The economic disaster that faces our country is the fault of both the major parties. Unfortunately neither can see their culpability or what to do about it.
Our economy is a dire as that of Greece.
Brown suggests raising taxes and keeping public spending up while the Tories believe in drastic cuts in spending.
These two idiotic parties are tinkering with the results of their mismanagement rather than grasping the cause.
WE MAKE NOTHING.
I agree we should not have too drastic cuts as these will increase unemployment but the targets of government spending give no return on the spending.
They printed money to bail out the banks when it could be lent to industry at cheap rates to create jobs instead of subsidising the destruction of jobs by actions such as the loan to Kraft by the State owned RBS to enable them to close Cadbury factories.
At the same time they increased National Insurance which is a tax on jobs.
PC jobs such as diversity officers Government adverts, smoking sessation officers together with a host of quangos could be cut without any harm to the economy.
Foreign aid could be cut as well and don't get me started on the EU or illegal wars.
The Tories are no better as they agree with these latter causes but would cut services drastically to reduce the deficit.
We have millions on the dole. Can these idiots not devise a scheme to give them USEFUL work. There is so much that needs to be done to improve our country that it is criminal it is not tackled while people are on the dole or doing unecessary jobs.
That way we would have a return on our investments and a better country.
I believe that unnecessary bureaucracy and regulation should be cut. Business taxes and National insurance should also be cut to encourage firms to start MAKING THINGS thus creating jobs and finance arranged through a National Bank which would lend money at a realistic rate rather than financing bankers bonuses.
The countries which have not been affected so much by the recession and which are already out of it are countries with a strong manufacturing base. Our reliance on the parasites of the City of London has cost us dear.
It will be a hard slog to rebuild our country but until we take the necessary measures we will not achieve it.
Neither major party seems to know what to do or if they do they are so much in hock with the bankers and their millionaire bosses living in their offshore tax havens they will not dare to take the necessary action.
Our party is at present powerless to influence the inevitable decline and many will suffer as a result of the incompetence of these politicians.
We can only wait until the train hits the buffers which it will and people will realise we had the answers all the time.
Friday, 19 February 2010
Thursday, 18 February 2010
EXPONENTIAL GROWTH
.
This is a topic that very few people understand. But it is vital that you DO understand it.
No, you don't need to understand all its mathematical details, but if you are to get a handle on the immigration problems facing you, then you need a general understanding of its consequences. This film will give you that.
Then you will understand why early action is vital.
About three or four years ago I gave a talk at a meeting about the demographics of Wigan over a spread of time, with projections into the future. Any reader who was at that meeting will now understand how I devised the diagrams I used and the conclusions I arrived at.
With the immigration problems we have, age groups are the key. The vital age group is 15yrs - 45yrs - the fighting age for men, the breeding age for women. The 0 - 15yrs age group is almost as important. Take some time to think about this.
If we wait until one third of the population comprises immigrants then we have only one generation (given childbirth differentials between natives and immigrants) before we are outnumbered two to one in the vital age group. We may still comprise an overall majority - but in this game we codgers don't matter. Don't look at snapshots - look at progress over time.
Morg
.
This is a topic that very few people understand. But it is vital that you DO understand it.
No, you don't need to understand all its mathematical details, but if you are to get a handle on the immigration problems facing you, then you need a general understanding of its consequences. This film will give you that.
Then you will understand why early action is vital.
About three or four years ago I gave a talk at a meeting about the demographics of Wigan over a spread of time, with projections into the future. Any reader who was at that meeting will now understand how I devised the diagrams I used and the conclusions I arrived at.
With the immigration problems we have, age groups are the key. The vital age group is 15yrs - 45yrs - the fighting age for men, the breeding age for women. The 0 - 15yrs age group is almost as important. Take some time to think about this.
