GENEROUS WITH OTHER'S MONEY

So as was predicted earlier last week Mervyn King has engaged in a bit of money printing or as he calls it Qantitive Easing, but only £70 billion, that's £1000 for every person in the country.

This of course devalues all our money.
It has he admitted devastating effects on those nearing retirement who will lose heavily in their pensions (the private sector, not the public)

I beleve this is a gross betrayal of those who have worked hard all their lives and saved as they thought for a comfortable retirement to have to experience this theft of their money and standard of living.

The bankers of course will do well out of this and will I'm sure secure their bonuses and the City will prosper, but this action will do little to help our industry and national finances, sold of by these same people.

IF IT IS SO EASY, WHY NOT PRINT A TRILLION AND PAY ALL OUR DEBTS OFF?

Cameron was waffling on about Africa and his "victory" over the tin pot dictator of a sand hole.
He put hs determined face on (as if he is playing tennis) and claimed he would bring back powers from Europe.
I'll believe that when I see it, but in my opinion he would be better for all concerned, our people, workers and pensioners but possibly not the bankers if he brought back the billions we now give to Europe.

IT'S OUR MONEY AND YOU HAVE NO MANDATE TO GIVE IT AWAY.

WE WANT IT BACK.

ONCE MORE INTO THE BREACH NICK

The increasingly worried BNP leadership again publishes a long list of questions to the BBC regarding their forthcoming exposure on next week's Panorama programme.

Excuses and panic seem to be the main topic of the official website in recent days and I am sure the producers will have a field day pointing out this anxiety which if the allegations are unfounded should not exist.
In their "wisdom" they declined to answer questions and thus gave a free rein to whatever the BBC may say.

In addition they have sunk to new depths by bringing David Hannam into their arguments who was a decent man and unlike the leadership knew the meaning of loyalty.

The BBC have no love for our nation and indeed today had a programme celebrating the increase of people of mixed race and I detest them for it.
I did not watch it as it would have annoyed me too much, but the mismanagement of their reaction to the programme is worse if anything than that of their party management.

OUR PARTY SHOULD STAND ITS GROUND not hide behind allegations of corruption in others.

The paranoia of the Party reaches all levels, even our area.
The St Helens organiser was asked to pick up some books from my house and advised to bring security with her.
What did they think I was supposed to do, attack her?
Fortunately she knew I have never been prone to violence and she came alone. In any case I could easily have handled the security man delegated to protect her, but that a violent confrontration was thought possible shows their mindset.

I have also heard that our Wigan & Leigh group has a list of people to be invited to meetings.
The list was described to me as "non rebels and non thinkers" . Thus it seems that rebels and thinkers are not welcome, which does not say much for the present management.

This list obviously includes me and many local Party stalwarts who built the group up from its former small beginnings.
It seems there is only one way to think, that of the official line and any deviation can not be tolerated and renders people asking questions of Clive Jefferson and Mike Whitby as "rebels" and "non thinkers".

Once more democracy at work.

I am no Einstein but I am sure I can hold my own with those two as I have done before and I can assure these "top" officials that far more people think as I do than agree with them,and they would be surprised who.

Never mind the group is going from strength to strength and there are plans for amalgamation with Bolton, this in stark contrast to our previous plans of splitting our group into two separate parts,such was our success.

With progress as good as this it will be unlikely that there will be a party in the NW by Christmas and a once thriving region will be reduced to a shrivelled shell, run with the usual efficiency by Whitby and Jefferson.

THE GOOD NEWS.

Many people wish to join us. The enthusiasm is there and growing and we will soon have a vehicle for the pent up frustration of the people when our movement has been cleansed of this incompetent and undemocratic leadership.

I know this as I speak regularly to people who wish to be involved but refuse to do so under the present regime.

THE OFFICIALS DON'T.

WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK.

WE WANT OUR NATIONALIST MOVEMENT BACK! and we'll get it.

