PANORAMA, A SHAMBOLIC INTERVIEW.

Has the BNP completely lost its marbles?

In a trailer for a film to expose the BBC to be played tonight the Party it seems made a complete fool of itself.
I accept that the BBC is infested by trendy PC Lefties and is no friend of ours but having admitted the reporters to the venue it was pure stupidity to make such a fool of themselves in front of not only their cameras but THOSE OF THE BBC who were also filming.
I agree filming any interview is good practice to enable rebuttal of sneaky editorial tactics and blatant lying which that organisation is often guilty of.
But do they not realise that their aggressive tactics will only portray the party in an even worse light and was recorded BY THE BBC?

The job of reporters in any case is to create interest in their programme by getting up the noses of the interviewees and is used against all parties.
If a party consents to be interviewed, surely the best course is to answer in a civilised manner in the hope of a positive portrayal. Civility can not be portrayed as bad manners even in a biased programme.

Why does our party have to be so defensive? Other parties are pleased to have their point of view aired even at the risk of bias.
Are our leaders and spokesmen not able to hold their own with reporters? Have they so little faith in their principles and facts?
To question reporters on the many perverts paedophiles and cheats in the BBC (which there are) is irrelevant.
A reporter's job is to ask, not answer questions and is not responsible for the conduct of others in his organisation, nor does he necessarily agree with that organisation's stance.

Nick Griffin complains that he has not been asked again on to "Question Time" where he knows they would try to ambush him as they did last time (next time I hope he is better prepared).
"Question Time" can be and is edited before it is broadcast whereas an interview on our premises can be videoed.
If he wants to be on that programme when he knows they will try to fit him up, why can he not answer in an interview controlled by the Party.
It looks as if he has something to hide. Has he?

We make fools of ourselves by behaving as Simon Darby does on this film and come over as wanting to deflect questions by asking irrelevent questions of the interviewer. We seem on the run as do those exposed on "Watchdog" and thus make a poor impression.

Yes the BBC are against us, but I believe by acting in such an aggressive way we will be portrayed in an even worse light than we would have been.
We are the ambassadors for Nationalism and if the behaviour on this "taster"is typical I shudder to think what the BBC have and what is on the rest of the film.

If that's the best we can do GOD HELP US!

NO WONDER WE ARE GOING DOWN!

A TALE OF FOUR BINS

A few days ago I wrote about waste by local and national government and the need to axe useless, nonproductive jobs which the general public would not miss.
This would help mitigate the disasterous national financial situation, I argued while those displaced from their unproductive positions could be redeployed in work which provided a return.

A day later I had an instance of such inefficiency.

My wife had asked for a "green bin" for garden rubbish, (why I do not know as we live on a farm, but that's not the point), and efficiently the next day one was delivered.
That was in April this year but the trouble is that it has never been emptied.

My wife rang the council and an official said he would get "The Green Bin Officer" to ring back.
We had a phone call the next day, not from the officer who was on holiday (it makes a change from being at a meeting or off sick) who said that they had no record of the green bin.
Not only that but that the computer did not indicate that the council had ever emptied our bin as the farm road was too narrow for the vehicle to access.

Now this is strange because a full sized bin wagon has emptied my bins since 1967 so it was strange to learn that the officer had no record of the bin wagon having visited my premises, in spite of their computer technology (no doubt requiring a "computer officer")
I believe he is to visit us to check whether the vehicle which has come down the drive for 40 years can actually do so. A nice hour out of the office for him.

Also for the last 10 months we have had a blue paper bin and a brown bottle bin provided by the council and which are emptied regularly as is the usual black wheely bin for general rubbish. Presumably these bins have their own controllers,(a blue, brown and black bin officer)but they don't know that we exist, in spite of emptying them.

I am a strong believer in recycling and I have no complaints at all with the service I get from the bin men, the people who actually do the work.
But times are hard and finances tight and cuts could have to be made.
I would expect these to fall on those at the bin face with fewer collections made.

