DAVID HANNAM'S DEATH.

I have heard tonight the sad news that David Hannam, the one time treasurer of the BNP has died at the young age of thirty.

I do not as yet know the cause of his early demise but feel that the immense strain of his job can not have helped his general health. He carried the can on many occasions for the manifold financial discrepancies which have not even now been settled and it must have been a great strain on him.

A likeable man, even when we had differences we knew the pressure he was under, and I am deeply sorry at his death.

My sympathies go to his family on this sad occasion.

A TRUE NATIONALIST.

FOR ONCE BOB CROW IS RIGHT.

I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD SEE THE DAY.

Last night on Sky News Bob Crow the ultra Leftie expressed sentiments with which I totally agreed. He wanted a referendum on our continued membership of the EU saying that our laws should be made by ELECTED British people rather than unelected EU bureaucrats.

In the programme (a discussion of the next morning's headlines in the papers) he was joined by the so called Right Wing equally repulsive Nigel Farage who of course agreed with him on this matter.
I can not stand this so called Right Wing Farage, a self publicist promoted by the media way beyond his natural competence and only to act as a safety valve to garner votes for disaffected Tories and thus diminish the nationalist threat to the status quo.

Farage is really a Right Wing Tory. Apart from his alleged antipathy to the EU he is just a Tory and not a Nationalist.
He was a "worker" in the city of London and apart from his proclaimed Eurosceptic ideas is just as embroiled and complicit in the internationalist global banking scam which makes all ordinary citizens poorer.

Now at last the Left in the person of Crow are beginning to see that the influence of our Parliament has been usurped and with it its power.

I do not agree with many of Crow's destructive policies but he and his followers have the right to make their case in their own country. even though I disagree with them, I do agree that the ultimate rulers of our land should be us, for better or worse.
It's called democracy and we do not want that democracy userped by unelected bureaucrats in Brussells.

So there we have it. The Left and the so called Right are against it, and polls have shown that the majority of our people wish to decide who rules us.
Indeed a Parliamentary debate will perhaps be held on that subject. Not whether to leave that corrupt institution but that we, the people could have a choice on who rules us and whether we wish to subsume our ancient democracy to the whims of that expensive and unrepresentitive institution.

HOWEVER,

Today the Tory toff who was elected as Prime Minister by an allegedly democratic proceedure has shown his contempt for the process which elected him by saying that even if MPs voted for a referendum on whether to remain in the EU although prior to the election he promised us one he would now oppose and possibly veto.

The proposed referendum was not to say that we would definitely exit the EU. It would only be to ask the people what they wished, which I always thought was the hallmark of democracy.
He has reverted to type. The rulers of society know what is best for the country. They are our "betters" by dint of their birth and ancestry, not as a result of their own achievements which when analysed are few.

Few of them have had proper jobs and none in productive occupations which have made even a pound for our country.
But they have friends in the City which has profited greatly at our expense and who fund their unpatriotic party.
They have been bought by the money men, few of whom have our national interests at heart.

They have sold our country for thirty pieces of silver.

In other words, apart from being liars and breaking promises, they are traitors, interested in feathering their and their friend's nests at the country's expense.

As is inscribed on many war memorials, when the s**t really does hit the fan as a result of their treachery--

WE WILL REMEMBER THEM, but for different reasons.

FOR ONCE CROW IS RIGHT!

DEMOCRACY OR THE LACK OF IT.

With the Tory conference next week we will see the end of the conference season for the big parties which control our country.
So perhaps it is time for an appraisal of their policies, who they represent and what they mean to our country.
Labour, the supposed party of the Left has moved to the centre. It has apologised for the disastrous financial decisions and waste of our assets when it was in office.

I may have missed it but I saw no apology for the selling off of our gold on the cheap, nor the pensions raid.
Nor did I hear any criticism of the Human Rights legislation which discriminates against British people in favour of terrorists and gypsy trash, nor indeed the foreign wars which have cost us so much in lives and money.
The "elder statesmen")of the so called Left have become millionaires of the backs of the people,(Tony Blair and Mandelson to name just two).

