... of this bollux?
Click on the link here: US SWINE FLU SPRAY PLANE SHOT DOWN IN CHINA
Absolutely anything that is anti-American will do for some people.
I'm a former servicaman who has had plenty to do with Americans. The only criticism I have of them is that they are too keen to please we Brits ...
Morg
..
.
Tuesday, 22 December 2009
RUCKUS AHOY - SEZ THE CAP'N
About Lanky's point about the planned televised debates between the three mainstream parties - the Liblabcon.
There's a site out there called 'Cranmer'. It is well and politely written and deals with the nexus between politics and religion - and believe it or not, I read it every day without fail. Here's Cranmer's take on the televised debates, and a very interesting take too:
There are pros and cons to this development, all of which are now a heated topic of fierce debate on all the political blogs.
But Cranmer is a little bemused.
In the United Kingdom, we have a party of government and an official opposition. The leader of one of these parties will be the next prime minister.
Nick Clegg may have produced the best Christmas card, but he does not have a cat in hell's chance of being the next prime minister.
So why is he granted three debates along with the Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition?
And since he has been granted such, why not the leaders of the DUP, the UUP, the SDLP, Plaid Cymru and the SNP?
Or Sinn Féin?
For they too will be contesting seats in their respective corners of the Kingdom.
And if these, why not UKIP, since they came a very respectable second in the recent Euro-elections?
And if UKIP, why not the Greens, since they also have councillors and assembly members?
And if the Greens, why not the BNP?
Or Respect?
And don't the English Democrats now have a mayor?
And what about the Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern?
And are not José Manuel Barroso or His Excellency Herman Van Rompuy of rather more political significance than any of these minnows at the next general election?
What exactly are the broadcasting criteria for deciding which political leaders are granted the (bountiful) gift of airtime to espouse their policies to the electorate? There is no precedent; there are no statutory guidelines.
By including Nick Clegg, the broadcasters have now left themselves vulnerable to a series of legal challenges. And a protracted and diversionary judicial review of televised political debate in the UK is the last thing our democracy needs.
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
Morg
.
There's a site out there called 'Cranmer'. It is well and politely written and deals with the nexus between politics and religion - and believe it or not, I read it every day without fail. Here's Cranmer's take on the televised debates, and a very interesting take too:
Televised election debates will open the floodgates of litigation
There are pros and cons to this development, all of which are now a heated topic of fierce debate on all the political blogs.
But Cranmer is a little bemused.
In the United Kingdom, we have a party of government and an official opposition. The leader of one of these parties will be the next prime minister.
Nick Clegg may have produced the best Christmas card, but he does not have a cat in hell's chance of being the next prime minister.
So why is he granted three debates along with the Prime Minister and the Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition?
And since he has been granted such, why not the leaders of the DUP, the UUP, the SDLP, Plaid Cymru and the SNP?
Or Sinn Féin?
For they too will be contesting seats in their respective corners of the Kingdom.
And if these, why not UKIP, since they came a very respectable second in the recent Euro-elections?
And if UKIP, why not the Greens, since they also have councillors and assembly members?
And if the Greens, why not the BNP?
Or Respect?
And don't the English Democrats now have a mayor?
And what about the Independent Kidderminster Hospital and Health Concern?
And are not José Manuel Barroso or His Excellency Herman Van Rompuy of rather more political significance than any of these minnows at the next general election?
What exactly are the broadcasting criteria for deciding which political leaders are granted the (bountiful) gift of airtime to espouse their policies to the electorate? There is no precedent; there are no statutory guidelines.
By including Nick Clegg, the broadcasters have now left themselves vulnerable to a series of legal challenges. And a protracted and diversionary judicial review of televised political debate in the UK is the last thing our democracy needs.
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/
Morg
.
WHY NO GRITTING?
Ok, for what it's worth, here's my best guess.
Councillors, Chief Executives etc do NOT like spending your money if it isn't on immigrants. So they've been listening to all the "Global Warming" tripe with enormous gratitude. The Met. Office says warm winter and they all sigh with relief - no need to spend that money preparing for winter. Same with the railways, airports everything.
