PETITION TO BAN RITUAL (halal) SLAUGHTER

Please click on the link and sign the petition to ban non stun, ritual slaughter such as HALAL.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/808

DIANE ABBOTT ARCH BLACK RACIAL SUPREMACIST AT IT AGAIN

*'White people love playing divide and rule'

So the ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT is caught again using *derogatory remarks about WHITE PEOPLE on the social networking site TWITTER.

In her defence the ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT claims that her Tweet was taken out of context and that she was referring to 19th Century Colonialism. Now I wonder where the previous quotes to 19th Century Colonialism, to put this in "context", went ?

Also it doesn't say White people "LOVED" playing divide and rule. Could she put this into context for us ?

REPORT THE ARCH BLACK SUPREMACIST RACIST NEW LABOUR MP DIANNE ABBOTT FOR RACISM TO THE POLICE NOW !

STEPHEN LAWRENCE CASE. JUSTICE?

With the jailing of Dobson and Norris in the Lawrence case I had hoped this PC circus would have ended, but now it does not seem to be the case as the police will continue their "work" to convict even more of those originally accused.

I have to ask how many people does it take to stab someone?

I accept that the two convicted were two unsavoury thugs and the murder was horrific, but it does seem that if the victim had been white little would have been heard about it after the first innocent verdict.

Certainly seven hundred years of English law would not have been cast aside as happened with the new "double jeapordy" provision and £millions would not have been spent in police and legal expense if there had not been a political motive.

That motive has been to appease the PC multiculti brigade and help put at a disadvantage those of us (the majority I believe) who oppose this uninvited invasion.

Indeed the Mc Pherson report that the police are "institutionally racist" has been used as a stick against people of British stock.

He is right , the police are institutionally racist, or at least the police chiefs are, they are racist against us.

It is considered that racism can only be perpetrated by whites on blacks, and this is shown by the phrase "reverse racism", an oxymoron if ever there was one. It is interesting to contrast the prominence given to this victim with memorial buildings and plaques with that given to other victims, which demonstrates the politicising of certain crimes especially if the victim is black.

Racism is and always will be endemic when different races mix, it is a natural human reaction to the outsider however reprehensible.

BUT IT DOES CUT BOTH WAYS.

Stephen Lawrence was no angel, a bully, petty drug dealer by all accounts and a "Black Power" activist, hardly a portrayal of peace or wishing to live in harmony with the society in which his parents had inserted their family, to the disadvantage of the original inhabitants.

Murder is murder whoever the perpetrator or victim is and is equally to be deplored and race does not come in to it.

Making a white on black murder more of a crime will stoke resentment because of its unfairness.

And justice must be done impartially and seen to be done so.

I believe the authorities were determined to get a conviction and am sure the jury was selected carefully as a "wrong" verdict would have caused the usual riots and arson that people of African origin are prone to indulge in.

The verdict may have been correct, I don't know but the case was politicised from the start and because of that--

IT WAS NOT BRITISH JUSTICE.

LEAVE THE GUN LAWS ALONE

The tragedy of the multiple shootings have brought out the inevitable kneejerk calls for tougher gun laws.

That people holding gun licences should be checked is common sense, but what about the more dangerous illegal guns used in far more murders such as that of the Indian student in Salford?
More draconian gun laws would have no effect and we are rapidly getting to the situation even now where the only people who have access to guns are the criminals.

And what about knives?

In our village 40 years ago a man killed his wife and children with a knife and strangled his mistress with a rope.
There was no call for a ban on knives or ropes, and indeed the majority of murders are committed with a knife or rope, should we ban these as well?

The talk in the papers illustrates how little media people know about the requirements needed to obtain a gun licence.

I know how the system works as I sign many gun and firearm certificates, unlike the "experts" in the media

A full medical history is needed for a firearm certificate (rifle) and any suicidal or other signs of mental instability and even marital disharmony preclude the issuance of such a certificate.
It is my job to unearth any dangers before signing them fit to have a rifle.

