As our leaflets are now being delivered for the General Election and people directed to our blog, here are a few of our opinions of what is wrong with our country and our methods of redressing 50 years of misgovernment. There was not enough space on the leaflet to elaborate our policies and this I will do here and in the next few days. This is the reason for promoting our blog on the main leaflets.
It also will give people a way of putting their points and asking questions which all are invited to do, so long as the debate is conducted in a civilised constructive way.
All the three main parties talk about "change" while all having the same policies.
WE WILL NOT RECOVER UNTIL THERE IS REAL CHANGE and we have a government which puts Britain and it's people before all else.
For too long the interests of international capitalism have been put before those of our people and country.The other parties are all just as culpable and the Tory and Lib Dem leaders stem from banking families while senior Labour politicians are also in their thrall.
THE COSTS OF LABOUR AND TORY GOVERNMENTS
WE ARE OVER £ 1 TRILLION IN DEBT thanks to the incompetence of the Labour and Tory governments.
WE HAVE SOLD MOST OF OUR NORTH SEA OIL .WE ARE A NET FUEL IMPORTER for the first time in our history, AS WE HAVE CLOSED MOST OF OUR PITS.
WE HAVE SOLD MOST of our manufacturing industries to countries such as China and India.
IMMIGRATION HAS MADE US THE MOST DENSELY POPULATED COUNTRY IN EUROPE and we are projected to be a MINORITY in our own land in 30 years.
THE EU costs us £60 billion per year and further £billions in regulatory costs
OUR SOLDIERS ARE DYING in an illegal war, which costs
£billions and the lives of hundreds of British soldiers and thousands of deaths of innocent Afghans.
WE ARE TO BE TAXED in the “Carbon Credit” scam which will put our industries at a disadvantage while subsidising China and India. Pensioners will be left to FREEZE in winter, AND YET we give foreign aid to these countries which can afford space programmes.
WHAT WOULD THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY DO?
OUR POLICIES.
END THE AFGHAN WAR NOW and save countless lives, both British soldiers and Afghan people, and--
BRING OUR TROOPS HOME.
EXIT THE EU. WE JOINED THE “COMMON MARKET” not the EU. The price of membership is too high.
We import far more from them than they do from us.
Norway and Switzerland are prosperous outside the EU.
A COMPLETE HALT TO IMMIGRATION. Do the other parties really believe that we lack the skills to be taxi drivers and care assistants? If so it does not say much about the education system. DO WE WANT TO BE A MINORITY in 30 years? We will be the way things are going.
CUT OUT THE GREEDY BANKERS, who have ruined our country. SET UP A NATIONAL BANK, with the profits going to the people and NOT THESE PARASITES, and then we can afford to cut interest rates and taxes and--
REGENERATE MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY, and ban British owned industries and assets being sold abroad.
STOP FOREIGN AID. China and India have more money than we have and own much of our industries. Other recipients are tin pot dictators and the money does not get to the people in need. Our "help" more often than not makes things worse.
INCREASE STATE PENSIONS TO £150 PER WEEK.
AND KEEP BRITAIN BRITISH!
It’s ours,and belongs to US
AND FINALLY. OUR THREE CANDIDATES ARE ALL LOCAL PEOPLE.
WE ARE NOT STANDING to use our area as are the others BUT TO FIGHT FOR THE JUSTICE THAT THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN & LEIGH HAVE LONG BEEN DENIED.
We will not be bound by any party whip. We will always put the interests of OUR AREA first.
Tuesday, 27 April 2010
THE MOCKERY OF CHRISTIANITY BY THE ESTABLISHMENT.
Is it a surprise that the insulting New Labour ideas for the Popes visit to Britain was concocted by a FOREIGNER not of the CATHOLIC FAITH.
Anjoum Noorani, the diplomat who has been disciplined over a Foreign Office memo mocking the Pope.
The Establishment is now jam packed full of Asians mainly of the Muslim faith, an ANTI-CHRISTIAN FAITH.