If we wait until one third of the population comprises immigrants then we have only one generation (given childbirth differentials between natives and immigrants) before we are outnumbered two to one in the vital age group. We may still comprise an overall majority - but in this game we codgers don't matter. Don't look at snapshots - look at progress over time.
Morg
.
You can't trust anybody these days.
How have we gotten to the stage where Governments are colluding with scientists to manipulate the AGW/Climate Change data to fit an agenda, where scientists submit supposedly "PEER REVIEWED" fake reasearch on Pharmecuticals?
I was prescribed Celebrex for my arthritis in my knees, guess what...Celebrex did nothing.
££££ come before your Health, and if GlobeCorp Health (any large multinational/international privately owned monopoly such as Rupert Murdochs NewsCorp) need to tell a little fib, just to get the Medicine ball rolling, they won't hesitate.
It's not your Health they're interested but their bank balance.
The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry." ...
NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals. Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study! Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway. It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal. As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted. After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)
Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all. Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction. Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on "good science." It's all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being "woo woo" wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that's based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption. You just have to laugh, actually, when you hear pushers of vaccines and pharmaceuticals claim their medicine is "scientific" while natural medicine is "unproven." Sure it's scientific -- about as scientific as the storyline in a Scooby Doo cartoon, or as credible as the medical license of a six-year-old kid who just received a "let's play doctor" gift set for Christmas. Many pharmaceutical researchers would have better careers as writers of fiction novels rather than scientific papers. For all those people who ignorantly claim that modern pharmaceutical science is based on "scientific evidence," just give them these three words: Doctor Scott Reuben.
When they claim their branch of toxic chemical medicine is based on "real science," what they really mean is that it's based on fraudulent science but they've all secretly agreed to call it "real science." When they claim to have "scientific facts" supporting their position, what they really mean is that those "facts" were fabricated by criminal researchers being paid bribes by the drug companies. "Evidence-based medicine," it turns out, hardly exists anymore. And even if it does, how do you know which studies are real vs. which ones were fabricated? If a trusted, well-paid researcher can get his falsified papers published for 13 years in top-notch science journals -- without getting caught by his peers -- then what does that say about the credibility of the entire peer-review science paper publishing process? Here's what is says: "Scientific medicine" is a total fraud. And this fraud isn't limited to Dr Scott Reuben, either. Remember: he engaged in routine research fraud for 13 years before being caught. There are probably thousands of other scientists engaged in similar research fraud right now who haven't yet been caught in the act. Their fraudulent research papers have no doubt already been published in "scientific" medical journals. They've been quoted in the popular press. They've been relied on by FDA decision makers to approve drugs as "safe and effective" for widespread use. And yet underneath all this, there's nothing more than fraud and quackery. Sure, there may be some legitimate studies mixed in with all the fraud, but how can we tell the difference?
How are we to trust this system that claims to have a monopoly on scientific truth but in reality is a front for outright scientific fraud?
I was prescribed Celebrex for my arthritis in my knees, guess what...Celebrex did nothing.
££££ come before your Health, and if GlobeCorp Health (any large multinational/international privately owned monopoly such as Rupert Murdochs NewsCorp) need to tell a little fib, just to get the Medicine ball rolling, they won't hesitate.
It's not your Health they're interested but their bank balance.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research.The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry." ...
NaturalNews) It's being called the largest research fraud in medical history. Dr. Scott Reuben, a former member of Pfizer's speakers' bureau, has agreed to plead guilty to faking dozens of research studies that were published in medical journals. Now being reported across the mainstream media is the fact that Dr. Reuben accepted a $75,000 grant from Pfizer to study Celebrex in 2005. His research, which was published in a medical journal, has since been quoted by hundreds of other doctors and researchers as "proof" that Celebrex helped reduce pain during post-surgical recovery. There's only one problem with all this: No patients were ever enrolled in the study! Dr. Scott Reuben, it turns out, faked the entire study and got it published anyway. It wasn't the first study faked by Dr. Reuben: He also faked study data on Bextra and Vioxx drugs, reports the Wall Street Journal. As a result of Dr. Reuben's faked studies, the peer-reviewed medical journal Anesthesia & Analgesia was forced to retract 10 "scientific" papers authored by Reuben. The Day of London reports that 21 articles written by Dr. Reuben that appear in medical journals have apparently been fabricated, too, and must be retracted. After being caught fabricating research for Big Pharma, Dr. Reuben has reportedly signed a plea agreement that will require him to return $420,000 that he received from drug companies. He also faces up to a 10-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine. He was also fired from his job at the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass. after an internal audit there found that Dr. Reuben had been faking research data for 13 years. (http://www.theday.com/article/20100...)
