So the result of the leadership election and Nick Griffin has won by 9 votes.
So near and yet so far.
I must say I had not expected Andrew Brons to have managed to get so close to overturning the present dictatorship and neither I think did Nick Griffin.
However we must respect the democratic will of members however much it pains us.
The tragedy is that many, possibly hundreds of our best nationalists have given up on the party and their absence from our electorate has gifted Griffin this win.
THE QUALITY HAS LEFT THE PARTY, and it will not survive without them.
It means that the majority of nationalists in and out of the party would prefer a new leader and the fact that Griffin has won (this time fairly) means that our patriotic party remains split and impotent.
We still need find a way to unite and put away past differences if we are to get anywhere and the result means that outcome unlikely.
So what do we do? I don't really know.
I do know both sides are stubbornly intransigent and will not accept the other.
Will Nick Griffin accept that the majority of nationalists are against him? I doubt it.
Will those good people expelled rejoin if allowed under Griffin? No.
What is needed is for people's heads to be banged together to make them realise the cause is more important than any clique or person.
Possibly, just possibly sense will prevail, but I do not hold out much hope.
I can only wait for others ideas on what to do and pray for an answer.
Monday, 25 July 2011
Sunday, 24 July 2011
THE DIE IS CAST.
So the day of destiny is tomorrow when the votes in the leadership election will be counted.
In recent weeks we have seen that the majority of the most respected members of the BNP have seen the need for change.
The only ones favouring Griffin are the armchair members who have little knowledge of the leader's machinations,a few activists who although hard working cannot see they are being taken for a ride and the cohort of recently joined members whose position depends on Griffin's survival.
Nick Griffin will probably win. He has seen to that, but that will be the end of the party as a credible force in British politics.
BUT WILL HE WIN THE HEARTS OF THE BRITISH ELECTORATE?
I doubt it.
He has been slow to condemn the Norwegian atrocities (has he has done so yet?) and thus has given an open goal to those who wish to taint nationalists as murderers.
Andrew was one of the first to condemn the killings, demonstrating his humanity and political nous.
If he wins there will be a mass exodus of the "quality" members, either by resignation or expulsion, and the party will be left with a small rump of second rate members still enthralled by his oratory but failing to see he is leading them down a blind alley.
Anybody who still believes in Nick after all his mistakes in throwing away the golden opportunity we had as a party is either politically naive or working for him.
If Andrew Brons wins we have just a chance that we can resurrect the party in an image more acceptible to the electorate and more democratic to its membership. It would give nationalists the opportunity to reunite as a cohesive and increasingly influential political presence.
If Andrew loses and Nick wins the cause of nationalism and possibly the fate of our nation will be set back years.
TRUE PATRIOTS CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE ORDINARY MEMBERS CAN SEE THE LIGHT.
WE WAIT WITH BATED BREATH.
In recent weeks we have seen that the majority of the most respected members of the BNP have seen the need for change.
The only ones favouring Griffin are the armchair members who have little knowledge of the leader's machinations,a few activists who although hard working cannot see they are being taken for a ride and the cohort of recently joined members whose position depends on Griffin's survival.
Nick Griffin will probably win. He has seen to that, but that will be the end of the party as a credible force in British politics.
BUT WILL HE WIN THE HEARTS OF THE BRITISH ELECTORATE?
I doubt it.
He has been slow to condemn the Norwegian atrocities (has he has done so yet?) and thus has given an open goal to those who wish to taint nationalists as murderers.
Andrew was one of the first to condemn the killings, demonstrating his humanity and political nous.
If he wins there will be a mass exodus of the "quality" members, either by resignation or expulsion, and the party will be left with a small rump of second rate members still enthralled by his oratory but failing to see he is leading them down a blind alley.
Anybody who still believes in Nick after all his mistakes in throwing away the golden opportunity we had as a party is either politically naive or working for him.
If Andrew Brons wins we have just a chance that we can resurrect the party in an image more acceptible to the electorate and more democratic to its membership. It would give nationalists the opportunity to reunite as a cohesive and increasingly influential political presence.
If Andrew loses and Nick wins the cause of nationalism and possibly the fate of our nation will be set back years.
TRUE PATRIOTS CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE ORDINARY MEMBERS CAN SEE THE LIGHT.
WE WAIT WITH BATED BREATH.
