Wednesday, 24 March 2010

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS.

.

 
February 1688/9 Day Tuesday 12
 
  • Whereas the late King James the Second, by the assistance of divers evil counsellors, judges and ministers employed by him, did endeavour to subvert and extirpate the Protestant religion and the laws and liberties of this kingdom;
  • By assuming and exercising a power of dispensing with and suspending of laws and the execution of laws without consent of Parliament; By committing and prosecuting divers worthy prelates for humbly petitioning to be excused from concurring to the said assumed power;
  • By issuing and causing to be executed a commission under the great seal for erecting a court called the Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes;
  • By levying money for and to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative for other time and in other manner than the same was granted by Parliament;
  • By raising and keeping a standing army within this kingdom in time of peace without consent of Parliament, and quartering soldiers contrary to law;
  • By causing several good subjects being Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;
  • By violating the freedom of election of members to serve in Parliament;
  • By prosecutions in the Court of King's Bench for matters and causes cognizable only in Parliament, and by divers other arbitrary and illegal courses;
  • And whereas of late years partial corrupt and unqualified persons have been returned and served on juries in trials, and particularly divers jurors in trials for high treason which were not freeholders;
  • And excessive bail hath been required of persons committed in criminal cases to elude the benefit of the laws made for the liberty of the subjects;
  • And excessive fines have been imposed;
  • And illegal and cruel punishments inflicted;
  • And several grants and promises made of fines and forfeitures before any conviction or judgment against the persons upon whom the same were to be levied;
  • All which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm;
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highness the prince of Orange (whom it hath pleased Almighty God to make the glorious instrument of delivering this kingdom from popery and arbitrary power) did (by the advice of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and divers principal persons of the Commons) cause letters to be written to the Lords Spiritual and Temporal being Protestants, and other letters to the several counties, cities, universities, boroughs and cinque ports, for the choosing of such persons to represent them as were of right to be sent to Parliament, to meet and sit at Westminster upon the two and twentieth day of January in this year one thousand six hundred eighty and eight [old style date], in order to such an establishment as that their religion, laws and liberties might not again be in danger of being subverted, upon which letters elections having been accordingly made;
And thereupon the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons, pursuant to their respective letters and elections, being now assembled in a full and free representative of this nation, taking into their most serious consideration the best means for attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place (as their ancestors in like case have usually done) for the vindicating and asserting their ancient rights and liberties declare:
  • That the pretended power of suspending the laws or the execution of laws by regal authority without consent of Parliament is illegal;
  • That the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal;
  • That the commission for erecting the late Court of Commissioners for Ecclesiastical Causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious;
  • That levying money for or to the use of the Crown by pretence of prerogative, without grant of Parliament, for longer time, or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal;
  • That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal;
  • That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of Parliament, is against law;
  • That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;
  • That election of members of Parliament ought to be free;
  • That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament;
  • That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted;
  • That jurors ought to be duly impanelled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders;
  • That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void;
  • And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening and preserving of the laws, Parliaments ought to be held frequently.
And they do claim, demand and insist upon all and singular the premises as their undoubted rights and liberties, and that no declarations, judgments, doings or proceedings to the prejudice of the people in any of the said premises ought in any wise to be drawn hereafter into consequence or example; to which demand of their rights they are particularly encouraged by the declaration of his Highness the prince of Orange as being the only means for obtaining a full redress and remedy therein.
Having therefore an entire confidence that his said Highness the prince of Orange will perfect the deliverance so far advanced by him, and will still preserve them from the violation of their rights which they have here asserted, and from all other attempts upon their religion, rights and liberties, the said Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons assembled at Westminster do resolve that William and Mary, prince and princess of Orange, be and be declared king and queen of England, France and Ireland and the dominions thereunto belonging, to hold the crown and royal dignity of the said kingdoms and dominions to them, the said prince and princess, during their lives and the life of the survivor to them, and that the sole and full exercise of the regal power be only in and executed by the said prince of Orange in the names of the said prince and princess during their joint lives, and after their deceases the said crown and royal dignity of the same kingdoms and dominions to be to the heirs of the body of the said princess, and for default of such issue to the Princess Anne of Denmark and the heirs of her body, and for default of such issue to the heirs of the body of the said prince of Orange. And the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons do pray the said prince and princess to accept the same accordingly.
And that the oaths hereafter mentioned be taken by all persons of whom the oaths have allegiance and supremacy might be required by law, instead of them; and that the said oaths of allegiance and supremacy be abrogated.
"I, A.B., do sincerely promise and swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to their Majesties King William and Queen Mary. So help me God."
"I, A.B., do swear that I do from my heart abhor, detest and abjure as impious and heretical this damnable doctrine and position, that princes excommunicated or deprived by the Pope or any authority of the see of Rome may be deposed or murdered by their subjects or any other whatsoever. And I do declare that no foreign prince, person, prelate, state or potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm. So help me God."
 
