DO NOT GIVE TO "CHILDREN IN NEED"

Another quick blog I forgot to put on before.

PLEASE do not give to "Children in Need".

It is a scam and much of the money which is not used in administration is given to anti British people.
Our kids will benefit little.
Many of the so called deprived children helped are from large immigrant families who we already foolishly subsidise and who present a population timebomb which OUR children will have to compete with.

Remember the leader of the London bombers ran a club partially financed by this so called charity.

Also much of the money is spent abroad, when we as a nation are in debt. Foreign aid thieved
from our taxes has increased against our will.

By all means give to charity if you can afford to but remember "charity begins at home"

Give to the "Help for Heroes", "Salvation Army" "British Legion" or your.
local hospice instead of this brainwashing con.

Or give to the BNP and help us save our country.

A MODERN CRUSADE

What an eventful week it has been and a portent for the disaster we face owing to the incompetence of our rulers.

First, unemployed ugly muslims desecrate our poppies by burning them. The only ones arrested for this crime are EDL supporters who complain.
It makes an Englishman want to throw up. However, many people including the young who the State has attempted to brainwash into accepting the destruction of Britain are also understandedly upset and support for the BNP is increasing among them.

Then Guantamano terrorists are compensaed to the tune of £ millions because they were tortured by the USA and we supposedly knew about it.
These terrorists are not just scum, they are Al Qaida scum and that is why they were arrested in the first place. At least one was only resident here and had no right of citizenship. Never mind he was flown back here in luxury at our expense and all the legal costs were paid for by ? you guessed it. The British taxpayer i.e you and me.

Also last week many muslim extremists who should have been deported have been released from prison as it is agains their "human rights" to send them back to their own country. Even "Hook hand"has been given right of residence.

Now as we are in Afghanistan and control certain areas they could all be deported to these areas and left to enjoy the advantages and pleasures of a muslim society without having to mix with the infidels. Oh and their families could also be relocated as they have a right to family life.
Food could be provided to give them a start. I suggest Spam. This is what the passengers on the luxury cruise ship which broke down in the Carribean survived on so if Spam is good enough for them it is good enough for these criminals and their families.

Yesterday we were informed as if we didn't know that white British people would be in a minority in little over 50 years.
Also yesterday it was announced that the UK government would have to pay £ 7 billion (money we have to borrow)to help bail out Ireland, and that is in addition to the increase in our EU contribution.
Today we get the new knighthoods awarded by the Tories and numbered amongst them are wealthy hedge fund managers who gave money to the Tory Party.
These thieves can loot the country knowing they will be richly rewarded by their party.

If course all the expenses incurred by government will mean that ways will have to be found to reduce expenditure on services used and needed by us.

They have now come up with a new way of saving NHS money. Sack GP receptionists and replace them with call centres which could be abroad (to save money you know) and even in India.
Well if you have ever tried to sort your broadband out speaking to a man you can not understand imagine the difficulties for an old person unused to modern technology trying to book an appointment to see his GP whose surgery is possibly within yards of the patient's house for stomach pains or a repeat prescription. What chance would there be for either the patient or Indian call centre employee understanding each other especially when descriptions of symptoms vary in different localities.
Lives would be lost.
Never mind, money would be saved. More for the hedge fund managers to get their greedy hands on and no doubt gain knighthoods.

The concept of offshoring jobs is not always a bad idea.
I would offshore the committee who suggested such a daft idea together with the senior members of the LibLabCon parties and all those promoted by them, not just the jobs but the people in them. And while they are at it they could take the anti British muslim scum who hate us and insult our flag and memories of those who fell for it and us.

We MUST endeavour to rid ourselves of the greedy parasites who rule us and the thieves who support this system and are so richly rewarded for doing so, and the dross of the world they have allowed into our land.

This would be a real modern CRUSADE. This is OUR Crusade.

WELL - WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Here is a simple thought exercise:
1. Freedom
2. Security
3. Diversity
Choose any two of the above.
You can have diversity and freedom, but you will have no security.
You can have diversity and security, but you will have no freedom.
You can have freedom and security, but you will have no diversity.
What do you value most?

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/017924.html


Personally, I reckon 1 and 2.


Morg
.

CONSERVATIVES - ISLAM SHOULD BE OUR NEW RELIGION

Islam should become our state religion

The Guardian became outraged when Iain Duncan Smith suggested that it was a "sin" that society had negligently abandonned 4.5 million people to live permanently on out-of work benefits instead of find ways to get them re-integrated into working life. His "mask" was said to have slipped, though he had "almost succeeded" in pretending there was a proper basis for his policies, more acceptable to our "secular society".

