Wednesday, 22 December 2010

"A DEEP FOREBODING"

THE DANGER OF ISLAM

The dangers of the adherents of this pre medieval barbaric superstition have been shown many times in recent years with bomb attacks the grooming of teenage girls and their general terrorist activities for which they avoid arrest and deportation with impunity using the notorious "Human Rights Act".

This ill thought out act only gives protection to those who wish us harm but leaves us vulnerable.
So frightened are the authorities of these alien terrorists that when an outrage occurs they reassure "the muslim communities" with our taxpayers cash to attempt to bribe them to desist from further terrorist activities but this furthers muslim contempt for us.

Representitives of this alien creed are promoted to positions of power and influence, not on merit but solely on account of their adherence to this creed. It is tokenism at its worst and most dangerous.
As Nationalists we prefer to live among our own European kind but can work sometimes with those of African or Indian origin and even tolerate some who have become integrated and who are no great threat to our society so long as the numbers are kept small.
However with muslims it is a different matter. These aliens do not want to integrate or cooperate, THEY SAY THEY WILL TAKE OVER.
"Islam will rule the world" they say, and all over the world they are actively working to this end.
If you look at the globe, you will see that wherever, without exception islam comes into contact with more gentle or civilised cultures there is strife.
In our country they are coming in increasingly large numbers to suck at the teat of the Welfare State while they continue their programming of outbreeding us.
Even Colonel Gadaffi stated that islam would triumph in Europe as they would outbreed us.
Nick Griffin was lucky to escape jail for being secretly recorded at a private meeting that it is a wicked vicious faith, merely a true interpretations of the facts.
Draw a picture of their paedophile prophet and all Hell breaks loose with death and destruction.
Of course they can threaten death to us in safety while the police arrest those English people who protest.
Convert from islam to another faith, that's a death sentence.
Homosexual,? get thrown off a cliff.
Commit adultery, stoning if you are a woman (even though you were raped)
How much more evidence do our government need that it is a wicked vicious faith,given that 30% of young muslims in Britain believe that killing is justified for their faith?
The trouble is that their numbers are growing exponentially as a result of illegal immigration and their rapid breeding. It is estimated that there are over 2 million muslims in Britain(I think many more). So that means there are 600,000 of them willing to kill us.
Daily they are becoming more vociferous in their demands and open in their contempt for us.
Today I read that the above poster has been put in some areas with the intent of stopping Christmas.
SOME HOPE!
While I agree that Christmas has lost some of its religious flavour it remains a central part of the Christian culture where people celebrate their faith and cement family ties. It is a time of giving and friendship.
How dare these uppity foreigners try to curtail our traditional customs.
The thought that they are predicted on present trends to increase ten fold within 2 decades fills me with dread. What will they be like when the are the majority in all our major cities and can out vote us.
Our country is indeed in mortal danger and still the government will not act.
So what can be done?
Well for a start anybody who has entered the country illegally in the last 10 years should be expelled immediately or as soon as possible together with any British slags who have had children with them and these children.
Of course all benefits to immigrants should be stopped. Think how much money that would save.
All aspects of our country which make them more comfortable such as new mosques and islamic schools should be prohibited, after all Christian churches are not allowed in Saudi Arabia.
All special concessions such as muslim toilets, islamic burial and the wearing of their ugly clothes should cease.
That would be a start. We would have to see how it went on after that and if further measures were needed.
Will it happen? Not while we are in the EU and no doubt that body would put sanctions in place against us. But Russia has a lot of trouble with islamic militants and would make a good ally.
It is said that all muslims are not extremists and I would accept that, but if over 600,000 would kill us for their religion how would we identify the dangerous ones? Therefore the only safe long term goal would be to rid our country of this dangerous group.
If we don't the only two possibilities are being dominated by them or civil war.
Or do our government want these scenarios?
Sometimes I wonder.

WIKILEAKS - 1-IN-3 MUSLIM STUDENTS IN BRITAIN SUPPORT KILLING FOR ISLAM - 40% WANT SHARIA.

Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, according to a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks' publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.

A survey of 600 Muslim students at 30 universities throughout Britain found that 32 per cent of Muslim respondents believed killing in the name of religion is justified.

A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion as saying 54 per cent wanted a Muslim party to represent their world view in Parliament and 40 per cent want Muslims in the UK to be under Sharia law.


THAT'LL BE THE RELIGION OF PEACE THEN ?

Muslims were also found to have the highest disability rates - with 24 per cent of men and 21 per cent of women claiming a disability - while the cable also cited statistics claiming Muslims were also the most likely group to be unavailable for work or not actively seeking employment due to illness, their studies or family commitments.

