Monday, 9 August 2010

ALL NATIONALISTS OUGHT TO KNOW ABOUT THIS. AND EVERYONE ELSE TOO.


Statewatch, the civil liberties body that monitors the EU, has gained access to Council of Ministers Conclusions that reveal that Brussels now want law enforcement agencies in its member countries to build lists of political activists as part of a 'systematic data collection'.

Those responsible in the member countries for acquiring the information on 'agents of radicalisation' have been sent, by the EU, a 'data compilation instrument' that includes a list of 70 questions they are requested to answer.

This involves discovering who targeted activists socialise with, family members, psychological traits, religious affiliation, activities, economic status and, very revealingly, 'oral comments' - presumably ascertained through phone taps.

What actually constitutes being considered to be an 'agent of radicalisation' is not defined to any degree of detail and leaves open the door to wide categories of people finding themselves of potential interest to EU agencies.

The EU documents refer to 'extreme right/left, Islamist, nationalist, anti-globalisation' groups as some of those qualifying for surveillance. Europol, the EU's fledgling FBI equivalent, will pull together the information gathered at the member state level.

This move by the EU to document and keep under surveillance political activists follows on from the establishment of Project Indect which York University and the Police Service of Northern Ireland are spearheading in the UK with £10m of Brussels funding.

When will people waken up to the EU's destruction of our freedoms?
 
 
Spread the link far and wide. Like-minded people on the European mainland need to know about this too.

Morg
.

BLACK BRITAIN BY DAVID CAMERON

DAVID CAMERONS - BLACK BRITAIN




DAVID CAMERON - CERTAINLY NOT A BRITISH PATRIOT

SIGN THE PETITION TO HAVE TONY BLAIR ARRESTED FOR WAR CRIMES

Sunday, 8 August 2010

TAKING THE SMIRK OFF HIS FACE

I read that the corrupt ex Inspector Ali Dizaie had been attacked in jail. Poor man.
He was physically attacked and faeces smeared over family photographs. Oh, and OF COURSE RACIALLY ABUSED.
This crook who came to our country and was overpromoted in spite of his dubious ability by his incessant use of the "race card". He even tried to sue when he was not promoted even higher using this method.
Prominent in the Black Police Association he failed to see the irony in that. Firstly that association by definition is racist as it discriminates on ethnic grounds. Secondly, he is not black. He is little darker than I am but I like to think I have a better looking face than his ugly mug and a less arrogant smirk than he formerly had.
Hopefully the latter characteristic has been somewhat removed now by his time in jail.

For some reason he is an inmate of Leyhill open prison near Bristol. Now I know something about that institution having visited a relative there many years ago.
I was amazed by the conditions there.
Imagine an upmarket holiday camp in lush parkland and you get some idea of it. It was better than that and the prisoners seemed to be the bosses of the warders.

Why was this overpromoted arrogant thug, a friend of Iran's president (can't spell his name) ever put in so cosy an environment. The establishment there is hardly punishment and I'm sure far superior in comfort to those of his beloved Iran.

He should be in a proper jail if there are any to pay for his abuse of our society.

Also if being "racially abused" bothers him so much why does he not go back to his own country? If he remains here it must be because in spite of the abuse he has to suffer is of a lesser nature than the problems he would face in Iran under the care of his friend, the president.

Perhaps he would have been stoned for his adulterous behaviour or had his hand cut off for theft.

Now that WOULD be abuse, but under Sharia Law, just. Perhaps Sharia Law should be introduced for muslims in Britain so that they feel at home and welcome.

This thought applies to all those who moan and sue for "racist" abuse. If it is so bad here there is nothing stopping them going back to their own environment where they will not be so abused.
I was abused once in France and came back home vowing never to go there again and to remain amongst my own people who do not abuse me. Yes I know I am liable to be abused by immigrants as many are but their opinions do not bother me as I AM WITH MY OWN as he should be.