Saturday, 23 July 2011
NOT THE ACTIONS OF A NATIONALIST
The horrific bonbing in Oslo and the following massacre of the young people at the youth camp has shocked and saddened all civilised people.
At first I like most people thought it carried the hallmarks of muslim extremists especially as there are 190,000 muslims in Norway and there have been threats from them in the past.
Now the perpetrator has turned out to be a native Norwegian the Lefty multiculturalists can hardly contain themselves calling him a "Right Wing" extremist, and thereby condemning by association all nationalist parties including the BNP.
This man was never a patriot nor a nationalist.
He is a nutter, pure and simple.
NATIONALIST DO NOT KILL THEIR OWN, especially young people (even if it was a political youth camp).
Nationalists believe in their own country and work to safeguard that by POLITICAL MEANS, NOT MURDER. This latter is the act of a psycopath not a political activist.
Although we do not know the details of this man, it seems he was a fundamentalist Christian and Mason.
Are these two groups also to be tainted by association?
The real shock of this outrage is that the killer was white European, showing how unusual and unexpected this kind of action in our civilised continent, and we can at least be thankful for that.
It is the exception rather than the rule, unlike the situation in islamic countries.
Unfortunately there will always be nutters in our otherwise civilised society such as the Dunblane gunman who murder as a result of mantal aberrations.
BUT DON'T BLAME NATIONALISM or "Right Wing" views.
WE ARE NOT LIKE THAT!
The buildings in Oslo can be replaced but those killed in Oslo and the innocent young people mercilessly butchered on the island can never be.
I SEND MY HEARTFELT SYMPATHIES TO THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS IN THEIR LOSS,inadequate I know but all I can do at this sad time.
At first I like most people thought it carried the hallmarks of muslim extremists especially as there are 190,000 muslims in Norway and there have been threats from them in the past.
Now the perpetrator has turned out to be a native Norwegian the Lefty multiculturalists can hardly contain themselves calling him a "Right Wing" extremist, and thereby condemning by association all nationalist parties including the BNP.
This man was never a patriot nor a nationalist.
He is a nutter, pure and simple.
NATIONALIST DO NOT KILL THEIR OWN, especially young people (even if it was a political youth camp).
Nationalists believe in their own country and work to safeguard that by POLITICAL MEANS, NOT MURDER. This latter is the act of a psycopath not a political activist.
Although we do not know the details of this man, it seems he was a fundamentalist Christian and Mason.
Are these two groups also to be tainted by association?
The real shock of this outrage is that the killer was white European, showing how unusual and unexpected this kind of action in our civilised continent, and we can at least be thankful for that.
It is the exception rather than the rule, unlike the situation in islamic countries.
Unfortunately there will always be nutters in our otherwise civilised society such as the Dunblane gunman who murder as a result of mantal aberrations.
BUT DON'T BLAME NATIONALISM or "Right Wing" views.
WE ARE NOT LIKE THAT!
The buildings in Oslo can be replaced but those killed in Oslo and the innocent young people mercilessly butchered on the island can never be.
I SEND MY HEARTFELT SYMPATHIES TO THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS IN THEIR LOSS,inadequate I know but all I can do at this sad time.
Thursday, 21 July 2011
THE FOLLY OF AID
A change for our party's navel gazing today.
Prominent in the papers and especially on BBC television is the dire situation in the Horn of Africa with millions going hungry.
The UN criticises Europe for being slow to contribute to food aid, but British people have voluntarily given millions in donations, although how close to the needy these will ever get is a different matter.
25 years ago we were urged by St Bob Geldoff and later by St Bono to give to famine relief in that region when the population was only half of its present size.
In other words the situation is made worse long term by their interference, for as the children are saved they adopt local habits and brred prolifically, without thinking of the consequences.
I would have liked more than two children but cut my family size to what I thought I and the country could sustain.
So why is famine a perennial problem in this area?
I believe it is because it is where the islamic world of thoughtless breeding meets Afican ignorance.
Muslims are encouraged to have large families while Africans lack the intellectual capacity to provide for them
Muslim countries in the Middle East have these overpopulation problems with young unemployed populations and this has been a reason for the recent unrest.
Fortunately for them they have had the oil money to fend off starvation by buying their food.This can not go on for ever as the increasing and ever more restless populations will inevitably overtake the capacity of those countries to feed them.