The absurdity of suggesting that Iain Duncan Smith's Christian motivations were any kind of secret and of criticising the use of moral categories to justify his policy approaches - only lefties are allowed to have morals, after all; to be Right Wing is, by definition, to be evil, seeking to impose final solutions on the poor, force them to eat rotting horse-flesh, and cleansing them from beyond the sight of nice middle class folk; any right-winger employing a moral term such as "wrong" or "sin" must have some sinister ulterior motivation - has been covered already by the Editor and by Cranmer.

What I want to add, though, is a challenge to this idea, underlying the Guardian's criticisms, that our society is "secular", by which the Guardian clearly means some combination of atheist materialist and agnostic. The reality is that no free society has even been secular, though a number of state structures have been. Our Establishment cannot, any longer, find inspiration in Christianity, so it must look elsewhere. I shall argue that the best alternative is Islam.

The majority religion in our society is, as it probably always has been, and probably has been in every significant human society, animism. As explored in a recent television show by Richard Dawkins, most people believe in some hotchpotch combination of astrology, chakras, healing crystals, reincarnation (think of past lives hypnosis), faith healers, ghosts and spirits. And that's before we start re-interpreting beliefs in aliens or the Illuminati in religious categories. Animism is the religion of The Folk, not atheism.

Leftist atheists (there are plenty of right-wing atheists, also, but they suffer from this particular error somewhat less) have a touching belief that because, as they see it, reason and evidence favour atheist materialism, society is destined eventually to become atheist materialist. Now obviously I dispute vigorously that reason or evidence favour atheist materialism - reason strongly favours philosophical monotheism and the belief in just desert for action (Islam is probably the religion most purely favoured by reason alone); whilst evidence runs contrary to reason in favouring Trinitarianism, and love and mercy as opposed to just desert (this clash between reason and evidence having been acknowledged and explored since the letters of St Paul). But that is not what I want to explore here. I want to challenge the notion that society could conceivably come to believe in atheist materialism even if it were recommended by reason and evidence. Recognising that that simply isn't an option has profound consequences for how a society's politics and constitution should be organised.

It requires a great deal of emotional and intellectual robustness to be a materialist atheist, because atheist materialism responds to the deepest questions of the human heart - "what's it all about?"; "what is truly meaningful and worthy?"; "there must be something more - what is it?"; "we cannot simply end, so what happens after we die?"; and others - it responds to these deep questions by the intellectual equivalent of sticking its fingers in its ears and crying "La, la, la, la! I'm not listening!", namely to intone "These are the wrong questions." Since that is so transparently unsatisfying a response, only very confident people can defy logic by proclaiming themselves satisfied by it. That is why the Dawkins, Atkins, and Hitchens of this world are so strident - they must yell loudly to drown out the discontented voices within.

Atheist materialism has no prospect of replacing orthodox religions (at least in anything remotely like its current forms). Its only contribution to the discussion can be that of the vandal - to destroy what it despises or does not understand leaving nothing of value in its place. The illusion of cleverness generated by atheist materialism has merely broken the confidence of the Establishment in its ability to sell orthodox religion to The Folk. Atheist materialism itself is obviously unsellable. So, without the credible and respectable critique of animism that orthodox religion provides, and only the fundamentally empty and implausible criticisms of animism that atheist materialism offers, The Folk feel no constraints upon the overt expression of what was always, in truth, their underlying superstition.

It is unclear how many in the Establishment were ever really convicted of the truths of orthodox religion, even in its pomp, but they certainly understood and respected its value as a guide and moral focus for policy-making, a discipline upon The Folk, and a key social binding force. The Somme and Passchendaele broke the British Establishment's confidence in itself and in its moral project, but Nihilism isn't any kind of long-term project. Self-pity, self-hatred and self-indulgence are understandable in the light of such terrible events, but at some point we must get over it.

I make no apologies about being a Christian, but I am pragmatic enough to recognise that the British Establishment finds it impossible, any longer, to accept any Christian inspiration for its projects. On the contrary, precisely because it retains certain of the forms of Christianity, the Establishment's self-hatred often takes the form of hating Christians. Individual Christians are oppressed, in our country, precisely because the Establishment still formally takes Christian inspiration but doesn't want it.

