Tony Blair and New Labour tried for War Crimes ?
Crimes Against Humanity ?
Would Sherrie represent him
Click here: Dutch inquiry seen as important benchmark for international inquiries into 'unlawful' Iraq war
And here: Dutch government misrepresented case for Iraq war
Lastly: Iraq invasion violated international law, Dutch inquiry finds
Can you see the potential for IRONY yet ?
Friday, 15 January 2010
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Reporting Diversity. How Journalists Can Contribute To Community Cohesion.
I add this to my previous two articles on how the Media portrays Racial issues.
"This guide offers advice and practical help to journalists about how to rise to the challenge and avoid the perils and pitfalls of reporting community issues. I commend it to everyone whose job is
reporting these stories."
Trevor McDonald.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/151921.pdf
Why does the Government and Media need to LIE to us about Race, Immigration, Multi-Culturalism etc?
There must be something badly wrong with this New Labour Multi-Cult Multi-Faith society.
And what was wrong with our Society before New Labour came to power...Not enough FOREIGNERS ?
"This guide offers advice and practical help to journalists about how to rise to the challenge and avoid the perils and pitfalls of reporting community issues. I commend it to everyone whose job is
reporting these stories."
Trevor McDonald.
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/communities/pdf/151921.pdf
Why does the Government and Media need to LIE to us about Race, Immigration, Multi-Culturalism etc?
There must be something badly wrong with this New Labour Multi-Cult Multi-Faith society.
And what was wrong with our Society before New Labour came to power...Not enough FOREIGNERS ?
THE AFGHAN WAR AND WHY WE'LL LOSE
.
Despite the dedication of our young men and women and their fighting abilities, despite all their sacrifice, we will lose.
No, I'm not a defeatist ... I'm a realist, as is our party. The only realist party this country has.
The Afghans hammered Alexander the Great; hammered the British twice in the 19th century when Britain was at the height of its power - in relation to the world as it was then, we were far more powerful than America has ever been; hammered the mighty Soviet Union; - what makes our cretinous politicians and their fellow-travellers think we can do any better today?
If we all left Afghanistan today, then in a year's time it will be exactly what it was a year before we invaded. If we were to stay - and keep taking casualties all that time - for another 100 years and then left, and even if technically, by our own definitions, we "won" ... in 101 years it would be back to what it was a year before we invaded. We can't change them, we can't win. We most certainly can't convert them into a "democratic" unified society. No more than we did in Iraq. So the BNP's policy of immediately ordering the withdawal of our army is the only logical course of action. No other party recognises this reality.
Want to know why no outsiders have ever won there, and never will? Watch the following five films. They are only about half an hour long in total - but at the end you'll wonder why half an hour can pass so quickly. "Where did that time go?" you'll ask yourselves.
Even better - we learn a lot about ourselves and our relationships both to each other and to the non-nationalist political parties and people. How many native British are there? Perhaps 45-50 million (I don't count the foreigners that take this land's population count up to over 60 million ... and will make their own way back out once the British tribes have finished gathering and make clear this is OUR land, and outsiders are unwelcome here, apart from a few who will experience our hospitality and protection). This compares to about 41 million Pashtuns. We think of our selves the way they think of them selves. We are the British tribe - or more precisely the four eternally allied British tribes: The English tribe, the Welsh tribe, the Scottish tribe and the Irish tribe ... The BRITISH tribe that has many western ideas of its own - education, technology, a certain amount of individualism... though not total. We are the British and we don't want anyone coming to our lands and telling us we must change to suit their ways, whether that be the other Europeans (Phillip 2nd of Spain,Napoleon, the Kaiser, Hitler, the EU) or the Islamics ... or ANYONE. No outsider will ever win here for the same reason no one will ever win in Afghanistan - We are the four allied tribes known as the BRITISH TRIBE. I personally am of the Welsh tribe and feel quite at home here amongst my English tribal comrades. We have all the modern-day attributes melded in with our reverence for our ancient ways. A modern tribe that is pretty unique in the world. We will KEEP our ancient ways thank you, tempered with our modern ways which, let's face it, WE invented in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries. The rest of the world - including our own offspring - copied us, but imperfectly. We will have our ways back again if it takes us a hundred years and we have to fight for them - just like the Afghans. We can't beat the Afghans, and no one can ultimately beat us, other than in the very short term until we gather ourselves and start fighting back. Note we now have a million voters. How many 20 years ago - a few thousand? THE BRITISH TRIBES ARE GATHERING. Beware, all incomers. If the Afghans were to invade here the way we have invaded there, then we would ultimately win here the way they will ultimately win there. Home turf is a terrific motivator and advantage.