Meanwhile I am sure all will be in order in the office and the various "officers" and "controllers" will continue to tap their keyboards and tick the requisite boxes at pay rates no doubt greater than those who actually do the donkey work.

All's well then

NO IT ISN'T!
This unimportant little episode indicates what is wrong with local and national government.
Many involved in controlling, discussing and record keeping --BUT FEW DOING THE WORK.

It can be put right, but will it?

I doubt it as those box tickers are the ones allocating the jobs and redundancies and you can be sure it will not be their jobs which will be lost.
IT WILL BE THE JOBS AT THE WORK FACE and the services which we want and pay for will deteriorate still further.

A TOFF TALKS TOUGH

Is David Cameron completely round the twist.

Fresh from his not yet achieved victory against Gadaffi he is spouting about tackling other regimes he does not like.

Who does he think he is?
Does he not realise that we are broke with the FTSE dropping 5% just today and the world predicted to be close to economic catastrophe?
Has he forgotten that he has downsized our forces and left us without aircraft carriers and planes to fly from them?
Does he not even yet see the costs of his and Blair's interference in other countries business has cost us not only the lives of many soldiers and the maiming of many more?
Does he not see the costs of combatting the terrorism which these escapades have encouraged?

Does he not realise that the British electorate wish him to extricate us from the costly mistake which is the EU, and that we do not want war which does not concern us.

He talks about sanctions, military and economic against dictatorships in the interests of democratic rights.
He even mentions Syria, China and Russia. Jesus wept!
He must be out of his mind but while he is mad and elated at his victory over a thinly populated Libya and the wind in his sails, what about North Korea, Pakistan and Israel?
Will he tacke them? I doubt it.

The UN is a toothless tiger and would never unite in common cause in any conflict or measures against any of the above countries, so it would just be the USA and its poodle Britain.
We had difficulty in getting the go ahead even in little Libya and even the other countries of the EU were not persuaded.

He is basically a soft public schoolboy (tennis player says it all) trying to look tough. Unfortunately this attempt is at the expense of the lives and livelyhoods of other people.

So Mr Cameron, its time you realised that our country, thanks to you and your predecessor is as weak as the average toff and in no position to talk tough.

You should mind your own business and look after our country.

Let's have some justice and democracy here!

That is supposed to be your job.

IS IT BECAUSE I IS BLACK?

Two men were executed yesterday for murder in the USA.
One case well known and publicised in the media was Troy Davis was executed in Georgia.
There was a vociferous campaign against this execution but in spite of many appeals he was still found guilty.

Another man, not so well publicised was also executed on the same day.
No media tears for him.
His name Lawrence Brewer a white man and alleged member of the KKK who had killed a black man.

Now I, unlike many in the BNP am against the death penalty and thus oppose both of thease judicial killings, BUT why the difference in the publicity.
Many of those vociferously opposing Davis's execution do it on the grounds that they are against the death penalty and I can as I said sympathise with that.

But what about Lawrence Brewer?. Is his death less of a "crime" just because he is white and an alleged member of the KKK? Is the life of a black murderer of more import than that of a white murderer?

Was the campaign to save Davis "because he was black"?

Was the silence over Brewer because he was white?

It seems so.

DISGUSTED OF WIGAN

Three months too late and thanks to John Walker I heard the recording of the EGM held in St Helens (not Wigan) and I am indeed shocked at the antics of the Chairman and his sycophantic acolytes.
I was unfortunately on holiday at the time and thus unable to attend, although I was kept in touch by local activists.

Although I had heard some details I had not realised the depths to which the chairman had sunk to get his way and protect his job and the finances of his family.
The meeting was a travesty of the democratic process with the chairman exerting his absolute power and bringing his proxy votes in on a vote on a resolution which had been formulated the night before, which overrode the will of the attendees at the meeting.

The people giving those proxy votes did not know on what they were voting, having given those votes before the resolution was formulated.
Sensible points from the floor from Arthur Kemp, Andrew Brons and Richard Edmonds were swept aside by this undemocratic and unfair system of voting, and from the tape it seems that even those present were only given the options of voting for the least bad motion rather than the one they wanted.