They go through the ritual at their conferences of advocating growth without saying how that will happen when industry is shackled with taxes to support non jobs in government employ.

But at least they have admitted some fault with the economy in general and thus ask us, the electorate to trust them again. They must be joking!

The Lib Dems, now in freefall over their renaging of their promises on student fees have little to offer. They say the Human Rights legislation is non negotiable and they, unlike the majority of the electorate are very much in favour of the EU and the supposed dangers of "Global Warming". They wish to tax us on our fuel consumption and thus force what remaining industries we now have to relocate to the Far East.
That will not bother them too much as few of them work in manufacturing and many of the millionaires in that party would cash in on any deals.

Which brings us to the Tory Party, financed to a great part by the bankers/thieves of the City of London.
They like to play this down and endeavour to lose the epithet of "The Nasty Party".
They are not the nasty party, they are the traiterous party.
Time and again they mouth weasel words, make promises and renage on them.
The EU referendum, taking back our law making back from Europe are just two. Taking our country to war is another action which did not appear in their literature nor did the running down of our armed forces.

Instead of reducing our national expenditure by cutting down on Human Rights legislation and immigration as they promised and which is wanted by the people, these actions have been shelved. Immigration in the first year of Tory rule was the highest ever, and token foreigners continue to be given legislative power over us.

The scam which is the banking "industry" continues unabated, while the people's standards of living is reduced (but then the "person who pays the piper calls the tune").

So in a nutshell there is little difference in these three parties in the supposed spectrum between Left and Right.
None of these three parties represents the will of the people. We have no democracy, just a sham or pretence to keep the plebs down as the "experts" know better than the people even as their mistakes are there for all to see.

THAT IS WHERE NATIONALISM COMES IN.

A nationalist believes that a unified nation works better. Sometimes national interests have to take priority over personal interests,(as for instance in war)

Nationalists believe that our government should be in our hands and our hands only.
We believe that our industries should be nurtured and protected from international predators, unlike the other parties who are happy to allow their sponsors make a fast buck at the expense of the country and workers.
We believe our people should not be compelled to compete with the cheapest labour in the world, even though the City and large firms profit from that.
We believe in fairness throughout society and those who try hardest by GENUINE effort should be rewarded.
We believe our armed forces should be strengthened and used in defence only.
We believe the assets of our land belong to us, bequeathed, worked and died for by our forefathers.
We, as owners should have priority here and recognise other peoples have priority in their own countries.


WE BELIEVE IN JUSTICE FOR OUR PEOPLE.

I believe most people agree with us but the media and State power are against us as we are a threat to their established monopoly of power.

Thus instead of debating with us they villify us, call us names in childlike fashion.

They call us extreme Right Wing. A bit rich from wealthy asset strippers who put millions on the dole.
They call us Nazis or Fascists when far from wanting aggressivly to take other's land, all we wish is to retain our own and make laws in that land which reflects the will of the people.

And worst of all insults they try to throw is that of RACISM, as if that is a crime worse than treason or murder.

Well if racism means prefering the company of my own kind them I am happy to be so called. After all the various ethnic ghettoes which are increasingly infesting our land are a result of these aliens also prefering their own. I just wish they would associate with their own groups in the countries from whence they came.
Just as I prefer my own family, as is natural, the closer people are to me the more comfortable I feel.
Thus I prefer Wiganers, Lancastrians, English, Britains and European in that order.
It is just natural. I do not believe I am better or that those close to me are just that I have more in common.

People all over the world (racists just as much as I am)feel the same and are also forced to lose their roots by the Globalists, and the patriots of many countries are now stirring.

They will and are being attacked by media and governments all over the world but I believe we can unite with these movements and stop this march to servitude.

But to have a race, a culture you have to have your own little patch of land and Britain is ours.
If we can respect other races natural desire for self rule and unite we could do it.

How about a slogan RACISTS OF THE WORLD UNITE?

