GENOCIDE OF THE BRITISH ? THE UN DEFINITIONS OF GENOCIDE.

Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment
of the Crime of Genocide

dopted by Resolution 260 (III) A of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 1948.

The Contracting Parties,

Having considered the declaration made by the General Assembly of the United Nations in its resolution 96 (I) dated 11 December 1946 that genocide is a crime under international law, contrary to the spirit and aims of the United Nations and condemned by the civilized world;

Recognizing that at all periods of history genocide has inflicted great losses on humanity; and

Being convinced that, in order to liberate mankind from such an odious scourge, international co-operation is required;

Hereby agree as hereinafter provided.

Article 1

The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish.

Article 2

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

• (a) Killing members of the group;
• (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
• (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
• (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
• (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Article 3

The following acts shall be punishable:

• (a) Genocide;
• (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
• (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
• (d) Attempt to commit genocide;
• (e) Complicity in genocide.

Article 4

Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals.

Article 5

The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3.

Article 6

Persons charged with genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall be tried by a competent tribunal of the State in the territory of which the act was committed, or by such international penal tribunal as may have jurisdiction with respect to those Contracting Parties which shall have accepted its jurisdiction.

Article 7

Genocide and the other acts enumerated in Article 3 shall not be considered as political crimes for the purpose of extradition.

The Contracting Parties pledge themselves in such cases to grant extradition in accordance with their laws and treaties in force.

Article 8

Any Contracting Party may call upon the competent organs of the United Nations to take such action under the Charter of the United Nations as they consider appropriate for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3.

Article 9

Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in Article 3, shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute.

Article 10

The present Convention, of which the Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish texts are equally authentic, shall bear the date of 9 December 1948.

Article 11

The present Convention shall be open until 31 December 1949 for signature on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State to which an invitation to sign has been addressed by the General Assembly.

The present Convention shall be ratified, and the instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

After 1 January 1950, the present Convention may be acceded to on behalf of any Member of the United Nations and of any non-member State which has received an invitation as aforesaid.

Instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Article 12

Any Contracting Party may at any time, by notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, extend the application of the present Convention to all or any of the territories for the conduct of whose foreign relations that Contracting Party is responsible.

Article 13

On the day when the first twenty instruments of ratification or accession have been deposited, the Secretary-General shall draw up a proces-verbal and transmit a copy of it to each Member of the United Nations and to each of the non-member States contemplated in Article 11.

The present Convention shall come into force on the ninetieth day following the date of deposit of the twentieth instrument of ratification or accession.

Any ratification or accession effected subsequent to the latter date shall become effective on the ninetieth day following the deposit of the instrument of ratification or accession.

Article 14

The present Convention shall remain in effect for a period of ten years as from the date of its coming into force.

It shall thereafter remain in force for successive periods of five years for such Contracting Parties as have not denounced it at least six months before the expiration of the current period.

Denunciation shall be effected by a written notification addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.

Article 15

If, as a result of denunciations, the number of Parties to the present Convention should become less than sixteen, the Convention shall cease to be in force as from the date on which the last of these denunciations shall become effective.

Article 16

A request for the revision of the present Convention may be made at any time by any Contracting Party by means of a notification in writing addressed to the Secretary-General.

The General Assembly shall decide upon the steps, if any, to be taken in respect of such request.

Article 17

The Secretary-General of the United Nations shall notify all Members of the United Nations and the non-member States contemplated in Article 11 of the following:

• (a) Signatures, ratifications and accessions received in accordance with Article 11;
• (b) Notifications received in accordance with Article 12;
• (c) The date upon which the present Convention comes into force in accordance with Article 13;
• (d) Denunciations received in accordance with Article 14;
• (e) The abrogation of the Convention in accordance with Article 15;
• (f) Notifications received in accordance with Article 16.

Article 18

The original of the present Convention shall be deposited in the archives of the United Nations.

A certified copy of the Convention shall be transmitted to all Members of the United Nations and to the non-member States contemplated in Article 11.

Article 19

The present Convention shall be registered by the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the date of its coming into force.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

New Labour, The CONned/DEMned are all MASS MURDERERS.

But if you speak out or protest against this GENOCIDE then the full force of the STATE and its VIOLENT STREET THUGS the UAF who are supplied by the SWP, backed by Governmant, Police, Councils, the Media, paid for out of OUR TAXES TO ATTACK US.

Ever wondered why ?

GENOCIDE

MARTIN SMITH, LEADER OF THE SWP/UAF SHOWING HIS NICE SIDE.

MARTIN SMITH SWP/UAF LEADER SHOWING HOW FASCISM SHOULD BE DONE.