And we are friendly with all our related tribes - America, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. And we are tribally bound to them and friendly ... we are bound to be - they are our offspring and always leap to our aid when we need it. Between us all we have at various times in the past liberated the European tribes; we will do so again after we have first liberated ourselves - which we WILL do once we have gathered.
And anyway - by what right do we outsiders presume to tell the Afghans how they should live in their own lands. After all, we object strongly, and that objection is growing stronger by the day, to anyone else telling us how we should live in our own lands. Are the real British hypocrites? I think not. Our cretinous politicians and their fellow travellers (who never take any of the actual risks of the wars they order, nor expect their own children take those risks - only ours) have a lot to answer for. When the British tribes have gathered we WILL call them all to account. The clock is counting down.
Even more surprising, these films are all just a monologue. Enjoy and learn:
Now have a serious think about what you've just been taught.
There is only one way we can win - genocide. But we British don't do genocide. Bring our young people home. 41 million Pashtuns ... do we really want to kill 41 million human beings? I thought we British were civilised.
And - and it's a very big AND - you will know by the end EXACTLY why Islam has to be removed from the western world. and as far as we are concerned, our country in particular
Morg
.
Despite the dedication of our young men and women and their fighting abilities, despite all their sacrifice, we will lose.
No, I'm not a defeatist ... I'm a realist, as is our party. The only realist party this country has.
The Afghans hammered Alexander the Great; hammered the British twice in the 19th century when Britain was at the height of its power - in relation to the world as it was then, we were far more powerful than America has ever been; hammered the mighty Soviet Union; - what makes our cretinous politicians and their fellow-travellers think we can do any better today?
If we all left Afghanistan today, then in a year's time it will be exactly what it was a year before we invaded. If we were to stay - and keep taking casualties all that time - for another 100 years and then left, and even if technically, by our own definitions, we "won" ... in 101 years it would be back to what it was a year before we invaded. We can't change them, we can't win. We most certainly can't convert them into a "democratic" unified society. No more than we did in Iraq. So the BNP's policy of immediately ordering the withdawal of our army is the only logical course of action. No other party recognises this reality.
Want to know why no outsiders have ever won there, and never will? Watch the following five films. They are only about half an hour long in total - but at the end you'll wonder why half an hour can pass so quickly. "Where did that time go?" you'll ask yourselves.
Even better - we learn a lot about ourselves and our relationships both to each other and to the non-nationalist political parties and people. How many native British are there? Perhaps 45-50 million (I don't count the foreigners that take this land's population count up to over 60 million ... and will make their own way back out once the British tribes have finished gathering and make clear this is OUR land, and outsiders are unwelcome here, apart from a few who will experience our hospitality and protection). This compares to about 41 million Pashtuns. We think of our selves the way they think of them selves. We are the British tribe - or more precisely the four eternally allied British tribes: The English tribe, the Welsh tribe, the Scottish tribe and the Irish tribe ... The BRITISH tribe that has many western ideas of its own - education, technology, a certain amount of individualism... though not total. We are the British and we don't want anyone coming to our lands and telling us we must change to suit their ways, whether that be the other Europeans (Phillip 2nd of Spain,Napoleon, the Kaiser, Hitler, the EU) or the Islamics ... or ANYONE. No outsider will ever win here for the same reason no one will ever win in Afghanistan - We are the four allied tribes known as the BRITISH TRIBE. I personally am of the Welsh tribe and feel quite at home here amongst my English tribal comrades. We have all the modern-day attributes melded in with our reverence for our ancient ways. A modern tribe that is pretty unique in the world. We will KEEP our ancient ways thank you, tempered with our modern ways which, let's face it, WE invented in the 17th, 18th, 19th centuries. The rest of the world - including our own offspring - copied us, but imperfectly. We will have our ways back again if it takes us a hundred years and we have to fight for them - just like the Afghans. We can't beat the Afghans, and no one can ultimately beat us, other than in the very short term until we gather ourselves and start fighting back. Note we now have a million voters. How many 20 years ago - a few thousand? THE BRITISH TRIBES ARE GATHERING. Beware, all incomers. If the Afghans were to invade here the way we have invaded there, then we would ultimately win here the way they will ultimately win there. Home turf is a terrific motivator and advantage.
