The news today is dominated by the shameful and illegal attack on aid ships in international waters by Israeli forces. More than 10 deaths were caused. The Israeli government says their forces were attacked by people with knives and iron bars. Of course they were. This was an act of piracy and they were defending their ship against attack.
Now I am no friend of the muslim religion and the sight of people in muslim dress in my country offends me.
BUT I sympathise with the people of Gaza and the Palestinian cause.
As a nationalist I believe everybody has a right to run their own country as they wish. I believe the state of Israel was a mistake we have to accept, but not their expansion into the West Bank and Gaza.
If I had had my land confiscated by a foreign power, my children driven into exile in a ghetto like Gaza I would never forgive the perpetrator.
The presence of Israel and its military expansion has been a cause of conflict for the last 50 years. The 9/11 outrage was a result and the radicalisation of muslims worldwide was a result of the West's perceived support for Israeli aggression.
The Iraq war was started because America believed Saddam threatened Israel. The excuse that he had not obeyed United Nations directives does not hold water as Israel has flouted these with impunity many times.
Afganistan is another conflict directly related to Israeli aggression and now Iran is threatened.
Yes, Iran threatens Israel but one can understand why. Muslims stand together (as do Jews).
There will be no peace in the Middle East until Israel is cut down to size and becomes more cooperative, and that is difficult with the large pro Israel lobby in the USA. However the USA is not the power it was and Israel as a Jewish state (now that's an interesting concept when an English nationality is considered racist) will be increasingly isolated in an ever more dangerous world.
The appointment of Tony Blair as a "peace envoy" shows how out of touch these people are. Blair was the man who appointed Lord Levy, a friend of Israel as his peace envoy, hardly likely to demonstrate impartiality to the dispossessed muslims.
Gaza costs us £millions in aid when the situation was caused by Israel and that country even prevents cement being imported into Gaza. Israel should pay for reconstruction, why should we pay for their actions? They really did pick up many ideas of brutality from Hitler but then like Hitler they believe in their superority over others (gentiles) and are just as deluded and no better.
Britain should keep out of any conflict this outrage causes apart from in my opinion a blockade of Israel to see how they like it. It might bring them to the table with a real intent on meaningful negotiations which could hopefully prevent the seemingly inevitable nuclear holocaust which their intransience will cause.
Monday, 31 May 2010
UNFREE FREE TRADE
I read in Saturday's Daily Mail that Land Rover and Jaguar cars are to be built in China.
So what's new you may ask?
This move is because of the high tariffs imposed on goods imported from Britain by China, in order to protect the home industry and labour force from cars made here. So we are not so uncompetitive after all otherwise why have these tarriffs against our goods?
Our government preaches free trade and allows tarriff free goods into Britain which decimates our industry and results in much of it being sold off to China of all places but accepts discrimination against British products ( a bit like the discrimination against British people)
I am a bit wary of naked protectionism believing it can provoke retaliation which may not be in our interests but it seems other countries arew quite prepared to use this tactic and get away with it.
I believe WE should retaliate with import duties on Chinese goods or those from any country which discriminates against ours. Of course this would reduce the profits of the big business on which the political parties depend, but it would be a step in the struggle to save our manufacturing jobs.
This is not a request for preference, JUST FAIRNESS, but I doubt if we will get it.
So what's new you may ask?
This move is because of the high tariffs imposed on goods imported from Britain by China, in order to protect the home industry and labour force from cars made here. So we are not so uncompetitive after all otherwise why have these tarriffs against our goods?
Our government preaches free trade and allows tarriff free goods into Britain which decimates our industry and results in much of it being sold off to China of all places but accepts discrimination against British products ( a bit like the discrimination against British people)
I am a bit wary of naked protectionism believing it can provoke retaliation which may not be in our interests but it seems other countries arew quite prepared to use this tactic and get away with it.
I believe WE should retaliate with import duties on Chinese goods or those from any country which discriminates against ours. Of course this would reduce the profits of the big business on which the political parties depend, but it would be a step in the struggle to save our manufacturing jobs.