Business as usual in Big Pharma
What's notable about this story is not the fact that a medical researcher faked clinical trials for the pharmaceutical industry. It's not the fact that so-called "scientific" medical journals published his fabricated studies. It's not even the fact that the drug companies paid this quack close to half a million dollars while he kept on pumping out fabricated research. The real story here is that this is business as usual in the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Reuben's actions really aren't that extraordinary. Drug companies bribe researchers and doctors as a routine matter. Medical journals routinely publish false, fraudulent studies. FDA panel members regularly rely on falsified research in making their drug approval decisions, and the mainstream media regularly quotes falsified research in reporting the news.Fraudulent research, in other words, is widespread in modern medicine. The pharmaceutical industry couldn't operate without it, actually. It is falsified research that gives the industry its best marketing claims and strongest FDA approvals. Quacks like Dr Scott Reuben are an important part of the pharmaceutical profit machine because without falsified research, bribery and corruption, the industry would have very little research at all. Pay special attention to the fact that the Anesthesia & Analgesia medical journal gladly published Dr. Reuben's faked studies even though this journal claims to be a "scientific" medical journal based on peer review. Funny, isn't it, how such a scientific medical journal gladly publishes fraudulent research with data that was simply invented by the study author. Perhaps these medical journals should be moved out of the non-fiction section of university libraries and placed under science fiction. Remember, too, that all the proponents of pharmaceuticals, vaccines and mammograms ignorantly claim that their conventional medicine is all based on "good science." It's all scientific and trustworthy, they claim, while accusing alternative medicine of being "woo woo" wishful thinking and non-scientific hype. Perhaps they should have a quick look in the mirror and realize it is their own system of quack medicine that's based largely on fraudulent research, bribery and corruption. You just have to laugh, actually, when you hear pushers of vaccines and pharmaceuticals claim their medicine is "scientific" while natural medicine is "unproven." Sure it's scientific -- about as scientific as the storyline in a Scooby Doo cartoon, or as credible as the medical license of a six-year-old kid who just received a "let's play doctor" gift set for Christmas. Many pharmaceutical researchers would have better careers as writers of fiction novels rather than scientific papers. For all those people who ignorantly claim that modern pharmaceutical science is based on "scientific evidence," just give them these three words: Doctor Scott Reuben.
Drug companies support fraudulent research
Don't forget that the drug companies openly supported Dr. Scott Reuben's research. They paid him, in fact, to keep on fabricating studies. The drug companies claim to be innocent in all this, but behind the scenes they had to have known what was going on. Dr. Reuben's research was just too consistently favorable to drug company interests to be scientifically legitimate. If a drug company wanted to "prove" that their drug was good for some new application, all they had to do was ask Dr. Reuben to come up with the research (wink wink). "Here's another fifty thousand dollars to study whether our drug is good for post-surgical pain (wink)." And before long, Dr. Reuben would magically materialize a brand new study that just happened to "prove" exactly what the sponsoring drug company wanted to prove. Advocates of western medicine claim they don't believe in magic, but when it comes to clinical trials, they actually do: All the results they wish to see just magically appear as long as the right researcher gets paid to materialize the results out of thin air, much like waving a magician's wand and chanting, "Abra cadabra... let there be RESEARCH DATA!" Shazam! The research data materializes just like that. It all gets written up into a "scientific" paper that also magically gets published in medical journals that fail to ask a single question that might exposed the research fraud. I guess these people believe in magic after all, huh? Where science is lacking, a little "research magic" conveniently fills the void. The whole system makes a mockery of real science. It is a system operated by criminals who fabricate whatever "scientific evidence" they need in order to get published in medical journals and win FDA approval for drugs that they fully realize are killing people.What is "Evidence-Based Medicine?"