Now that would really frighten those now in control.
But first we must start at home and unite as patriots, not as extremists, hating others but with a programme for justice for all in our country.

We need a coherent programme of policies and the activists to promote it.
We need to put our ideological nationalist differences aside and join together with what unites us.

LOVE FOR OUR COUNTRY, PEOPLE AND WAY OF LIFE.

We are not doing that now but we must, AND SOON.
Very hard times are ahead and we need to be ready and united.

WITH GOOD WILL AND HONESTY, IT CAN BE DONE.

WILL HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF?

The depths to which our news media nas sunk was amply demonstrated today by the almost blanket coverage on the news channels of the trial of the drug addict and possible child abuser Michael Jackson and the possible involvement of his doctor in prescribing drugs to such a disturbed person.
He must be pleased that he is black or no doubt a racial component would have been introduced to the proceedings.

I am not interested in the findings of this death of a man who admittedly dance a bit but otherwise was of no greater and definitely a lot less consequence than many who have died.
All my brief and unwanted knowledge of this case has informed me of is, don't have a black doctor as they seem unable to control the drugs they are authorised to dispense if bribed by money.

All this is of course irrelevent.

The Euro is collapsing in spite of the millions injected into it by Germany and other European countries including ours.
Where has all this money come from?
It has been created out of thin air by computer keyboard and lent with interest payable by the respective taxpayers.

Even worse the repayment time is so long that future generations not yet born will be theoretically liable for this artificially created debt.
All this is being done in a Ponzi style system in an attempt to keep a corrupt and unwanted European Union going for the present.

It is said that "growth"will in future pay the bills (and the interest to the bankers).
What growth? You can not grow forever and apart from some infrastructure all needs have been provided for Europeans. We all have a roof over our heads, mobile phones, televisions and kitchens and an adequate diet. Yes fuel is a problem but growth will make this worse.

Do those at present in control believe future generations will put up with paying these unfair and un necessary debts thus reducing their standard of living?
If they believe this they are deluded.

These debts will be defaulted on or there will be revolution, and the people will take power.
Perhaps for the first time for many years we may have a semblance of democracy, and the theives of the EU and the bankers have their true deserts.

The EU is just one part of the globalist capitalist cabal which seeks to use us in their financial interests. They wish to control us financially and politically.
Evidence of this can be seen in titles given to certain jobs.
When I was younger there were "personnel" departments. Now it is "Human Resources", that is each person is a resource to be used by the financiers to further their globalist financial agenda.
They do not regard us as people. We are there to be used.

We have travelled little distance from the Middle Ages when the great aristocrats controlled all the wealth and even the freedoms of the people.
Our freedoms are being diminished. Our free speech has become criminal. Our wishes are ignored by those who through this iniquitous electoral system, financed by wealthy capitalists now control us.

In my three years of history lessons at grammar school I learnt a good and relevent saying.

HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF.

THAT SAYING STILL HOLDS TRUE.

REMEMBER THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.

If people are pushed too far HISTORY COULD INDEED REPEAT ITSELF, if those in power do not see sense.

LET THE EURO FAIL, THE PEOPLE DO NOT WANT IT!

GOD HELP EUROPE

It seems that the Euro project has been saved for the present.
The bankers will get their rewards and the taxpayers of Germany and other European countries will pay the price of their bonuses, even including Britain although we are not part of that scam.

The Euro project can never work however many Billions (trillions?) are thrown at it without causing poverty among millions of people through no fault of their own.
I am not talking now of how all this money is created out of thin air and interest charged on it by the banks.
I am talking about simple geographical facts.

When I was at school unlike now we were taught Geography as a scientific discipline, uncorrupted by PC influences.
We were taught the reasons why cetrtain regions specialised in certain industries and created their prosperity thereby.

Thus in my region it was "King coal and King cotton which created the wealth (the profits unfortunately leaving our area for the great maw of London), but it did provide employment and in doing so made Britain as a whole wealthy.
But this was just one of many regions specialising on and taking advantage of their strengths and the whole taken together made a successful country.