With nearly ALL Doctors assesing and deciding DLA claims no wonder they get what we can't.
I wonder how many people entitled to DLA who are not of an Islamic bent are refused on Religious and Racial Hatred Grounds against the INFIDEL ?

THAT'LL BE THE SCROUNGING UNGRATEFUL SCUM THEN ?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340599/WikiLeaks-1-3-British-Muslim-students-killing-Islam-40-want-Sharia-law.html

Tuesday, 21 December 2010

LEGALISED MASS MURDER OF THE UNBORN

We are forever being told that we need IMMIGRANTS to work to pay for our ever growing PENSIONER POPULATION, yet we can murder through ABORTION the NATURAL INDIGENOUS REPLACEMENTS FOR OUR PENSIONERS.

Figures from the Office for National Statistics indicated 42.4 per cent of all pregnancies to women under the age of 20 ended in a legal abortion in 2008. This compares with 37.8 per cent a decade ago.

Experts said that though some progress had been made in halting Britain's alarming rate of teen pregnancies, abortion was increasingly seen as the major method of contraception for many young women.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/8155092/Abortion-rates-for-under-20s-shoots-up.html

We are supposed to be unable to replace our AGED POPULATION with INDIGENOUS YOUNGSTERS yet we are always told we have the HIGHEST TEENAGE PREGNANCIES IN EUROPE.
It seems we are not being allowed to replace ourselves, which we obviously can, the TRAITORS allow the MURDER OF THE (mainly Indigenous) UNBORN.

THIS SICKENS ME - IF THE NAZIS HAD BEEN TERMINATING UNBORN CHILDREN ON THIS SCALE THROUGH ABORTION IT WOULD NOW BE CATEGORISED AS A WAR CRIME.

The leaders of this country have created this through creating LAWS to allow it, what does that say about them and us that we accept ABORTION as the NORM ?

PS, The New labour MP for MAKERFIELD, yvonne fovargue (Who She ?) SUPPORTS ABORTION.

Saturday, 18 December 2010

MORE INJUSTICE FROM THE EHRC

The State sponsored quango has been at it again.
They have supported a prosecution by two homosexuals who were denied a double bed in a hotel in the West Country on the grounds that they were not married and thus were "homophobic"
No mention of the fact that unmarried heterosexual couples would also not be allowed to sleep together in their hotel.
Now I am no prude and would have no objections to unmarried couples sleeping together. Indeed how many people nowadays keep their sex until marriage? Very few I suspect and certainly not me.

BUT the fact remains that this hotel belongs to this couple and they should be allowed to make their rules in their own establishment however much others may disagree with these rules.
It has been said that if this couple are running a commercial hotel they should accept all people and lifestyles.

I disagree.
If I turned up to the Savoy in London in my working gear I would not be allowed in. The hotel has its standards and we all accept them. Many restaurants do not allow people in jeans to dine there, indeed I have been refused entry to a club on that account.

Some hotels are temperance with alcohol prohibited. Fair enough, these are their rules and if I don't like them (I dont) I am free to go elsewhere, and I do.
Similarly the West Country hotel proprieters should be allowed their standards whether the Equalities Commission likes it or not, and if homosexuals wish to bed each other they should find a hotel willing to accomodate them. Indeed many hotels are run by homosexuals so it should not be too difficult to find one.

And that is the trouble with this overpaid State subsidised busybodies. They want to dictate the behaviour of everybody, and even their thoughts.
Basically if your rules and beliefs are not politically correct you are likely to be sued and even bankrupted.

This in a way mirrors the way in which they objected to the British National Party policies, because they did not like them, and therefore they tried to bankrupt us.
It demonstrates their attitude to freedom of concience and belief. They have none,and they will push the views of the minority over those of the vast majority of the British people.

We nowadays have to watch what we say in case we offend some alien group and are prosecuted for our free speech while aliens can preach death to us with impunity.
It is ironic that the same organisation which persecutes Christian people for their beliefs on homosexuality supports the rights of those who preach that these same homosexuals should be put to death.

It is time that this expensive anti freedom organisation was scrapped but I doubt that even with all the economies which must be made it will happen.
To many of the governing elite are involved in it and are using it as a tool to suppress our freedoms.

When will the people wake up?