The fact that a researcher like Dr. Reuben could so successfully fabricate fraudulent study data, then get it published in peer-reviewed science journals, and get away with it for 13 years sheds all kinds of new light on what's really behind "evidence-based medicine." The recipe for evidence-based medicine is quite simple: Fabricate the evidence! Get it published in any mainstream medical journal. Then you can quote the fabricated evidence as "fact!" When pushers of pharmaceuticals and vaccines resort to quoting "evidence-based medicine" as their defense, keep in mind that much of their so-called evidence has been entirely fabricated.When they claim their branch of toxic chemical medicine is based on "real science," what they really mean is that it's based on fraudulent science but they've all secretly agreed to call it "real science." When they claim to have "scientific facts" supporting their position, what they really mean is that those "facts" were fabricated by criminal researchers being paid bribes by the drug companies. "Evidence-based medicine," it turns out, hardly exists anymore. And even if it does, how do you know which studies are real vs. which ones were fabricated? If a trusted, well-paid researcher can get his falsified papers published for 13 years in top-notch science journals -- without getting caught by his peers -- then what does that say about the credibility of the entire peer-review science paper publishing process? Here's what is says: "Scientific medicine" is a total fraud. And this fraud isn't limited to Dr Scott Reuben, either. Remember: he engaged in routine research fraud for 13 years before being caught. There are probably thousands of other scientists engaged in similar research fraud right now who haven't yet been caught in the act. Their fraudulent research papers have no doubt already been published in "scientific" medical journals. They've been quoted in the popular press. They've been relied on by FDA decision makers to approve drugs as "safe and effective" for widespread use. And yet underneath all this, there's nothing more than fraud and quackery. Sure, there may be some legitimate studies mixed in with all the fraud, but how can we tell the difference?
How are we to trust this system that claims to have a monopoly on scientific truth but in reality is a front for outright scientific fraud?
Keep up the great work, Dr Reuben
Thank you, Dr Scott Reuben, for showing us the truth about the pharmaceutical industry, the research quackery, the laughable "scientific" journals and the bribery and corruption that characterizes the pharmaceutical industry today. You have done more to shed light on the true nature of the drug industry than a thousand articles on NaturalNews.com ever could. Keep up the good work. After paying your fine and serving a little jail time, I'm sure your services will be in high demand at all the top drug companies that need yet more "scientific" studies to be fabricated and submitted to the medical journals. You may be a dishonest, disgusting human being to most of the world, but you're a huge asset to the pharmaceutical industry and they need you back! There are more studies that need to be fabricated soon; more false papers that need to be published and more dangerous drugs that need to receive FDA approval. Hurry! Because if there's one place that extreme dishonesty is richly rewarded, it's in the pharmaceutical industry, where poisons are approved as medicines and fiction is published as the truth. Sources for this story include: http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/... http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2010/01... http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicH... http://www.theday.com/article/20100...IS THIS AN ELECTION YEAR?
You can always tell when its an election year in the Uk, as all the politicians smile as they stab you in the back while they remove your wallet. (Usually they frown) Anyway worried about how the general public will vote after the debacle with the MPs outlandish expenses claims and how so many people have said they will not vote.It appears that Labour has settled on getting the Muslim vote in which to ensure they spend another 5 years in power.
