonable manner
He urged us not to join one of the several disparate new groups which he said would tend to lead to division and separation of the various groups.
He advised that an umbrella grouping be set up under Jim Lewthwaite's "Democratic Nationalist" name in order that like minded people could keep in touch and even stand in elections.
This grouping could later reconnect with the other groups to which so many have drifted, not because they have any problems with the policies of the BNP, only disappointment and disgust at the way it has been run down deliberately or otherwise by the incompetent leadership. They feel they need a home and a party in which to belong.
And that is the core of Andrew's message. Drifting off in different directions will tend to separate people.
Our project must be to keep some semblance of nationalist unity so that when the present leadership of the BNP is ousted we can once again come together as a united cause for the sake of our country.
I realise that this can seem like inaction but that is better than the wrong action.
After the May elections we will have a better idea of the best policy to adopt, but the message I take from the meeting is that in future --
WE MUST UNITE ALL THE GROUPS and in the meantime keep the contacts open between these groups.
OUR TIME WILL COME but only when nationalism is free of those in the BNP who seem intent on destroying it.
There was discussion as to the best way forward in the question and answer session with various opinions, but all agreed with the importance of keeping in touch.
Another such "nationalist unity" meeting will be held next month. BNP hierarchy not invited I believe.
A video is on the "Ideas" website.
A highlight of the meeting for me was meeting so many old friends from the BNP before that organisation had been destroyed by the present leadership. It was like a reunion and heartening that though many attendees had become inactive or joined in other organisations the bond of nationalism was still there.
There was a full room in spite of the event being by invitation only in order to avoid disruption by hardened "Griffinites" and was thus low key.
It is a sad state of affairs when long term activists are frightened of their erstwhile colleagues that they fear to publicise such events.
In his speech Andrew was his usual reasonable and moderate self when he put forward the options available to us, the pros and cons of each.
No name calling ("vermin" "scumbag" etc, the language of the gutter). Andrew is far too cultured and polite than that and puts his points over in a reasonable manner
He urged us not to join one of the several disparate new groups which he said would tend to lead to division and separation of the various groups.
He advised that an umbrella grouping be set up under Jim Lewthwaite's "Democratic Nationalist" name in order that like minded people could keep in touch and even stand in elections.
This grouping could later reconnect with the other groups to which so many have drifted, not because they have any problems with the policies of the BNP, only disappointment and disgust at the way it has been run down deliberately or otherwise by the incompetent leadership. They feel they need a home and a party in which to belong.
And that is the core of Andrew's message. Drifting off in different directions will tend to separate people.
Our project must be to keep some semblance of nationalist unity so that when the present leadership of the BNP is ousted we can once again come together as a united cause for the sake of our country.
I realise that this can seem like inaction but that is better than the wrong action.
After the May elections we will have a better idea of the best policy to adopt, but the message I take from the meeting is that in future --
WE MUST UNITE ALL THE GROUPS and in the meantime keep the contacts open between these groups.
OUR TIME WILL COME but only when nationalism is free of those in the BNP who seem intent on destroying it.
There was discussion as to the best way forward in the question and answer session with various opinions, but all agreed with the importance of keeping in touch.
Another such "nationalist unity" meeting will be held next month. BNP hierarchy not invited I believe.
Monday, 20 February 2012
RACIST? OF COURSE I AM. THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT.
When I was at school in the "forties" I learnt that in our country we had free speech unlike many others.
In the Communist bloc people had to pretend to be communist and join the party if they wanted a job. Disent or a contrary opinion could mean a spell in the gulags.
Similarly in Nazi Germany you had to be a party member and obey orders to avoid a concentration camp.
Even in the West in "The Land of the Free" any hint of a Communist opinion would land you in trouble.
Eventually the yoke of dictatorship was thrown off in the Soviet bloc and the books thrown open to demonstrate the tyrrany of the system. Similarly with the defeat of the nazis its hidden horrors were shown.
At last we thought the majority of the western world was free and people could articulate their thoughts without penalty.
Alas no such luck. A new Orwellian totalitarian system has arisen where pepole are afraid to give vent to their thoughts and opinions.
What is it? The "Race Industry".
According to the rules instigated slowly and surreptitiously by this well funded industry to utter a "racist" word is one of the most hienous crimes of all.
If a child utters a word considered by this body as racist it can blight his prospects of employment for life. If an adult, the sack without compensation and possibly with loss of pension.
All this is said to be done in the interests of equality but again some are more equal than others.