These are the people who are running, sorry, RUINING our country.
WHY ?
Because like New Labour they are an ENEMY TO BRITAIN AND HER PEOPLE.
These TRAITORS have been put in major positions of power in this country and New Labour has embedded them in ALL HIGH POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY.
The sooner the BNP get elected the sooner this sort of scum will be removed from office and repatriated to their MOTHER COUNTRIES.
"Anjoum Noorani, 31, was the leader of the Papal Visit Team which drew up a document suggesting the Pope should launch his own range of “Benedict” condoms, open an abortion clinic and stay in a council flat in Bradford. The memo, which also called for the Pope to bless a homosexual marriage, was emailed around Whitehall by Steven Mulvain, a 23-year-old Oxford graduate who describes his sexual orientation on a social networking website as “gay”.
Senior members of the church have described Mr Noorani and his team as having “not the slightest understanding of Catholicism”. None of the four-strong group is thought to be a practising Catholic.
Anjoum Noorani, the diplomat who has been disciplined over a Foreign Office memo mocking the Pope.
The Establishment is now jam packed full of Asians mainly of the Muslim faith, an ANTI-CHRISTIAN FAITH.
These are the people who are running, sorry, RUINING our country.
WHY ?
Because like New Labour they are an ENEMY TO BRITAIN AND HER PEOPLE.
These TRAITORS have been put in major positions of power in this country and New Labour has embedded them in ALL HIGH POSITIONS OF AUTHORITY.
The sooner the BNP get elected the sooner this sort of scum will be removed from office and repatriated to their MOTHER COUNTRIES.
"Anjoum Noorani, 31, was the leader of the Papal Visit Team which drew up a document suggesting the Pope should launch his own range of “Benedict” condoms, open an abortion clinic and stay in a council flat in Bradford. The memo, which also called for the Pope to bless a homosexual marriage, was emailed around Whitehall by Steven Mulvain, a 23-year-old Oxford graduate who describes his sexual orientation on a social networking website as “gay”.
Senior members of the church have described Mr Noorani and his team as having “not the slightest understanding of Catholicism”. None of the four-strong group is thought to be a practising Catholic.
CANDIDATES LEAFLETS/LEAFLETING
TO ALL CANDIDATES.
If you would like leaflets to do a leafleting session in your Ward please contact Charles. We have Voice of Freedom, Policy Leaflets, Local Leaflets, Euro Leaflets, DVDs.
It would not hurt to put out in your intended wards a few of these leaflets to promote your Candidacy and to remind the Voters of Wigan that they do have a choice and a chance to save their country.
Also, if anyone who is not a candidate but would like to help do a few leafleting sessions please do not hesitate to Contact Charles on 07779 321542.
Leaflets, DVDs and Voice of Freedom will be available.
Thanks,
TONY.
If you would like leaflets to do a leafleting session in your Ward please contact Charles. We have Voice of Freedom, Policy Leaflets, Local Leaflets, Euro Leaflets, DVDs.
It would not hurt to put out in your intended wards a few of these leaflets to promote your Candidacy and to remind the Voters of Wigan that they do have a choice and a chance to save their country.
Also, if anyone who is not a candidate but would like to help do a few leafleting sessions please do not hesitate to Contact Charles on 07779 321542.
Leaflets, DVDs and Voice of Freedom will be available.
Thanks,
TONY.
Monday, 26 April 2010
THE HUSTINGS
The election process hots up.
I've had the leaflets for the Labour Tory and Independent candidates for Makerfield.
The Labour candidate Yvonne Fovargue, a good old Wigan name that is endorsed by "Wiganer" our illustrious retiring "local" MP.
Now that's a surprise. Who would have thought it?
Her leaflet says she went to university and has worked most of her life in the charity sector.
So no proper job then in spite of her education.
She says she will always be Makerfield's representitive in Westminster. So she has a job for life, parachuted in by the Labour hierarchy.