So we have seen the formerly ostracized Muslim council of Britain brought back into the fold. we have seen numerous court cases concerning Muslims where those in the dock have walked free such as:
Mohammed Atif Siddique
Three Muslims accused of murdering a Black man in Birmingham
Those idiots who wanted to behead a British soldier
We have an MP interceding on behalf of an man who stole £80,000 via benefit fraud, by writing a letter to the judge asking not to jail him because of the impact that might have on his health and family life.
And now we have the British PM instigating an inquiry into how the men who allegedly killed a Hamas leader used fake British Passports by demanding a word with the Israeli ambassador. But get this Brown quoted the following in his defense;
"We have to make sure everything is being done to protect [the British passport].
This from the man (and the party) who have given away hundreds of thousands of British passports to those who hate us. You know like those who aren't British but live here on benefits while hating everything about us.
Now it seems he is attacking Israel so as to garner a few brownie points with the Muslims who reside in the UK just to ensure that they vote for labour.
http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/2010/02/british-labour-government-sucks-up-to.html
Morg
So yes, I suppose it must be an election year. Best come along to tonight's meeting then; we have things to talk about, council and general election candidates to settle, etc.
So we have seen the formerly ostracized Muslim council of Britain brought back into the fold. we have seen numerous court cases concerning Muslims where those in the dock have walked free such as:
Mohammed Atif Siddique
Three Muslims accused of murdering a Black man in Birmingham
Those idiots who wanted to behead a British soldier
We have an MP interceding on behalf of an man who stole £80,000 via benefit fraud, by writing a letter to the judge asking not to jail him because of the impact that might have on his health and family life.
And now we have the British PM instigating an inquiry into how the men who allegedly killed a Hamas leader used fake British Passports by demanding a word with the Israeli ambassador. But get this Brown quoted the following in his defense;
"We have to make sure everything is being done to protect [the British passport].
This from the man (and the party) who have given away hundreds of thousands of British passports to those who hate us. You know like those who aren't British but live here on benefits while hating everything about us.
Now it seems he is attacking Israel so as to garner a few brownie points with the Muslims who reside in the UK just to ensure that they vote for labour.
http://eye-on-the-world.blogspot.com/2010/02/british-labour-government-sucks-up-to.html
Morg
So yes, I suppose it must be an election year. Best come along to tonight's meeting then; we have things to talk about, council and general election candidates to settle, etc.
Wednesday, 17 February 2010
THAT Question Time transcript
.
So, Nick Griffin's dreams came true, and he got to appear on the real telly, with some real politicians.
And what a night it was. A glittering gallery of all the key figures, the big beasts, in British politics: MP Chris WhoHe of extremist minority party the "Lib Dems", Jack 'thought he'd retired?' Straw for Labour, Sayeeda WhoShe for Conservatives and Bonnie Greer, a random American writer, filling that vital role of black-person-sat-right-next-to-nasty-Nick-ha-ha.
Through his contacts with the BBC (you just press '1' on the remote), CF is able to bring you a full transcript of what was probably the mosttedious controversial Question Time yet.
Dimbleby: "Good evening. I'd like to welcome our panel tonight. Well, all of them bar one, of course"
[audience laughs nervously]
Griffin: "I .."
[audience boos enthusiatically]
Dimblebore: "That's really quite enough from you, Mr Griffin"
[applause. Cries of 'quite right']
Dumbledore: "First, I must just apologise for the screaming and breaking glass you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully stormed the building and are now peacefully smashing the place up".
Dumbledore: "..and so, to our first question. Gentleman with the cross face.."
Angry Asian: "Nick. Is it that you love Churchill and hate Muslims, innit?"
[wild applause, jeering]
Griffin: "I didn't ..."
Baroness Wassup [interrupting]: "Yes, you do, don't you, you do"
[prolonged applause]
Dumbledore: "Moving on now. I've got photos, Mr Griffin, of you standing near a man from the Klu Klux Klan. Does the very existence of these photo's not prove, beyond doubt, that you'd very much like to strap a black man to the front of your pickup and drive all round the bayou at high speed?"