This is the weakness of the EU. It seeks to lump all countries together with a common tax and political system which prevents local areas all over Europe exploiting their relative advantages.

It is no surprise that the countries (the PIGS) are at the priphery of this union.
Why are they unable to compete with the Northern European countries in this union?
The answer is simple. Geography. These countries are distant from the centres of power and thus unable to compete. It is not a level playing field.

Imagine a firm wanting to start a factory. Will they open it in Greece, Southern Italy or in North West England in paces such as Blackpool or Workington?
Very unlikely as the transport costs would make them uncompetitive so the new factory will be built in North Germany, the Low Countries, North France or South East England, all near to the hub of the EU.
The common rules on tax and economics preclude these regions from taking measures to negate this disadvantage.
To survive the more peripheral regions must exploit any comparative advantage they may have and if these advantages are few create them.
The Isle of man for instance has a benign tax system which counters its severe transport disadvantage.
Greece has its sun as does Southern Italy, Spain and Portugal. We in the North of England have our fishing (and still plenty of coal and probably gas) if the European fisheries policy were rescinded.
We have a great port Liverpool the nearest to the Americas which if we had a decent transport system could be revitalised, and industries could be encouraged to produce easily exportable goods for the Americas markets with suitable tax breaks. We have the engineering expertise (as yet) and it could be done.
Even shipbuilding could be resurrected with the right will and conditions. Finland, the only prosperous periphjeral EU country has a thriving shipbuilding industry in a harsh climate.
If they can do it so can we.

Why don't we do it?

Because everything European is geared to the centre of the Union for political and financial reasons and this is why even if it does not suffer financial collapse the peripheral regions will always be poorer.

The "experts" will at some time have to consider whether they want a rich crowded centre surrounded by relative poverty and empty areas or will they come to their senses and see it is unworkable.

Many of the bankers and Eurocrats will of course taken their ill gotten gains elsewhere but we, the people of Europe will face strife, disorder and possibly violent revolution because of this injustice.
The Euro project was supposed in part as a method of ensuring peace and stability but as I think I have shown, the contradictions caused by a unified set of rules for very different regions are a recipe for trouble.

The next conflict will not be between nations fortunately but between the united impoverished peoples of the peripheral regions against those who have betrayed and stolen from them.

This institution, supposedly an antidote for war but beset by unresolvable stresses will be the cause of civil war when the money runs out.
I have not even started on the imposition of millions of unwanted aliens in our midst BUT--

It will demonstrate THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES and

GOD HELP EUROPE.

THE END OF THE EURO, HOPEFULLY.

The shambles which is known as the EU and the financial problems it faces and can not solve are a result of the fashinonable for now idea that diversity is a good thing.
The Euro is finished. It may linger on helped by ever draconian measures to try and ensure it survival.

New taxes are proposed to solve the financial crisis which are not the fault of Greece but the idiotic idea that different nations with different cultures and financial rules can be united under a common umbrella.
This can never be achieved by the consent of the various peoples and nations of Europe. It is only possible by undemocratic edicts issued by Brussels encouraged by the "ex"? Communist Barrosso who proposes a tax on financial transactions to pay some of the bills.

Now I have no problems with taxing the bankng parasites, many of whom are based in the City of London and who create no wealth but feed on the carcasses of businses they have destroyed by buying cheap, swearing the assets and selling them off to the detriment of our country.

Yes we should hit these thieves hard.
But Barosso's idea is that any taxes gained from this action should be given to Europe to pay their debts.
We should tax them and keep the money here.


It seems that thse unelected commissars will stop at nothing to save their EU project.
They will do anything, put people on the dole, destroy industries and even nations to promote their internationalist project.
It is straight out of the "Frankfurt School" of Marxist thought.

These people who champion diversity or so they say, object to European diversity. Their aim is to have a monolithic EUSSR controlled not by the democratic wishes of the people but the bureaucrats of Brussels.