The killer in Peterlee had a firearms certificate (and shouldn't) but the weapon used was a shotgun, not a rifle, for which the rules are less draconian and a certificate easier to gain.

Long range,(up to a mile) rifles are far more dangerous than shotguns and they are rightly heavily controlled, but shotguns are safe at 150 yards but devastatingly lethal at short range.

Shotguns are an essential part of country life, without them farm crops would be devastated by crows and pigeons and many of the people who control these pests are welcomed by farmers on to their land.
Yes they get pleasure but they do a lot of good, but they are generally stable and law abiding or they wouldn't have got a certificate in the first place.

Unfortunately people sometimes do flip and tragedies occur but to ban all guns would deprive the vast majority of owners of pleasure and incur great losses in agricultural production.

And the criminals would still kill with their unlicenced guns and knives.

Leave the gun laws as they are, if mad men do not use them they will kill in other ways and those killed would be--

JUST AS DEAD.

FRIENDS IN HIGH (AND LOW) PLACES

It's New Year's Eve again and we have the usual list of those deemed by the government worthy of "honours".
This charade is a demonstration of who the government holds in high regard and in so doing throws a spotlight on their values.

The knighthood "for services to the arts" bestowed on a man who reputably made £100 million betting on the downfall of Northern Rock (not a very productive way to make your money).
His half million donation to the Tory party was incidental and even though he has engaged in and represents the worst aspects of the corrupt banking system he is considered good enough to be knighted.

Then we have Gerald Ronson, a jailed thief and fraudster rehabilitated after his spell at Her Majesty's pleasure, for his work for charity, no doubt subsidised by the money he has creamed from the banking and property businesses to which he returned following his release.

People may remember his co defendant Guinness who developed Alzheimers in jail and was released early when he made a miraculous recovery, the first recorded instance of a cure for that disease.

Then we have the thug and ex drug dealer who received an award for not returning to his former criminal activities (yet) who also got an award, for being black I presume as I've heard of no young white ex thugs who have been so honoured, nor of the millions of people who have helped their communities without first becoming a criminal

Golfers and various arty farty people have received gongs but few people who have contributed anything to our nation have received anything.

If I was offered an honour I would decline it, not wanting to be associated with the sleazy business men, so called sportsmen or theatrical luvvies, not that I ever would be and nor would any true patriot. And that says it all. It shows the priorities of the ruling elites and they sure as hell are not the people who have contributed to our nation.

One exception I would is Jonathan Ive who played a big part in the development of the I pad and showed what British people can do. Unfortunately he had to use his talents in the USA and his brilliance did little to help Britain finacially, but he did contribute something to human knowledge and wellbeing, unlike many of the others who are just parasites.

The Tories have shown that they are in hock to the sleazy worlds of business and finance with token appeasement actions to blacks and sportsmen (golfers mainly, what does that say about them?) and luvvies. But Labour are no different and in the past have awarded gongs to people of dubious value and repute.

If the honours system is to be of any value the highest should be given to those who have built up MANUFACTURING and other businesses providing employment rather than taking them over, breaking them up and selling them to foreigners.
Other awards should recognise campaigners and workers who seek to improve the lot of the ordinary person and indeed some are awarded to such people, but these will be people who do not question the status quo or rock the boat.

It is obvious the biggest gongs are given to the powerful people in the finance, media and posh sports categories while lesser gongs are thrown out like the late dictator of Haiti, Papa Doc threw out money to his impoverished citizens to keep them quiet.

Our system is hardly less corrupt than his was.

THE COST OF LIFE

I am sure you'll all agree that the senseless and unprovoked murder of Indian student Anuj Bidve, 23 in Salford on Boxing Day morning was a shocking act of inconceivable wanton violence of the very highest order and iterates just what our society has now become and how worthless someone's life is to others.