This is not a request for preference, JUST FAIRNESS, but I doubt if we will get it.
Sunday, 30 May 2010
A SHORT KNIGHT
Sometimes we often feel we have had a long night.
Now it seems we have a short knight, "Sir"Ian Mc Cartney who has been awarded the bauble which has been given to so many nonentities as to be worthless. So demeaned has this "award" become that any self respecting man would refuse it.
Whe one considers the others who have received the accollade such as "Sir" Elton John, "Sir" Ian Mc Kellan, "Sir"Ian Blair of the Metropolitan Police, other government lackeys,various nondescript actors and sportsmen together with thieving bankers like "Sir" Fred Goodwin of RBS fame, a type of person considered worthy enough for a knighthood emerges.
You either have to be a gay "luvvie", a government lackey or a parasite who lives off the efforts and miseries of others.
You always note the absence of people who have really helped our country, the engineers, production managers and scientists who we need if we are going to escape national catastrophe.
The fact that the most worthy people are not knighted shows what is wrong with our country. Mediocrity is rewarded while talent is ignored.
The status of the position is tainted by association with this rag tag group of people to the degree that many would consider being "honoured" in this way an insult.
I suppose knighthoods help to cure many inferiority complexes, but then they are not complexes.
THESE PEOPLE ARE INFERIOR.
Yes he may be a short knight, but he has represented our area for too many long years and done b****r all for us apart from giving the WEP a multitude of photo opportunities.
So "Sir" Ian. You can go and celebrate with your new champagne glasses filled to the brim with your favourite bubbly. You have made it. A real "Champagne Socialist".
Why don't you take them down to Platt Bridge Labour club and share a bottle there, but then they wouldn't thank you for it as your preferred drink is just expensive, tasteless fizz and froth like the leaders of your party. A pint of bitter tastes far better.
Now it seems we have a short knight, "Sir"Ian Mc Cartney who has been awarded the bauble which has been given to so many nonentities as to be worthless. So demeaned has this "award" become that any self respecting man would refuse it.
Whe one considers the others who have received the accollade such as "Sir" Elton John, "Sir" Ian Mc Kellan, "Sir"Ian Blair of the Metropolitan Police, other government lackeys,various nondescript actors and sportsmen together with thieving bankers like "Sir" Fred Goodwin of RBS fame, a type of person considered worthy enough for a knighthood emerges.
You either have to be a gay "luvvie", a government lackey or a parasite who lives off the efforts and miseries of others.
You always note the absence of people who have really helped our country, the engineers, production managers and scientists who we need if we are going to escape national catastrophe.
The fact that the most worthy people are not knighted shows what is wrong with our country. Mediocrity is rewarded while talent is ignored.
The status of the position is tainted by association with this rag tag group of people to the degree that many would consider being "honoured" in this way an insult.
I suppose knighthoods help to cure many inferiority complexes, but then they are not complexes.
THESE PEOPLE ARE INFERIOR.
Yes he may be a short knight, but he has represented our area for too many long years and done b****r all for us apart from giving the WEP a multitude of photo opportunities.
So "Sir" Ian. You can go and celebrate with your new champagne glasses filled to the brim with your favourite bubbly. You have made it. A real "Champagne Socialist".
Why don't you take them down to Platt Bridge Labour club and share a bottle there, but then they wouldn't thank you for it as your preferred drink is just expensive, tasteless fizz and froth like the leaders of your party. A pint of bitter tastes far better.
Saturday, 29 May 2010
Something In Common.......but what's their purpose?
This post is very much more of a visual post than a written one...... or, which can be classed as "actions speak louder than words."Anyway, after doing a bit of post election 'research' and certainly looking more at the local elections - I came across a few photographs in relation to the day and something stirred my curious and inquisitive grey matter!
Now, we all know that "New Labour" employed the rather expensive services of Blue Digital Services..... this very specialist company that orchestrated, manipulated, propagated and delivered Barack Obama to the White House across the pond the other year. And who this year masterminded the anti-BNP propaganda/pro- Labour nonsense - which worked by and large very successfully in the key constituencies up and down the country.
