THE END OF THE EURO, HOPEFULLY.

The shambles which is known as the EU and the financial problems it faces and can not solve are a result of the fashinonable for now idea that diversity is a good thing.
The Euro is finished. It may linger on helped by ever draconian measures to try and ensure it survival.

New taxes are proposed to solve the financial crisis which are not the fault of Greece but the idiotic idea that different nations with different cultures and financial rules can be united under a common umbrella.
This can never be achieved by the consent of the various peoples and nations of Europe. It is only possible by undemocratic edicts issued by Brussels encouraged by the "ex"? Communist Barrosso who proposes a tax on financial transactions to pay some of the bills.

Now I have no problems with taxing the bankng parasites, many of whom are based in the City of London and who create no wealth but feed on the carcasses of businses they have destroyed by buying cheap, swearing the assets and selling them off to the detriment of our country.

Yes we should hit these thieves hard.
But Barosso's idea is that any taxes gained from this action should be given to Europe to pay their debts.
We should tax them and keep the money here.


It seems that thse unelected commissars will stop at nothing to save their EU project.
They will do anything, put people on the dole, destroy industries and even nations to promote their internationalist project.
It is straight out of the "Frankfurt School" of Marxist thought.

These people who champion diversity or so they say, object to European diversity. Their aim is to have a monolithic EUSSR controlled not by the democratic wishes of the people but the bureaucrats of Brussels.

Tonight on Newsnight we saw signs of the Greek society breaking down. They are stuck in the situation caused by their membership of the Euro.

Different countries have their own societies, their own cultures, strengths and weaknesses and can not survive as coherent societies if brought into a supposedly unified whole.

It is indeed ironic that those in power and who are imposing diversity on our country wish and are trying to impose uniformity on the many different proud nations which make up the European peoples.

That it will not work is shown by the trouble with the Euro project. It never will. It has been tried by empire builders of far greater calibre than the overpaid bureaucrats who are now just as undemocratically in charge.
Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon, Stalin and Hitler all tried to unite our European nations against the will of the people and failed and in doing so nearly brought the house down.
But they eventually failed by the will of the people.

They will fail again. It will be costly and we may have to pay a price for our hard won freedom as our forebears have before but it will have to be done whatever the cost.
Freedom trumps all and will eventually prevail and we can look forward to friendly relations with our European brothers working in our own way to secure the future of our continent FOR THE PEOPLE and not the bureaucrats and bankers who have cheated us for the last forty years.

Those who think they rule us will use every last weapon in their armory to preserve their idea of a Eurostate but the end for these traitors is nigh.

The European people will prevail.

Let's hope the German Parliament tomorrow rejects pouring more money down the drain to satisfy the bankers and bureaucrats of Brussels and save our continent and our future.

WASTING ACTIVIST'S TIME.

There are it seems new members in the BNP replacing the seasoned activists who have in several ways been sidelined or sacked from the Party.
I have heard of few of them so they are obviously new recruits, but their presence demonstrates a desire to help save our country and I wish them well.

I am told the recent NW organisers meeting was bland and nothing of note came out of it, hardly surprising given the inexperience of the new members.

I wonder how long before these at present fired up members will last. Not long I would suspect.
They will either give up exhausted at fighting what will become evident as a lost cause or disagree with the leadership and be suspended or worse.

This has been the weak link of the party for the last ten years. Rapid turnover.
People join, enthusiastic but give up after all too few years, only to be replaced by others.
They remain nationalists but give up on the Party, disillusioned by incompetence and infighting.

Why, when the country faces a financial abyss caused by incompetent government, a cultural catastrophe and mounting unemployment is the Party not doing better?

In spite of these new enthusiastic members we are losing ground even as the conditions for our growth are favourable.
No one trusts the major parties but our influence decreases.
We are in effect ignored. We do not matter.

The point is that a majority of British people are fearful for the future, want a party which supports their interests and not those of international bankers and foreigners but decline to support us.
The party's financial mismanagement and unlikable leadership are not the real cause of our decreasing influence.

Our trouble is that we portray the wrong image, push the wrong policies and miss the immediate issues which would differentiate us from the other parties.

A favourite medical regime to satisfy patients was to give patients something to do to take their mind off their complaints.
The BNP is doing the same in politics, in effect wasting activists time.

I believe the present policies of the Party of getting signatures at table tops to exit the EU and Bring Our Boys home are a waste of time.
The vast majority of the people believe in these issues, indeed there have been large anti war demonstrations in London and an internet petition against the EU.

What difference therefore do they think a few signatures taken at a table top will make?

It will achieve nothing politically but will exhaust the energies of the new activists on blind alley campaigns when with different issues they could make a huge difference.

It is not rocket science, but I am beginning to believe it is a deliberate ploy to divert the enthusiasm of the new activists from more productive activities.
Make of that what you will, but I do not think those who have been expelled are State assets. These latter remain in the Party in my opinion.