Black and other ethnic organisations are tolerated and even subsidised and encouraged while societies to promote the interests of "whites" are deemed racist.
Black organisations can not be tarred with the racist brush (pun intended)
All this makes native Brits frightened of speaking freely. If a topic vaguely racist is aired they seem obliged to preface their remarks with "I'm not racist but"
You never hear a black man say this.
Muslim hate clerics can promote death and destruction to non believers with impunity.
When terrorist outrages are committed the police visit "community elders" to reassure them that all is well.
Similarly when blacks riot the police take a softly softly approach to avoid inflaming feelings. Blacks are promoted above their capabilities in a show of diversity as it seems black criminals do not like being arrested by white officers.
I would not know, never having been arrested, but being arrested in MY country by someone born abroad would stick in my craw.
Why am I going on like this?
Well last week a seven year old child was threatened with being tagged racist after asking a dark boy at school whether he came from Africa, an innocent question I would have thought and with no malice.
His mother refused to sign that her son was racist. She insisted he isn't and I am sure that is so. It is only later when he realises the damage multiculturalism and immigration has done to his prospects that it will dawn on him that there is a logic to this so called racism.
It is not that we feel we are better, it is just that this is our only country and we want it for us. We have never been asked if we wanted this brave new world(some democracy).
If I had been the mother I would have been tempted to say my child is not racist but I am. The danger with that strategy would be that Social Services would be called and the child put into care.
Nothing must interfere with the brainwashing of our children.
Much of the deterioration of educational standards is down to the policy of promoting teachers on the grounds of their PC credentials which usually means a poor teacher as well.
So how do we counter this insidious brainwashing of our children?
Well we can take heart. In the USSR and Nazi Germany when people could speak freely they expressed the thoughts they always had but which of necessity had to lie dormant.
Also the law of unintended consequences kicks in.
When white kids are discriminated against at school, overlooked for promotion on grounds of positive discrimination and see their neighbourhoods degenerating into squalid ghettoes they will hold their tongues but the feeling of injustice will remain and will erupt in the future.
What can we older folk do.
Well they can't touch me, I'm retired so I shall continue to speak my mind, not in an agressive way but a factual one. I shall keep pointing out to my descendants the disadvantages they suffer.
It is not so hard and I am heartened by the seething anger many young Brits feel about the situation but dare not express it.
I can and so I state without any shame that as a patriot--
I AM A RACIST.
That is something I DO have in common with blacks as they are the most racist of all.
In the Communist bloc people had to pretend to be communist and join the party if they wanted a job. Disent or a contrary opinion could mean a spell in the gulags.
Similarly in Nazi Germany you had to be a party member and obey orders to avoid a concentration camp.
Even in the West in "The Land of the Free" any hint of a Communist opinion would land you in trouble.
Eventually the yoke of dictatorship was thrown off in the Soviet bloc and the books thrown open to demonstrate the tyrrany of the system. Similarly with the defeat of the nazis its hidden horrors were shown.
At last we thought the majority of the western world was free and people could articulate their thoughts without penalty.
Alas no such luck. A new Orwellian totalitarian system has arisen where pepole are afraid to give vent to their thoughts and opinions.
What is it? The "Race Industry".
According to the rules instigated slowly and surreptitiously by this well funded industry to utter a "racist" word is one of the most hienous crimes of all.
If a child utters a word considered by this body as racist it can blight his prospects of employment for life. If an adult, the sack without compensation and possibly with loss of pension.
All this is said to be done in the interests of equality but again some are more equal than others.
Black and other ethnic organisations are tolerated and even subsidised and encouraged while societies to promote the interests of "whites" are deemed racist.
Black organisations can not be tarred with the racist brush (pun intended)
All this makes native Brits frightened of speaking freely. If a topic vaguely racist is aired they seem obliged to preface their remarks with "I'm not racist but"
You never hear a black man say this.
Muslim hate clerics can promote death and destruction to non believers with impunity.
When terrorist outrages are committed the police visit "community elders" to reassure them that all is well.
Similarly when blacks riot the police take a softly softly approach to avoid inflaming feelings. Blacks are promoted above their capabilities in a show of diversity as it seems black criminals do not like being arrested by white officers.
I would not know, never having been arrested, but being arrested in MY country by someone born abroad would stick in my craw.
Why am I going on like this?
Well last week a seven year old child was threatened with being tagged racist after asking a dark boy at school whether he came from Africa, an innocent question I would have thought and with no malice.