It is also well known that Wigan council had hired earlier this year - some of their very own specialist experts to educate their much high-ranking council officials and representatives on how to combat the "rise" of the local British National Party! But....just what else did these leaders in their field educate them on and just who where these people?Anyway, considering I wasn't going to say much here we go.......
Looking at the above I am sure you'll recognise quite a few of the faces shown....you may struggle with the last picture? The picture directly above shows the annual congregation of the
Portuguese Commie Party (I think the picture brings it home a little better) So..............
Can anyone spot what I'm getting at??
The Fist Salute........The raised fist (also known as the clenched fist) is a salute and logo most often used by leftist activists, such as: Marxists, anarchists, socialists, communists, pacifists, trade unionists, and black nationalists. The raised fist is usually regarded as an expression of solidarity, strength or defiance.
Now, we all know that "New Labour" employed the rather expensive services of Blue Digital Services..... this very specialist company that orchestrated, manipulated, propagated and delivered Barack Obama to the White House across the pond the other year. And who this year masterminded the anti-BNP propaganda/pro- Labour nonsense - which worked by and large very successfully in the key constituencies up and down the country.
It is also well known that Wigan council had hired earlier this year - some of their very own specialist experts to educate their much high-ranking council officials and representatives on how to combat the "rise" of the local British National Party! But....just what else did these leaders in their field educate them on and just who where these people?Anyway, considering I wasn't going to say much here we go.......
Looking at the above I am sure you'll recognise quite a few of the faces shown....you may struggle with the last picture? The picture directly above shows the annual congregation of thePortuguese Commie Party (I think the picture brings it home a little better) So..............
Can anyone spot what I'm getting at??
The Fist Salute........The raised fist (also known as the clenched fist) is a salute and logo most often used by leftist activists, such as: Marxists, anarchists, socialists, communists, pacifists, trade unionists, and black nationalists. The raised fist is usually regarded as an expression of solidarity, strength or defiance.
A PORTENT OF DISASTER
Just got back from Cockermouth having discussed with Clive Jefferson our plans for our future push. While there I read in yesterday's Daily Mail the horrifying revelation shown below.
How can our small country absorb all these people most of them from alien cultures? How can we provide the infrastructure and houses for them without destroying our country. How will we feed ourselves in future?
The headline shows the magnitude of our task and it's importance to the future of our country.It will encourage our party members to continue our struggle to save our land.
YES WE DID WELL in the elections nearly trebling our vote, but it is not fast enough.
As most of the immigrants have large families it is evident that within 30 years we will be in a minority and no longer able to assert our rights in a democratic way in our own country. Even now when immigrant numbers are not the majority they are pandered to in order to placate them and massive voter fraud has been uncovered.
We of the British National Party campaign for our rights and freedoms through the ballot box in spite of the violence and electoral fraud directed against us.
We do NOT condone the violence of the EDL preferring debate but if this onslaught of people and anti British legislation continues violence WILL increase as people's frustrations boil over.
If the politicians in power give our party fairness a solution could be brought to this looming disaster. If however we, as the voice of reason are not heeded and the rapid invasion of those of different cultures and norms continues street fighting and civil war beckons.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS as Neville Chamberlain found, and as Churchill said--
WE SHALL NEVER GIVE IN.
How can our small country absorb all these people most of them from alien cultures? How can we provide the infrastructure and houses for them without destroying our country. How will we feed ourselves in future?The headline shows the magnitude of our task and it's importance to the future of our country.It will encourage our party members to continue our struggle to save our land.
YES WE DID WELL in the elections nearly trebling our vote, but it is not fast enough.
As most of the immigrants have large families it is evident that within 30 years we will be in a minority and no longer able to assert our rights in a democratic way in our own country. Even now when immigrant numbers are not the majority they are pandered to in order to placate them and massive voter fraud has been uncovered.
