THE PAPAL VISIT

The furore about the Pope's visit amazes me and in my view demonstrates the intolerance of the PC brigade over matters of Christianity which would not be expressed against the leader of any other faith or even a tin pot dictator.

First let me explain where I am coming from.

I was brought up in a strong Cof E household although my mother was a Methodist. In the past there had been trouble with "mixed marriages" in the family between Catholics and Protestants which had caused some family rifts and indeed the first question my father would ask me if I went out with a girl was "Is she a Catholic" The answer seemed to be invariably "yes", to which the reply was "You will have Father Mahogany coming to see you"
My first wife was a Catholic and her parents did not attend our Cof E wedding although I got on well with them.
Following my divorce I had two girlfriends who were Catholic.

I am now an agnostic but wish I could believe in God but to me the science is against His existance especially in a form we could understand. I certainly do not believe if God did exist He would want us to spend several hours a week "worshipping Him"

However I can understand the sense of peace gained by sitting quietly in a church and the atmosphere in St Peter's in Rome was such that I could almost be tempted to believe.
Religion brings immense comfort to millions of people and IF I did ever believe I would turn Catholic.

That church has resisted the modern tendency to be all things to all men and has stuck to it's original tenets of belief. Yes I have issues with its views on contraception and the paedophile actions of some of the priests was a scandal which should have been addressed.
However the actions of those who oppose this visit of the leader of 5 million British people demonstrates their intolerance, an intolerance they would not direct against a muslim cleric or tin pot dictator.

The worm and paedophile advocate Peter Tatchell has a cheek to oppose the visit on the grounds of the Pope's intolerance when he himself is so intolerant that he would happily see people arrested for saying anything against homosexuality (homophobia as he calls it).
Similarly the lefties and Guardianistas and various arty farty types oppose the visit for the same reason and say the police costs should be borne by the church. The Catholic church is not as wealthy as often supposed.
Yes they have priceless artifacts in their churches and many irreplaceable paintings on ceilings etc but these are not saleable assets.
Against these costs should be put the costs of guarding the muslim terrorists,Tony Blair, the Notting Hill Carnival or the many alien events in our country.

Who would be likely to attack the Pope? Not Richard Dawkins or some such atheist. If past experience with the attack on the last Pope if an attempt on his life was made it would be more likely to be made by a muslim nutter.
Lastly Cardinal Kasper's comments that landing at Heathrow airport reminded him of visiting a Third World Country rings true, and that is before he has visited the "enriched diverse" city we have as our capital.

So there it is, although I am not a Catholic or even a practicing Christian I welcome the Pope, not least because he is not a muslim and belongs to a European tradition from which we have drawn so much of our history.

Live and let live you Lefties gays and atheists.--

AND SHOW SOME TOLERANCE for a change.

CHILD PROSTITUTION - BASED IN INCE.

You've all surely read about this in the MSM over the past couple of days:

GANG WHO TRIED TO SELL GIRLS’ VIRGINITY IS JAILED

But I bet you didn't know it came from here in the borough though?

http://www.wigantoday.net/news/child_prostitution_gang_facing_jail_1_1542739


Tell me - please - I've only lived here for six+ years ... but ... did this sort of stuff used to happen before Labour introduced mass immigration? Or is this just the start - going by other Northern towns with an immigrant population and a child prostitution problem?

Correction:

And I didn't come from the third world - Anglesey's my place of descent, birth and upbringing. I'm a native to these isles (thanks for correcting me Englishman - you are of course correct, and I am of course a Welshman ).

Morg

.

PAEDOPHILE "ENRICHMENT"

This ugly looking bastard is one of a gang of Middle Eastern people who have taken residence in our town only to abuse the foolishly granted government and council hospitality by preying on our young girls. This piece of scum is part of the "vibrant and enriched"
society we have allowed to infect our land.
They sought to obtain "young virgins" and to trade them for up to £150,000 to wealthy Arabs so they could "break them in".
So our kids have to be used because of muslim obsession with virginity? Virginity is not the big deal for us as it is in the fly blown countries of the middle East but paedophilia is.
We think it abuse and a crime which is completely beyond the pale.