And then they (and we) will be in trouble.
Our foolish government already gives more of its national product than any other country even though we are a debter country to China and Arab oil countries who have so far failed to contribute anything.
Nor has any islamic country.
SO WHY SHOULD WE BORROW MONEY FROM RICHER SOLVENT COUNTRIES pay interest on it and give it away?
Why should the British people having had their tax money taken from them be cajoled into giving more?
It is not that I have no sympathy with these people's plight. I have, but we are in no position to continue to protect them from their own actions.We can not afford it especially as it is making matters worse.
IT IS THE ECONOMICS OF THE MADHOUSE and piracy of our taxpayers.
And WHICH OF THESE COUNTRIES WILL HELP US WHEN WE NEED IT? which we surely will if we continue to give away borrowed money.
THEY WON'T EVEN GIVE TO THEIR OWN! so God help us.
We, as a country are overpopulated, in debt and crowded out with alien peoples who care nothing for us or our land. We can not feed ourselves now let alone in the future when our population has increased owing to the influx of these uninvited immigrants.
We really are heading for disaster and sadly the proof that--
ENOCH POWELL WAS RIGHT.
I SHALL NOT BE CONTRIBUTING TO THIS APPEAL--AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU.
Cameron has already stolen too much in taxation from us and given it away.
Prominent in the papers and especially on BBC television is the dire situation in the Horn of Africa with millions going hungry.
The UN criticises Europe for being slow to contribute to food aid, but British people have voluntarily given millions in donations, although how close to the needy these will ever get is a different matter.
25 years ago we were urged by St Bob Geldoff and later by St Bono to give to famine relief in that region when the population was only half of its present size.
In other words the situation is made worse long term by their interference, for as the children are saved they adopt local habits and brred prolifically, without thinking of the consequences.
I would have liked more than two children but cut my family size to what I thought I and the country could sustain.
So why is famine a perennial problem in this area?
I believe it is because it is where the islamic world of thoughtless breeding meets Afican ignorance.
Muslims are encouraged to have large families while Africans lack the intellectual capacity to provide for them
Muslim countries in the Middle East have these overpopulation problems with young unemployed populations and this has been a reason for the recent unrest.
Fortunately for them they have had the oil money to fend off starvation by buying their food.This can not go on for ever as the increasing and ever more restless populations will inevitably overtake the capacity of those countries to feed them.
And then they (and we) will be in trouble.
Our foolish government already gives more of its national product than any other country even though we are a debter country to China and Arab oil countries who have so far failed to contribute anything.
Nor has any islamic country.
SO WHY SHOULD WE BORROW MONEY FROM RICHER SOLVENT COUNTRIES pay interest on it and give it away?
Why should the British people having had their tax money taken from them be cajoled into giving more?
It is not that I have no sympathy with these people's plight. I have, but we are in no position to continue to protect them from their own actions.We can not afford it especially as it is making matters worse.
IT IS THE ECONOMICS OF THE MADHOUSE and piracy of our taxpayers.
And WHICH OF THESE COUNTRIES WILL HELP US WHEN WE NEED IT? which we surely will if we continue to give away borrowed money.
THEY WON'T EVEN GIVE TO THEIR OWN! so God help us.
We, as a country are overpopulated, in debt and crowded out with alien peoples who care nothing for us or our land. We can not feed ourselves now let alone in the future when our population has increased owing to the influx of these uninvited immigrants.
We really are heading for disaster and sadly the proof that--
ENOCH POWELL WAS RIGHT.
I SHALL NOT BE CONTRIBUTING TO THIS APPEAL--AND NEITHER SHOULD YOU.
Cameron has already stolen too much in taxation from us and given it away.
Wednesday, 20 July 2011
MISUSE OF OUR LANGUAGE AND INSULTS OF PATRIOTS
Misuse of word meanings has been a common instrument of propaganda in politics for hundreds of years.
In the 20th century Stalin used the epithet "Enemy of the People" to persecute and often execute Russians whose only "crime" was to be perceived as a threat to the regime. Others were exiled to slave labour for this alleged crime, even though many had been working loyally in it.
Later Soviet satellites were set up with the title including the word "Democratic" as in DDR or the German Democratic Republic and that word is still used to a degree in Africa as in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
One thing you can be certain of is that if the title of a country has "Democratic" in it, it means the opposite.