However, I suspect that if a Paki complains he can't drive to the mosque, all hell will break loose. There'll be a daily dawn patrol of gritters keeping the roads passable ... well, the roads leading to the mosque anyway. That's the proper thing to spend YOUR money on.
How much of a bet does anyone want to lay that if questions are laid in the council chamber, the Met. Office forecasts are the excuse that will be used.
Morg
.
Councillors, Chief Executives etc do NOT like spending your money if it isn't on immigrants. So they've been listening to all the "Global Warming" tripe with enormous gratitude. The Met. Office says warm winter and they all sigh with relief - no need to spend that money preparing for winter. Same with the railways, airports everything.
However, I suspect that if a Paki complains he can't drive to the mosque, all hell will break loose. There'll be a daily dawn patrol of gritters keeping the roads passable ... well, the roads leading to the mosque anyway. That's the proper thing to spend YOUR money on.
How much of a bet does anyone want to lay that if questions are laid in the council chamber, the Met. Office forecasts are the excuse that will be used.
Morg
.
Monday, 21 December 2009
SNOW AND WHITEWASH
Yesterday and today I drove as usual from the Wigan area to Billinge. The roads under Wigan Metro were appalling and had not been gritted. As soon as I crossed the boundary into St Helens the roads had been gritted and were safe.
In the WEP there have been reports of no gritting all over the Wigan Metro area, and now a football match cancelled not because of the pitch conditions but the nearby roads.
I have never heard of this before and it is a disgrace to the town.
What do these overpaid executives think they are doing for their money?
They are too complacent and well in with the ruling Labour group, no doubt spending money thinking of schemes to stop the rise of the BNP as they did a few weeks ago.
If our councillors and MPs had done their job and sacked these jobsworths then perhaps there would have been no need for the BNP but this incompetence shows how much we are needed.
ON ANOTHER TOPIC.
The proposed television debate between the leaders of "The three big parties" may perhaps be interesting in exposing their collective weaknesses but it will not be democratic.
The debate will be in effect a party political broadcast for them even though it will show them up for being very little different.
But what about the other parties not just ours, Scot and Welsh Nat, Greens UKIP etc?
I have a feeling that the "Big Three" are afraid of the so called "minor" parties and their growing support and are staging the debate to ward off people voting for parties like ours.
The selected audience aspect of it ironic. You mean like the selected audience at Question Time? I don't think so. The three muppets will be allowed to speak unlike Nick Griffin.
I accept that there can be too many in a debate so how about a debate with UKIP the Scot and Welsh Nationalists and Nick Griffin?
Surely that would be more democratic.
The others are having three debates. One will do for us and be proportionate, after all these parties polled a large number of votes at the Euro elections.
That would really set the cat among the pigeons, but they would never do it as they fear the BNP and Nick Griffin especially and they would be right to, he would aniihilate them.
In the WEP there have been reports of no gritting all over the Wigan Metro area, and now a football match cancelled not because of the pitch conditions but the nearby roads.
I have never heard of this before and it is a disgrace to the town.
What do these overpaid executives think they are doing for their money?
They are too complacent and well in with the ruling Labour group, no doubt spending money thinking of schemes to stop the rise of the BNP as they did a few weeks ago.
If our councillors and MPs had done their job and sacked these jobsworths then perhaps there would have been no need for the BNP but this incompetence shows how much we are needed.
ON ANOTHER TOPIC.
The proposed television debate between the leaders of "The three big parties" may perhaps be interesting in exposing their collective weaknesses but it will not be democratic.
The debate will be in effect a party political broadcast for them even though it will show them up for being very little different.
But what about the other parties not just ours, Scot and Welsh Nat, Greens UKIP etc?
I have a feeling that the "Big Three" are afraid of the so called "minor" parties and their growing support and are staging the debate to ward off people voting for parties like ours.
The selected audience aspect of it ironic. You mean like the selected audience at Question Time? I don't think so. The three muppets will be allowed to speak unlike Nick Griffin.