And we are friendly with all our related tribes - America, Australia, Canada and New Zealand. And we are tribally bound to them and friendly ... we are bound to be - they are our offspring and always leap to our aid when we need it. Between us all we have at various times in the past liberated the European tribes; we will do so again after we have first liberated ourselves - which we WILL do once we have gathered.
And anyway - by what right do we outsiders presume to tell the Afghans how they should live in their own lands. After all, we object strongly, and that objection is growing stronger by the day, to anyone else telling us how we should live in our own lands. Are the real British hypocrites? I think not. Our cretinous politicians and their fellow travellers (who never take any of the actual risks of the wars they order, nor expect their own children take those risks - only ours) have a lot to answer for. When the British tribes have gathered we WILL call them all to account. The clock is counting down.
Even more surprising, these films are all just a monologue. Enjoy and learn:
Now have a serious think about what you've just been taught.
There is only one way we can win - genocide. But we British don't do genocide. Bring our young people home. 41 million Pashtuns ... do we really want to kill 41 million human beings? I thought we British were civilised.
And - and it's a very big AND - you will know by the end EXACTLY why Islam has to be removed from the western world. and as far as we are concerned, our country in particular
Morg
.
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Refugees and the Media
When New Labour (OLD Communists) came to power in 1997, the Media got started on a Campaign for Refugees.
New Labours plans for the destruction of our country and people were planned well in advance by the looks of things.
Refugees
New Labours plans for the destruction of our country and people were planned well in advance by the looks of things.
Refugees
In 1997 PressWise began looking for partners and funding to examine the consequences of inaccurate and sensational coverage of asylum-seekers, refugees, Roma and other 'non-settled' groups.
In 1999 we were able to launch the Refugees, Asylum-seekers and the Media (RAM) Project to promote best practice in media coverage of refugee and asylum issues. It is based in the UK but has an international dimension.
In 2003, in association with Omni Productions, PressWise produced On the Receiving End, a 15-minute film in which refugees discuss the experience of exile and reactions to media coverage of refugees and asylum-seekers in the UK. You can find out more, including how to buy a copy, here.
The Exiled Journalists' Network was launched in 2005, to assist journalists who flee to the UK to escape persecution and to promote press freedom. It has taken on some of the work of the RAM Project, including publication of a regular email bulletin EJNews. ......
http://www.mediawise.org.uk/display_page.php?id=76
I also suggest you read it all.
Silly Kuffar.
Race and the Media. (NUJ Guidlines)
Have you ever thought why the Media very rarely reports on racist attacks on white people ?
Some cases are reported with the aim of discrediting white people, making us all out to be racists.
Do you remember Stephen Lawrence ? His death was front page news for months on end, and is still now being commented on in the media.
How many cases of black on white racist attacks do we hear of ?
The same with asian on white attacks? Only a few very rare cases make the News, and the story is usually dropped by the next day, or commented on after a racist attacker/s have been found guilty. And then it's usually never mentioned that the attack was racially motivated, or if it is it is only in passing.
Remember Kriss Donald ? The young Scottish lad who was brutally tortured and Murdered by a group of Muslims ?
His injurys were horrific, yet the Media never really went for this story as a racist attack. It was mentioned, in passing, but was not reported on anywhere near the amount of coverage Stephen Lawrences murder attracted.
And Stephen Lawrence was not Abducted nor tortured, stabbed him 13 times. He sustained internal injuries to three arteries, one of his lungs, his liver and a kidney. He was castrated, had his tongue cut out, was doused in petrol, set on fire and left to die. (RIP)
Google results for Stephen Lawrence Murder = Results 1 - 10 of about 13,600,000 for stephen lawrence murder. (0.27 seconds)
Google results for Kriss Donald Murder = Results 1 - 10 of about 293,000 for kriss donald murder. (0.27 seconds)
WHY ?
Because the NUJ wants you all to believe that black/coloured/asian etc are the ones suffering at the hands of whitey.
These guidelines are on how to report on an article of race or with racial or racist overtones
There are parts of this code which may enlighten you to the RED PEN DELETER on Wigan Today News.