Not if we can help it. I bet she had never heard of Makerfield six months ago.
The Tory candidate Itrat Ali, (another local name) but much more pleasant and seemingly a nicer person than Ms Fovargue, has also been chosen to show Camerons "diverse" credentials and has been imposed in a test to see if she is good enough for preferrment.
I suppose if she does not get in as she won't she could be made a baroness like the gobby Baroness Warsi who also rose without trace to the Lords.
Her leaflet shows her at various places round the Makerfield constituency (presumably she had a sat nav to find her way about) spouting the usual vacuous Tory plattitudes.
Anyhow last night there was a "hustings" at Hindley Parish Church and these two were joined by my brother's namesake John Mather whose leaflet seems more like a job application, although as a physics graduate he is obviously more intelligent than the other two, and his unemployed status is a mystery.
A notable absence on the invites list was our candidate for Makerfield Ken Haslam who has lived and worked in the area for over 65 years.
I am told that a hustings should legally invite all contestants and although the churches are against our Christian party it is a moot point whether they were breaking the law.
Not to be deterred 4 of our members sat in the audience and when the vicar was asked by Mr Haslam if all men were equal before God why was he denied a platform.
Of course the vicar, more used to preaching to his diminishing flock without being challenged was somewhat discomfited. There was shock in the audience when Ken announced his party allegience.
He asked Ms (I presume she is a Ms, she's Labour) why she had been parachuted into an erstwhile safe Labour seat in spite of knowing nothing about the area. This of course was an unwelcome question which she could not answer.
Mrs Ali (she will be Mrs she's a Tory) was asked the same question. The racist rejoinder was easily countered when it was pointed out that she had been brought up in Yorkshire and that was why the question was posed.
With Ken were another 3 stalwarts, our secretary Tony Farrell, Morgan and Barry Longstaff
Tony asked about their attitude to abortion and stated that we would not need immigration if more British childeren were born.
The trouble with the electoral system is that the major parties USE US in their struggle for dominance.
The local people get no choice. It is imposed on them.
After the meeting Mr Haslam went to shake hands with those on the panel in the usual civilised way of our party.
Mrs Ali was very friendly as was the vicar and Mr Mather.
However Ms Fovargue or whatever her name is refused even this show of politeness when people of different opinions can debate in a civilised way. SO NOT MUCH CHARITY THERE THEN.
She will go a long way in the Labour Party and if they ever get power again will fit in nicely with the other Labour harridan cabinet ministers.
LET'S HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS!
Labour really is the "Nasty Party" or is it that they just attract nasty women?
I've had the leaflets for the Labour Tory and Independent candidates for Makerfield.
The Labour candidate Yvonne Fovargue, a good old Wigan name that is endorsed by "Wiganer" our illustrious retiring "local" MP.
Now that's a surprise. Who would have thought it?
Her leaflet says she went to university and has worked most of her life in the charity sector.
So no proper job then in spite of her education.
She says she will always be Makerfield's representitive in Westminster. So she has a job for life, parachuted in by the Labour hierarchy.
Not if we can help it. I bet she had never heard of Makerfield six months ago.
The Tory candidate Itrat Ali, (another local name) but much more pleasant and seemingly a nicer person than Ms Fovargue, has also been chosen to show Camerons "diverse" credentials and has been imposed in a test to see if she is good enough for preferrment.
I suppose if she does not get in as she won't she could be made a baroness like the gobby Baroness Warsi who also rose without trace to the Lords.
Her leaflet shows her at various places round the Makerfield constituency (presumably she had a sat nav to find her way about) spouting the usual vacuous Tory plattitudes.
Anyhow last night there was a "hustings" at Hindley Parish Church and these two were joined by my brother's namesake John Mather whose leaflet seems more like a job application, although as a physics graduate he is obviously more intelligent than the other two, and his unemployed status is a mystery.
A notable absence on the invites list was our candidate for Makerfield Ken Haslam who has lived and worked in the area for over 65 years.