The motions carried (with the aid of proxy votes) contradicted the will of the party as expressed by previous conferences and meetings. The will of the Party activists was cast aside by those who had no idea of the issues, but were voting members who foolishly gave their mandate to the chairman, having no knowledge of Party matters apart from the untrue and biased propaganda fed to them by the party machine.

The whole meeting was a charade, a pretence of democracy worthy only of a Stalinist state.
Our party is supposed to stand for democracy in Britain, but it seems that principle is not allowed in the running of the party itself.

The way the motions were manipulated was a disgrace and a banana republic would have been more honest.

No wonder membership and donations are haemorrhaging (in spite of what they would have us believe).
Formerly I believed Nick Griffin was God but now I see him as a cheat who has abused my faith in him and the faith of his followers.
He has also done the cause of Nationalism great harm and thus harmed our country and people.
For what?

I can only assume it is for his own financial gain, that is the least damaging interpretation I can put on it. One could imagine other motives of which I will not speak(yet).
The Party owes me £5000 which I loaned them before the Euro elections and which I have requested is returned without receiving a reply.

Will I continue to support nationalism? YES all the time.

Will I continue to support a party ( the BNP)run by a liar and a cheat who has used every devious method in the book to consolidate his position at the cost of bringing the party down?

YOU MUST BE JOKING!

But all is not lost, as with the demise of the present set up moves are afoot to resurrect a clean honest and ELECTABLE Nationalist party which with common sense will gain strength, following and influence and work to save our country, freed from the self aggrandisement and avarice which now invests what I once was proud to call my party.

Have no fear NATIONALISM WILL PREVAIL.

EXPERTS WRONG AGAIN.

The news today that Government debt in August rose to record levels does not surprise me, even though the recent financial disasters seem to have surprised the "experts".
One reason given for this is that the government tax take has been less than expected. Taxes may have to rise it is said or QE (printing money).
All this rubbish shows how incompetent those in power are.

One thing I agree with Vince Cable about is that we are entering the financial equivalent of a war.
So how do we get this ever increasing debt burden reduced? It is so obvious.

Spend less.

Now that does not mean cutting essential services nor pushing people into poverty It just means spending on things and goods which give us a return.

Thus the money wasted on "Human Rights" could be stopped. Gypsies could be ejected from their illegal sites without vast expenditure. Illegal immigrants, especially those who have committed criminal acts could be instantly deported and the doors closed to ALL further immigration.
Legal aid and translation services for foreigners could be STOPPED as could all benefits and medical treatment.
Foreign wars should cease.
The EU should be exited.
Spending on non essential council and government services should be stopped.
Equalities legislation should be abolished.
The Global Warming scam should be ignored, reducing fuel prices and the burden it places on our industries.
Foreign aid should be STOPPED.

A recent survey showed that the per capita GDP in Britain was lower than other Western countries. That does not mean that the average worker does not work as hard or is more unproductive than his foreign counterparts. It just means that there are too many useless jobs which we could do without but which are paid for out of the productive workers on whom our national wellbeing depends.

I was recently in Germany, a country with a high standard of living and contrary to what we are told they do not work harder. They just have to carry fewer government paid parasites and thus more of their national effort goes into productive work.
They also have little vandalism and a patriotic outlook and buy German products when possible, creating a virtuous circle of industry and prosperity.

There are far too many non essential positions whose absence we would not miss. We could have the same standard of living with less work if that work had a tangible benefit.

I believe the government should thus take the measures outlined above and kick start the economy by large infrastructure projects, transport, construction, sea defences etc which would with a multiplier effect create millions of jobs (and a larger tax take).
Our coal industry could be resurrected and our power generation brought back under British NATIONAL ownership.

We would also get something back for our money in an improved environment, unlike the many PC jobs which are a cost with no return.

Will they implement some or any of these proposals? Not yet, but they will have to do something when the Euro goes down and the s**t really does hit the fan.