So much for the freedom of the press. But then we in the BNP do not trust the Media to report accurately or fairly on our party. And especially us Scousers after the SCUM (Sun) reporting on the Hillsborough disaster.
This is why.
NUJ guidelines on race reporting
Statement on race reporting
1. The NUJ believes that the development of racist attitudes and the growth of fascist parties pose a threat to democracy, the rights of trade union organisations, a free press and the development of social harmony and well-being. ...
Race reporting
Only mention someone's race if it is strictly relevant. Check to make sure you have it right. Would you mention race if the person was white? ...
Reporting racist organisations
When interviewing representatives of racist organisations or reporting meetings or statements or claims, journalists should carefully check all reports for accuracy and seek rebutting or opposing comments. The anti-social nature of such views should be exposed. ...
Guidelines on travellers
Only mention the word gypsy or traveller if strictly relevant and accurate.
The above are only the first paragraphs/sentences of NUJ rules on Race and reporting, under the same headlines.
I suggest reading the whole article to get a better understanding of the state of the Media in this country.
http://www.mediawise.org.uk/display_page.php?id=648
DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ OR HEAR ON THE NEWS.
Silly Kuffar
Some cases are reported with the aim of discrediting white people, making us all out to be racists.
Do you remember Stephen Lawrence ? His death was front page news for months on end, and is still now being commented on in the media.
How many cases of black on white racist attacks do we hear of ?
The same with asian on white attacks? Only a few very rare cases make the News, and the story is usually dropped by the next day, or commented on after a racist attacker/s have been found guilty. And then it's usually never mentioned that the attack was racially motivated, or if it is it is only in passing.
Remember Kriss Donald ? The young Scottish lad who was brutally tortured and Murdered by a group of Muslims ?
His injurys were horrific, yet the Media never really went for this story as a racist attack. It was mentioned, in passing, but was not reported on anywhere near the amount of coverage Stephen Lawrences murder attracted.
And Stephen Lawrence was not Abducted nor tortured, stabbed him 13 times. He sustained internal injuries to three arteries, one of his lungs, his liver and a kidney. He was castrated, had his tongue cut out, was doused in petrol, set on fire and left to die. (RIP)
Google results for Stephen Lawrence Murder = Results 1 - 10 of about 13,600,000 for stephen lawrence murder. (0.27 seconds)
Google results for Kriss Donald Murder = Results 1 - 10 of about 293,000 for kriss donald murder. (0.27 seconds)
WHY ?
Because the NUJ wants you all to believe that black/coloured/asian etc are the ones suffering at the hands of whitey.
These guidelines are on how to report on an article of race or with racial or racist overtones
There are parts of this code which may enlighten you to the RED PEN DELETER on Wigan Today News.
So much for the freedom of the press. But then we in the BNP do not trust the Media to report accurately or fairly on our party. And especially us Scousers after the SCUM (Sun) reporting on the Hillsborough disaster.
This is why.
NUJ guidelines on race reporting
Guidelines ratified by the National Union of Journalists (UK and Ireland) for all its members to follow when dealing with race relations subjects.
Statement on race reporting
1. The NUJ believes that the development of racist attitudes and the growth of fascist parties pose a threat to democracy, the rights of trade union organisations, a free press and the development of social harmony and well-being. ...
Race reporting
Only mention someone's race if it is strictly relevant. Check to make sure you have it right. Would you mention race if the person was white? ...
Reporting racist organisations
When interviewing representatives of racist organisations or reporting meetings or statements or claims, journalists should carefully check all reports for accuracy and seek rebutting or opposing comments. The anti-social nature of such views should be exposed. ...
Guidelines on travellers
Only mention the word gypsy or traveller if strictly relevant and accurate.
The above are only the first paragraphs/sentences of NUJ rules on Race and reporting, under the same headlines.
I suggest reading the whole article to get a better understanding of the state of the Media in this country.
http://www.mediawise.org.uk/display_page.php?id=648
DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ OR HEAR ON THE NEWS.
Silly Kuffar
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
WIGAN STALINISTAS IN ACTION
It is important that this post STAYS ON TOP. It's a long post, but we want as many Wigan people reading it as possible - give it 36 hours at least.