MORE TORY WAFFLE

This morning David Cameron was in a quandary.
His speech to the Tory conference was to contain the advice to people to pay their credit card bills and save more.
What a fool he was to consider this and he soon realise what a mistake he had made in many aspects.
He realised that he had made a mistake and hastily amended his speech (possibly some banker friends had been to see him).

First it is easy for him, a multimillionaire to advise squeezed families to cut their debts when the pain does not affect him and that statement would look bad on him from a political point of view.

BUT the main boob he made was that if people reduced their debts his banker friends would have less money to leech from. Also the "High Street" also owned by his rich friends would suffer.
Now I don't care if the high street shops do suffer as they create few jobs and build their business on importing Chinese tat which has the advantage of boosting the shops profits and the debts the banks hold on people.

I do believe that IF POSSIBLE people should endeavour to only buy what is absolutely necessary and pay their credit bills off. This would free them from the clutches of the bankers and other usurers, but the words are IF POSSIBLE.

I do think many people buy too much new stuff,(possibly because I am of an older generation), phones, cars, furniture etc when the items they have are adequate for their use. A look in skips and recycling facilities proves this.
The idea that all this consumption creates jobs is a myth.
Ninety percent of these purchases are foreign goods, and provide no employment in this country apart from the sales assistants.

If gradually over a period of years we could rid ourselves of this consumption obsession and the associated debt we would all be just as happy and a lot more prosperous.
The banks would be poorer as would people like Philip Green who has made his billions by buying cheap foreign tat and selling it at a good profit.

Most people have clothes they never wear much of it bought on credit and it is not necessary for a decent standard of living.

We have enough to pay out for council taxes and fuel, let alone food and these are the items which DO matter.

Now we come back to Mr Cameron.

It is no good him advising thrift when he is giving billions in foreign aid, spending in foreign wars and donating to the EU.


If we, the people did not have these weights around our necks we could have lower taxes and be able to pay our credit cards off.

BUT THEN THAT WOULD NOT SUIT YOUR BANKER FRIENDS.

Thrift like charity begins at home Mr Cameron. Don't tell us you are saving when in August your government spent twelve billion more than it took in taxes.

PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH MR CAMERON.

MORE PAINC AND CROCODILE TEARS

I was never one for literature but some sayings of our great poets are sometimes apt.

The constant preoccupation with the forthcoming BBC Panorama programme featuring the financial aspects of the BNP bring to mind the saying "methinks they doth protest too much"

On the BNP website there has over the last week been a constant theme of criticism of wrong practices of the BBC of which there are many, and now today asking why do they not concentrate on the fraud of the other parties.
There have been such programmes and no doubt there will in the future be more but the questions it seems in this programme are in relation to our party's affairs.

Yes we know corruption is rife in the BBC and the other parties but the questions are being now asked of our party. Whether these other bodies are corrupt is irrelevant, but two wrongs do not make a right.
This constant attack on a programme which has not yet been broadcast would give an impartial observer the impression that the Party does have something to hide and in itself does the Party no good.

Are they so afraid of scrutiny that their only defence is to attack other parties and organisations?

Why not be open if you have nothing to hide?

The belated "obituary" of David Hannam illustrates this mindset, implying that questions asked of him hastened his untimely demise.
If so it can only be because of his having been used by the hierarchy and been obliged to cover up failings.
At one point in this "obituary" he is praised for his work and advice in financial matters and a paragraph later said to be not up to the task.
He will be used as a convenient scapegoat. he deserves better than this.

He was a decent man who was USED and any deficiencies can not justifiably be laid at his door.
The buck in any organisation stops at the top, and David was not that man, just a pawn who, if his death has been caused by this programme ,paid the price of loyalty to a hierarchy who did not deserve such loyalty, nor it seems value him.

RIP David.

Your name will be remembered unsullied unlike some who used you.

Theresa May wants the Human Rights Act changed.

Theresa May to tackle 'human rights' defence in immigration cases

"Theresa May will today announce plans to tighten the immigration rules, making it easier to deport foreign nationals who have settled and started families in Britain.