All concerned, the buyers and sellers in this vile trade belong to the "religion of peace". Yes I suppose it seems OK for them to abuse our children in this paedophilic way as their prophet
whose every word they follow would have been considered a paedophile in England.

This case is just the tip of the iceberg, and was only uncovered by the vigilance of hotel staff.
How many thousands of vulnerable girls are sacrficed to this vile product of "enrichment" without anybody knowing?

Why are these perverts so obsessed with sex. They blanket their women in black shrouds so that others can not see them. Some of these women MAY even be good looking but even if they were, normal red blooded males in a civilised country exercise restraint. Possibly however many are as ugly as their bearded bosses(husbands)
They deem our women as prostitutes if they show a bit of leg let alone anything else.

It could be said that these girls should not have been let out so young by their parents ,but their parents were brought up in a society when such outrages were unheard of.
My daughters went out as teenagers and although I sometimes worried about them I never feared they would be forced into prostitution.
Following enrichment these occurrences are becoming all too common. The irony of it is that 2 years ago 13 members were arrested by a PC policeman who wished to gain some Brownie points for stating the facts, and were only cleared when we threatened a mass protest, For their wrongful arrest they were awarded £thousands in compensation and left him with egg on his face covering his brown nose.
The policeman in this latest case remarked that it was not only foreign girls who have been trafficked but British girls were also used thus.
That is what we have been telling you for years and what our members were arrested for. And you have only just found out? Jesus you must be thick.


So what do we tell our young girls?,The old advice beware of strangers and the stranger they are the more care should be taken.

Yes we have some bad uns in Wigan but my advice is the less like a Wiganer he sounds like the less you should trust him and if he does not speak English with a pure English (or Welsh etc)accent don't trust him at all.

When they are older they can be more discerning and less liable to be used but in their early teens they should only mix with those of their own kind.

And to think this took place in Wigan, one of the least "enriched" towns in the country.
What is going on in other towns and citied does not bear thinking about.

Thanks a lot New Labour and the Tories for encouraging this cesspit of depravity in the country our ancestors worked and died to create.

PLAYING DOCTORS AND NURSES?

About 30 years ago I was in a relationship with a nurse who although not qualified was good at her job and was very capable of gaining nursing qualifications. The reason she did not do so was because on qualifying many nurses were not being offered jobs and she feared that she would become unemployed if she did gain a qualification. Many nurses were not employed on qualifying.
Since then of course the NHS has scoured the world for nurses, often poorly trained and with little knowledge of English and Western hygene.
The results have been evident for all to see in the increased hospital infections owing to inadequate cleaning and barrier precautions.

I read in the paper today that over a thousand newly qualified British doctors are surplus to requirements but at the same time they are recruiting doctors from the third world, who have little knowledge of British culture or language. They are expected to communicate and empathise with often elderly patients who have been fortunate enough to escape the modern vibrant and diverse society until now when they are vulnerable and can do little about it.
Many of these foreign doctors have obtained their qualifications at such centres of excellence as are found in the Congo, Malawi or some such place.
Meanwhile doctors trained here at great expense to the taxpayer leave medical schools with massive debts and find themselves , highly trained professionals unemployed in their own country . They are then forced to take their skills abroad and are lost to our society which trained them.

Is it any wonder that medical mishaps are so frequent? Ias it any wonder that patients say they can not communicate with their GPs.
I am not saying that all foreign doctors are inefficient or dangerous, some are excellent,but many are not and a liabiliy to the NHS.

Now it is often said that the NHS would collapse without foreign doctors. Yes it would because British doctors and nurses have failed to gain employment here. If we kept our own well trained people here we would not be dependent on what the third world has to offer.

But why is this happening or allowed to happen? I am beginning to think there is an ulterior motive at work here. What possible reason could there be for encouraging our best to leave while having them replaced by the mediocre from all over the world.?
It is certainly not to improve the working of the National health SERVICE.

I believe it is part of a plan to so disrupt our country that we British people are so dependent on foreigners even in the sphere of so vital provision as our health that we will be as powerless as the Orwellian pawns in the New World Order our political elites seek.

SMOKING AT THE HOSPITAL

Wigan Infirmary has a few smoking shelters outside for those patients and staff who smoke. They plan to remove them on Oct 1st and make the entire site non-smoking. I reckon they should read this first:

SMOKING shelters for patients, visitors and staff have been reintroduced at the Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals.
Trust managers were forced into the U-turn because of safety issues around the number of people defying the five-year-old smoke-free policy.
As the Daily Echo reported in June, some patients had been caught smoking under the bedclothes, in stairwells, toilets, storerooms, courtyards and even next to the oxygen store. The fire service had been called out and staff had put out small fires with jugs of water.
Employees had been caught smoking in 21 areas around the Bournemouth site and six at Christchurch, leading to a build-up of debris and litter.
Smoking continues to be banned inside the hospitals. In the grounds, it is now restricted to newly-designated smoking areas or shelters.
The six areas at Bournemouth include the edge of the car park opposite the main entrance and the edge of the car park outside the emergency department.
At Christchurch, patients can smoke under supervision in the ward gardens and a smoking shelter has been provided in the car park behind the hospital. There is also a new smoking area at the trust’s sterile services unit at Alderney in Poole.
Staff at all three sites have been warned they face disciplinary action if they are caught smoking outside designated areas.
A spokesperson for the trust said: “The board agreed, reluctantly, to implement smoking areas as a way of minimising the risk of illicit smoking within our hospitals.
“The trust does not endorse or support smoking in any way.
“We have a health campaign in place, which includes working with SmokeStop services to educate staff and patients about the dangers of smoking and related illness.
“We are also promoting healthy living – for example, encouraging staff to take walks at lunchtime.
“The trust will monitor the impact of the policy, and if it is felt to be not working, it will be reviewed.”

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/8386360.Bournemouth_Hospital_smoking_u_turn/

What do the bigwigs at the infirmary think will happen here?

I'll take a flying guess - the other side of the road will have a constant 50+ people having a smoke - patients and staff. Fine-ish for the staff, not so good for the patients in winter.  They may (or may not) have the power to impose their will on the staff - they certainly don't have such power over the patients.

I recommend the anti-smoking nazis have a policy rethink.

You might care to read this - which is where I got the story from. It has more information.

http://freedom-2-choose.blogspot.com/2010/09/you-are-always-on-my-mind.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FqZch+%28Freedom+To+Choose%29

Morg
.

Fear and Uncertainty Have Paths of Their Own

Fear and uncertainty create patterns, paths of their own. And societies are again in a mosaic of uncertainty -- and resultant fear -- over the fate and durability of the social and security frameworks once taken for granted. Mass reaction to these fears will trigger transformative change. But there will be opportunities to seize and command change.

Almost all societies in the world have gone beyond the stage where they expect stability and linear progressions of the past to long endure. Some societies -- almost en bloc -- anticipate the end of their security; others anticipate the end of their suffering. Few expect insulation from change. That change, however, need not be entirely inscrutable if we look at global patterns and at historical human behaviour.

Economic Patterns: What we now call "economics" determines power and conflict patterns because wealth, or the deprivation of it, determines survival, and, for those who survive, "economics" determines the relative control they may have over individual and societal destiny. Thus social behavior determines economic viability, and the failure or success of economic patterns determines social corrective or compounding action.

We are about to see an acceleration of social reaction to economic failure - a reaction to the inflexibility of policies which have failed to adjust to changing circumstances.

Many finance ministers are speaking, still, as though their national economies can perform well with just minor adjustment to old patterns. This may not be so, particularly in the West, where the rapid growth in state revenues since the end of the Cold War pushed governments down the path of highly capital-intensive programs in areas which absolutely do not contribute to national productivity in essential manufactures or primary industry, and in many cases actually constrain productivity rises. As wealth grew, and tax revenues rose commensurately, the logical approaches of governments in market economies should have been to reduce taxation and further stimulate investment.

This occurred only rarely and incompletely. Taxpayers, also benefiting from rising wealth, themselves did not demand that governments constrain their spending. The situation thus created massive state sector positions in the Western economies. When recession strikes, industry and private citizens scale back and pay the price, but governments are less flexible. Unions and state workers make themselves immune to cuts and to the realities of the "real world".

In countries such as Greece, France, Spain, Portugal, and so on (and now the US, UK, Australia, etc.), those in the private sector who have come to rely on state handouts -- and therefore become "agents" for statism, and by default are opposed to market freedom -- compound the entrenched political class' view that the state should not undergo the kind of profound self-analysis and restructuring which the private sector must embrace.

The US, Australia, Greece, and so on, as just a few examples, are undergoing per capita productivity declines just at the time when they need to be developing a strategic buffer of internally-balanced economies and the ability to better compete internationally. And there is a fear that if wasteful government spending on huge capital projects ceases, then economies will collapse.

This fearful, selfish, and ignorant intellectual process within governments has been caused by the hubris generated by unfettered control of great wealth, and the presses which print the money. But governments only have the ability, in real terms, to dominate the non-productive -- or, at best, productivity-enabling infrastructure -- spending. Only by returning spending power to the innovative sections of society (in other words, the people) can economies become nimble and productive.

This is unlikely to happen, so we should expect sudden contractions in buying power in many Western states over the coming few years.

We are also already witnessing the contraction of some aspects of multinational mechanisms to amass and deploy capital wherever the market determines it can profitably be invested. Part of this contraction derives from the situation in which the world is entering a period where it may soon be without a viable global reserve currency. This in turn leads to the point where trade becomes more bilateral; investment scope becomes limited in some respects; and nationalism -- and with it, protectionism -- revives out of economic necessity.

There have been many factors leading to the revival of nationalism since the collapse of the brief (45 year) bipolar global strategic framework in 1990-91, and these were touched upon (certainly by this writer) from 1990 onward. So the seeming uncertainty in which we now find ourselves did not emerge suddenly or without understandable cause.

Perhaps, then, our "uncertainty" is not so uncertain?

Strategic Patterns: What clarity is emerging?

- Western economies will continue to decline, in real and strategic terms (if not in nominal accounting terms), unless truly radical re-structuring occurs, including the rapid and massive reduction of the size of government intervention in economies. This means an end to the era of entitlement welfare. However,

- No democratically-elected government will dare face voters if it reduces "bread for the masses", that method of cheaply buying votes. So most governments will continue to jeopardize their nations -- by continuing the bribery of the electorate -- in order to remain in office. Change, then, should only be expected through the appearance of massive threat, or national collapse, enabling the emergence of decisive leadership not based on the popular vote.

- Those states which abandon forms of taxation (such as those based on carbon emissions) which curb productivity will fare better than those which do not.

The immediate future, then, will be commanded not by electoral "democracies", but by decisive non-populist leaders who truly return productivity to the marketplace.

Russia and the People's Republic of China are thus favored.

Taken from an Email received from OilPrice.com

Protesting the Persecution of Pakistani Christians

Stories about arson, assault, and murder directed at Pakistan’s Christian community are commonplace. They come through the news feed almost every night.

The typical story begins when a rumor circulates among Muslims in Pakistan that Christians have done something heinous to Muslims, usually involving the desecration of the Koran. The stories inevitably prove to be unfounded, but the truth is no barrier to Muslim hysteria, and devout protesters go on the rampage sacking, burning, and killing

The following report from Pukaar News describes one such series of attacks, and the worldwide protests in its wake. Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for YouTubing it:

by Baron Bodissey

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/09/protesting-persecution-of-pakistani.html

I have posted this in response to a comment (unpublished) we received asking for proof of persecution of Christians in Pakistan, where food and medical aid were denied to Pakistani Christians seeking aid in the recent floods unless they converted to Islam.
Though not related to the flood this still shows how Pakistani Christians are persecuted by Islamist Mohammedans.
Maybe the commentator thinks Islam is a Religion of Peace.
Maybe the commentator thinks 'Peace' means dead ?