It shows that the Labour party has declared war on its own people. It refuses to allow debate by Wigan people about the Labour party. Read the comments I copied, and go here:
http://www.wigantoday.net/wigannews/Angry-scenes-at-shortlist-meeting.5973982.jp
Look at the comments; look at the deletions, and check with these copied comments to see what they deleted, to see what they are sensitive about, and to see how petty they sometimes are.
This was the comment thread as I copied it - I missed one or two, but the evidence is overwhelming - THE MODERN LABOUR PARTY CONSISTS OF STALINISTS. Do the people of Wigan want to vote for these critters?
The job started off easily enough - there appeared to be only one apparatchik doing the deleting. But it got progressively more difficult as they must have been phoning around their fellow Labour activists to get help. By the end, comments were going up and instntly being deleted - still, it kept them off the bottle and the weed I suppose. That's my little social service for this week.
We now have evidence to present to the electorate demonstrating that Labour no longer believes in Liberty for the British people in general and, locally, the Wigan people in particular.
12 January 2010
By Richard Bean
A selection row has rocked the search for Labour's choice of the next Wigan MP.
There were angry scenes at the weekend's Wigan Constituency Labour Party (CLP) meeting after local woman Emma McGurrin failed to make the final list of six Labour hopefuls fighting to replace Neil Turner.
Her supporters will meet this week to discuss making a formal objection to the General Secretary of the Labour Party.
They erupted into noisy chanting when the result was announced and a number walked out.
Miss McGurrin, cousin of Sky News presenter Kay Burley, declined to comment on the outcome but Wigan Labour Party said claims about irregularities had "no substance".
She is now known to have been invited to apply for the Makerfield seat, which is also going begging after Ian McCartney's surprise decision to stand down.
As we went to press eight other candidates have come forward, but Miss McGurrin remains the sole 'local' choice so far.
The six-strong group chosen to fight the Wigan seat for Labour are: Metro cabinet member for children and young people Coun Susan Loudon; former Government Asylum and Immigration Minister Barbara Roche; policy advisor for the charity Children's Society Lisa Nandy; Liverpool City Council member and full-time party worker Roz Gladden; East Midlands Development Agency member and former European Parliament candidate in 2004 Elizabeth Donnelly and Hackney Labour councillor Nargis Khan.
Miss McGurrin's supporters allege that some Wigan Labour members were turned away because of a supposed lack of space to accommodate them in Hallgate's Unite office venue.
They say the doors were locked against voters gaining entry BEFORE the meeting start deadline.
One furious Wigan CLP member who did attend the meeting said: "The meeting was moved from The Deanery High – which obviously has loads of room – to the Unite office, which doesn't.
"Officials decided there was no more room and locked the doors before we were due to start, leaving supporters out in the cold.
"When the result was announced people couldn't believe it. There was booing and people broke into a round of chants for 'McGurrin, McGurrin' before there was a mass walkout. It just wasn't right."
Makerfield CLP applications close this Thursday. Members name their six-strong panel on January 23.
1
Lomra Greener,
12/01/2010 10:03:10
Not surprised at the protest.
I keep saying it; there would be a massive outcry of 'sexist' at a male only short list.
Discrimination is discrimination and there is nothing 'positive' about it. There are only negative effects from policies such as this.
2
rugbyleague_is dead_inwigan,
12/01/2010 10:32:01
liarbour in freefall ,lets hope that the people of wigan wake up and get rid of this fraudulent party forever in wigan ,as a liarbour voter for years ,no longer will i vote for a party that only feather their own nests and laughs at the rest of us ,out with the scum .
3
JosephJames,
12/01/2010 12:16:46
You could.nt make it up could you,the labour party should be renamed as the soviet socialist party.
4
Jemmy,
Bryn 12/01/2010 12:20:50
A '31 year old single mother' just doesn't seem the right qualification for a MP.
5
trucker john,
wigan 12/01/2010 12:58:38
no surprise there then, rats and a sinking ship come to mind,
6
Jay1,
12/01/2010 14:30:11
'Hackney Labour councillor '
Laughable.
If only we could find a decent local independent candidate to rally round.
Maybe Kay Burley could give up her sky news job.;-).
7
labour no more 12345,
12/01/2010 14:57:40
its a fix from start to finish. this london woman will get in . so come may or june get this lot out. or are you just like them yes men . just noding dogs?
8
Wasted,
12/01/2010 15:11:19
It's all fixed.