We of the British National Party campaign for our rights and freedoms through the ballot box in spite of the violence and electoral fraud directed against us.
We do NOT condone the violence of the EDL preferring debate but if this onslaught of people and anti British legislation continues violence WILL increase as people's frustrations boil over.
If the politicians in power give our party fairness a solution could be brought to this looming disaster. If however we, as the voice of reason are not heeded and the rapid invasion of those of different cultures and norms continues street fighting and civil war beckons.
YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
APPEASEMENT NEVER WORKS as Neville Chamberlain found, and as Churchill said--
WE SHALL NEVER GIVE IN.
THE GRIM RIPA
RIPA – A Brief History
Britain has an intrusive culture of state snooping which has attracted much negative attention internationally. But the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) is a particularly unpleasant feature of it. As The New York Times put it,3
It has become commonplace to call Britain a “surveillance society,” a place where security cameras lurk at every corner, giant databases keep track of intimate personal details and the government has extraordinary powers to intrude into citizens’ lives. …
Under the [RIPA] law, the localities and agencies can film people with hidden cameras, trawl through communication traffic data like phone calls and Web site visits and enlist undercover “agents” to pose, for example, as teenagers who want to buy alcohol.
RIPA4 was introduced by the Labour Government in 2000; the Act was intended to make provision for and about
the interception of communications, the acquisition and disclosure of data relating to communications, the carrying out of surveillance, the use of covert human intelligence sources and the acquisition of the means by which electronic data protected by encryption or passwords may be decrypted or accessed;
to provide for Commissioners and a tribunal with functions and jurisdiction in relation to those matters,
to entries on and interferences with property or with wireless telegraphy
and to the carrying out of their functions by the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service and the Government Communications Headquarters; and for connected purposes.
On reading this, most people would imagine that these serious powers – to spy on people, without notice – were meant for law enforcement use against terrorists and crime kingpins. One might also presume, wrongly, that these powers are meant to be used sparingly in serious cases, rather than by council officials on members of the public, not convicted of any offence, in relation to trifling allegations. The “connected purposes” clause hinted at above has been extended in the legislation to include almost any alleged infraction.
The powers are “self-authorising” for Councils – that is to say that no external authority (such as a warrant from a court, or approval from a police officer) is required before they are used; the approval of one council official is enough to permit another council official to spy on a member of the public, potentially for months.
As their use has grown, these powers have been widely criticised. In November 2009, the House of Lords was told that non-law enforcement bodies (including Councils) were using their spying powers 200 times a week.
As a result, then-Home Secretary Alan Johnson announced that he would curb the ability of local authorities to use RIPA; he had apparently come to the view that junior council officials shouldn’t have the authority to order surveillance operations, including secret filming and eavesdropping, for (in his words) "trivial reasons", such as catching people putting out their rubbish on the wrong day or letting their dogs foul the street.
Key findings
- 372 local authorities in Great Britain have conducted RIPA surveillance operations in 8,575 cases in the past two years. This means that Councils alone have carried out over eleven surveillance operations every day in this country over the past two years
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne is the worst local authority in the country for RIPA investigations, having spied on their residents 231 times in two years
- Authorities have used covert surveillance to spy on their own employees – because they thought they were lying about their car parking (Darlington), work times (Exeter), sick pay (Hambleton, Hammersmith and Fulham) – or to spy on the wardens they employ to spot crime (Liverpool)
- Over a dozen authorities have used RIPA to spy on dog owners to see whose animals were responsible for dog fouling
- Five authorities have used their powers to spy on people suspected of breaking the smoking ban
- Suffolk County Council used RIPA powers to make a “test purchase” – of a puppy
- Bromley Council spied on a charity shop to see people “fly tipping” donations at their door
Big Brother and the Nanny State. Orwellian nightmares coming true.
http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/TheGrimRIPA.pdf
Britain has an intrusive culture of state snooping which has attracted much negative attention internationally. But the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) is a particularly unpleasant feature of it. As The New York Times put it,3
It has become commonplace to call Britain a “surveillance society,” a place where security cameras lurk at every corner, giant databases keep track of intimate personal details and the government has extraordinary powers to intrude into citizens’ lives. …
Under the [RIPA] law, the localities and agencies can film people with hidden cameras, trawl through communication traffic data like phone calls and Web site visits and enlist undercover “agents” to pose, for example, as teenagers who want to buy alcohol.