I am told that a hustings should legally invite all contestants and although the churches are against our Christian party it is a moot point whether they were breaking the law.
Not to be deterred 4 of our members sat in the audience and when the vicar was asked by Mr Haslam if all men were equal before God why was he denied a platform.
Of course the vicar, more used to preaching to his diminishing flock without being challenged was somewhat discomfited. There was shock in the audience when Ken announced his party allegience.
He asked Ms (I presume she is a Ms, she's Labour) why she had been parachuted into an erstwhile safe Labour seat in spite of knowing nothing about the area. This of course was an unwelcome question which she could not answer.
Mrs Ali (she will be Mrs she's a Tory) was asked the same question. The racist rejoinder was easily countered when it was pointed out that she had been brought up in Yorkshire and that was why the question was posed.
With Ken were another 3 stalwarts, our secretary Tony Farrell, Morgan and Barry Longstaff
Tony asked about their attitude to abortion and stated that we would not need immigration if more British childeren were born.
The trouble with the electoral system is that the major parties USE US in their struggle for dominance.
The local people get no choice. It is imposed on them.
After the meeting Mr Haslam went to shake hands with those on the panel in the usual civilised way of our party.
Mrs Ali was very friendly as was the vicar and Mr Mather.
However Ms Fovargue or whatever her name is refused even this show of politeness when people of different opinions can debate in a civilised way. SO NOT MUCH CHARITY THERE THEN.
She will go a long way in the Labour Party and if they ever get power again will fit in nicely with the other Labour harridan cabinet ministers.
LET'S HOPE IT NEVER HAPPENS!
Labour really is the "Nasty Party" or is it that they just attract nasty women?
Three Horse Nightmare
Three-horse race to a supranational nightmare
By Gerald Warner, Scotsman. Published Date: 25 April 2010
CHOICE is a luxury that is no longer on offer to British voters. The identical programmes of the three main political parties have effectively created a one-party state. It is the great irony of this general election that the expansion of the traditional two-horse race into a three-horse contest has brought not the slightest philosophical broadening of the electoral landscape.
It would be more accurate to say that Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats share a homogenous culture. It is possible to detect slight differences in their respective agendas – the Liberal Democrats’ dissent from the Iraq War would be one instance but these are purely tactical variations in the implementation of a common political culture that Gordon Brown once described as “the Progressive Consensus”. When the advent of David Cameron as Conservative leader absorbed even the Tory Party into that consensus, multi-party democracy became history.
This did not simply happen: it was engineered. Nor is it a British phenomenon; if anything, Britain is a latecomer to a post-democratic political system that is propagated by the European Union as well as, at global level, by the United Nations. It is a necessary precursor to world government, the ultimate objective of the Progressive Consensus. Before attempting to understand what is happening at national level, we need to recognise the bigger picture, the context in which our own helotry is being engineered.
That picture is darkly dystopian. The EU project is a distorted attempt to recreate the unity of Christendom, but in the interests of the most fanatically anti-Christian agenda of which one could conceive: that of the Frankfurt School of Marxism. Economic Marxism is now the province of historians; cultural Marxism is carrying all before it. The fall of the Berlin Wall marked only the collapse of a failed model of state socialism. The rise of the European Union signals the resurgence of cultural Marxism, untrammelled by the need for Five Year Plans and regarding plutocracy as perfectly congenial.
Let the capitalists create wealth, is the new philosophy, so long as the state, through punitive taxation, is the largest beneficiary and dictates the mores of corporations, communities and individuals. The characteristics of cultural Marxism are materialism, statism, militant atheism, sexual nihilism, cultural shallowness and the sedulously fostered illusion of popular autonomy within what is actually a totalitarian system.
Its enemies are religion, the family, authentic as distinct from synthetic communities, tradition, national identity and homogenous culture. In recent decades the forces of cultural Marxism, spearheaded by the EU, have launched a ferocious attack upon all those unsympathetic institutions, increasingly employing legal coercion.