Think what we could achieve if we concentrated on jobs, housing, banks, taxes Britishness, etc, matters of great importance to everybody.
We would not have to mention immigration except as a contributing factor to our national woes, and thus free ourselves from the racist tag.

I doubt whether the BNP as now run will move along these lines.

Mike Whitby said the last time I heard him that if something was not working it was stupid to continue on the same way. That is where I do agree with him, so why is the Party continuing along the same failed path?

I have answered that question above.

GET READY - IT'S ALL GOING "PETE TONG"

THE SEXUALISATION OF BRITISH CHILDREN IN BRITISH SCHOOLS

"

Education bodies in parts of the country are using the Healthy Schools initiative introduced by Tony Blair’s government to impose “liberal and permissive” teaching on pupils, campaigners warn.

Labour introduced the National Healthy Schools Programme in 1999, with aims including support for healthy behaviour and reduction of health inequalities.

But a survey of all 152 local authorities in England found inconsistency in the way in which its guidelines were being applied in the classroom, according to the Family Education Trust.

A report by the trust suggests that some authorities are insisting schools teach sex education in order to qualify for the Healthy Schools award.

The trust said such lessons are not required by law or the Healthy Schools criteria.

Norman Wells, a Family Education Trust director, said: “It is very concerning to find some local authorities insisting that primary schools teach sex and relationships education as a condition of receiving the Healthy Schools award, when primary school governing bodies are free to decide whether or not to teach sex education after consultation with parents.

"Primary schools that make a principled decision not to teach sex education should not be stigmatised and denied a sought-after award for that reason.

“There is nothing inherently 'unhealthy’ about a primary school that decides not to teach sex education.”

The report also found that a significant minority of local authorities were using the initiative to restrict schools’ use of outside agencies to teach the benefits of saving sex for marriage.

It found secondary schools were being told that such messages could only be taught in “Healthy Schools” if they were balanced by other viewpoints.

However, there was no such reservation or qualification regarding instruction on the use of condoms.

Mr Wells said: “It is ironic that in some local authority areas, the Healthy Schools programme is undermining the healthiest messages of all and depriving young people of learning about the physical, emotional and social benefits of keeping sex within a lifelong, mutually faithful marriage.”

The report calls on local authorities to be less prescriptive and to recognise that schools are responsible for determining their policy on sex and relationships education on a local basis, in consultation with parents.

Mr Wells said local authorities should respect the position of schools which, after consultation with parents, decide that they would like to use external agencies that emphasise the benefits of saving sex for marriage."

Does this not make you ANGRY ?

Britons accused of trying to join Somali militants

The truth of this is not that BRITONS are trying to join Somali militants but BANGLADESHIS who, like anyone from the third world who come to our country are instantly given a BRITISH PASSPORT.

Why BANGLADESHIS who have BANGLADESHI passports need or are given a BRITISH passport is beyond me.
Now that these men have been caught it won't be long before they are sent back home. No, not to Bangladesh but back to OUR HOME and OUR LAND which it seems we have no say in who can come here, who can stay and who can't.

We can't even deport foreigners who have taken part in mass murder and genocide, paedophilia, rape and a 1000 other crimes which would see a NATIVE BRITON in a foreign country imprisoned and then deported back home.

"In recent months, MI5 and MI6 have become aware of an increasing number of young British men arriving in the African country in order to cross into Somalia, sources told The Daily Telegraph.

In Somalia, they have been joining up with al-Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda in East Africa and there are concerns that they could return to Britain to launch attacks.

The latest arrests involved three men who were detained for questioning in the port of Mombasa last week.

Ambrose Munyasia, head of Kenya’s Coast Province police force, said: “They were seen acting suspiciously. We trailed them for a day after suspecting their movement within the town. Although they told us that they are tourists, some of their actions have given us cause to believe that they are not.”

Three suspected British al-Shabaab members were arrested in north east Kenya in May.

The men were of Bangladeshi origin but holding British passports, according to reports.

They were arrested when the Land Rover they were travelling in was stopped at a police checkpoint on a road linking Kenya and Somalia.

Philip Ndolo, the North Eastern regional deputy police chief, said the suspects claimed to be heading for the tourist island of Lamu, thousands of miles from where they were picked up.

He said investigations showed that the three used complex routes to avoid police checkpoints to get to the village where they were eventually arrested.

In November 2002 terrorists tried to shoot down an Israeli-chartered Boeing 757, firing two missiles which narrowly missed the plane as it took off from Mombasa airport and killing 15 people in a bomb explosion at the nearby Paradise Hotel."

A team of specialist forensic officers were examining laptops belonging to the suspects, sources said.

Kenyan counter-terrorism police were said to have become suspicious about the men and tracked their movements before arresting them on Thursday.