Tonight on Newsnight we saw signs of the Greek society breaking down. They are stuck in the situation caused by their membership of the Euro.

Different countries have their own societies, their own cultures, strengths and weaknesses and can not survive as coherent societies if brought into a supposedly unified whole.

It is indeed ironic that those in power and who are imposing diversity on our country wish and are trying to impose uniformity on the many different proud nations which make up the European peoples.

That it will not work is shown by the trouble with the Euro project. It never will. It has been tried by empire builders of far greater calibre than the overpaid bureaucrats who are now just as undemocratically in charge.
Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler all tried to unite our European nations against the will of the people and failed and in doing so nearly brought the house down.
But they eventually failed by the will of the people.

They will fail again. It will be costly and we may have to pay a price for our hard won freedom as our forebears have before but it will have to be done whatever the cost.
Freedom trumps all and will eventually prevail and we can look forward to friendly relations with our European brothers working in our own way to secure the future of our continent FOR THE PEOPLE and not the bureaucrats and bankers who have cheated us for the last forty years.

Those who think they rule us will use every last weapon in their armory to preserve their idea of a Eurostate but the end for these traitors is nigh.

The European people will prevail.

Let's hope the German Parliament tomorrow rejects pouring more money down the drain to satisfy the bankers and bureaucrats of Brussels and save our continent and our future.

WASTING ACTIVIST'S TIME.

There are it seems new members in the BNP replacing the seasoned activists who have in several ways been sidelined or sacked from the Party.
I have heard of few of them so they are obviously new recruits, but their presence demonstrates a desire to help save our country and I wish them well.

I am told the recent NW organisers meeting was bland and nothing of note came out of it, hardly surprising given the inexperience of the new members.

I wonder how long before these at present fired up members will last. Not long I would suspect.
They will either give up exhausted at fighting what will become evident as a lost cause or disagree with the leadership and be suspended or worse.

This has been the weak link of the party for the last ten years. Rapid turnover.
People join, enthusiastic but give up after all too few years, only to be replaced by others.
They remain nationalists but give up on the Party, disillusioned by incompetence and infighting.

Why, when the country faces a financial abyss caused by incompetent government, a cultural catastrophe and mounting unemployment is the Party not doing better?

In spite of these new enthusiastic members we are losing ground even as the conditions for our growth are favourable.
No one trusts the major parties but our influence decreases.
We are in effect ignored. We do not matter.

The point is that a majority of British people are fearful for the future, want a party which supports their interests and not those of international bankers and foreigners but decline to support us.
The party's financial mismanagement and unlikable leadership are not the real cause of our decreasing influence.

Our trouble is that we portray the wrong image, push the wrong policies and miss the immediate issues which would differentiate us from the other parties.

A favourite medical regime to satisfy patients was to give patients something to do to take their mind off their complaints.
The BNP is doing the same in politics, in effect wasting activists time.

I believe the present policies of the Party of getting signatures at table tops to exit the EU and Bring Our Boys home are a waste of time.
The vast majority of the people believe in these issues, indeed there have been large anti war demonstrations in London and an internet petition against the EU.

What difference therefore do they think a few signatures taken at a table top will make?

It will achieve nothing politically but will exhaust the energies of the new activists on blind alley campaigns when with different issues they could make a huge difference.

It is not rocket science, but I am beginning to believe it is a deliberate ploy to divert the enthusiasm of the new activists from more productive activities.
Make of that what you will, but I do not think those who have been expelled are State assets. These latter remain in the Party in my opinion.

Think what we could achieve if we concentrated on jobs, housing, banks, taxes Britishness, etc, matters of great importance to everybody.
We would not have to mention immigration except as a contributing factor to our national woes, and thus free ourselves from the racist tag.

I doubt whether the BNP as now run will move along these lines.

Mike Whitby said the last time I heard him that if something was not working it was stupid to continue on the same way. That is where I do agree with him, so why is the Party continuing along the same failed path?

I have answered that question above.