The government has said that it will ring fence education spending in spite of the growing deficit.
No one could disagree with the importance of education but at present most of this money is being thrown away.
Why? Incompetent and lazy teachers.
I have two grandchildren at secondary school, one in the North and one down South.
The one down South has been encouraged to take "soft" subjects like catering as opposed to languages. His maths teaching has been woeful.
When my daughter complained last year about the poor maths teaching she was promised an improvement this year with a qualified maths teacher. This has not materialised and he is still poorly taught if taught at all.
The other one near here has been disadvantaged by her teacher in one subject being off sick for several weeks but not too sick to go out shopping etc and another teacher unable to control her class and breaking down in tears most lessons. Yet another is teaching a different subject to her own and I'm doubtful whether she is a qualified teacher at all or just an assistant.
Again improvement has been promised next year, but that will be too late.
Our children are being denied a future because of incompetent or lazy teachers who will possibly retire on a good pension with "stress" while the kids are left to make their way in the world with little education(the teachers at some schools even have a day off for Christmas shopping. Do they not have enough holidays as it is?)
The governments answer to this is to make the exams easier and to build new schools under PFI at great expense. Buildings do not make for better education, it is competent teachers who have their pupil's interests at heart.
The sensible answer is a four letter word. SACK for incompetents who can't teach. Alright the NUT would possibly call a strike. Let them, the kids are learning nothing in any case.
It is ironic that parents are prosecuted for failing to send their children to school but when these children go to school they are not taught.
We buy our kids education dearly through our taxes and are entitled to have them educated.
If we buy something from a shop we can get redress by law for faulty goods. The same should apply to education as it is much more important than mere goods.
Of course this does not trouble the "elite" as their kids don't have to suffer this neglect being privately educated. Our children will face an increasingly competitive world. Are they being educated as well as the Chinese? I think not. They deserve better.
Schools would also be better if they concentrated on TEACHING and not the various politically correct matters they are brainwashed with such as sex education, racism, homophobia and Islamophobia not to mention what to eat.
Consider this stupidity.
A teacher can be sacked for being a member of the BNP a legal party even if they do not mention it but can carry on blighting the children's futures at school until their (early) retirement even though THEY CAN'T TEACH.
Sunday, 13 December 2009
Friday, 11 December 2009
THE NOBEL "PEACE" PRIZE
I like Barak Obama. He seems the best (of a bad bunch) of recent American presidents.
However to award him the Nobel peace prize within weeks of his inauguration and before he had time to do anything was like awarding somebody the winner's trophy in a race before the race had started.
No he was awarded the peace prize for being Black, nothing more.
Since then he has shown his peace credentials by sending 30,000 more troops to the illegal war in Afganistan.
Other recipients of this prestigious prize include the peaceful terrorist Nelson Mandela,(not just any peaceful terrorist but a BLACK peaceful terrorist)
Martin Luther King, not exactly whiter than white (excuse the pun) also received one as did the gun toting Yasser Arafat.
I wonder how long Tiger Woods will wait for his award for his work in uniting peoples of different races. Going on past experience not long.
Let's face it these "peace awards" are a farce, unlike the Nobel science awards. These latter seem largely deficient in black recipients. I wonder why.
Could it be that science is colour blind and Nobel prizes for this recognise brilliant original intellectual work rather than all this PC nonsense? Perhaps but wait until someone in the climate change lobby receives an award (they may already have done I don't know).
Then the once prestigious accolade will be really be devalued and shown to be like most awards nowadays, PC nonsence.
(Sir) Paul Mc Cartney anybody?
However to award him the Nobel peace prize within weeks of his inauguration and before he had time to do anything was like awarding somebody the winner's trophy in a race before the race had started.
No he was awarded the peace prize for being Black, nothing more.
Since then he has shown his peace credentials by sending 30,000 more troops to the illegal war in Afganistan.
Other recipients of this prestigious prize include the peaceful terrorist Nelson Mandela,(not just any peaceful terrorist but a BLACK peaceful terrorist)
Martin Luther King, not exactly whiter than white (excuse the pun) also received one as did the gun toting Yasser Arafat.
I wonder how long Tiger Woods will wait for his award for his work in uniting peoples of different races. Going on past experience not long.
Let's face it these "peace awards" are a farce, unlike the Nobel science awards. These latter seem largely deficient in black recipients. I wonder why.
Could it be that science is colour blind and Nobel prizes for this recognise brilliant original intellectual work rather than all this PC nonsense? Perhaps but wait until someone in the climate change lobby receives an award (they may already have done I don't know).
Then the once prestigious accolade will be really be devalued and shown to be like most awards nowadays, PC nonsence.
(Sir) Paul Mc Cartney anybody?
Thursday, 10 December 2009
A FOOL OF A CHANCELLOR
If you tossed a coin there is a 50% chance of getting either heads or tails.