Griffin: "Well, I ..."
Bonnie Greer [interrupting]: "Don't you try to tell me about no KKK. I'm a 'merican."
[rapturous applause, cries of 'Right on', 'mmm hmmm']
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the smoke the audience may be able to smell. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully ripped open the filing cabinets, piled up all the scripts and books in the building, and set light to them".
Dimblebore: "..and now, for another question"
Lone non-nutter in audience: "Is it not possibly the case that some of our problems with immigration stem from Labour's policies in this area?"
[audience falls silent, confused]
Chris WhoHe: "What? Is it me? Sorry. What was the question?"
Jack Straw: "I'd like to answer that by reading out a long list of Labour's achievements, allowing the audience to refill their glasses and go to the toilet."
Baroness WhoShe: "Well that's not true is it, and ..."
Dimbleby [interrupting]: "I'm sorry, we'll have to move on. Mr Griffin is just sitting there, smiling, and no-one has booed him for nearly five minutes"
[applause, booing]
Dumbledore: "Moving on. Mr Griffin, I've got a puppy in this bag. Very cute. But it's a black puppy. Am I right in thinking that you, and members of your odious party, would like to kick it to death and then eat it?"
Griffin: "Well, that would be illegal and.."
Straw [interrupting]:: "As a member of the Government, and a Justice Minister, can I just say that I would be more than happy to change the law, right now, if I felt that it would make you look bad, Mr Griffin, or indeed make me look better."
[applause, shouts of 'go on Jack']
Dimmock: "..and so to another question. You sir, what would you like to ask the panel?"
Teenager: "Hey, Mr Griffin: instead of calling you Nick, I call you Dick"
[thunderous applause, teenager high-fived by all in the next row]
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the triumphant howling you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully killed a BBC security guard, and are parading his head on a pole around the car park".
Dimbley:"..but now, time for one more question, and perhaps on a slightly different topic. You, sir.."
Angry black man: "Griffin, Why don't you fuck off to the Antarctic? it's all white there"
[hysterical laughter, applause, cries of 'yeah!']
Dimbleby: "Well, I'm afraid that's all we've got time for tonight. Some pretty impressive, incisive debate this evening, I think you'll agree. And to the audience, I would ask you to leave by the western exit, as the UAF have peacefully brought down a police helicopter in the eastern carpark, and are currently hacking the occupants to death with machetes. Goodnight!"
[applause, music, lights fade]
http://constantlyfurious.blogspot.com/2010/02/that-nick-griffin-question-time.html
Morg
.
So, Nick Griffin's dreams came true, and he got to appear on the real telly, with some real politicians.
And what a night it was. A glittering gallery of all the key figures, the big beasts, in British politics: MP Chris WhoHe of extremist minority party the "Lib Dems", Jack 'thought he'd retired?' Straw for Labour, Sayeeda WhoShe for Conservatives and Bonnie Greer, a random American writer, filling that vital role of black-person-sat-right-next-to-nasty-Nick-ha-ha.
Through his contacts with the BBC (you just press '1' on the remote), CF is able to bring you a full transcript of what was probably the most
Dimbleby: "Good evening. I'd like to welcome our panel tonight. Well, all of them bar one, of course"
[audience laughs nervously]
Griffin: "I .."
[audience boos enthusiatically]
Dimblebore: "That's really quite enough from you, Mr Griffin"
[applause. Cries of 'quite right']
Dumbledore: "First, I must just apologise for the screaming and breaking glass you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully stormed the building and are now peacefully smashing the place up".
Dumbledore: "..and so, to our first question. Gentleman with the cross face.."
Angry Asian: "Nick. Is it that you love Churchill and hate Muslims, innit?"
[wild applause, jeering]
Griffin: "I didn't ..."