When the baffled voter looks at the three mainstream political parties and wonders why he cannot identify with any of them, his choice has been removed by supranational forces. He is alarmed by immigration and, so widespread is that concern, the snake-oil salesmen have adopted a cosmetic pretence of responding. Dave is babbling about an unspecified “cap”, Gordon pretends immigration is diminishing and Clegg wants to amnesty illegals.
None of that comes near meeting public concern. How is it that, in a cut-throat election contest, all three parties dare to defy the electorate? By consensus is the answer: so long as nobody breaks ranks, they can laugh at the mug punters, as they have done since the cross-party consensus was first formed in 1965 to abolish the death penalty against the will of the nation.
All three parties support the futile war in Afghanistan, which the public opposes; polls now show a majority of Britons wants to leave the EU, but none of the three parties would accord the promised referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, let alone an In/Out plebiscite. Every PC “hate law” and other oppressive measure enjoys tripartite support, since it is political and social death, within the bubble inhabited by the elite, to dissent from PC dogma.
It may not be possible to hold that line indefinitely. In this election the Liberal Democrats, who epitomise the PC consensus to the point of caricature, have irrationally become the conduit of electoral protest. That mistake will not be repeated. On Friday the BNP – the party that represents the antithesis of the PC consensus – published its manifesto. Its headline policies are: an end to immigration, withdrawal from Afghanistan and Britain’s exit from the European Union. If the main parties cannot see the writing on the wall they will have only themselves to blame.
Morg
.
By Gerald Warner, Scotsman. Published Date: 25 April 2010
CHOICE is a luxury that is no longer on offer to British voters. The identical programmes of the three main political parties have effectively created a one-party state. It is the great irony of this general election that the expansion of the traditional two-horse race into a three-horse contest has brought not the slightest philosophical broadening of the electoral landscape.
It would be more accurate to say that Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats share a homogenous culture. It is possible to detect slight differences in their respective agendas – the Liberal Democrats’ dissent from the Iraq War would be one instance but these are purely tactical variations in the implementation of a common political culture that Gordon Brown once described as “the Progressive Consensus”. When the advent of David Cameron as Conservative leader absorbed even the Tory Party into that consensus, multi-party democracy became history.
This did not simply happen: it was engineered. Nor is it a British phenomenon; if anything, Britain is a latecomer to a post-democratic political system that is propagated by the European Union as well as, at global level, by the United Nations. It is a necessary precursor to world government, the ultimate objective of the Progressive Consensus. Before attempting to understand what is happening at national level, we need to recognise the bigger picture, the context in which our own helotry is being engineered.
That picture is darkly dystopian. The EU project is a distorted attempt to recreate the unity of Christendom, but in the interests of the most fanatically anti-Christian agenda of which one could conceive: that of the Frankfurt School of Marxism. Economic Marxism is now the province of historians; cultural Marxism is carrying all before it. The fall of the Berlin Wall marked only the collapse of a failed model of state socialism. The rise of the European Union signals the resurgence of cultural Marxism, untrammelled by the need for Five Year Plans and regarding plutocracy as perfectly congenial.
Let the capitalists create wealth, is the new philosophy, so long as the state, through punitive taxation, is the largest beneficiary and dictates the mores of corporations, communities and individuals. The characteristics of cultural Marxism are materialism, statism, militant atheism, sexual nihilism, cultural shallowness and the sedulously fostered illusion of popular autonomy within what is actually a totalitarian system.
Its enemies are religion, the family, authentic as distinct from synthetic communities, tradition, national identity and homogenous culture. In recent decades the forces of cultural Marxism, spearheaded by the EU, have launched a ferocious attack upon all those unsympathetic institutions, increasingly employing legal coercion.
When the baffled voter looks at the three mainstream political parties and wonders why he cannot identify with any of them, his choice has been removed by supranational forces. He is alarmed by immigration and, so widespread is that concern, the snake-oil salesmen have adopted a cosmetic pretence of responding. Dave is babbling about an unspecified “cap”, Gordon pretends immigration is diminishing and Clegg wants to amnesty illegals.