It is ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons now assembled at Westminster that this Declaration be ingrossed in Parliament and inrolled among the rolls of Parliament and Recorded in Chancery.
                                                                                            

 
Day 15 February 1688.
His majesties Gracious answer to the Declaration of both houses.
My Lords and Gentlemen
This is certainly the greatest proof of the trust that you have in us that can be given which is the thing that maketh us value it the more and we thankfully accept what you have offered. And as I had no other intention of coming hither than to preserve your Religion, Laws and Liberties so you may be sure that I shall endeavour to support them and shall be willing to concur in anything that shall be for the good of the Kingdom and to do all that is in my power to advance the welfare and glory of the nation.
Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal assembled at Westminster That his Majesties Gracious answer to the Declaration of both houses and the Declaration be forth with printed and published and that his Majesties Gracious Answer this day be added to the engrossed Declaration in Parliament to be Enrolled in Parliament and Chancery.


Morg
.

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

NICK GRIFFIN AND THE CHRISTIAN PARTY DEBATE.

NICK GRIFFIN AND THE CHRISTIAN PARTY DEBATE.

PT 1.




PT 2






PT 3




PT 4



PT 5



PT 6



PT 7



PT 8



PT 9

UAF NAZIS

UAF = FASCIST NAZIS.









Martin Smith TRAITOR of the UAF
supports VIOLENCE AGAINST THE BRITISH.




Manchester UAF member fined for giving NAZI SALUTES in Bolton.
http://www.englishdefenceleague.org/images/stories/uaf-nazi-salute-report.png


Peter Franzen UAF SUPPORTER
of VIOLENCE

BRITAIN AT RISK FROM AL-QA'IDA 'DIRTY BOMB'

"Britain is facing an increased threat of nuclear attacks by al-Qa'ida terrorists, according to three counter-terrorism reviews published yesterday.

Downing Street issued an update to the National Security Strategy, which stated that "the UK does face nuclear threats now", adding that there was "the possibility that nuclear weapons or nuclear material [could] fall into the hands of rogue states or terrorist groups."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/britain-at-risk-from-alqaida-dirty-nuclear-bomb-1925496.html


"
Bomb makers who have been active in Afghanistan may already have the ability to produce a "dirty bomb" using knowledge acquired over the internet.

It is feared that terrorists could transport an improvised nuclear device up the Thames and detonate it in the heart of London. Bristol, Liverpool Newcastle, Glasgow and Belfast are also thought to be vulnerable."

Lord West, the Security Minister, also raised the possibility of terrorists using small craft to enter ports and launch an attack similar to that in Mumbai in 2008, when more than 150 people were killed.

The Government is so concerned about the threat that it is setting up a command centre to track suspicious boats.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/7500719/Nuclear-terror-risk-to-Britain-from-al-Qaeda.html




If the above is true is it now time to start forcefully deporting all known ISLAMIC EXTREMISTS, PREACHERS, ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, ALL ASYLUM SEEKERS and reducing the ISLAMIC POPULATION and monotoring the entry and exits from our country of ISLAMISTS?

New Labour the CONSERVATIVES and LIB/DEMS have bought and fostered an extremely violent JIHADIST MOVEMENT into our country, Encouraging ISLAMISTS to take CONTROL. Telling THEM that they should be running OUR COUNTRY.










OR could this be a warning of an expected FALSE FLAG ATTACK.

Using the VIOLENT JIHADISTS in Britain to bring about a reign of untold TERROR and COMMUNIST LOCKDOWN, Civil Liberties Curtailed, Curfews, No Elections, Martial Law, The Military on the Streets, Racial Unrest, Civil Unrest etc?
Handy for Gordy and his Cabal of TRAITORS to bring in the CIVIL CONTINGENCIES BILL?



http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/ukresilience/preparedness/ccact.aspx


Current threat level


New Labours MultiCultural Britain turning into an ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE !

KICK THE BAS*ARDS IN THE BALLOTS (if we are allowed one)

VOTE BNP

Monday, 22 March 2010

UNITE UNION AND THE LABOUR PARTY _ A FEW FACTS

Congratulations to The Daily Referendum for unearthing this gem. My comments in Italics.

66% of Unite members would not vote Labour if a General Election was called today.
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 32% of Unite members believe that the Labour party share their values
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 25% of Unite members believe that the Labour party leadership is honest and principled
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 30% of Unite members believe that the Labour party leadership is competent and capable
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 27% of Unite members believe that Gordon Brown is the right person to lead Britain forward after the next general election (Cameron 37%)
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

58% of Unite members think that Gordon Brown is bad for them and their families
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

58% of Unite members think that Gordon Brown is not up to the job of being Prime Minister
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 36% of Unite members believe that it was right for the union to donate £500,000 to Labour in the last three months.
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

Only 31% of Unite members believe that it is right for the union to donate any further large donations to the Labour party.
Then why are all 2 million members expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

59% of Unite members describe themselves as “moving away from the Labour party”
Then why are all 2 million member expected to pay £7.12 a year each to support the Labour Party?

HALF the Cabinet, including Gordon Brown and 12 of his ministers, are bankrolled in their constituencies by Unite. Unite in the form of Charlie Whelan, against the wishes of their members. One man’s agenda.

Isn’t that their objection to Lord Ashcroft?

A PEACEFUL? VIOLENT PROTEST

A little bird tells me that local "democrat" Peter Franzen was with his fellow thugs in Bolton on Saturday as was his friend Stephen Hall enjoying the company of his friends, the violent UAF
These two you will remember were at the demonstration last year when BNP activist Tony Ward was "peacefully" hit on the head with a claw hammer.


While understanding the EDL's anxiety at the rising influence of militant islam we do not condone or support these confrontational demonstrations. Attendance at these events results in expulsion from the BNP.
Street fighting is not our way. We BELIEVE in the democratic process even though it is stacked nowadays against us. When we have power we will redress the balance and promote FAIRNESS.


We believe in EQUALITY,so that all people can enjoy free speech but free speech is not assisted by violent demonstrations. Yes this is OUR country but street marches are not the way and only serve to bring the antidemocratic thugs like Franzen and Hall out of their holes to join their friends such as UGLY WEYMAN.
Judge a person by his friends and while Franzen is not as ugly (or thick?) as Weyman he is certainly no oil painting and if he had his way we would soon become a minority in our town.

Franzen is not a muslim so why was he there if not to take part in his favourite activity, a riot.
He was a councillor and pretended to represent British people but his main concern was to prevent illegal immigrants being deported (in between being warned for disruptive behaviour in the council chamber when he tried to bring his thuggish ways into that chamber).


No doubt this lout will be putting up for election this time.
If you are thinking of voting for him remember by doing so you are voting for a thug who cares more for the interests of immigrants than he does for you.
Perhaps however you do agree with him and believe that Wigan is not "vibrant and diverse" enough and wish to live in a town which has more in common with Islamabad than old Wigan.
IF YOU WANT MORE DIVERSITY then Franzen is your man.

Saturday, 20 March 2010

A SUCCESSFUL FUNDRAISER

Just a quick note tonight as I am somewhat tired following our successful fundraiser last night.
We were treated to another of Jonathan Bowden's speeches. Jonathan is possibly one of the most accomplished political speakers in any party and certainly better than any our opposition could put up. We were lucky to have him and appreciate his effort in driving 150 miles in each direction.


Although the actual numbers at the meeting were somewhat fewer than we would have liked that was more than made up by the generosity of those buying tickets even though they were unable to attend and the generosity of people's contributions including two donations of £100, one from a member on benefits and one from a pensioner.
Really special was a cheque for £68 from members of the crew of a Royal Navy supply ship from somewhere in the Atlantic. Our reach really does spread wide.

Also thanks to the owners of the venue and the ladies who provided the superb buffet.
The total receipts were £2,566. From that was deducted £90 for petrol.
These funds will enable us to mount a strong campaign in our three Parliamentary seats with full leaflet cover.

In addition we will be standing in as many wards as possible and candidates are being selected.We may not be able to leaflet fully all the wards we are standing in but the candidates will be announced on this blog together with their wards and policies later.
We are on our way!

Keep looking in to this blog for the latest information and policies in the next six weeks.

yaz