You don't need to go out and vote because as long as you are outnumbered by benefit claimants it's pointless.
Look where all the post offices are. Norley and Asda.
Just hope the rest of the country is not as thick.
But with all the extremists the BNP will do well I think.
9
Labour Voter - Never again!!!,
12/01/2010 16:46:17
No need to watch a comedy show!!
10
BRITISHLADY,
12/01/2010 16:49:02
" Officials decided there was no more room and locked the doors before we were due to start, leaving supporters out in the cold "
Does that not show the arrogance and contempt of this Party to there own members ?
Leave them, out in the cold at polling day.
11
away but watching,
12/01/2010 17:00:06
We should not be shocked by this situation, Wigan has always been a guaranteed labour seat,to have an mp from Wigan who is decent and honest is never going to happen, a yes man / woman who has no links with the town and can be controlled from Labour hq, and needs a safe seat is always going to be in position, the day Wigan wakes up and tries a different option, then and only then do we have a chance of reading some positive comments in columns like this , It would not take much to win the Wigan public over, a bit of decency, honesty and a will to try on behalf of the borough.
12
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:10:29
away but watching: Decency, Honesty, Will.
I do believe you've pointed the way to the BNP.
13
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:12:01
I'm timing post 12 for deletion.
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:20:26
They must still be in the labour club.
15
dougiesmate,
12/01/2010 17:22:22
I actually don't believe this article.
The idea that there were lots of people (who later staged a mass walk out) supporting this woman but she could not get on a shortlist (not the selection but just to go forward to the next round!) or that they were locked out beforehand is just not credible. A quick search on the internet shows that Labour selections and shortlists are one member one vote. So this McGurrin lady didn't get enough votes compared to some who are not even known?!? It is faintly ridiculous to think that is because members were prevented from selecting her.
I know there will be the usual anti lot who will swallow this story hook line and sinker because it fits their own vision of the Labour party, but those of us who are not so blinkered retain a healthy dose of scepticism for stories like this.
The most telling line is "She is now known to have been invited to apply for the Makerfield seat..."
16
BRITISHLADY,
12/01/2010 17:27:24
Could the WEP not have put a small picture and brief writeup of the 6 chosen to fight the Wigan seat for Labour.
Many, I am sure have never heard of some of them till today.
It is a quite importent, your next Mp.
17
Morgan,
12/01/2010 17:43:31
Deletions and filth will be pointless this time - I am copying each comment as it is posted.
Given that it takes approximately a minute and a half for a deleton to go through, I should catch the lot. I can keep this up for several days if necessary.
When the debate is over, I may tidy up and publish the wuole thing on Wigan Patriot, if it gets bad enough.
18
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:44:21
As I thought. Post 12 didn't last long.
All I said was that post 11, Quoting "Decency, Honesty and Will. Could be a recruiting call for the BNP.
Sad isn't it that the pinko's can't even stand the sound or sight of the words BNP.
19
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:46:36
Morgan: Thanks for that. This could be a long debate though.
20
Morgan,
12/01/2010 17:49:41
ytrewq
Longer the better, provided it stays on topic.
Without all the filth - though that too will be useful for patriot post - let people know what we're up against.
21
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 17:53:53
Morgan: I don't know whether or not you are following the Bob Brierly post. But red pen man's got going on there as well.
22
Morgan,
12/01/2010 17:56:13
More importantly - let the people of Wigan know what the God fearing decent Labour party they used to vote for morphed into when it became "New" Labour.
That God fearing decent Labour party was the one I was once a member of.
23
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:00:23
I tried following both - but could only manage the one - it's not so simple trying to catch every comment. So put the word on that post - the debate will be taking place here - even Brierly stuff if you wish.
Doing this is a little boring though, and I doubt if I can comment much of my own.
24
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 18:08:27
Morgan: No worries.
25
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:23:00
Ooops; ytrewq, Morgan you really are upsetting the NEW-liarbour activists. Seems like things are not going to well in the town hall, Oh dear...
26
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:23:11
To the man with the red pen - you are wasting your time.
I'm a former serviceman so, as ytrewq will confirm:
1. I can cope with boredom
2. I am stubborn.
Y'see, my father was the most stubbrn man I ever met - turned out his No 1 boy could out-stubborn even him.