As we learn that the fifth person arrested in connection to the murder was from Leigh - we also understand that there is a £50,000 reward leading to the arrest and conviction of the killer and in addition will also be treated by the GMP as a "hate" crime as explained here below:

Speaking at a press conference yesterday, Chief Superintendent Kevin Mulligan said detectives were not ruling out that the shooting might have been racially motivated.

He said: 'A racially-motivated crime is when there is actual evidence to show that it is the actual motivation for the crime.'

He said a hate crime, 'by definition, is something that a community or anyone perceives is racially motivated'

Just click on this link here for a short video on who determines it may just be a hate crime:

In contrast to the above heinous crime take a look at the tragic murder that took place earlier in December in London:

A teenager has been viciously stabbed to death as he tried to flee a gang of youths.

The victim, named locally as Danny O'Shea, was chased and had his throat slashed outside his mother's front door in Newham, east London last night.

Sadly this has already been dropped by the mainstream media and no £50,000 reward for the conviction of the killers has been offered.

Is someone's life worth more dependent upon the colour of their skin?

Of course!

WHY "DONATE"

Nationalist readers of the BNP blog must by now have noticed every day there is a request to "Donate".
Million young people unemployed "Donate" is the latest offering.
There are no important elections imminent and anyhow in the past local branches have paid their own expenses during election campaigns, we certainly did.

Not only that we have not had an audited summary of the BNP's accounts for several years let alone accounts for the Trafalgar Club.

SO WHY THESE NEVER ENDING REQUESTS FOR DONATIONS?

Andrew Bron's shadow "Ideas" and Brent group manage without continually asking for money.

If a conference is called expenses can be recouped by a door collection.
If a local campaign is needed the money can be raised locally as we have done often in the past.

Of course my question above is rhetorical. The debts of the party are astronomical and have not been incurred in the promotion of our cause, rather by mis management, idiotic legal cases and top officials living off the fat of their contributors.

HOW THE BNP HAS SUNK from the heady days when we thought we had made the breakthrough and were frightening the opposition.
Now they just ignore us.

Nick Griffin seems determined to hang on to his position in spite of his bringing the Party to its knees. He must be able to see the rapid decline just by looking at the membership figures, local activities or even the poor attendance at meetings and the annual conference.

We nationalists are intelligent enough to see through him and his deceit. I accept I for too long had rose covered glasses but over the last twelve months my eyes have been opened to the chicanery and lack of any semblance of democracy in the party.

As evidence of Nick Griffin's financial deviousness is the incident of the seizure of his car for non payment of debt. He said in a vain attempt to get away with it said the car was on loan from Ian Kitchen.
Common sense would indicate that an MEP with a large salary and expenses would not have had to "loan" a clapped out Skoda from a Party member (and a strange brand of car for a nationalist leader to use). He had the cash to buy any car he wanted (like his wife has done).

This deviousness reflects badly on the Party and those who can not see through it are either blind or stupid.

We desparately need a new nationalist vehicle, a united grouping of all the strands of our cause, putting aside irrelevent doctrinal differences in order to save our country.

I would suggest all patriots follow Andrew Brons's paralell party and the Brent group who are seeking to unite these strands.

Nick Griffin by his deceit and toxicity is beyond the Pale as are those associated with him. They are a hindrence to Nationalism.

However the spirit of burns brightly among millions of people, not just those normally associated with our cause and our job is to harness this as yet hidden support..
Without Griffin and his ilk we can do it.

BTW I have learnt on the grapevine that my membership will not be renewed.
It's as if I have been expelled.

YOU DON'T NEED TO BOTHER EXPELLING ME OR MY WIFE!

WE WEREN'T INTENDING RENEWING IN ANY CASE.

I WOULD SUGGEST OTHER MEMBERS ALSO DO NOT RENEW.
Save your money from the bottomless pit of Griffin subsidising and join Andrew Brons where you will not be used as a cash cow but will still be able to contribute to the saving of our country.

THERE ARE MOVES AFOOT TO CREATE A CLEAN AND ELECTABLE GROUPING hopefully uniting all patriots.

WATCH THIS SPACE.