Look at the HATRED in his eyes
And this guy wants you to vote for people like him - VIOLENT TRAITORS.

ADMIT IT CAMERON - ISLAM IS A FOREIGN, VIOLENT, MALEVOLENT FORCE IMPORTED INTO BRITAIN.

BRITAIN BETRAYED - IT'S PEOPLE PLACED IN MORTAL DANGER THROUGH THE ACTIONS AND INACTIONS OF THE Lib/Lab/Conned us all.

When the first Mohammedan immigrants arrived here they kept themselves to themselves.
Offering platitudes and taqqiya by the boat load to our BETRAYERS, their was not enough to start calling for the DEATH and DESTRUCTION of BRITAIN and ITS PEOPLE.
But NOW there IS.

Now that OUR Country is ruined by IMMIGRATION, OUR PEOPLE,IT'S ARMED FORCES, ITS PENSIONERS AND THE POLICE and a host of other BRITISH INSTITUTIONS are constantly under VIOLENT ATTACK by IMMIGRANTS, mainly MOHAMEMDAN IMMIGRANTS, attacking the YOUNG (RACE PEADOPHILLIA.), OUR PENSIONERS (RACIAL HATRED) and OUR PEOPLE IN GENERAL (RACIAL HATRED) and CALLING FOR THE DEATHS OF THE BRITISH(RACIAL HATRED)

OUR BETRAYERS, Lib/Lab/Conned us all again, have brought and encouraged VIOLENT MOHAMMEDANS to OUR LAND, OUR DOORSTEPS.

If MOHAMMEDANISM and MOHAMMEDANS were as "Peaceful" as the TRAITORS keep LYING TO US that they are, then why the need for this ?

In his new year message, the Prime Minister says that the security services are facing a daily struggle to stop plots that would "do terrible harm to our people and our economy".

The risk of terrorism has been demonstrated by the arrest this month of nine men accused of plotting a Christmas bombing campaign with targets including the London Stock Exchange and Big Ben, Mr Cameron declares.

He also suggests that Britain faces fundamental questions about why young Muslims continue to be drawn into violent extremism. The Islamic community must help address how their minds are "poisoned", he says.

Mr Cameron's stark message comes amid a prolonged row between Coalition ministers over anti-terrorism laws, with the Liberal Democrats pressing for some of Labour's contentious security measures to be watered down.

Mr Cameron says: "For many years now, we have been aware of the threat we face from international terrorism. Recent arrests show that that threat is still very much with us. And it is as serious today as it ever has been."

Earlier this week, City of Westminster magistrates' court heard that nine alleged terrorists – British men of Bangladeshi origin – had carried out reconnaissance on potential targets in London. The alleged plot was only one among many being monitored, Mr Cameron suggests. "Our police officers, together with the security and intelligence agencies, are working round the clock to foil plots that would do terrible harm to our people and our economy," he says.

Counter-terrorism work also depends on the public. "Together we will defend our values and way of life and defeat those who threaten them," he says.

Mr Cameron also raises the issue of British Muslims' responsibilities to combat extremism, suggesting the country is "allowing" radicalisation to continue."

So, there we have it, Cameron telling us we still have the MOHAMMEDAN COMMUNITY trying to MURDER US, and he wants to know WHY the Mohammedan Community are allowing RADICALISATION.

"Mr Cameron also raises the issue of British Muslims' responsibilities to combat extremism, suggesting the country is "allowing" radicalisation to continue. "We must ask ourselves as a country how we are allowing the radicalisation and poisoning of the minds of some young British Muslims who then contemplate and sometimes carry out acts of sickening barbarity,""

Why do you think we don't see mass Mohammedan Anti-Islamic protests against ISLAMIC TERRORISTS ?

Because the majority of the Mohammedans HATE US AND WANT WANT BRITAIN TO BE ISLAMIC NOT CHRISTIAN.


""We cannot just protect ourselves at home," Mr Cameron says, paying tribute to the "incredible bravery and sacrifice" of the Armed Forces."

" "Together we will defend our values and way of life and defeat those who threaten them," "

GET REAL CAMERON - WE THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE WILL "DEFEND OUR VALUES AND WAY OF LIFE AND DEFEAT THOSE WHO THREATEN THEM"

YOU and YOUR ILK CAMERON are THOSE WHO THREATEN THEM (OUR VALUES AND WAY OF LIFE), WE WILL REMEMBER YOU AND THE REST OF THE BETRAYERS for
TREASON.