P S I read today that Wigan and Leigh have the fifth lowest percentage of immigrant births in the country. We are in a way insulated from the disaster that is befalling other towns and only see it when we venture outside the borough.
Long may we be able to resist Wigan Metro's efforts to make us more diverse and "vibrant"
We are happy as we are.




H

ETHICS AND THE CO OP

I see a soldier has been refused service in a Co op in Croydon on account of his being in uniform.
Now all the people I know would give a squaddie preferential treatment rather than penalise him. Our soldiers represent the "best of British" and even when fighting in illegal wars are OUR lads and are always on OUR side.

I know what a wonderful diverse and vibrant place Croydon is but I would hazard a guess that the checkout person who refused to serve the soldier was not what you might think of as an English person. If they were they are a disgrace to our people and should be punished for it.
The Co Op says that it was a mistake and that in the past policemen in uniform have not been served.
What do they mean, a mistake? How can you make such a "mistake" They could see his face (unlike some others who undoubtably patronise that shop) so what is the problem?
I bet they would have been glad if a cop in uniform was in their shop when a robbery took place.
The Co Op is too politically correct with all their "ethical" principles while endorsing the party of the war criminal Tony Blair.

In recent years they have become more competitive and our local shop is good in contrast to the situation in the past when there was nothing worth buying in their premises. But they still can not escape their outdated principles and so they make excuses for their insult to one of our brave lads.
I had an ex squaddie who asked me for assistance and in appreciation for the danger he had put himself fighting "for Queen and country" I have andeavoured to help him as much as I can.

Now what about those who are against "our Queen and country"?
I would give them NOTHING but then I would be done for "racism".
If that situation were ever to occur that is what I would do whatever the cost.
You are either 100% for us or I do not want you and will not deal with you.

This is MY land and I appreciate those who put their lives in danger on our behalf. Those who do not back them or treat them with civility should be punished, if foreign deported and if so called British ostracised by decent people.

The person who refused this man SHOULD BE SACKED .

Friday, 6 August 2010

HOW TO TALK ABOUT FURRINERS



PRIME minister David Cameron has been receiving advice from Prince Philip on how to talk about foreigners, it was confirmed last night.


Image
Mr Cameron spots a dago
Downing Street revealed the one-on-one sessions after Mr Cameron was overheard referring to Iran as being 'like Mordor full of mosques and kebab shops'.

The comments came just a week after he described Pakistan as a 'nation of exploding shopkeepers' and was photographed pulling at the corners of his eyes during a formal lunch with the prime minster of Japan.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "Shortly after taking office, the prime minister was briefed by the Duke of Edinburgh on the four basic, untrustworthy foreign types.

"Dagoes, golliwogs, slitty-eyed devils and what His Royal Highness called the 'Olive-Skinned Fez Brigade'.

"The prime minister was given a bullet-point rundown on the key characteristics of each one, including thievery, violence, general laziness and surly ingratitude."

The spokesman added: "His Royal Highness spent an awful lot of time talking about the slitty eyed devils, but he is nothing if not a 21st Century thinker."

Tom Logan, professor of geo-politics at Reading University, said: "Prince Philip is often portrayed as being a hopelessly irrelevant old bugger, but in the recent public consultation on government cost cutting, more than 60 per cent suggested feeding immigrants to the big cats at Longleat Safari Park.

"Which indicates that the Prince does seem to have a deeper connection with the British psyche than the likes of Harriet Harman. I'm not sure how I feel about that."

Meanwhile Mr Cameron will hold formal talks with President Zardari of Pakistan later today while dressed like one of the bomb disposal experts from The Hurt Locker.

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/i%27ve-been-taking-advice-from-prince-philip%2c-cameron-finally-admits-201008062981/

Morg
.

Thursday, 5 August 2010

IRAN HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS ACCORDING TO CAMERON

David Cameron admits that another rogue state has NUCLEAR WEAPON.



FRIGHTENING.

If Cameron was telling the truth.
He's mad quite a few gaffes recently and this could be no different.
Let's see how he riggles out of this one, if he can.

yaz