RIPA4 was introduced by the Labour Government in 2000; the Act was intended to make provision for and about
the interception of communications, the acquisition and disclosure of data relating to communications, the carrying out of surveillance, the use of covert human intelligence sources and the acquisition of the means by which electronic data protected by encryption or passwords may be decrypted or accessed;
to provide for Commissioners and a tribunal with functions and jurisdiction in relation to those matters,
to entries on and interferences with property or with wireless telegraphy
and to the carrying out of their functions by the Security Service, the Secret Intelligence Service and the Government Communications Headquarters; and for connected purposes.
On reading this, most people would imagine that these serious powers – to spy on people, without notice – were meant for law enforcement use against terrorists and crime kingpins. One might also presume, wrongly, that these powers are meant to be used sparingly in serious cases, rather than by council officials on members of the public, not convicted of any offence, in relation to trifling allegations. The “connected purposes” clause hinted at above has been extended in the legislation to include almost any alleged infraction.
The powers are “self-authorising” for Councils – that is to say that no external authority (such as a warrant from a court, or approval from a police officer) is required before they are used; the approval of one council official is enough to permit another council official to spy on a member of the public, potentially for months.
As their use has grown, these powers have been widely criticised. In November 2009, the House of Lords was told that non-law enforcement bodies (including Councils) were using their spying powers 200 times a week.
As a result, then-Home Secretary Alan Johnson announced that he would curb the ability of local authorities to use RIPA; he had apparently come to the view that junior council officials shouldn’t have the authority to order surveillance operations, including secret filming and eavesdropping, for (in his words) "trivial reasons", such as catching people putting out their rubbish on the wrong day or letting their dogs foul the street.
Key findings
- 372 local authorities in Great Britain have conducted RIPA surveillance operations in 8,575 cases in the past two years. This means that Councils alone have carried out over eleven surveillance operations every day in this country over the past two years
- Newcastle-upon-Tyne is the worst local authority in the country for RIPA investigations, having spied on their residents 231 times in two years
- Authorities have used covert surveillance to spy on their own employees – because they thought they were lying about their car parking (Darlington), work times (Exeter), sick pay (Hambleton, Hammersmith and Fulham) – or to spy on the wardens they employ to spot crime (Liverpool)
- Over a dozen authorities have used RIPA to spy on dog owners to see whose animals were responsible for dog fouling
- Five authorities have used their powers to spy on people suspected of breaking the smoking ban
- Suffolk County Council used RIPA powers to make a “test purchase” – of a puppy
- Bromley Council spied on a charity shop to see people “fly tipping” donations at their door
Big Brother and the Nanny State. Orwellian nightmares coming true.
http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/TheGrimRIPA.pdf
Friday, 28 May 2010
ARE THE BRITISH PEOPLE GOING TO PUT UP WITH THIS?
Read this, then do scroll down and read at least the first comment. Do you remember your own childhoods?
Are we learning, at last, who our real enemies are, and who is really taking our children's childhood away? I can remember my own upbringing ... but I can't remember any school friend who didn't break at least one bone, escape bruises and grazes, including myself. I permanently had some mark or injury ... just from uninterfered-with play. Who never fell off their bike? And who EVER wore a helmet? The righteous would have been watching everyone. Maybe that's what this is about?
Morg
.
Are we learning, at last, who our real enemies are, and who is really taking our children's childhood away? I can remember my own upbringing ... but I can't remember any school friend who didn't break at least one bone, escape bruises and grazes, including myself. I permanently had some mark or injury ... just from uninterfered-with play. Who never fell off their bike? And who EVER wore a helmet? The righteous would have been watching everyone. Maybe that's what this is about?
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)