NON NURSING NURSES

The head of the Royal College of Nursing has suggested that visiting times in Hospitals should be relaxed so that relatives can help with simple nursing tasks such as feeding patients and toiletting.
This demonstrates the degree to which the NHS has sunk and typifies what is wrong with the nursing "profession".

Over the last 20 years or so nursing has become a proffession demanding it seems, a degree no doubt placing great stress on important subjects such as gender, ethnic and cultural requirements.
In addition computer proficiency and the correct form filling will be taught.
This of course will leave little time for nursing, the TLC of making sure patients are fed and comfortable and not left in soiled beds.

That all is well on the wards can be seen every day on visits to relatives.
The university trained nurses of course will be there, sitting round a computer screen in between chatting among themselves. Being highly educated one can not expect them do do anything so demeaning as actual nursing. In any case there is not time for menial tasks such as this as forms have to be filled in and equality and diversity targets met.

The nursing functions are left to untrained staff, often from the third world who if patients are lucky can actually speak English. Some care, many don't and patients are often neglected.

Ward cleanliness, previously of paramount importance has often been contracted out and is performed in a desultary inefficient manner often by foreigners brought in on the cheap from third world country slums to whom sterility and cleanliness is an alien concept.

The matrons of old would have a fit, but never mind, all is well. All the forms are filled in correctly even if patients are starving, lying in their own filth and infected by the many pathogens which abound in hospitals nowadays.

The increased number of hospital contracted infections is blamed on the misuse of antibiotics causing resistance, and there may be a little truth in that. But before there were antibiotics infections were not so prevelant. There were no antibiotics for the bacteria to be resistant to.

But there was cleaning. There were dedicated nurses. There were ward sisters and matrons of whom all working on the wards were in fear.
Harridans they may have seemed to the junior staff, but the buck did stop with them and thus they ruled with a rod of iron, to the benefit of all, not least and most importantly the patients.

This new idea of encouraging relatives (if patients had them) to visit more regularly shows the contempt for the profession of nursing by those in charge.
They show a lack of knowledge of infection control by encouraging even more visiting as visitors often introduce infection into an environment where sick people have enough on their plate (not food it seems)recovering from their various illnesses.

Visitors are a great comfort to patients but I believe visiting should be restricted in any case in order to lessen the chance of infection on the wards.

It seems nursing has gone the way of the bin men I spoke about a couple of days ago.
The bosses talk about it and fill all the forms in and are judged to have done a good job.

BUT the actual work (in nursing and TLC) comes a very distant second.

And that is what is wrong with our country.

Too much talk and not enough action.

P.S I do not include the reception and out patient staff at Wigan Infirmary in this little rant. They could not be more helpful, but then they are all native Wiganers to whom civility and courtesy comes naturally.

PANORAMA, A SHAMBOLIC INTERVIEW.

Has the BNP completely lost its marbles?

In a trailer for a film to expose the BBC to be played tonight the Party it seems made a complete fool of itself.
I accept that the BBC is infested by trendy PC Lefties and is no friend of ours but having admitted the reporters to the venue it was pure stupidity to make such a fool of themselves in front of not only their cameras but THOSE OF THE BBC who were also filming.
I agree filming any interview is good practice to enable rebuttal of sneaky editorial tactics and blatant lying which that organisation is often guilty of.
But do they not realise that their aggressive tactics will only portray the party in an even worse light and was recorded BY THE BBC?

The job of reporters in any case is to create interest in their programme by getting up the noses of the interviewees and is used against all parties.
If a party consents to be interviewed, surely the best course is to answer in a civilised manner in the hope of a positive portrayal. Civility can not be portrayed as bad manners even in a biased programme.

Why does our party have to be so defensive? Other parties are pleased to have their point of view aired even at the risk of bias.
Are our leaders and spokesmen not able to hold their own with reporters? Have they so little faith in their principles and facts?
To question reporters on the many perverts paedophiles and cheats in the BBC (which there are) is irrelevant.
A reporter's job is to ask, not answer questions and is not responsible for the conduct of others in his organisation, nor does he necessarily agree with that organisation's stance.

Nick Griffin complains that he has not been asked again on to "Question Time" where he knows they would try to ambush him as they did last time (next time I hope he is better prepared).
"Question Time" can be and is edited before it is broadcast whereas an interview on our premises can be videoed.
If he wants to be on that programme when he knows they will try to fit him up, why can he not answer in an interview controlled by the Party.
It looks as if he has something to hide. Has he?

We make fools of ourselves by behaving as Simon Darby does on this film and come over as wanting to deflect questions by asking irrelevent questions of the interviewer. We seem on the run as do those exposed on "Watchdog" and thus make a poor impression.

Yes the BBC are against us, but I believe by acting in such an aggressive way we will be portrayed in an even worse light than we would have been.
We are the ambassadors for Nationalism and if the behaviour on this "taster"is typical I shudder to think what the BBC have and what is on the rest of the film.

If that's the best we can do GOD HELP US!

NO WONDER WE ARE GOING DOWN!