ONLY THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY CAN DO ANYTHING ABOUT THIS, BUT IT'S UP TO YOU VOTE FOR THEM.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/8232733/David-Cameron-Britain-on-New-Year-terror-alert.html

HAPPY NEW YEAR

So 2010 draws to a close and our new government has shown that it is no different from the others.
Admittedly we had hoped to do better this year but with the media and the big party machines against us we knew it would be an uphill battle.

All the other parties were disappointed. The Tories hoped for outright victory but people could not bring themselves to trust the fake Cameron brand. The Lib Dems also hoped for a better result than they managed, but then a party devoid of policy is hard to vote for.


Labour, in spite of their in effect bankrupting our country and decimating the few remnants of our industries the Tories had not destroyed before them did well to hold as many seats as they did. It demonstrates the sickness of British politics that after a disastrous three periods in power, involvement in illegal wars, terror attacks, industries sold abroad, bankers bail out and massive immigration and consequent unemployment, people could not trust the Tories enough to give them their vote.


Unfortunately on account of the distortions and the assembled might of the other parties and media and in some cases blatant fraud, we were not able to garner as many votes as we had hoped.
I know we had no chance of winning a seat in our area but for the first time we stood three candidates and saved our deposits in all three.
We know our presence is causing some discomfort to our enemies as they know when our message of hope gets through we will gain influence, that is why they spent so much to oppose us.

None the less we had our best national vote which under the present system does not translate into seats. This of course gave the others the chance to gloat which disheartened some of our activists who could not see the progress made, causing internal party friction and a small number left us.


The majority remained committed and many activists are now campaigning in the Oldham bye election, caused as a result illegal election activities by Labour, similar to the tactics which were used in Barking and Dagenham against Nick Griffin by the millionairess Margaret Hodge.
In our case her crime was not known about and her massive majority unassailable as a result of the flooding of the area with immigrants and lies spread about us.

So where do we go now?

Well this coalition government has shown it is just as incompetent, corrupt and as liable to break its promises as the last. Their alliance with those speculators who have sold our country out shown by the knighthood conferred on Roger Carr who sold Cadbury's to Kraft and who now controls Centrica the profiteering gas company, not to mention Heseltine's plea to go easy on the bankers.

The country faces huge economic problems and we are facing a resources crisis, having sold or used all our own. In addition increasing numbers of immigrants are coming here bringing with them the danger of terrorism and the government frightened of tackling the source of the trouble.
I believe we are in for a period of straightened circumstances, and it is not the fault of the British people it is the fault of those who govern us.

Never has there been a more urgent need for a nationalist government than now.
We as patriots must put our squabbles behind us and unite in our cause to save our country and culture.

Concentrate not on what divides us but what unites us. Let bygones be bygones and work together and let's put the fear of God into those selfish corrupt people who are selling out our country.

We are the flame of the British future which will never be extinguished but grow ever stronger.

THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.

A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL PATRIOTS.

THE DESTRUCTION OF BRITAINS EDUCATION SYSTEM - YOUR CHILDREN BETRAYED

Now we know what BLIAR meant when he said "EDUCATION, EDUCATION, EDUCATION."

It wasn't Education for our Children he meant by that, what he really meant was 'While we have control of the Schools and Teacers through the NUT we can INDOCTRINATE the MULTICULT IDEOLOGY into the CHILDREN, forget their EDUCATION these White kids need to pay the price for the actions of their forfathers, take away their intelligence and capacity to learn, GIVE THEM NO FUTURE.'

Successive governments have caused lasting damage to the education system by prioritising access and social inclusion over a decent grounding in the arts, science, languages and humanities, it was claimed.

David Perks, an author and physics teacher, said a series of “anti-elitist” reforms in recent years have undermined schools’ ability to deliver an old-fashioned liberal education.

Changes to Ofsted inspections, a remodelling of the National Curriculum and reforms to testing and assessment have “led to the complete disintegration of education” in England, he said.

The comments were made in a report published by the Institute of Ideas, an education think-tank.

In a series of high-profile educaiton reforms, the Government plans to increase the number of pupils studying tough subjects up to the age of 16.

Read the rest by clicking anywhere on the article -

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/8160745/School-subjects-sidelined-in-drive-to-promote-social-justice.html

Our Childrens futures BETRAYED.

New Labours LISA NANDY and YVONNE FOVARGUE are known for their hard work in the Multi-Cult industry and Social Justice for Immigrants.

Just so you know who to blame for ruining your Childrens Futures.

SPOT THE MISSING WORD ?

Can you spot the MISSING WORD ?

Please read the following article carefully.