Baroness Wassup [interrupting]: "Yes, you do, don't you, you do"
[prolonged applause]
Dumbledore: "Moving on now. I've got photos, Mr Griffin, of you standing near a man from the Klu Klux Klan. Does the very existence of these photo's not prove, beyond doubt, that you'd very much like to strap a black man to the front of your pickup and drive all round the bayou at high speed?"
Griffin: "Well, I ..."
Bonnie Greer [interrupting]: "Don't you try to tell me about no KKK. I'm a 'merican."
[rapturous applause, cries of 'Right on', 'mmm hmmm']
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the smoke the audience may be able to smell. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully ripped open the filing cabinets, piled up all the scripts and books in the building, and set light to them".
Dimblebore: "..and now, for another question"
Lone non-nutter in audience: "Is it not possibly the case that some of our problems with immigration stem from Labour's policies in this area?"
[audience falls silent, confused]
Chris WhoHe: "What? Is it me? Sorry. What was the question?"
Jack Straw: "I'd like to answer that by reading out a long list of Labour's achievements, allowing the audience to refill their glasses and go to the toilet."
Baroness WhoShe: "Well that's not true is it, and ..."
Dimbleby [interrupting]: "I'm sorry, we'll have to move on. Mr Griffin is just sitting there, smiling, and no-one has booed him for nearly five minutes"
[applause, booing]
Dumbledore: "Moving on. Mr Griffin, I've got a puppy in this bag. Very cute. But it's a black puppy. Am I right in thinking that you, and members of your odious party, would like to kick it to death and then eat it?"
Griffin: "Well, that would be illegal and.."
Straw [interrupting]:: "As a member of the Government, and a Justice Minister, can I just say that I would be more than happy to change the law, right now, if I felt that it would make you look bad, Mr Griffin, or indeed make me look better."
[applause, shouts of 'go on Jack']
Dimmock: "..and so to another question. You sir, what would you like to ask the panel?"
Teenager: "Hey, Mr Griffin: instead of calling you Nick, I call you Dick"
[thunderous applause, teenager high-fived by all in the next row]
Dumbledore: "I must just apologise for the triumphant howling you may be able to hear. I'm told that the UAF have peacefully killed a BBC security guard, and are parading his head on a pole around the car park".
Dimbley:"..but now, time for one more question, and perhaps on a slightly different topic. You, sir.."
Angry black man: "Griffin, Why don't you fuck off to the Antarctic? it's all white there"
[hysterical laughter, applause, cries of 'yeah!']
Dimbleby: "Well, I'm afraid that's all we've got time for tonight. Some pretty impressive, incisive debate this evening, I think you'll agree. And to the audience, I would ask you to leave by the western exit, as the UAF have peacefully brought down a police helicopter in the eastern carpark, and are currently hacking the occupants to death with machetes. Goodnight!"
[applause, music, lights fade]
http://constantlyfurious.blogspot.com/2010/02/that-nick-griffin-question-time.html
Morg
.
Tuesday, 16 February 2010
PEOPLE AND PRINCIPLE.
.
"Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt Government risks harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker, but only to give the moral cowards an excuse to think nothing at all." Michael Rivero
Morg
.
"Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which they live is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of a corrupt Government risks harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker, but only to give the moral cowards an excuse to think nothing at all." Michael Rivero
Morg
.
Ali Dizeai CORRUPT ASIAN COP.
THE BLACK POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION LEADER FOUND GUILTY OF CORRUPTION.
This is the thin edge of the wedge. New Labour have been placing Foreign Nationals in position of power. The Bill Of Rights should be bought in and all Non-Ethnic Brits denied a vote in any Local or General Election on the British Mainland. IMHO.
This is the thin edge of the wedge. New Labour have been placing Foreign Nationals in position of power. The Bill Of Rights should be bought in and all Non-Ethnic Brits denied a vote in any Local or General Election on the British Mainland. IMHO.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)