When analysed these terms indicate that opposition to or questioning of the regime is not tolerated.
In smaller organisations similar tactics of word distortion are used, and indeed we have it in our party.
TRAITOR has been used to describe anyone in the party who disagrees with the leadership and that is one of the milder insults.
Other words such as "Searchlight Spies", "Reds" or "UAF infiltrators" are also unjustly used, basically as a means to ensure obedience or exclusion of anyone who has a problem with the hierarchy.
Democracy is another word abused by the leadership.
Excessive powers for the chairman and hastily convened meetings with resolutions passed with the help of dubious "proxy votes" are not democratic and another abuse of our language.
The leadership must realise that our loyalty is to our country, people and the party is just the vehicle for that, and the leader of the party has to show he is promoting these ideals.
To criticise the leader for any failures he has is not treachery it is a duty.
He is not the party. WE ARE.
A list of the people now supporting a change in leadership (and many of those expelled) reads like a roll call of the best in the party who by their actions in recent years have been responsible for our gaining two MEPs.
HARDLY TRAITORS OR SEARCHLIGHT SPIES!
THEY BY THEIR ACTIONS HAVE PROVED THEIR LOYALTY TO THE CAUSE.
Yes, we will have embedded people who wish to cause our party damage but they will be found among more recent members who exercise powers disproportunate to their length of membership.
WE MUST FIND AND RESIST THESE INFILTRATORS but--
DO NOT INSULT THE REAL PATRIOTS both in the party and expelled who have in the past built the party up.
AND DO NOT ABUSE OUR LANGUAGE.
In the 20th century Stalin used the epithet "Enemy of the People" to persecute and often execute Russians whose only "crime" was to be perceived as a threat to the regime. Others were exiled to slave labour for this alleged crime, even though many had been working loyally in it.
Later Soviet satellites were set up with the title including the word "Democratic" as in DDR or the German Democratic Republic and that word is still used to a degree in Africa as in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
One thing you can be certain of is that if the title of a country has "Democratic" in it, it means the opposite.
When analysed these terms indicate that opposition to or questioning of the regime is not tolerated.
In smaller organisations similar tactics of word distortion are used, and indeed we have it in our party.
TRAITOR has been used to describe anyone in the party who disagrees with the leadership and that is one of the milder insults.
Other words such as "Searchlight Spies", "Reds" or "UAF infiltrators" are also unjustly used, basically as a means to ensure obedience or exclusion of anyone who has a problem with the hierarchy.
Democracy is another word abused by the leadership.
Excessive powers for the chairman and hastily convened meetings with resolutions passed with the help of dubious "proxy votes" are not democratic and another abuse of our language.
The leadership must realise that our loyalty is to our country, people and the party is just the vehicle for that, and the leader of the party has to show he is promoting these ideals.
To criticise the leader for any failures he has is not treachery it is a duty.
He is not the party. WE ARE.
A list of the people now supporting a change in leadership (and many of those expelled) reads like a roll call of the best in the party who by their actions in recent years have been responsible for our gaining two MEPs.
HARDLY TRAITORS OR SEARCHLIGHT SPIES!
THEY BY THEIR ACTIONS HAVE PROVED THEIR LOYALTY TO THE CAUSE.
Yes, we will have embedded people who wish to cause our party damage but they will be found among more recent members who exercise powers disproportunate to their length of membership.
WE MUST FIND AND RESIST THESE INFILTRATORS but--
DO NOT INSULT THE REAL PATRIOTS both in the party and expelled who have in the past built the party up.
AND DO NOT ABUSE OUR LANGUAGE.
CORRECTION TO DEMOCRACY FORUM
It seems our fame is spreading to the Democracy Forum where our blogs have been quoted.
I would like to comment on this forum and was previously able to so do, but recently I have been obliged to register each day, I don't know why and I can't be bothered with the hassle and now just read the posts, especially as my computer skills are somewhat limited.
One post I saw on the forum yesterday said that we did not allow non members to help us leaflet. COMPLETELY UNTRUE.
We have always been grateful for any help we could get and wives, girlfriends and children of members and many other non members from as far away as Ormskirk have helped us.
It is just a case of Griffin supporters lies or more likely trouble causers who post in order to cause dissent.
It is a pity that we can not have open debate without all this bile and hatred.