Christmas bomb plot: nine men remanded over plan to 'blow up Big Ben and Westminster Abbey'

Nine alleged terrorists plotted a Christmas bombing campaign targeting sites that included the London Stock Exchange and Big Ben, a court heard.

They are alleged to have carried out reconnaissance missions before deciding on their possible targets.

Police were said to have found a list of six sites, including the full postal address of the Stock Exchange, Boris Johnson’s London mayoral office and the US embassy.

Defendants were seen studying the tower of Big Ben, before inspecting Westminster Abbey, the London Eye and the Church of Scientology.

Al-Qaeda inspired books and leaflets, including instructions on making a pipe bomb, were also uncovered during the counter-terrorism operation.

Details of the alleged plot were outlined at City of Westminster magistrates’ court.

The defendants, aged 19 to 28, were charged on Sunday with conspiracy to cause an explosion and conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism, having been arrested during early-morning raids in Cardiff, London and Stoke-on-Trent on Dec 20.

Piers Arnold, prosecuting, said the list of landmarks was found during police searches. “A handwritten note was found next to a computer with six contact details handwritten. They included the name, full address and post codes,” he said.

Among the details were the addresses of the Dean of St Paul’s Chapter House and of two rabbis at separate synagogues.

A reconnaissance trip is alleged to have been made from Trafalgar Square, down Whitehall to Westminster Bridge where Big Ben was studied intently.

A mobile phone had appeared to be raised and pointed towards the clock tower, the court heard.

Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye were also closely examined before the Church of Scientology near Blackfriars was allegedly observed intently for some minutes.

The journey ended with a meal in a McDonald’s fast food restaurant, the court heard.

Police searches are said to have uncovered two issues of the al Qaeda extremist magazine Inspire, which is published in English in Yemen and is aimed at a Western audience. An article in issue one was entitled “How to make a pipe bomb in the kitchen of your mom”, while issue two included “What to expect in jihad” and “Tips for our brothers in the US”.

Other allegedly extremist material found was entitled 39 Ways which said it was intended to help people “serve and participate in jihad”.

Anwar Al-Awlaki, the extremist Yemeni preacher whose teachings support and encourage violent jihad against the West, is alleged to be the inspiration for the plot, the court heard. Between Oct 1 and Dec 20, the men are alleged to have downloaded information from the internet, discussed acts

of terrorism and tested explosives while “unlawfully and maliciously” conspiring to “endanger life or cause serious injury” with one or more explosions.

The first defendants to appear before Chief Magistrate Howard Riddle were Mohammed Chowdhury, 20, and Shah Rahman, 28, from east London.

Mr Chowdhury, wearing a white hooded top with shoulder-length hair and a goatee beard, was the first to confirm his date of birth and home address.

Neither he nor Mr Rahman, dressed in a pale blue T-shirt, black jacket and long beard, showed any emotion as the case against them was explained.

Their behaviour was in sharp contrast to that of Omar Latif and Abdul Miah, who appeared in the dock alongside Gurukanth Desai. Mr Latif, 26, and Mr Miah, 24 whispered and laughed while in the dock, with Mr Latif winking and giving a thumbs up as he was led from the court.

All three, from Cardiff, were in matching dark blue fleeces.

The court heard that Mr Miah, whose wife is expecting a baby in April, and Mr Desai, a 28-year-old father of three, were brothers.

The last four men to appear in court, including the youngest of the group, were from Stoke-on-Trent. Usman Khan, 19, Nazam Hussain, 25, Mohibur Rahman, 26, and Abul Shahjahan, 26, were brought into the dock in pairs, and listened impassively to the court proceedings.

All nine men, who are of Bangladeshi origin, were remanded in custody and are due to appear at the Old Bailey on Jan 14.

The counter-terrorism operation was led by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit and supported by the Metropolitan Police and South Wales Police. Three other men – two from Cardiff and one from London – were released without charge.

Sue Hemming, head of the Crown Prosecution Service Counter Terrorism Division, said last night: “I have reviewed the evidence provided to me by the West Midlands Counter Terrorism Unit and I am satisfied it is sufficient for a realistic prospect of conviction, and it is in the public interest that these men should be charged with these offences.”

If you know the answer to this MISSING WORD puzzle please leave your answer in the comments section.

VIEWS OF THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER - REASONS FOR VOTING BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY ?

The Bishop of Winchester, the Rt Rev Michael Scott-Joynt, warned that the death of “religious literacy” among those who made and administered the law had created an imbalance in the way in which those with faith were treated compared to sexual minorities.

Highlighting the case Gary McFarlane, a relationship counsellor who was sacked by Relate for refusing to give sex therapy to a homosexual couple, he said that the judiciary now went out of its way to protect the rights of minorities.