His mother refused to sign that her son was racist. She insisted he isn't and I am sure that is so. It is only later when he realises the damage multiculturalism and immigration has done to his prospects that it will dawn on him that there is a logic to this so called racism.
It is not that we feel we are better, it is just that this is our only country and we want it for us. We have never been asked if we wanted this brave new world(some democracy).
If I had been the mother I would have been tempted to say my child is not racist but I am. The danger with that strategy would be that Social Services would be called and the child put into care.
Nothing must interfere with the brainwashing of our children.
Much of the deterioration of educational standards is down to the policy of promoting teachers on the grounds of their PC credentials which usually means a poor teacher as well.
So how do we counter this insidious brainwashing of our children?
Well we can take heart. In the USSR and Nazi Germany when people could speak freely they expressed the thoughts they always had but which of necessity had to lie dormant.
Also the law of unintended consequences kicks in.
When white kids are discriminated against at school, overlooked for promotion on grounds of positive discrimination and see their neighbourhoods degenerating into squalid ghettoes they will hold their tongues but the feeling of injustice will remain and will erupt in the future.
What can we older folk do.
Well they can't touch me, I'm retired so I shall continue to speak my mind, not in an agressive way but a factual one. I shall keep pointing out to my descendants the disadvantages they suffer.
It is not so hard and I am heartened by the seething anger many young Brits feel about the situation but dare not express it.
I can and so I state without any shame that as a patriot--
I AM A RACIST.
That is something I DO have in common with blacks as they are the most racist of all.
Saturday, 18 February 2012
DIVERSITY TAKES PRECEDENCE
In spite of our straightened financial circumstances and front line services being severely cut it seems some departments are immune from any cuts.
The "Diversity and Citizen Directorate" of the Metropolitan police and its 36 staff is safe.
This virtuous group, headed by the daughter of immigrants on it is said £80,000 per year will continue to promote the interests of ethnic minority employees and deals with gender, disability and sexual orientation and race.
Three years ago it urged staff to "celebrate" the contribution of Roma gipsies to London's culture and diversity.
The total cost of this worthy operation must have cost well in excess of three million. No actual police duties, criminals arrested of course.Nothing must be allowed to detract from the more important work of diversity.
If this were all and the only example of police waste it would be bad enough but the above PC charade only refers to the Met.
Lancashire police has a similar department with a staff of about five led this time not by a black person but by a representitive of another so called disadvantaged group,a homosexual to see that there is no homophobia in Lancashire in the police or anywhere else.
They are not on the beat of course but doing the important work of collating alleged homophobic or racist incidents from their cosy warm offices.
It is interesting that these groups are always headed by a person from a so called minority group who always have an agenda to promote their cause and seek advantages over the "normal" ethnic Brits. We are thus themselves disadvantaged twice, first by being forced to pay for what we have not requested and being discriminated against at our own expense.
This situation is no doubt replicated throughout all police "services"(not forces) and the sums devoted to this cause must be enormous.
So when you are attacked or burgled and the police are too busy to attend you can rest assured that the important work is continuing in the office and all homophobic and racist comments recorded.
But that is not all.
Local authorities, while cutting down front line staff in the street maintenance, social care and refuse collection on account of cost imperatives will still ring fence diversity departments in their costly little empires.
The total costs must run into hundreds of millions, costs which add to our rates and taxes, costs which cost jobs and do not deliver the services to which we are entitled.
I believe this army of tax sucking parasites should be sacked with no compensation or given jobs which benefit our communities.
It will not happen of course and our country will keep sinking under the heavy load of these unproductive leeches.
THE PC AGENDA IS TOO ENTRENCHED and will remain so until we do hit the buffers .
BUT HIT THE BUFFERS IT WILL, and we will get the services we pay for at a lesser cost.
THIS MADNESS CAN NOT CONTINUE and logic and fairness WILL eventually prevail.
The "Diversity and Citizen Directorate" of the Metropolitan police and its 36 staff is safe.
This virtuous group, headed by the daughter of immigrants on it is said £80,000 per year will continue to promote the interests of ethnic minority employees and deals with gender, disability and sexual orientation and race.
Three years ago it urged staff to "celebrate" the contribution of Roma gipsies to London's culture and diversity.
The total cost of this worthy operation must have cost well in excess of three million. No actual police duties, criminals arrested of course.Nothing must be allowed to detract from the more important work of diversity.
If this were all and the only example of police waste it would be bad enough but the above PC charade only refers to the Met.
Lancashire police has a similar department with a staff of about five led this time not by a black person but by a representitive of another so called disadvantaged group,a homosexual to see that there is no homophobia in Lancashire in the police or anywhere else.
They are not on the beat of course but doing the important work of collating alleged homophobic or racist incidents from their cosy warm offices.
It is interesting that these groups are always headed by a person from a so called minority group who always have an agenda to promote their cause and seek advantages over the "normal" ethnic Brits. We are thus themselves disadvantaged twice, first by being forced to pay for what we have not requested and being discriminated against at our own expense.
This situation is no doubt replicated throughout all police "services"(not forces) and the sums devoted to this cause must be enormous.
So when you are attacked or burgled and the police are too busy to attend you can rest assured that the important work is continuing in the office and all homophobic and racist comments recorded.
But that is not all.
Local authorities, while cutting down front line staff in the street maintenance, social care and refuse collection on account of cost imperatives will still ring fence diversity departments in their costly little empires.
The total costs must run into hundreds of millions, costs which add to our rates and taxes, costs which cost jobs and do not deliver the services to which we are entitled.
I believe this army of tax sucking parasites should be sacked with no compensation or given jobs which benefit our communities.
It will not happen of course and our country will keep sinking under the heavy load of these unproductive leeches.
THE PC AGENDA IS TOO ENTRENCHED and will remain so until we do hit the buffers .
BUT HIT THE BUFFERS IT WILL, and we will get the services we pay for at a lesser cost.
THIS MADNESS CAN NOT CONTINUE and logic and fairness WILL eventually prevail.
Friday, 17 February 2012
WE SHOULD KEEP OUR NOSES OUT
Why is our government making such a song and dance about the turmoil in Syria?
Have they not done enough damage in Libya and Egypt where the new "free" governments are implicated in torture and persecution against minorities.
What will happen in the future nobody knows but it is likely that muslim fundamentalists will gain control.
In Libya it was easy. Gadaffi was persuaded to give up his arms and so was unable to defend his regime.
This fact will not have been un noticed by Assad in Syria, a well armed state and there is no way we could intervene in what is a civil war.
I have no love for these Arab dictators but recent events have shown that replacing these strong men causes more suffering than if they had been left in place. In any case people do not like outsiders interfering in the internal p0olitics of a nation.
That is why Russia and China vetoed the UN resolutions lest it was taken as a method of poking our arrogant Western noses in the affairs of these countries.
And why is there no clamour for regime change in North Korea where there is much more persecution?
Because they are a nuclear power and that is the reason why Iran wants to join the nuclear club, so that they can not be intimidated by the USA, Israel, and its poodle supporters.
And who can blame them?
Bad as these regimes are they will in all likelyhood be replaced by even worse regimes but in any case these are matters internal to the countries concerned and nothing to do with us.
I have a feeling however that turmoil in the Middle East and the consequent disunity among the Arabs could have been engineered to prevent a united front against Israel when it proceeds with its promised attack on Iran.
I don't like the Iranian regime , but they are no threat to us and we could buy oil from them as does China but we wage economic war against them and our oil prices are going up as a consequence.
Yes they are belligerent towards Israel, but from England's point of view who cares? it is not our problem. I don't care if they blow each other off the face of the earth so long as our country is not involved.
Iran and Syria are no threat to us if we keep our noses out but we are paying the penalty in terrorism and oil prices because of our perceived support for Israel.
In the meantime China has access to cheap oil and is undercutting us financially.
It is time we realised who our friends are. We have none and must stand on our own feet and make our own way in the world by trade alone.
If it suits our interests go for it, if not ignore it and don't take sides.
Our governernment must realise that they were elected to promote our interests in a highly competitive world and that should be the first and only priority.
So KEEP YOUR NOSES OUT OF FOREIGN DISPUTES.
YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE.
Have they not done enough damage in Libya and Egypt where the new "free" governments are implicated in torture and persecution against minorities.
What will happen in the future nobody knows but it is likely that muslim fundamentalists will gain control.
In Libya it was easy. Gadaffi was persuaded to give up his arms and so was unable to defend his regime.
This fact will not have been un noticed by Assad in Syria, a well armed state and there is no way we could intervene in what is a civil war.
I have no love for these Arab dictators but recent events have shown that replacing these strong men causes more suffering than if they had been left in place. In any case people do not like outsiders interfering in the internal p0olitics of a nation.
That is why Russia and China vetoed the UN resolutions lest it was taken as a method of poking our arrogant Western noses in the affairs of these countries.
And why is there no clamour for regime change in North Korea where there is much more persecution?
Because they are a nuclear power and that is the reason why Iran wants to join the nuclear club, so that they can not be intimidated by the USA, Israel, and its poodle supporters.
And who can blame them?
Bad as these regimes are they will in all likelyhood be replaced by even worse regimes but in any case these are matters internal to the countries concerned and nothing to do with us.
I have a feeling however that turmoil in the Middle East and the consequent disunity among the Arabs could have been engineered to prevent a united front against Israel when it proceeds with its promised attack on Iran.
I don't like the Iranian regime , but they are no threat to us and we could buy oil from them as does China but we wage economic war against them and our oil prices are going up as a consequence.
Yes they are belligerent towards Israel, but from England's point of view who cares? it is not our problem. I don't care if they blow each other off the face of the earth so long as our country is not involved.
Iran and Syria are no threat to us if we keep our noses out but we are paying the penalty in terrorism and oil prices because of our perceived support for Israel.
In the meantime China has access to cheap oil and is undercutting us financially.
It is time we realised who our friends are. We have none and must stand on our own feet and make our own way in the world by trade alone.
If it suits our interests go for it, if not ignore it and don't take sides.
Our governernment must realise that they were elected to promote our interests in a highly competitive world and that should be the first and only priority.
So KEEP YOUR NOSES OUT OF FOREIGN DISPUTES.
YOU KNOW IT MAKES SENSE.
Wednesday, 15 February 2012
A TOLERANT MUSLIM? DON'T BELIEVE IT.
As a lapsed Cof E member and now an agnostic I take issue with the militancy with which Prof Dawkins attacks religion as well as the secular fundamentalists who have succeeded in getting prayers banned at council meetings.
I do not see why it should bother them what other people believe or do.
I believe religious tenets are more suitable to primitive societies as explanations of events which were not then understood and to give simple people's lives a sense of meaning.
I wish I could believe in the last part but to me wishing something was true and life had a higher purpose does not make it true.
I believe we are too small and insignificant to understand the vast universe and thus remain agnostic, but if others have faith and it helps them then OK.
Having been brought up to it I do find a sense of peace and connection with our past in a Christian church. Christianity is part of our heritage and whether logical or not should be respected as should those who believe in it.
Islam though has and never had a place in our national conciousness nor should it in future.
Baroness Warsi's defence of Christianity is I believe a Trojan Horse, the thin end of the wedge.
Her ultimate goal as a muslim is the supremacy of that religion and its inevitable replacement of Christianity. Her advocacy of Christianity is a ploy to lull us to sleep and facilitate her foreign creed.
Both Christianity and islam are in my opinion based on superstition, but there the similarity ends.
Our country and traditions have been built on Christian principles of tolerance and love while islam advocates Holy wars.
Think about it.
Under which religion would you rather live Christianity or islam?
Under which religion would other faiths and beliefs be tolerated? It sure as Hell is not islam
So I do not see the hand of tolerance from the overpromoted "Baroness" I see a not so subtle attempt to further advance the triumph of her militant barbaric creed.
BEWARE OF MUSLIMS PREACHING TOLERANCE.
A TOLERANT MUSLIM IS AN OXYMORON AND ISLAM IS AN ALIEN FAITH IN OUR LAND.
CHRISTIANITY, FOR ALL ITS FAULTS BELONGS HERE.
I do not see why it should bother them what other people believe or do.
I believe religious tenets are more suitable to primitive societies as explanations of events which were not then understood and to give simple people's lives a sense of meaning.
I wish I could believe in the last part but to me wishing something was true and life had a higher purpose does not make it true.
I believe we are too small and insignificant to understand the vast universe and thus remain agnostic, but if others have faith and it helps them then OK.
Having been brought up to it I do find a sense of peace and connection with our past in a Christian church. Christianity is part of our heritage and whether logical or not should be respected as should those who believe in it.
Islam though has and never had a place in our national conciousness nor should it in future.
Baroness Warsi's defence of Christianity is I believe a Trojan Horse, the thin end of the wedge.
Her ultimate goal as a muslim is the supremacy of that religion and its inevitable replacement of Christianity. Her advocacy of Christianity is a ploy to lull us to sleep and facilitate her foreign creed.
Both Christianity and islam are in my opinion based on superstition, but there the similarity ends.