I accept that there can be too many in a debate so how about a debate with UKIP the Scot and Welsh Nationalists and Nick Griffin?
Surely that would be more democratic.
The others are having three debates. One will do for us and be proportionate, after all these parties polled a large number of votes at the Euro elections.
That would really set the cat among the pigeons, but they would never do it as they fear the BNP and Nick Griffin especially and they would be right to, he would aniihilate them.
Sunday, 20 December 2009
CARBON CREDIT SCAM
It has been alleged by "Climate Change" believers that opposition to the measures advocated is driven by self interest and big coal and oil companies, while those in favour are pure scientists with no axe to grind.
The truth is somewhat different.
In this exceptionally cold week after the Copenhagen Talks failure it seems everything is OK for those greedy parasites who seek to profit out of it.
The article above from The Mail on Sunday illustrates the point.
We are being charged through our utility bills and taxes with the money being creamed off by the City and foreign industrialists and Labour donors. Even the NHS has to pay £millions. Worse we are losing thousands of jobs as indicated in the article with the closure of the Corus steel plant in Redcar.
Thus the friends of Labour foreign industrialists and the friends of the Tories, City fat cats are methodically destroying our future.
Our delegates to this farce of a conference flew there (many by private jet) causing huge carbon emissions, a thing they said they wanted to prevent showing themselves to be hypocrits as well as traitors.
It is just an exercise in the move to world government and away from democracy.
Carbon trading will not reduce emissions by one ton, but even if they did it would be too high a price to pay here for such an uncertain science.
Global warming even if it were to occur would not adversely affect our country.
It is ironic that the coldest period in the Northern Hemisphere for many years started during the conference.
That is not to say I am against conservation but any taxes raised on fossil fuel consumption should be used to reduce our dependence here and not sent abroad. We should resurrect the coal industries and ignore these non scientists and student protestors.
Saved our financial system and now the world have you Gordon?
You must be joking!
And you wonder why few intelligent people believe you.
The truth is somewhat different.
In this exceptionally cold week after the Copenhagen Talks failure it seems everything is OK for those greedy parasites who seek to profit out of it.The article above from The Mail on Sunday illustrates the point.
We are being charged through our utility bills and taxes with the money being creamed off by the City and foreign industrialists and Labour donors. Even the NHS has to pay £millions. Worse we are losing thousands of jobs as indicated in the article with the closure of the Corus steel plant in Redcar.
Thus the friends of Labour foreign industrialists and the friends of the Tories, City fat cats are methodically destroying our future.
Our delegates to this farce of a conference flew there (many by private jet) causing huge carbon emissions, a thing they said they wanted to prevent showing themselves to be hypocrits as well as traitors.
It is just an exercise in the move to world government and away from democracy.
Carbon trading will not reduce emissions by one ton, but even if they did it would be too high a price to pay here for such an uncertain science.
Global warming even if it were to occur would not adversely affect our country.
It is ironic that the coldest period in the Northern Hemisphere for many years started during the conference.
That is not to say I am against conservation but any taxes raised on fossil fuel consumption should be used to reduce our dependence here and not sent abroad. We should resurrect the coal industries and ignore these non scientists and student protestors.
Saved our financial system and now the world have you Gordon?
You must be joking!
And you wonder why few intelligent people believe you.
FOR BRITISH LADY - BY REQUEST
But nobody go making this a habit ...
To view in full screen click on the link: here
Tony Ward interviewed by BNPTV
Morg
.
To view in full screen click on the link: here
Tony Ward interviewed by BNPTV
Morg
.
Saturday, 19 December 2009
ROLE REVERSAL?
.
It really does sometimes appear as if the free/oppressed parts of the world are undergoing a role reversal.
Pravda, oh how we used to mock, but ...
Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.
These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.
Read it all and wonder - this is coming out of RUSSIA?
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/111032-0/
Morg
.
It really does sometimes appear as if the free/oppressed parts of the world are undergoing a role reversal.
Pravda, oh how we used to mock, but ...
Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.
These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.
Read it all and wonder - this is coming out of RUSSIA?
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/111032-0/
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)