A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)

Wednesday, 20 October 2010
Monday, 18 October 2010
BRITAIN BC - FRANCIS PRYOR
BRITAIN BC PT1
BRITAIN BC PT 2
Watch and learn - the truth about Britains historical past.
BRITAIN BC PT 2
Watch and learn - the truth about Britains historical past.
ALL TORIES SHOULD READ THIS.
Francis Maude MP, Minister for the Cabinet Office is a man of many characters - tough Conservative policy maker, champion of public sector transparency, behind the scenes Tory change agent and moderniser, dubious businessman and friend of the middle aged woman with the basket.
Above all Maude has nailed his personal and political colours to the mast of transparency in government. He recently stated “Transparency is at the heart of the Government's programme, which is why the Cabinet Office, at the heart of government, is taking the lead. All departments will open up their data in the weeks ahead.” The gushing honesty and openness goes on ...
“We are pulling back the curtains to let light into the corridors of power._ By being open and accountable we can start to win back people’s trust. Openness will not be comfortable for us in government; but it will enable the public to hold our feet to the fire. This way lies better government. Transparency is key to our efficiency drive, and will enable the public to help us to deliver better value for money in public spending. Today is just the start of what we plan to do. We are determined to set an example for the wider public sector, and to create a ‘right to data’ as a core part of government business.
So who is the middle aged woman with the empty shopping basket? None other than Julia Middleton, Chief Executive Officer of the political charity Common Purpose, who enjoys a salary of circa £85,000 a year, largely from the taxpayer.
Common Purpose And Dirty Deals
Maude’s relationship with Middleton is an interesting one.TO READ THE REST OF THIS - CLICK HERE.
Morg
.
ISLAMIST CODE OF CONDUCT FOR DAILY LIFE
1. Wake up.
2. Hit my wife and daughters
3. Take a s**t.
4. Wipe my ass with my hand.
5. Pray
6. Complain that I am discriminated against
7. Pray
8. Organise protest because I moved to the west but it’s just not like it was back home
9. Pray
10. Riot because my new country allows me to, but I hate them for it.
11. Pray
12. Beat a random woman because she doesn’t dress like a ninja or mailbox.
13. Order my wives and sex slaves to feed my 18 children.
14. Procreate with my wives and sex slaves because 18 children isn’t enough.
15. Pray for forgiveness from Allah because I had to see my wives and sex slaves naked.
16. Go to bed and wonder why everyone hates my religion of peace.
2. Hit my wife and daughters
3. Take a s**t.
4. Wipe my ass with my hand.
5. Pray
6. Complain that I am discriminated against
7. Pray
8. Organise protest because I moved to the west but it’s just not like it was back home
9. Pray
10. Riot because my new country allows me to, but I hate them for it.
11. Pray
12. Beat a random woman because she doesn’t dress like a ninja or mailbox.
13. Order my wives and sex slaves to feed my 18 children.
14. Procreate with my wives and sex slaves because 18 children isn’t enough.
15. Pray for forgiveness from Allah because I had to see my wives and sex slaves naked.
16. Go to bed and wonder why everyone hates my religion of peace.
A BANKING SOLUTION
An interesting website taken from the comments section of the Telegraph.
Supported by economists and industrialists this site explains the causes of our financial woes and the remedies.
It points out that the £200 billion "quantitive easing" (money printing) action by the government has all gone to the banks who then lend it out at vast profit.
If this money was put into the system to pay government debt and help industry our problems could be easily solved.
It seems too good to be true but I can not find any flaws in it.
Why don't they do it?
Because all the senior politcians are in hock to the banks and many of them are themselves bankers, and so we all suffer by paying interest to these parasites who produce nothing.
Anyhow look at this link and see what you think.
http://www.bankofenglandact.co.uk/
Supported by economists and industrialists this site explains the causes of our financial woes and the remedies.
It points out that the £200 billion "quantitive easing" (money printing) action by the government has all gone to the banks who then lend it out at vast profit.
If this money was put into the system to pay government debt and help industry our problems could be easily solved.
It seems too good to be true but I can not find any flaws in it.
Why don't they do it?
Because all the senior politcians are in hock to the banks and many of them are themselves bankers, and so we all suffer by paying interest to these parasites who produce nothing.
Anyhow look at this link and see what you think.
http://www.bankofenglandact.co.uk/
Sunday, 17 October 2010
TV LICENCE
Nicked this from here:
http://inotify.blogspot.com/2010/10/tv-licence.html
I cancelled the telly tax sometime ago – I hardly watched TV as most of the stuff was abysmal, such as X-factor, Strictly Come Lap Dancing and other panem et circenses programs. As for the news, it was either sensationalised trivia, celebrity worship or in the case of the BBC, outright bias which had me reaching for the bendroflumethiazide.
If there are any programs I want to watch I either watch on demand or rent/buy the bluray DVDs. Being a geek, I have networked, using CAT6 cabling, the entire house and can stream media to any TV or PC in the house using NMTs.