Our country and traditions have been built on Christian principles of tolerance and love while islam advocates Holy wars.
Think about it.
Under which religion would you rather live Christianity or islam?
Under which religion would other faiths and beliefs be tolerated? It sure as Hell is not islam
So I do not see the hand of tolerance from the overpromoted "Baroness" I see a not so subtle attempt to further advance the triumph of her militant barbaric creed.
BEWARE OF MUSLIMS PREACHING TOLERANCE.
A TOLERANT MUSLIM IS AN OXYMORON AND ISLAM IS AN ALIEN FAITH IN OUR LAND.
CHRISTIANITY, FOR ALL ITS FAULTS BELONGS HERE.
Sunday, 12 February 2012
THIN BLACK SKINS
As I have said previously I have no interest in football but the furore over Suarez's refusal to shake Evra's hand has appalled me.
Suarez was alleged to have said some "racist" word to the thin skinned black Evra and was fined £40,000 and eight games for it.
No mention of what may have been said by Evra to Suarez. Race was the issue and must be punished. No matter that Suarez may himself have a bit of black in his genetics Evra cried like a soft child to the authorities and had Suarez punished.
I have never played the soft game of Soccer but have played a bit of Rugby Union in my time and on the field insults and even blows were exchanged.
We did not complain to the ref about verbal insults and shook hands after the game.
I have not heard of incidents like this in Rugby and there are many black players in that game.
They are obviously not so touchy.
It was suggested a few weeks ago that this should be the case in so called racial insults after the game, but this was considered unacceptable by the authorities.
Comments in the heat of the moment do not matter and a handshake after the match puts the matter to an end, and any racial comments put behind with a pint together.
In this case Evra, like a spoilt child had a severe penalty imposed on Suarez who in any case he was not being racist, but just using a Spanish word. He was not convicted of anything but nevertheless lost money and games because Evra would not let the case drop.
And Evra expected Suarez to shake his hand?
He must have been deluded.
It's like me being asked to shake hands with someone who has cost me thousands.
NO WAY.
Now the PC FA have prevailed on Dalgleish and Suarez to apologise.
Money and power talks but you know that their thoughts will remain the same.
If people like Evra with thin black skins (an anatomical oxymoron) can not stand the rough and tumble of insults in the so called English game then perhaps they should return to their African homeland where they could display their undoubted skills but receive less of the white man's money.
P S did you see Owen Farrell of Wigan win the match for England in the man's game, Rugby against Italy?
His kicking was superb. It made one proud to be a Wiganer.
As I said yesterday when he kicked the goals--
GOD BLESS FARRELL,WIGAN AND St GEORGE. and I was not referring to you Tony.
Suarez was alleged to have said some "racist" word to the thin skinned black Evra and was fined £40,000 and eight games for it.
No mention of what may have been said by Evra to Suarez. Race was the issue and must be punished. No matter that Suarez may himself have a bit of black in his genetics Evra cried like a soft child to the authorities and had Suarez punished.
I have never played the soft game of Soccer but have played a bit of Rugby Union in my time and on the field insults and even blows were exchanged.
We did not complain to the ref about verbal insults and shook hands after the game.
I have not heard of incidents like this in Rugby and there are many black players in that game.
They are obviously not so touchy.
It was suggested a few weeks ago that this should be the case in so called racial insults after the game, but this was considered unacceptable by the authorities.
Comments in the heat of the moment do not matter and a handshake after the match puts the matter to an end, and any racial comments put behind with a pint together.
In this case Evra, like a spoilt child had a severe penalty imposed on Suarez who in any case he was not being racist, but just using a Spanish word. He was not convicted of anything but nevertheless lost money and games because Evra would not let the case drop.
And Evra expected Suarez to shake his hand?
He must have been deluded.
It's like me being asked to shake hands with someone who has cost me thousands.
NO WAY.
Now the PC FA have prevailed on Dalgleish and Suarez to apologise.
Money and power talks but you know that their thoughts will remain the same.
If people like Evra with thin black skins (an anatomical oxymoron) can not stand the rough and tumble of insults in the so called English game then perhaps they should return to their African homeland where they could display their undoubted skills but receive less of the white man's money.
P S did you see Owen Farrell of Wigan win the match for England in the man's game, Rugby against Italy?
His kicking was superb. It made one proud to be a Wiganer.
As I said yesterday when he kicked the goals--
GOD BLESS FARRELL,WIGAN AND St GEORGE. and I was not referring to you Tony.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)