27
leviticus,
12/01/2010 18:24:06
i see the noo labour red pen moron is with us again, ket them argue etc amongst themselves maybe then the people of this town will see them as the self serving money grabbing shysters they really are and use their heads before they blindly put their x in the box for them
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:27:40
leviticus;
I think that quite a lot of Wiganers are going to be using their heads when visiting the ballot box in less than 6 months.
29
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:28:57
Doesn't matter folks - have your debate - I've caught every comment so far - so it will be published eventually.
The debate main topic is the Labour party and its discriminatory illegal selection paractises; with possibly a side debate about Bob Brierly if you so decide.
30
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 18:31:09
4 deletions and I didn't get a chance to read any of them.
Celedrialjoy: I don't know why the new labour activists are getting upset, if indeed it is new labour activists doing the deleting. I thought that this was an open forum where views could be exchanged. If the mere mention of the BNP and the qualities they stand for is enough to trigger censorship, then we have come a long
way toward a totalitarian state
31
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:32:07
I decided not to post for a while on these pages due to the disgusting posts by the Trolls on the snow chaos story. But hey there they go again trying to choke free speech, Sorry can not but up with bullies cyber kind or any other.
32
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:35:27
ytrewq;
For some while I have believed that this country has been running towards the principle of dictatorship, I had hoped I was wrong, but unfortunatly the tactics being used to deny free speech are more akin to the regime of Hitler than to any democracy.
33
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:36:32
ytrewq
Just for you:
25
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:23:00
Ooops; ytrewq, Morgan you really are upsetting the NEW-liarbour activists. Seems like things are not going to well in the town hall, Oh dear...
26
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:23:11
To the man with the red pen - you are wasting your time.
I'm a former serviceman so, as ytrewq will confirm:
1. I can cope with boredom
2. I am stubborn.
Y'see, my father was the most stubbrn man I ever met - turned out his No 1 boy could out-stubborn even him.
27
leviticus,
12/01/2010 18:24:06
i see the noo labour red pen moron is with us again, ket them argue etc amongst themselves maybe then the people of this town will see them as the self serving money grabbing shysters they really are and use their heads before they blindly put their x in the box for them
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:27:40
leviticus;
I think that quite a lot of Wiganers are going to be using their heads when visiting the ballot box in less than 6 months.
29
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:28:57
Doesn't matter folks - have your debate - I've caught every comment so far - so it will be published eventually.
The debate main topic is the Labour party and its discriminatory illegal selection paractises; with possibly a side debate about Bob Brierly if you so decide.
34
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:37:28
Morgan;
Thanks,
35
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 18:39:00
On the Bob Brierly site, all I did was to agree with a previous post that was praising Bob for his determination to fight for the people of Wigan. I think I upset the censor when I pointed out that those qualities that they identified in Bob where to be found in the BNP, and if they wanted change, they should vote BNP as they are more likely to be able to affect that change than a lone voice. Strange people out there.
36
celedrialjoy,
wigan 12/01/2010 18:43:32
Things are getting tense with NEW-liarbour and their followers. They are terrified of people voicing their opinions.
37
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 18:45:06
Dougiesmate: I also got deleted on the Bob Brierly thread for praising you.
I admired the way you cut through the fog of deceit to seek the truth.
Like I say, "Strange people out there".
38
Morgan,
12/01/2010 18:47:19
CJ
Go to Wigan Patriot and email me. If you have an hour or so to Spare tomorrow afternoon, I'll need you to take over for a while - MUST go to the post office and the shop tomorrow (no, I don't get Giros).
39
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 18:52:01
Truth, to some people is like a beacon of light, to others it is like a laser beam, shrivelling their souls.
The so called labour party have now gone so far down the path of deceit that truth is poison to them.
Truth, education and devotion to country is now required to reverse our decline; only the BNP are prepared to follow the path necessary.
40
dougiesmate,
12/01/2010 18:56:37
I don't actually get why some of these comments are deleted. I think the BNP are reprehensible but I also believe they can be easily beaten in open debate. OK some of the posts on here are little more than "dur, vote BNP cuz dey are gud and labour are ded bad" but I rather like the general public seeing that (not that they read these sites) as they can form their own conclusions. The usual conclusion being don't vote BNP.
So that said - I am as anti BNP as the next person - I still don't get why a lot of these comments are being deleted?!?