Friday, 17 December 2010

A VICTORY FOR FREEDOM

Good news at last.
The government sponsored and subsidised Equalities Commission lost in their efforts to destroy our party.
It is ironic that we supporters and members of the British National Party have to pay our taxes to support an organisation dedicated to destroying us and our rights to have a voice.
It is even more offensive that many of the members of this overpaid quango are of foreign origin from their chairman Phillips down. Those not foreign are without exception people with impeccable leftist credentials who view the British people as an obstacle to their multiculti agenda.

We were told as children that we lived in a democracy which protected the right to free speech.
Now we are not allowed to complain about the colonisation of our country except in the most guarded terms. However as Nick Griffin said they can ot stop us thinking unallowed non PC thoughts.
Which other country would gag its inhabitants who wished to protect their standards and customs?
Which other country would subsidise a body led by foreigners to persecute the native people and force on them their agenda?

I can understand why the people on this anti British quango feel as they do. Many of them are not British and thus they look at things from a different viewpoint.
But the fact is that this is OUR country and our wishes should be paramount.

What I can't understand is why our government gave them so much power.
There can be no other reason other than our governing elite wish to destroy our way of life, one that has served us well for centuries and through many threats and turmoils.
Now this government subsidised quango wanted us as a party to open our membership to those who opposed our principles and ideals and tried to bankrupt us for not rolling over and accepting this.

They really are traitors to the British people.

Thank God that the judges have SOME sense of justice and impartiality.

Thursday, 16 December 2010

IS IT A GOOD IDEA?

I know many of you will not agree with me but I think Bob Ainsworth's idea of decriminalising drugs could be a good idea.

I think that if drugs were made available cheaply on prescription it would kill the drug trade stone dead.
It would remove the profit motive and pushers would have no incentive to ply their evil trade. I think it is this pushing which causes many people to start taking drugs and afterwards addicts steal to feed their habit.
These drugs are cheap to manufacture. The cost on the street is due to scarcity caused by the prohibition.
People under the influence of drugs would be prosecuted severely especially if they caused bother and if they did become addicted it would be made clear they would be taken to a spartan detox centre.
If people under this "liberal"regime wish to take harmful substances it should be at their own risk. It is not for the nanny state to look after foolish people.

In recent years when a drug has been banned it becomes more expensive and often popular and when unavailable other substances take over. Also in times past cocaine and opiates were available over the counter and there was no real problem.
This regime I think in removing the incentive in the selling of drugs would do much to reduce drug taking, robbery and best of all the massive amounts made by Asian heroin pushers who use their ill gotten gains to fund terrorism.

Look what happened in the USA with prohibition.

Wednesday, 15 December 2010

THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR COUNTRY

At one time in the words of Victor Meldrew I would have said "I can't believe it"
Unfortunately nowadays I can believe anything that our rulers do to destroy our country.
As the last Harriers flew off into oblivion or more likely another country in receipt of our foreign aid while we have carriers mothballed,we are informed that in the interests of economy lollipop ladies and men are to be scrapped in some areas. This "improvement" in efficiency will no doubt spread.

How far have we sunk since I was a child in the Forties.
Then there was less money around but everybody worked. There was no "underclass", just honest working people. We had Spitfires and a powerful Royal Navy.
We were self sufficient in energy and manufactures and the greedy bankers had not got their claws into our national wealth.

We had no lollipop people then. Every day at school turning out time (4 pm then) the local police sergeant came up from the police station to escort us across the road. Yes in those days we had local bobbies in whom we were in awe and whose orders had to be obeyed.
We had little traffic in those days and indeed in my village I remember playing football in a B road. But even with so little traffic it was considered important to protect children crossing the main street.
Now, in spite of all the progress and exponential increase in traffic it seems that escorting children across the much busier roads by people on a low wage is unaffordable.

What is affordable is benefits to foreigners who send money back to their countries and who are hailed as heroes by Harriet Harman. Also affordable is legal aid for prisoners in jail to make spurious allegations such as the postman convicted of murder to sue the Post Office for wrongful dismissal even though he will be incarcerated for fifteen years.
Also protected are the many "non jobs" such as diversity officers and health co ordinators whose numbers seem to increase annually.

I believe taxpayers pay their taxes willingly (unless they are Tory donors) but want them to fund those things they think matter.
It is time that our rulers spent our money in the way WE wish in the defence of our country and the safety of our children.

We pay the taxes and they should be used for OUR benefit and not the dross of the world.
Is that not fair? Of course it is but those in power have no concept of fairness.

If we, the ordinary British people are not heard and considered someday, perhaps not so far in the future the pot of our anger will boil over and THEY will feel the consequences.

The people are in a mood for revolt and it will not be the "mummy's boys" of the middle class students who will be revolting, so BEWARE.

yaz