The Home Secretary will argue that an over-zealous interpretation of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) is preventing the deportation of illegal immigrants and convicted criminals.

But the crowd-pleasing move, to be announced in her Tory conference speech this morning, will be attacked by human rights and immigrant groups for threatening to split up families and penalise children.

The controversy centres on Article 8 of the ECHR, which provides the right to respect for an individual's "private and family life", but weighs that against the requirement that he or she acts "in accordance with law".

Ms May will tell the Manchester conference that the courts have allowed the fact that a foreign national has started a family to trump the argument that he or she entered Britain unlawfully.

She will announce plans to change immigration rules to make it clear that foreign nationals can be deported even if they have started a family, where they are in the country illegally or have been convicted of a criminal offence.

The new rules will also say they can be removed if they cannot make ends meet, or find a home, without help from the state. A spokeswoman for the Home Secretary said: "It is legitimate to interfere with the exercise of that right where it is in the public interest to do so and in particular where it is necessary for public protection or the economic well-being of the UK, which includes maintaining our immigration controls." Critics of the interpretation of Article 8 point to the cases of a West Indian drug dealer who allegedly beat his girlfriend and a Sri Lankan robber who claimed the right to remain because he had a girlfriend here. Tory sources insisted the moves had been approved by their Liberal Democrat coalition partners, but Nick Clegg's party will be wary of any move that appears to undermine human rights. The Deputy Prime Minister has vowed to block any moves to scrap the Human Rights Act, which enshrines the ECHR into British law.

Kenneth Clarke, the Justice Secretary, will detail plans for his "rehabilitation revolution" in the country's jails. He will spell out plans for "drug free wings" in prisons and to bring in private companies to help inmates kick their habits, paying them by their results.

* Last night Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, accused many prison governors of deliberately tolerating drug use among inmates to keep them placid. It was, he told The Independent's fringe meeting, outrageous that there were fewer offenders with drug problems leaving prisons than entering. "For too much of the prison estate it's the modern equivalent of bromide in the tea," he said."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-to-tackle-human-rights-defence-in-immigration-cases-2365269.html

--------------------------------------

Could the Tories actually challenge the Human Rights Act and go against the Powers That Be in the European Parliament ?

Theresa May should act, not in accordance with the FASCISTS in Europe but should act in accordance to what is best for Britain and it's NATIVE people.

I hope that May and the Tories carry this our and send back ALL Foreign CRIMINALS to their home countries.

The Human Rights Act has worked against us. The reasons given are that the FOREIGN CRIMINALS have a Right to Family Life and that the Prisons in their home countries don't measure up to British Prisons.

I agree that they have a right to family life, but they don't have to stay here to have that right. After deportation and the removal of their passports their familys left here can allways join them in their MOTHER COUNTRIES and carry on with their RIGHT to a FAMILY LIFE. I mean if these people are so intent on their family life they are welcome to continue their right in their HOME COUNTRIES.

And if Foreign criminals are here to avoid imprisonment in their home countries then tough, if their prisons are so bad so what. Send them all back and lets destroy the Human Rights Act as it works against US as an INDIGENOUS PEOPLE in OUR OWN HOMELAND.

Let's wait and see if the Tories have the bottle to put US FIRST.

FRACKING SENSE?

I must congratulate Nick Griffin on his speech reported on the Party website regarding the undue influence of big business in our energy industry and future, aided and abetted by politicians.

Whether you believe in AGW or not it is certain that CO2 levels are rising but their relationship to temperature is at least unproven.
I myself don't care either way as the contributions of Britain are miniscule in comparison to countries such as China, India, the USA or even Germany.
All thease countries are building coal fired power stations and if we do not secure our own energy we will need more than the hair shirts advocated by the Limp Dems or Greens if we are to avoid starvation or famine.