If the Labour government takes a decision there is a 100% chance of them getting it wrong.
The Chancellors budget statement yesterday was typical. Although we are borrowing more than at any time in our history he has done nothing to repair the finances.
To "ring fence" overseas aid when we have to borrow the money we donate is plain stupid.
To propose the majority of the cuts which will be necessary to be on capital expenditure such as roads and infrastructure and housing when these would give a return in the future on that expenditure is short sighted.
One suggestion is selling what is left of the "family silver" such as the Dartford crossing which has paid the debt off and is making a profit for the taxpayer is idiotic.
To propose cuts in the defense budget when his government is fighting illegal wars and our soldiers are ill equipped is criminal.
To increase National Insurance is a tax on jobs and will just keep unemployment high.
National Insurance for manufacturing industry should be cut drastically to encourage firms to take on labour.
A good candidate for savage cuts is the Equalities industry which has persecuted our party at great public expense.
The prosecution of two Christians for saying anti muslim things to an old fool who had converted and which was thrown out by the judge cost thousands. They tried to convict Nick Griffin a few years ago forthe same thing. It must cost £millions per year to attack free speech and appease muslims.
If we returned all the illegal immigrants immediately with no appeal and foreign criminals and their wives and families who had been given (wrongly) citizenship we would be a lot better off.
After all I had not noticed a national need for corner shop, kebab shop, Indian restaurant workers or taxi drivers, let alone the hundreds of thousands of mulim asylum seekers with large families who are milking the system.
Having done this we could reduce the cost of anti terrorism measures and empty many jail places.
If we did this, brought our soldiers home from illegal wars and left the EU we could pay all our bills and have a future as a stable country.
The future under this government (and the Tories would do the same) does not bear thinking about.
If the Labour government takes a decision there is a 100% chance of them getting it wrong.
The Chancellors budget statement yesterday was typical. Although we are borrowing more than at any time in our history he has done nothing to repair the finances.
To "ring fence" overseas aid when we have to borrow the money we donate is plain stupid.
To propose the majority of the cuts which will be necessary to be on capital expenditure such as roads and infrastructure and housing when these would give a return in the future on that expenditure is short sighted.
One suggestion is selling what is left of the "family silver" such as the Dartford crossing which has paid the debt off and is making a profit for the taxpayer is idiotic.
To propose cuts in the defense budget when his government is fighting illegal wars and our soldiers are ill equipped is criminal.
To increase National Insurance is a tax on jobs and will just keep unemployment high.
National Insurance for manufacturing industry should be cut drastically to encourage firms to take on labour.
A good candidate for savage cuts is the Equalities industry which has persecuted our party at great public expense.
The prosecution of two Christians for saying anti muslim things to an old fool who had converted and which was thrown out by the judge cost thousands. They tried to convict Nick Griffin a few years ago forthe same thing. It must cost £millions per year to attack free speech and appease muslims.
If we returned all the illegal immigrants immediately with no appeal and foreign criminals and their wives and families who had been given (wrongly) citizenship we would be a lot better off.
After all I had not noticed a national need for corner shop, kebab shop, Indian restaurant workers or taxi drivers, let alone the hundreds of thousands of mulim asylum seekers with large families who are milking the system.
Having done this we could reduce the cost of anti terrorism measures and empty many jail places.
If we did this, brought our soldiers home from illegal wars and left the EU we could pay all our bills and have a future as a stable country.
The future under this government (and the Tories would do the same) does not bear thinking about.
Tuesday, 8 December 2009
HARRY BROWN
Just watched the film Harry Brown.
You can watch it on-line here:
http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/harry_brown/
Recommended, and the first button works just fine, on that link. You don't have to download it.
Morg
.
You can watch it on-line here:
http://www.watch-movies-online.tv/movies/harry_brown/
Recommended, and the first button works just fine, on that link. You don't have to download it.
Morg
.
Sunday, 6 December 2009
HI DENNIS
Dennis doing his bit.
I hope Nick Griffin closes this claptout organisation as his number one priority.
Although i must admit it has a catchy P,C title. Who said some are more equal than others.
- dennis shambley, wigan England, 5/12/2009 7:15
And here's the article he was responding to:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233356/Equality-Human-Rights-Commission-Labour-stooges.html#ixzz0YoHNrmlS
Morg
.
I hope Nick Griffin closes this claptout organisation as his number one priority.
Although i must admit it has a catchy P,C title. Who said some are more equal than others.
- dennis shambley, wigan England, 5/12/2009 7:15
And here's the article he was responding to:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233356/Equality-Human-Rights-Commission-Labour-stooges.html#ixzz0YoHNrmlS
Morg
.
DON'T GIVE THEM WHAT THEY WANT
The action by the Equalities Commission to force our party to change its constitution to allow ethnics to join is indicative of the fear our recent progress has engendered in the other parties who all support this vindictive action.