We are all SUPPOSED to be nationalists
I would like to comment on this forum and was previously able to so do, but recently I have been obliged to register each day, I don't know why and I can't be bothered with the hassle and now just read the posts, especially as my computer skills are somewhat limited.
One post I saw on the forum yesterday said that we did not allow non members to help us leaflet. COMPLETELY UNTRUE.
We have always been grateful for any help we could get and wives, girlfriends and children of members and many other non members from as far away as Ormskirk have helped us.
It is just a case of Griffin supporters lies or more likely trouble causers who post in order to cause dissent.
It is a pity that we can not have open debate without all this bile and hatred.
We are all SUPPOSED to be nationalists
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
NO CONFIDENCE IN OUR POSITION?
Well it seems our little blog is having an effect and is getting up the noses of the "official" faction in the party.
GOOD.
Members supporting the present chairman have been advised to avoid our blog and that of the St Helens Patriot as we are apparently very biased in Andrew Bron's favour.
A "member" (Mike Whitby?) it seem has made a "complaint"
Well I do support Andrew, but it is an indication of their desire to avoid people seeing an alternative view that this warning has been issued.
They obviously do not have much confidence in their own arguments.
Foe myself, I am quite happy to visit sites with views which may be different form mine but in the end make my own mind up.
However up to now I have seen nothing to convince me that we do not need a new leader.
For instance.
Yesterday we learnt that Nick Griffin DOES owe in excess of £45,000 for printing which he previously denied and he has lost a court case regarding this.
I do not necessarily condemn him for the debt but I DO condemn him for denying that judgement had been awarded against him.
I KNOW there are several others in the pipeline which Nick denies.He is thus guilty of blatant dishonesty and I have lost my ability to believe anything he says.
Yes he has done much for the Party in the past but shady deals and lies stick in my craw and show him to be no better than the leaders of other parties.
I joined the BNP partly because I considered it to be honest (as well as patriotic).
I think the vast majority of members are, but when those at the top become tarnished by corruption and deceit my duty is to help promote the election of a new leader whose reputation is unsullied by such antics.
THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ADVISED TO AVOID THIS BLOG (AND ST HELENS) SHOWS WE ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH FOR THEIR LIKING.
TO THOSE WHO PUT THIS ADVICE OUT--THANKYOU FOR YOUR ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRUTH OF MY ARGUMENTS.
MY ARGUMENTS WILL STAND SCRUTINY, YOURS WON'T
THAT IS WHY YOU ARE HOT UNDER THE COLLAR!
GOOD.
Members supporting the present chairman have been advised to avoid our blog and that of the St Helens Patriot as we are apparently very biased in Andrew Bron's favour.
A "member" (Mike Whitby?) it seem has made a "complaint"
Well I do support Andrew, but it is an indication of their desire to avoid people seeing an alternative view that this warning has been issued.
They obviously do not have much confidence in their own arguments.
Foe myself, I am quite happy to visit sites with views which may be different form mine but in the end make my own mind up.
However up to now I have seen nothing to convince me that we do not need a new leader.
For instance.
Yesterday we learnt that Nick Griffin DOES owe in excess of £45,000 for printing which he previously denied and he has lost a court case regarding this.
I do not necessarily condemn him for the debt but I DO condemn him for denying that judgement had been awarded against him.
I KNOW there are several others in the pipeline which Nick denies.He is thus guilty of blatant dishonesty and I have lost my ability to believe anything he says.
Yes he has done much for the Party in the past but shady deals and lies stick in my craw and show him to be no better than the leaders of other parties.
I joined the BNP partly because I considered it to be honest (as well as patriotic).
I think the vast majority of members are, but when those at the top become tarnished by corruption and deceit my duty is to help promote the election of a new leader whose reputation is unsullied by such antics.
THE FACT THAT PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ADVISED TO AVOID THIS BLOG (AND ST HELENS) SHOWS WE ARE TOO CLOSE TO THE TRUTH FOR THEIR LIKING.
TO THOSE WHO PUT THIS ADVICE OUT--THANKYOU FOR YOUR ENDORSEMENT OF THE TRUTH OF MY ARGUMENTS.
MY ARGUMENTS WILL STAND SCRUTINY, YOURS WON'T
THAT IS WHY YOU ARE HOT UNDER THE COLLAR!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)