Of course it suits, as Nick said other countries to impose impediments to our industry in the form of a carbon tax as this not only benefits them but those parasites who trade in certificates of no intrinsic value but are an easy way to make money.
Before the happy event of its demise Lehman Brothers was big in this corrupt scam, and that is one reason why the Tories are in favour on these unrealistic schemes.

Regarding "Fracking" or the release of gas from deep geological structures I am not necessarily against this. My only problem with it is if the strata contains recoverable coal deposits which we may need later,and could destroy, but otherwise I am all for it.

Talk of methane escapes is irrelevant.

This may surprise many but Wigan hundreds of years ago was sometrhing of a spa town before industrialisation as is shown by the many local area names containing the word "spring"
Indeed there was a nationally famous well near Wigan known as "The Burning Well" where methane escaped from the coal measures and caught light.

There is no record of any harm coming from this well (apart perhaps from some facial burns)
Methane's old name was "Marsh Gas" or "Will o the Wisp" and common in boggy regions, so I do not believe any methane escape into the water supply will do much harm.

If we find massive gas reserves with the above proviso that in extracting it we do not destroy other resources I am all for it.

BUT

I do not believe we should waste this asset as we wasted North Sea gas and oil.

I remember when I was a councillor (a proper one ) when Nick Griffin was fresh out of private school, North Sea oil was discovered and saying to a fellow councillor that having found and proved it we should cap the wells and use it when it had become scarce and dear.

Instead Thatcher sold oil cheaply to destroy the miners, and we became an oil and gas exporter even though the price we received was a fraction of what it would now be worth. She and the following Labour government joined the "dash to gas" thus destroying our coal industry and in effect selling our family silver.
Now we are at the mercy of foreign states and pay dearly for our fuel.

Short termism, political expediency and graft. The wealth and prosperity of the nation has come last with our politicians, influenced as they are by their friends in the City and abroad.

I therefore believe we should prove these gas deposits, put the infrastructure in for their exploitation and mothball them.

In future energy in the bank will be more valuable than money in the bank as the latter nowadays is not even paper, just lines on a computer screen.

We need to conserve our tangible assets.

THEY WILL BE WORTH FAR MORE IN THE FUTURE.

WRONG TACTICS

Yesterday, I like most I presume BNP members received a letter rebuffing the questions which were put to the Party leaders by the BBC for the forthcoming "Panorama" programme.

The BBC as is well known is no friend of Nationalism being infested by P C Metropolitan types and left wing aliens but I believe its questions should have been answered.
We must have a more effective way of promoting our cause.

According to the letter the majority of questions were not of a policy nature , but regarding finance. It seems the party's policies on immigration and ethnicity were not questioned. Whether they will be in the programme I do not know.

I know the BBC contains many perverts and cheats as do the other parties but we should at least have the courage of our convictions and be prepared to answer honestly questions put regarding our finances and policies.
Hiding away and sending out letters answering questions which may or may not have been put will convince no one and the BBC will as always have the last laugh, AT OUR EXPENSE.
To challenge reporters on the morality of their bosses in so large an organisation is I believe futile. It has nothing to do with them, any more than the "Granny Porn" episode has to do with Nick Griffin.

The fact that the party is so hot under the collar over a programme which has not yet been broadcast and which it seems is mainly concerned with finance would seem to the impartial observer that it has something to hide in this aspect.
The thrust of the programme apart from a few financial aspects is not known yet we have a campaign of answers to questions not even asked.

In fact some of the questions which we are told were put are those members have been asking for years without having had a satisfactory answer.

BNPtv is a worthy organisation with a loyal following including me but it can not compete with the reach of the BBC and to believe it can is delusional.

The best way to deal with a hostile media is to simultaneously video interviews and answer questions with straight answers.
YOU CAN'T GET BEHIND THE TRUTH.
The Party has recently been demonstrating at the lack of publicity we are getting, but when a reporter comes they refuse to be interviewed.

This programme will show the Party in the worst possible light and then--

THE BBC WILL CONTINUE TO IGNORE US.