It's time to move on. We need to abandon the last vestiges of Christian role in our constitution, and regard Christians as the minority we are, entitled to proper protection in a liberal society of the sort we automatically extend to Muslims and Hindus. But we cannot hope to abandon religious inspiration in our constitution. All that does is create a disconnect between an irreligious polity and our ineliminably religious Folk, and will make our Establishment despised rather than perceived as the rulers and leaders it should be. So we must have something. As I have said above, Christians accept the dictats of evidence over intuitive reason, but Islam is the most straightforwardly intuitive religion of all. Its core doctrines make perfect sense: there is one God over all the earth; He is our creator; He commands obedience from us; He will judge us at the end of our lives sending the virtuous to paradise and the wicked to hell. How could it be any more obvious? Islam is also clearly tempting to our Establishment - they admire its disciplines, certainty, self-confidence and clear hierarchies of authority. If Muslim politicians express matters in moral categories or talk about their prayers, they are not condemned in the way that Christian politicians are. If our Establishment adopted Islam as its religion of inspiration, and we chose Islamic religious leaders to listen to as our society's moral guides, The Folk could be diverted from their superstitions and decadence into more morally purposeful and energetic projects. Our lethargic, morbid Establishment could be quickened into life by clear moral goals provided by those they could respect and listen to. Sunni Islam has also (and crucially), historically been the second most successful structure for promoting tolerant multi-cultural societies (behind Protestantism and ahead of Catholicism).

Our society is not the atheist materialist place that Guardian writers fondly imagine it, and it cannot and will not ever be so. Atheist materialism is simply not well-designed to provide a moral inspiration to societies, for the simple reason that it offers no answers to the big questions. Christianity cannot serve that role any longer in Britain, and the notion that it does has become a threat to individual devout Christians - the Establishment's self-hatred becomes manifest in oppression of Christians. The next best alternative is Islam. That would be the best way to go from here.

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/centreright/2010/11/islam-should-become-our-state-religion.html

-------------------------

Well we new it was coming - CIVIL WAR can't be far away.

THE PUBLIC SECTOR IS CRIPPLING THE BRITISH ECONOMY.

PUBLIC SECTOR HAS RUINED BRITAIN

Follow this link to BRITAINS TRILLON POUND HORROR STORY.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/britains-trillion-pound-horror-story/4od#3139408

WIGAN "IS SHE OR ISN'T SHE" A MUSLIM MP LISA NANDY BECOMES VICE - CHAIRS OF LABOUR FRIENDS OF SEARCHLIGHT

(Picture courtesy of townofshame.com)

(That's her on the left above Hi! I'm Yvonne and Robert Mugabe is the chap to the right of Lisa)

Recently appointed Wigan "is she or isn't she" Muslim MP Lisa Nandy has just accepted a newly arranged post of 'Vice-Chairs of Labour Friends of Searchlight'.Pro-halal slaughtered meat lover Lisa Nancy has offered her services to the already unsteady rabble and BNP hating, kosher loving friends of communist crank and bungling buffoon burglar Gerry Gable over at Searchlight HQ - and this after their last meeting discussed that the BNP are in apparent demise as opposed to the more popular English Defence League?

Lisa Nancy MP - Potentially The Only Halal Pie-Eating Witch In Wigan....Or, Is She?

You voted for her....so, remember "YOU REAP WHAT YOU SOW". See the previous post!

WE WILL REMEMBER THEM

Today this alien scum showed disrespect to our country while living off our backs by trying to disrupt the Armistice Day ceremony and even worse burning poppies. It seems they do not accept the civilised rules of behaviour we have but are quite willing to accept the benefits we pay them even as they threaten to take over our country.
This ugly rabble were eventually escorted away but only after some EDL protestors were arrested. Why were these trolls not arrested for racial hatred?

Yesterday hiding among student protestors SWP thugs caused mayhem at Tory Central office thus hijacking a legitimate student grievance. The government says it has not enough money to pay for our young people to have a university education, and it does not, the way it allocates resources.

Also Mr Roumpy or whatever he calles himself, president of the EU says the days of the nation state are numbered. Well being a Belgian he never really had a nation.

So what have these three items have in common? Well there is a solution which can solve all three and make us a lot better off.

First Exit the EU and save us £billions and then we would have enough money to pay for ALL our needs. This would enable us to withdraw from the European Human Rights legislation and would allow us to deport those who show our society such contempt.

Where would we deport them to?
Well they don't like us in "muslim lands" but we still controll bits of Afghanistan so they could be deported their to live in squalour with their muslim "brothers".We would need to supply some food to get them started (we would not see them starve) so we could provide food such as pork and bacon to sustain them.

This would help the housing demographic and economic problems in this country.

So it's easy. Get the EU with all its expense and laws (and asylum lawyers) off our backs and help muslims to reconnect with their fellow muslims in the culture they like with a little help to get them going.
Our benefits would not have to be cut. Our education and defence could be financed and there would be less unrest on our streets, and everybody would be happy and get what they want.

They would be happy as they don't like our soldiers. They say to them "go to hell". No we would just bring them home in one piece.

Until then today "We will remember our fallen heroes who died for us"

We will also remember the bastards who desecrated our heroes memory and we have long memories.

We will have our day.

Watch The Hate Filled SCUM Video Here...