41
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:01:57
Dougiesmate
I'm a BNPer and we wlcome debate - nothing but good can come from it - if we are beaten in it, then fair dos.
The deletions are generally random to disrupt debate about the Labour party - make people give up and go elsewhere. Mention of the BNP is only the excuse they use. They thrive in the dark - shrivel in the light.
Keep commenting - even anti-BNP comments will be posted on Wigan Patriot.
42
Cartman,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:05:05
Five months to go? - YIPEEEEEE
43
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:05:12
But do note that the topic here is the Labour party.
44
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:10:44
Incidentally, the Chatterati in Islington have now started talking about "all Black shortlists".
Nothing concrete yet - but that's how they start these things.
So "All woman shortlists" will be old hat before long.
45
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:15:39
That's one of the reasons why the Haaridan is pushing through legislation to make ant-white-males discrimination legal.
You will be a second class citizen in your own town.
49
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:28:32
And 46
46
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:23:12
That includes you Labour party members.
Don't say you weren't warned. Imagine what it'll be like when you've already been up in arms about the discriminatory all-woman shortlists here.
It wont be a local woman - that critter Roach will get one of the places - and some other bigwig apparatichik will get the other.
You read it here first folks - you are just fodder for the Labour carrer politicians.
48
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:25:58
Repost of censored comments (the truth doesn't half hurt them - as you can see by the comments deleted.
44
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:10:44
Incidentally, the Chatterati in Islington have now started talking about "all Black shortlists".
Nothing concrete yet - but that's how they start these things.
So "All woman shortlists" will be old hat before long.
45
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:15:39
That's one of the reasons why the Harridan is pushing through legislation to make ant-white-males discrimination legal.
You will be a second class citizen in your own town.
49
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:28:32
And 46
46
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:23:12
That includes you Labour party members.
Don't say you weren't warned. Imagine what it'll be like when you've already been up in arms about the discriminatory all-woman shortlists here.
It wont be a local woman - that critter Roach will get one of the places - and some other bigwig apparatichik will get the other.
You read it here first folks - you are just fodder for the Labour carrer politicians.
50
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:30:02
You still there dougiesmate?
Who do you think are reprehensible now?
Those who wish to participate in civilised debate, or the stalinists who are in control of the party that was once labour?
52
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:33:42
You still there dougiesmate? Who do you think are reprehensible now?
Those who wish to participate in civilised debate; or the stalinists who have hijacked the labour party,
53
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:33:45
It's all going to be posted on Wigan Patriot - so anyone will be able to see what you Stalinistas are sensitive about.
54
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:34:36
Thank god for a party like the BNP who will stand up to these thugs
55
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:35:21
I missed comment 51 - care to repost?
57
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:37:43
Thank god for a party like the BNP who will stand up to thses stalinist thugs.
58
Morgan,
12/01/2010 19:38:06
Well stalinistas - as long as you know that all your sensitivities are going to be available for the people of Wigan to read at their leisure.
And how petty most of them are - you are declaring war on your own people.
59
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:38:49
Hello dougies mate are you still there?
Where is our debate?
God bless the BNP.
60
ytrewq,
Wigan 12/01/2010 19:41:55
Still think the BNP are reprehensible dougiesmate? your stalinist mates are running true to form, trying to stifle debate and truth.
Morg (with an awful headache and as tired as hell)
.
UPDATE
I just conducted a small experiment, Comment 103
No deletions for a while, so I posted the following entirely innocuous comment:
"Can we please discuss the main topic. I'll stay out of it. I just want to read what people think."
Immediately deleted. Confirmed what I suspected - they FEAR me after what I've done to them over the past few days. My name is enough to get them into deletion mode. I'm honoured actually - Labour party's professional dirty tricksters down at Walworth Road frightened of little old - and I mean old - me.
I had noticed that after the evisceration I committed on UaB and Buzz that they were no longer arguing with me - just deleting as fast as they could. Hope this post gets spread around, and I must thank Jack at Lunatic Arms for doing what he can to help that happen.
Thank you Jack.
Incidentally, the deleted comment 84 was also mine - in-between the two comments they left in place. In it I had said that if I was Gordon Brown I'd sack the lot of them for incompetence. Which is why comment 85 said that I would throw a laser printer and a mobile phone at them first. We know all the (provable) stories about Brown and his mental difficulties. I hope there are tight controls on the use of nukes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)