We will be forced to change our membership criteria or cease to exist as a party.
All of us are appalled at the injustice of this legislation which is obviously designed to attack our party and our rights alone. It does not apply to any of the thousands of organisations existing purely for ethnics. In other words it is specific to us and not universal as all laws should be.
The fact that it does not apply to ethnic organisations shows that "racism" is not the driving force. In any case how many ethnics would want to join a party whose ideology is contrary to theirs
The fascists of the other parties know we will have to accept it to be able to stand in future elections.
What they want is for the law to cause dissent in our ranks and indeed there are different views in the Party on how to tackle this assault on democracy. They want a split or implosion in our membership, destroying the Party with people leaving and moving to fringe parties who fight against each other.
THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT, the destruction of the BNP.
For the first time ever a nationalist party is becoming mainstream and a threat to the rotten established order.
We as nationalists are the only hope for our people and if we have to swallow a bitter pill to survive, then that is what we must do, for our unity is the only way to power, when we will reverse these injustices.
Nationalism is gaining in strength all over Europe and our time will come.
Our policies and ethos will remain the same and no doubt members will have to sign that they support the policies of the Party or be expelled.
Although there will be some mutterings I don't think there will be a major split in our ranks, indeed I forsee a major surge in membership and support.
But a split in nationalist ranks would be a disaster for us and the country at the very moment that we could take off.
WE MUST NOT GIVE THESE UNDEMOCRATIC FASCISTS WHAT THEY WANT.
We must bury our differences and speak with one voice.
OUR UNITY WILL BE OUR STRENGTH and we will advance to greater influence.
WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED and will continue our fight for our people and country.
We will be forced to change our membership criteria or cease to exist as a party.
All of us are appalled at the injustice of this legislation which is obviously designed to attack our party and our rights alone. It does not apply to any of the thousands of organisations existing purely for ethnics. In other words it is specific to us and not universal as all laws should be.
The fact that it does not apply to ethnic organisations shows that "racism" is not the driving force. In any case how many ethnics would want to join a party whose ideology is contrary to theirs
The fascists of the other parties know we will have to accept it to be able to stand in future elections.
What they want is for the law to cause dissent in our ranks and indeed there are different views in the Party on how to tackle this assault on democracy. They want a split or implosion in our membership, destroying the Party with people leaving and moving to fringe parties who fight against each other.
THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT, the destruction of the BNP.
For the first time ever a nationalist party is becoming mainstream and a threat to the rotten established order.
We as nationalists are the only hope for our people and if we have to swallow a bitter pill to survive, then that is what we must do, for our unity is the only way to power, when we will reverse these injustices.
Nationalism is gaining in strength all over Europe and our time will come.
Our policies and ethos will remain the same and no doubt members will have to sign that they support the policies of the Party or be expelled.
Although there will be some mutterings I don't think there will be a major split in our ranks, indeed I forsee a major surge in membership and support.
But a split in nationalist ranks would be a disaster for us and the country at the very moment that we could take off.
WE MUST NOT GIVE THESE UNDEMOCRATIC FASCISTS WHAT THEY WANT.
We must bury our differences and speak with one voice.
OUR UNITY WILL BE OUR STRENGTH and we will advance to greater influence.
WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED and will continue our fight for our people and country.
MORG LIKES MULTICULTURALISM
I was born into a multicultural country, and I'd like it to stay that way.
It's all a matter of definitions though. The multiculturalism I have in mind consists of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish cultures.
That's quite multicultural enough for me thank you very much; and for you too I shouldn't wonder.
We are all very close to having the same cultures anyway, and even though we have been united for hundreds of years now, we're still a bit iffy about each other. So how the hell do these stupid politicians think they can import millions of entirely alien people and expect us all to get on like a house on fire? And talking of houses on fire - I'm Welsh so I'm familiar with the concept. Oh yes indeedy. So I predict that there's a lot of that to come within all our cities. And it wont be the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish doing it to each other.
English, Welsh, Scots and Irish. Multiculturalism at its best. The REAL British.
Morg
.
It's all a matter of definitions though. The multiculturalism I have in mind consists of the English, Welsh, Scottish and Irish cultures.
That's quite multicultural enough for me thank you very much; and for you too I shouldn't wonder.
We are all very close to having the same cultures anyway, and even though we have been united for hundreds of years now, we're still a bit iffy about each other. So how the hell do these stupid politicians think they can import millions of entirely alien people and expect us all to get on like a house on fire? And talking of houses on fire - I'm Welsh so I'm familiar with the concept. Oh yes indeedy. So I predict that there's a lot of that to come within all our cities. And it wont be the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish doing it to each other.
English, Welsh, Scots and Irish. Multiculturalism at its best. The REAL British.
Morg
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)