I am thus pessimistic in the short term but in the long term I am guardedly optimistic as even the ignorant unscientific morons now in control will be forced to do the right thing by our country and people, but I hope it will not be too late.

And then--

WE MAY BE ABLE TO RETIRE AT 65.

UNEQUAL EQUALITY

The shambles at the attempted eviction of the "travellers" from the illegal Dale Farm site says much about what's wrong with our society.

Like many of those groups who seem to have preference in our society they want it both ways.
They want and are given ethnic minority status, in itself a scam perpetrated by the equality industry which far from promoting equality gives these groups preference.
Hardly equality.
They are not even an identifiable ethnic group. They are a bunch of Irish people, who in their wish to benefit from a tax free life roam OUR countryside doing jobs cash in hand.
They are also non travelling travellers, who it seems do not want to travel but to settle down in permanent houses, a contradiction I think. In any case for people whose way of life is travelling it is strange and ironic that they own valuable properties in Ireland.

Whe I went to Ireland 35 years ago there were many travellers there who occupied various bits of unused land. Each different group had a speciality. Some of these untidy encampments specialised in wheels, others in machinery and others in scrap iron etc, a difficult thing to do if you are travelling.

Nowadays there is little evidence of travellers infesting Ireland. The Irish government became fed up with them and legislated against them and that country became a lot tidier as a result, but the trash which inhabited them came to Britain.

Now we have a plague in our land, unwanted by 99% of the people, fed up of the filth left behind when they do travel and are moved on and the thieving which occurs when they are in the vicinity.
Local people are threatened with violence when they protest.

The main reason that this has become a problem apart from idiotic PC laws giving them preference is the indolence of local authorities.
The travellers know the law, even though they do not abide by it. They set up camp on playing fields on a Friday night knowing that no one from the local authority will be on duty to eject them until Monday and that they will be given notice at great cost in legal fees (to the council)

Afterwards when they have moved on the local authority is faced with the filth they have left behind and must pay extra bonuses to workers to clean it up.

The farce at Dale Farm and the alleged 10 million it has so far cost is down to incompetence and lawyers fat fees.
The council should have gone in hard quickly and stopped this unauthorised camp and bulldozed the buildings. Electricity and water should have been cut off (do they pay for this?).

Even this week the council gave notice of the time the bailiffs were to go in, giving the pikeys time to prepare and to invite the scum of the earth to assist them.
If they had gone in sooner as soon as the order had been given it would have all been over now.

I have been involved twice with the stopping of illegal travellers and know of others.
The way to get them off, within hours is to go in hard and let them know that they will not see the night out on that field. When they see you mean business they move off quickly, but then the local authorities are too indolent and PC and thus we the taxpayers are left with astronomic bills.

I believe this rabble should have their vehicles confiscated to pay for the costs of their removal and this would be a deterrant to other such scum from trying these tactics elsewhere.
AND if thay really need somewhere to park their caravans I am sure that wealthy communists such as Vanessa Redgrave have land to where they could be relocated.

NOW TO THE ANARCHISTS.

Anarchists by definition believe in the law. They are however keen to use it at the slightist opportunity to protest at (police brutality) again having it both ways.
If you want the protection of the law you should abide by it.
If you, being an anarchist and thus not believing in the law ,you in my opinion put yourself outside the law and anything you get you have brought on yourselves.

So they should all be arrested and locked up for aiding an illegal act and their dole stopped as they have no intention of working.

The above is just an isolated if large incident of similar ones all over the country.
Think how much money could be saved if the authorities acted.

Some local communities have acted directly and stopped this scourge.
They have shown how it can be done.

Now it's up to the councils.

P.S Remember Codnor? We were only allowed six caravans on a field over a mile from the village for our RWB weekend fest. Any more and the police would have moved in immediately.
We were not even allowed to have an unamplified guitar solo 600 yards from the next building and the country lane.The police and council officials came in at 10 pm and stopped it.

SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS and it's not us.