None of that comes near meeting public concern. How is it that, in a cut-throat election contest, all three parties dare to defy the electorate? By consensus is the answer: so long as nobody breaks ranks, they can laugh at the mug punters, as they have done since the cross-party consensus was first formed in 1965 to abolish the death penalty against the will of the nation.
All three parties support the futile war in Afghanistan, which the public opposes; polls now show a majority of Britons wants to leave the EU, but none of the three parties would accord the promised referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, let alone an In/Out plebiscite. Every PC “hate law” and other oppressive measure enjoys tripartite support, since it is political and social death, within the bubble inhabited by the elite, to dissent from PC dogma.
It may not be possible to hold that line indefinitely. In this election the Liberal Democrats, who epitomise the PC consensus to the point of caricature, have irrationally become the conduit of electoral protest. That mistake will not be repeated. On Friday the BNP – the party that represents the antithesis of the PC consensus – published its manifesto. Its headline policies are: an end to immigration, withdrawal from Afghanistan and Britain’s exit from the European Union. If the main parties cannot see the writing on the wall they will have only themselves to blame.
Morg
.
Sunday, 25 April 2010
THE ANTI CHRISTIAN FOREIGN OFFICE
The scurrilous attack on the Catholic Church by some idiot in the Foreign office shows clearly the anti Christian mentality of the other parties. They would not dare to attack a muslim leader. There would be riots, so why the difference in attitude.
It is because our traditions and heritage have been built on Christianity and thus must be mocked in the interests of "diversity" and "vibrance".
They even wanted the Pope to apologise for the Spanish Armada.
What's that hisorical event to do with the present Pope.
Now I am not a Catholic, indeed am a lapsed Anglican but am incensed at this insult.
Yesterday I was at a wedding, actually in a Catholic church, and it was a beautiful service and even though not a Catholic I FELT AT HOME.
I do not think I would have had the same feeling in a mosque at a muslim wedding as that faith is ALIEN to our land.
The "junior officials" have been "repremanded" BIG DEAL.
If they had been found out to have been a member of the BNP or insulted Mohammed they would have been instantly sacked, and that is what should happen to these anti Christian fools.
It is only a pity that theCof E clergy can not see the insidious danger that is threatening our culture. But then they seem to change their beliefs like the weather to be inclusive.
RUBBISH If you have a faith you stick by it. That is why your churches are empty.
YOU STAND FOR NOTHING.
The BNP does. IT STANDS FOR CHRISTIANITY.
It is because our traditions and heritage have been built on Christianity and thus must be mocked in the interests of "diversity" and "vibrance".
They even wanted the Pope to apologise for the Spanish Armada.
What's that hisorical event to do with the present Pope.
Now I am not a Catholic, indeed am a lapsed Anglican but am incensed at this insult.
Yesterday I was at a wedding, actually in a Catholic church, and it was a beautiful service and even though not a Catholic I FELT AT HOME.
I do not think I would have had the same feeling in a mosque at a muslim wedding as that faith is ALIEN to our land.
The "junior officials" have been "repremanded" BIG DEAL.
If they had been found out to have been a member of the BNP or insulted Mohammed they would have been instantly sacked, and that is what should happen to these anti Christian fools.
It is only a pity that theCof E clergy can not see the insidious danger that is threatening our culture. But then they seem to change their beliefs like the weather to be inclusive.
RUBBISH If you have a faith you stick by it. That is why your churches are empty.
YOU STAND FOR NOTHING.
The BNP does. IT STANDS FOR CHRISTIANITY.
Saturday, 24 April 2010
NICK GRIFFIN NEWSNIGHT INTERVIEW
Well, Poxman is making quite clear his attitude towards us in particular and the indigenous British in general, by his body language and tone of voice:
Hat tip Bertie Bert. Thank you for the link.
Morg
.
Hat tip Bertie Bert. Thank you for the link.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)