Life is much better without TV, it’s more fulfilled and hours of your life are not simply wasted in silence watching angry soaps full of cliché repeating, angry chav-like actors. I like spending time reading debates on blogs, selecting online news from different countries for a wider perspective. Suddenly, news becomes more of a discussion than a one way stream of propaganda. It’s quite liberating.
Cancelling the licence is simple: one phone call, one cancelled direct debit, tear up the letters as they arrive and most importantly: one notice of “implied right of access denied for the following companies: Capita, TV Licensing and the BBC”.
The TV Licensing guy that eventually turned up at my place walked up my drive, read the notice, scratched his head, made a call on his mobile and went away, never to be seen again. And the letters suddenly stopped.
I know most people think you need a TV licence if you own a TV. That’s wrong, it’s any device used to receive live broadcast. You can use a laptop or a TV to view DVDs or other streamable material.
I know most people are worried that they may be caught. Put a notice up and ignore the TV Licence guys – they’re a private company and you can deny them right of access to your property. They are the ones infringing the law if they come up to your property.
They must obtain a warrant to enter your premises but they need to show the court proof that the occupier is watching live broadcast – this is an expensive route and if they have deceived the court in any way, they can be in big, big trouble both as an individual and a company. That is why warrants are extremely rare.
There are also no TV detector vans to catch you – they cross check their licence database with the address. The TV detector vans are empty hoaxes. No one to date has been prosecuted using a TV detector. Because they don’t exist, although the technology is feasible, it is cheaper for Capita to use the database and employ empty threats.
And there's absolutely no way they could stop me from watching live broadcasts using software on my PC using my network, should I choose to.
Like New Zealand, the licence fee will go eventually - it needs a critical mass of people to be aware of the above and then the cost of defending the licence fee becomes too great.
So, come on people, let's do it!
End.
I haven't had a telly - or a licence - for some 15 years now. I used to have one ... but then ... I used to have a wife; she was forever whingeing that "you've always got your nose stuck in a book" instead of watching the telly with her. We had a telly because SHE wanted one. I've never missed it ... or her, come to think of it. Certainly never missed forking out £150 every year.
I do still get a couple of Crapita men knocking on my door every year. I just tell them I wouldn't have a telly if THEY paid ME £150 a year.
Morg
.
http://inotify.blogspot.com/2010/10/tv-licence.html
I cancelled the telly tax sometime ago – I hardly watched TV as most of the stuff was abysmal, such as X-factor, Strictly Come Lap Dancing and other panem et circenses programs. As for the news, it was either sensationalised trivia, celebrity worship or in the case of the BBC, outright bias which had me reaching for the bendroflumethiazide.
If there are any programs I want to watch I either watch on demand or rent/buy the bluray DVDs. Being a geek, I have networked, using CAT6 cabling, the entire house and can stream media to any TV or PC in the house using NMTs.
Life is much better without TV, it’s more fulfilled and hours of your life are not simply wasted in silence watching angry soaps full of cliché repeating, angry chav-like actors. I like spending time reading debates on blogs, selecting online news from different countries for a wider perspective. Suddenly, news becomes more of a discussion than a one way stream of propaganda. It’s quite liberating.
Cancelling the licence is simple: one phone call, one cancelled direct debit, tear up the letters as they arrive and most importantly: one notice of “implied right of access denied for the following companies: Capita, TV Licensing and the BBC”.
The TV Licensing guy that eventually turned up at my place walked up my drive, read the notice, scratched his head, made a call on his mobile and went away, never to be seen again. And the letters suddenly stopped.
I know most people think you need a TV licence if you own a TV. That’s wrong, it’s any device used to receive live broadcast. You can use a laptop or a TV to view DVDs or other streamable material.
I know most people are worried that they may be caught. Put a notice up and ignore the TV Licence guys – they’re a private company and you can deny them right of access to your property. They are the ones infringing the law if they come up to your property.
They must obtain a warrant to enter your premises but they need to show the court proof that the occupier is watching live broadcast – this is an expensive route and if they have deceived the court in any way, they can be in big, big trouble both as an individual and a company. That is why warrants are extremely rare.
There are also no TV detector vans to catch you – they cross check their licence database with the address. The TV detector vans are empty hoaxes. No one to date has been prosecuted using a TV detector. Because they don’t exist, although the technology is feasible, it is cheaper for Capita to use the database and employ empty threats.
And there's absolutely no way they could stop me from watching live broadcasts using software on my PC using my network, should I choose to.
Like New Zealand, the licence fee will go eventually - it needs a critical mass of people to be aware of the above and then the cost of defending the licence fee becomes too great.
So, come on people, let's do it!
End.
I haven't had a telly - or a licence - for some 15 years now. I used to have one ... but then ... I used to have a wife; she was forever whingeing that "you've always got your nose stuck in a book" instead of watching the telly with her. We had a telly because SHE wanted one. I've never missed it ... or her, come to think of it. Certainly never missed forking out £150 every year.
I do still get a couple of Crapita men knocking on my door every year. I just tell them I wouldn't have a telly if THEY paid ME £150 a year.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)