A LOCAL BLOG SUPPORTING THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY IN THE INTERESTS OF THE INDIGENOUS BRITISH PEOPLE AND ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE OF WIGAN AND LEIGH IN OUR FIGHT AGAINST FASCISM, THE TRAITORS IN PARLIAMENT AND FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT. - "NO FOREIGN PRINCE, PERSON, PRELATE, STATE OR POTENTATE HATH, OR OUGHT TO HAVE, ANY JURISDICTION, POWER, SUPERIORITY, PRE-EMINENCE, OR AUTHORITY, ECCLESIASTICAL OR SPIRITUAL, WITHIN THIS REALM" (ENGLISH BILL OF RIGHTS 1689)
Now our Security Services are under increased pressure from within New Labours heirarchy. "A police inquiry into the officer, which began last July at the request of Baroness Scotland, the Attorney General, is understood to be at an advanced stage, and lawyers have discussed whether the officer could be charged under the Human Rights Act, which prohibits torture. An MI6 officer is also under investigation over an unrelated case. " Are our Security Services now going to start telling us what we should really know about New Labour and Islam ?
Could this be the spark that ignites the flame of Race Riots around the General Election ? This looks decidedly dodgy to me. The UAF are painting the EDL in BNP colours and predicting a Race Riot in Bradford in March, it's expected to "coincide with the BNP general election campaign".
If any Race Riots do occur then Gordon Brown and Jack (The COWARDS SON) Straw can enact the CIVIL CONTINGENCIES ACT 2004. The UAF are predicting that "In 2010, shortly after a big EDL protest in Stoke, the EDL are organising right-wing hooligans to mob-up in Bradford, to coincide with the BNP general election campaign. The EDL Bradford rally isn't a protest, it's a pre-planned riot, and the EDL have no more right to commit this crime than car thieves have a "right" to steal cars."
"In Stoke, the EDL's neo-Nazi hooligans broke loose and rampaged through a majority Asian neighbourhood, attacking shops, homes and cars, and if the policing in Bradford was to be just as shambolic, angry young Muslim people will not stand by idly while drunken racist football hooligans go on the rampage. Militant anti-fascists will also stand their ground when the EDL's bully-boys break away from the police's kettle, however if the numbers of neo-Nazis are indeed large, and they storm through the streets of Bradford with inpunity like SS-stormtroopers, if the police are seen as defending the racists and allowing them to racially abuse and assault Asian people at will, all hell will break loose. "
Is this the UAF calling Islamists to Arms in Bradford? To kick start the Race Riots We were meant to have last summer, around the Euro Elections, but it never materialised? Could it be that the EDL were not large enough back then to make any sort of difference ? This is an opportunity for the UAF to start some serious violence in Bradford through the EDL. Even though the BNP has proscribed the EDL we will still be tarred with the same brush.
But the main focus here should be on the UAF, and what they are threatening in their predictions. If the UAF don't turn up and the EDL have a Demonstration then the police can surly marshal them away from any trouble spots and nip it in the bud. But if the UAF, and the likes of Martin Smith are stoking up the Muslims and Racial tensions among the Immigrant community for a confrontation with the EDL then it's going to kick off and the UAF, BBC, Guardian etc can blame the BNP. Especially if the Police mis-handle this. It could be manna from heaven for New Labour.
Why did New Labour send us to a WAR on a LIE ? Why did New Labour give FALSE EVIDENCE to the AMERICANS so that the America could say that they went to WAR with IRAQ through a BRITISH Governmenet ? Why did New Labour DENY THE ARMY VITAL EQUIPMENT ?
The bigger picture is any WAR REPARATIONS that may have to be given to IRAQ for Deaths and Damages. Who would be held RESPONSIBLE ? WE WOULD. If it is found that we went to WAR in IRAQ on a FALSEHOOD it will be Me and You who will pay. The deaths and suffering of the IRAQIS is down to BRITAIN through NEW LABOUR LYING. The IRAQIS would be in their RIGHT to demand COMPENSATION and BRITISH SOLDIERS COULD BE CHARGED WITH MURDER or MANSLAUGHTER. New Labour also DENIED and is continuing to DENY the ARMY ESSENTIAL EQUIPMENT. It's what you would expect from TRAITORS.
Binyamin Mohammed will be wanting COMPENSATION FROM US, for being COMPLICIT in his ALLEGED TORTURE. Though if Binyamin Mohammeds' claim that British Intelligence were COMPLICIT IN HIS TORTURE, this should still stop at the NEW LABOUR GOVERNMENTS DOOR. BLAIR, BROWN, STRAW (Jack Straw The COWARDS SON) etc...ALL GUILTY OF TREASON AND WAR CRIMES. And if they are, we will have to pay £ BILLIONS in REPARATIONS and COMPENSATION. OUR ARMED FORCES could be HELD REPONSIBLE. This could destroy what little Army, Navy and Air Force we have. The MILITARY cannot say that they were 'JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS'.
Whatever way it go's WE are the ones who will LOSE OUT. If New Labour are charged with WAR CRIMES and found GUILTY, WE will be the LOSERS. If Nothing Happens to Blair, Brown and Straw (Jack Straw the COWARDS SON) get away SCOTT FREE, WE will be the LOSERS.
Now we know that ZaNuLabour, through Andrew Neathers admission that the TRAITORS allowed unfettered immigration into OUR Country.But we didn't get the full story. Now we have more proof that ZaNuLabour is RACIST TO WARDS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION OF THESE ISLES.
"The release of a previously unseen document suggested that Labour’s migration policy over the past decade had been aimed not just at meeting the country’s economic needs, but also the Government’s “social objectives”.
The paper said migration would “enhance economic growth” and made clear that trying to halt or reverse it could be “economically damaging”. But it also stated that immigration had general “benefits” and that a new policy framework was needed to “maximise” the contribution of migration to the Government’s wider social aims."
"The Government has always denied that social engineering played a part in its migration policy."
However, the paper, which was written in 2000 at a time when immigration began to increase dramatically, said controls were contrary to its policy objectives and could lead to “social exclusion”."