At the same time, for the first time in British history politicians and judges were largely ignorant of religion and so failed to

appreciate the importance Christians placed on abiding by the scriptures rather than the politically correct values of the secular state.

The Bishop’s concerns were underlined by Lord Woolf, a former Lord Chief Justice, who agreed that in some legal cases the balance had gone “too far” in tipping away from Christians.

His words echo recent warnings from other church leaders about what they perceive as attacks on Christianity.

The critique of the Human Rights Act is likely to fuel the criticism of David Cameron for failing to abide by a pre-election

pledge he made to replace the controversial European rules with a home-grown Bill of Rights.

Other recent high profile legal cases involving Christians include bed and breakfast owners sued for turning away two homosexuals who wished to share a bedroom, and adoption agencies forced by the Government to close their doors after they refused to place children with same sex couples

Bishop Scott-Joynt told the BBC’s World This Weekend: “The problem is that there is a really quite widespread perception among Christians that there is growing up something of an imbalance in the legal position with regard to the freedom of Christians and people of other faiths to pursue the calling of their faith in public life, in public service.

“Probably for the first time in our history there is a widespread lack of religious literacy among those who one way and another hold power and influence, whether it’s Parliament or the media or even, dare I say it, in the judiciary.

”The risk would be that there are increasingly professions where it could be difficult for people who are devoted believers to work in certain of the public services, indeed in Parliament.

“Anybody who is part of the religious community believes that you don’t just hold views, you live them. Manifesting your faith is part of having it and not part of some optional bolt-on.

“Judgement seemed to be following contemporary society, which seems to think that secularist views are statements of the obvious and religious views are notions in the mind. That is the culture in which we are living.

“The judges ought to be religiously literate enough to know that there is an argument behind all this, which can’t simply be settled by the nature of society as it is today.”

Appearing on the same programme, Lord Woolf said that the law should be the same for everyone, regardless of faith or lack of it.

But, he conceded: “We may have gone too far. If the law has gone too far in one direction, then the experience of the law is that it tends to move back.

”The law must be above any sectional interest even if it is an interest of a faith but at the same time it must be aware of the

proper concerns of that faith.

“The law should be developed in ways that, wherever practicable, it allows that faith to be preserved and protected.”

The Bishop’s words echo those of Lord Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, who has put his name to the “I’m Not Ashamed” campaign, which promotes the rights of Christians.

He produced a leaflet earlier this month claiming that Christians of “deep faith” faced discrimination and were “under attack” at the start of a campaign to encourage religious people to “wear their faith with pride”.

The Human Rights Act has come under increasing criticism in recent years for protecting the rights of minorities including criminals over those of the wider population.

Before the general election, Mr Cameron had promised to scrap the Act in favour of a British Bill of Rights, but with the Liberal Democrats supporting the current system, introduced under the last, Labour government, the plans were effectively kicked into the long grass following the formation of the Coalition.

Earlier this month, there was anger after it emerged that a failed Iraqi asylum seeker who killed a 12-year-old girl in a hit and run accident could not be deported because he had fathered children in this country and the Act upheld his right to a family life.

The case followed that of Learco Chindamo, who killed headteacher Phillip Lawrence but escaped deportation to Italy, his country of birth, on the grounds that he had moved to Britain as a child and had a right to remain in this country.

He has since been returnedto jail after allegedly breaching the terms of his licence by being involved in a street robbery.

We know the Lib/Lab/Con won't do anything about this otherwise they would have, instead they LIED to you.

And elsewhere in Governement -

Multi-faith chaplains to make House of Commons more inclusive -

John Bercow has backed the creation of a team of multi-faith chaplains, which will also include representatives of the Hindu, Buddhist and Jainist religions.

Members of the House have expressed surprise at the move, which some have described as "an exercise in politically-correct box ticking".

It could mean that religious leaders of non-Christian faiths will take part in parliamentary ceremonies, though there would need to be constitutional reform to allow them to read the daily prayers.

At present, the Speaker's Chaplain is the only person allowed to say the prayers before each day's sitting and the role has been filled by an Anglican cleric since the office was created in 1660.

The proposal to introduce a multi-faith chaplaincy was made by the current chaplain, the Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin, who was appointed by Mr Bercow against the wishes of the Very Rev John Hall, the Dean of Westminster.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/8224923/Multi-faith-chaplains-to-make-House-of-Commons-more-inclusive.html

A nice CHRISTMAS gift to the ENEMY WITHIN FROM THE ENEMY WITHIN.

AND FOR THESE REASONS YOU SHOULD BE VOTING FOR THE

BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY.