I believe the "Hate Democracy Love Violence" aka "Hope not Hate" organisation is to hold another get together at The Swan and Railway pub in Wallgate following their successful event a couple of months ago.
This Labour Party funded fascist group is using a venue previously used by us.
Now I admit we did use the pub to our advantage, in an effort to give a little help to the landlord but really the venue was too seedy for the quality of our organisation and that is why we did not invite our best speakers.
Sometimes there was no beer or little choice but we tried our best to make a few bob for the pub.
The fact that they have to cater for this rabble now just shows how bad things have become, and I hold no ill feeling towards them, indeed they have my sympathy.
To be forced to throw open your premises to this rag tag group, few no doubt from Wigan must be a heartbreak but business is business.
Not much beer will be sold because apart from misguided bearded vicars who only drink lemonade most of the others will be on stronger stuff such as cannabis or cocaine.
I wonder whether I might attend this uplifting experience, but would I be allowed in to this hate free do without a claw hammer. I haven't got one as I have not needed it since finishing work and did not envisage I might need one for a party.
Shall I buy one?
Saturday, 1 August 2009
TRAITORS AND POODLES
I see the Lib Dem MEP has taken on a French employee to assist him with his work.
This MEP who I have never heard of, so much has he done for us, brags that he has previously employed Greek,Italian and Portuguese assistants to help him in whatever he does.
He is not allowed to act for local constituents as that is the job of MPs so Nick Griffin was told in Brussels.
The main purpose of these MEPs and it seems the only one which they are allowed to do is to promote the EU, ie spend our money.
Mr Griffin of course seeks to bring us out of the EUSSR as do most of the British people and will try to find a permitted way of using his allowance to that end.
It says much about the loyalty of the Lib Dems to the British people that the useless Mr Davies is unable to find a suitable British candidate out of hundreds of applicants. But then the Lib Dems are poodles of the EU.
It's time to rid ourselves of these traitors and we are making good progress in that direction.
We are watching you Davies and will not forget.
This MEP who I have never heard of, so much has he done for us, brags that he has previously employed Greek,Italian and Portuguese assistants to help him in whatever he does.
He is not allowed to act for local constituents as that is the job of MPs so Nick Griffin was told in Brussels.
The main purpose of these MEPs and it seems the only one which they are allowed to do is to promote the EU, ie spend our money.
Mr Griffin of course seeks to bring us out of the EUSSR as do most of the British people and will try to find a permitted way of using his allowance to that end.
It says much about the loyalty of the Lib Dems to the British people that the useless Mr Davies is unable to find a suitable British candidate out of hundreds of applicants. But then the Lib Dems are poodles of the EU.
It's time to rid ourselves of these traitors and we are making good progress in that direction.
We are watching you Davies and will not forget.
Friday, 31 July 2009
A FAMILY TIE AND A COMMON BOND
It's surprising what you find out while researching matters completely unrelated to politics.
I was contacted by a person who had been doing her family tree and who had found out that she and I were distantly related.
I knew her father well but did not realise that we had a common ancestor in the early 19th century.
I rang her up and it seems she has had trouble with the local council re her council house.
She wanted a move to another council house and all was arranged but she found out that she would have been unable to have a parking space for her car. She needed this as she is disabled, so the deal fell through.
Soon after a new parking space and bathroom was provided and a family of immigrants have moved in and the surround to the house is a tip with rubbish all over the place, so that my relative has to take her bin out through her house to get it emptied.
The council say they can do nothing about this antisocial tenant.
So there you have it, yet another uninvited guest being given preference over people whose families have lived in the area for centuries.
I know of other such instances.
What are your Labour and Tory councillors doing apart from collecting their generous allowances and additional expenses when Wigan people whose families have lived and contributed for centuries languish on waiting lists unable to get decent accommodation in their OWN area.
AND WE ARE TOLD TO WELCOME THIS ANTI BRITISH DISCRIMINATION!
NO WONDER PEOPLE ARE TURNING MORE AND MORE TO THE BNP.
WE REFUSE TO BE SECOND CLASS CITIZENS IN OUR OWN COUNTRY.
I was contacted by a person who had been doing her family tree and who had found out that she and I were distantly related.
I knew her father well but did not realise that we had a common ancestor in the early 19th century.
I rang her up and it seems she has had trouble with the local council re her council house.
She wanted a move to another council house and all was arranged but she found out that she would have been unable to have a parking space for her car. She needed this as she is disabled, so the deal fell through.
Soon after a new parking space and bathroom was provided and a family of immigrants have moved in and the surround to the house is a tip with rubbish all over the place, so that my relative has to take her bin out through her house to get it emptied.
The council say they can do nothing about this antisocial tenant.
So there you have it, yet another uninvited guest being given preference over people whose families have lived in the area for centuries.
I know of other such instances.
What are your Labour and Tory councillors doing apart from collecting their generous allowances and additional expenses when Wigan people whose families have lived and contributed for centuries languish on waiting lists unable to get decent accommodation in their OWN area.
AND WE ARE TOLD TO WELCOME THIS ANTI BRITISH DISCRIMINATION!
NO WONDER PEOPLE ARE TURNING MORE AND MORE TO THE BNP.
WE REFUSE TO BE SECOND CLASS CITIZENS IN OUR OWN COUNTRY.
Wednesday, 29 July 2009
HOW DO WE TOP THAT?
As the pictures show we had yet another excellent meeting last night. The pictures below were taken during the interval and shows small parties of "BNP thugs" enjoying a chat and a pint
The star attraction of course was our Chairman Mr Nick Griffin MEP and the combination of his attendance and the excellence of the venue drew a crowd counted at 240.
Not bad for a political meeting!
How long is it since a Labour Party meeting had so many attendees.
Nick walked into the room to tumultuous applause and was almost engulfed by people wanting to shake his hand or have their photos taken with him
Perhaps 70 had never attended a BNP meeting before and were impressed by the general friendly civilised atmosphere and of course the quality of Nick's speech. I've had e mails today saying what a good night it was, social as well as political.
He touched on many topics but one of the main ones was that the media barons, pehaps a dozen people control all the information people receive and thus politicians must pay homage to them. This is one reason why they are so universally hostile to our party. They will speak with terrorists, murderers, traitors but refuse to share a platform with us.
Another reason they will not debate with us is that they know we would win the debate.
He said that to have won two MEPs in the face of the continual barrage of lies was a credit to all the activists who had worked so hard.
A member pointed out that only our party depended on the contributions from ordinary members. We have no mega rich benefactors or unions fleecing their members for the Labour Party.
Nick pointed out that even if somebody offered a large sum of money to change our policy, as is the case in other parties we would refuse it.
WE ARE A PARTY OF PRINCIPLE AND NOT FOR SALE!
We have learnt from the smear leaflets put out by other parties against us. Our advice is "people who live in glass houses should not throw stones"
Also mentioned was the importance of attending the RWB festival.
The local council has slapped an order on us banning caravans from the field in a particularly vindictive way. This is presumably because the rabble of the Left vandalised the local villages last time. Many were arrested. No BNP members were arrested but the local council TRIED to make us suffer.
It seems OK for drug fuelled festivals such as Glastonbury to take place (I wonder what the locals think about that), attended by ageing "rebels" from the BBC drinking Champagne at our expense but 50 caravans in a quiet field 600 yards off a country lane is too much to tolerate.
I wonder whether we will be done for having an illegal Punch and Judy show this time.
Well I have a ventrioquist's dummy and I will take that and see if they try to do me for unlicenced entertaining. It could be interesting.
Well they will not as we will take caravans to other sites and subsidise the cost.
All in all the best ever North West meeting which ended with three cheers for our Chairman Mr Nick Griffin MEP.
How do we follow that?
Tuesday, 28 July 2009
LABOUR'S RE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN STARTS NOW
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8171689.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8171865.stm
GORDON Brown is pinning Labour's re-election hopes on a strategy of dragging injured soldiers through the courts and trying to steal their money.
The prime minster has instructed the Ministry of Defence to make wounded servicemen beg for compensation in a move that he believes will wrong-foot the Tories and secure millions of votes across middle England.
A Labour spokesman said: "If there is one thing this country is absolutely sick of it is lazy, horribly injured soldiers lying around doing nothing all day except suffering constant pain and terrifying flashbacks.
"I think most people will be shocked to learn we have given them any money, let alone just enough for them to begin rebuilding their shattered lives.
"This is money that could be used to provide high-class prostitutes and Wii games for those unfortunate teenage boys who found themselves in a young offenders' institute after being forced to break into your house."
He added: "Everyone knows that when you join the army you can either choose to go to war or you can choose to stay at home and provide back-up in case of a fire brigade strike.
"And even if you do go to war you are under no legal requirement to follow orders, especially if they are really stupid and badly thought out."
The Labour manifesto is likely to propose a programme of ritual humiliation for injured soldiers in what opposition parties condemned as 'naked populism of the worst kind'.
The spokesman said: "We'll give you a couple of grand for a severed leg, but you are going to have to bring the leg with you, re-enact the explosion and be judged by a panel of celebrities before we write the cheque."
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/labour-manifesto-to-focus-on-bullying-injured-soldiers-200907281936/
Morg
.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/8171865.stm
GORDON Brown is pinning Labour's re-election hopes on a strategy of dragging injured soldiers through the courts and trying to steal their money.
The prime minster has instructed the Ministry of Defence to make wounded servicemen beg for compensation in a move that he believes will wrong-foot the Tories and secure millions of votes across middle England.
A Labour spokesman said: "If there is one thing this country is absolutely sick of it is lazy, horribly injured soldiers lying around doing nothing all day except suffering constant pain and terrifying flashbacks.
"I think most people will be shocked to learn we have given them any money, let alone just enough for them to begin rebuilding their shattered lives.
"This is money that could be used to provide high-class prostitutes and Wii games for those unfortunate teenage boys who found themselves in a young offenders' institute after being forced to break into your house."
He added: "Everyone knows that when you join the army you can either choose to go to war or you can choose to stay at home and provide back-up in case of a fire brigade strike.
"And even if you do go to war you are under no legal requirement to follow orders, especially if they are really stupid and badly thought out."
The Labour manifesto is likely to propose a programme of ritual humiliation for injured soldiers in what opposition parties condemned as 'naked populism of the worst kind'.
The spokesman said: "We'll give you a couple of grand for a severed leg, but you are going to have to bring the leg with you, re-enact the explosion and be judged by a panel of celebrities before we write the cheque."
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/politics/politics-headlines/labour-manifesto-to-focus-on-bullying-injured-soldiers-200907281936/
Morg
.
Monday, 27 July 2009
WHAT DO YOUR ENEMIES THINK?
THE general verdict among the German generals I interrogated in 1945 was that Field-Marshal von Manstein had proved the ablest commander in their Army, and the man they had most desired to become its Commander-in-Chief.
Captain B. H. Liddel Hart
So … that would make Manstein the best general of the entire war then? Now then, what did this man, probably the most formidable individual general this country's army has faced since Napoleon, think about the character of the British?
O.K.H. was bound to regard this sceptically from the outset, partly because of the British national character, which made it fairly improbable that Great Britain would come to terms …
If Hitler really believed he had already won the war after the defeat of France and that it was now merely a matter of bringing this home to Britain, he could not have been more wrong. The icy indifference of the British to his peace offer - which was anyway an extremely vague one - showed that neither the Government nor the nation were open to persuasion. And so Hitler and O.K.W. found themselves wondering 'What next?'
Certainly no war goes off according to a firm programme set by one side or the other. But
since Hitler accepted the risks of war with France and Britain in September 1939, it was his duty to consider beforehand how he should cope with these powers in various contingencies. It is quite obvious that prior to - or even during - the offensive in France, Germany's supreme command had no kind of 'war plan' to determine what measures should be taken once the victories it hoped for had been won. Hitler's hope was that Britain would give in. …
… the German Supreme Command had two facts to contend with: First, the existence of an unbeaten Britain which was palpably unwilling to come to terms.
… On the other hand, though, it may be that the British national character, so impressively incorporated in the person of Winston Churchill, prevented Britain from entertaining any serious thought of a rational settlement at that or indeed any later stage of the war. There was that admirable tenacity of the British which impels them to go through with any struggle they have once embarked on, however threatening the situation of the moment may be.
… In addition to all this, Churchill was probably too much of a fighter. His mind was too exclusively concerned with battle and ultimate victory to see beyond this military goal into the political future.
… Painful though the loss of Gibraltar, Malta and her positions in Egypt and the Near East might well have been for Britain, it would certainly not have been fatal. Indeed, the British being as they are, it would presumably have served only to stiffen their national will. The British nation would have refused to accept these losses as final and would have gone on fighting all the more bitterly. In all probability it would have given the lie to the slogan about the Mediterranean being the life-line of the Empire. It is also most unlikely that the Dominions would have withdrawn their support.
I wonder what today’s scumbaggy enemies think of us … given that we can’t even deport foreign nonces and murderers ?
Sad isn’t it, what successive governments have been doing to the British character.
A fascinating account of one man’s war, and he wrote it for easy reading. Read it all, or just pick out the bits that interest you. Whatever – you’ll read a new perspective written by our then enemy, and it really will make you seriously consider what you thought happened, in places. Hold your friends close; hold your enemies closer.
Captain B. H. Liddel Hart
So … that would make Manstein the best general of the entire war then? Now then, what did this man, probably the most formidable individual general this country's army has faced since Napoleon, think about the character of the British?
O.K.H. was bound to regard this sceptically from the outset, partly because of the British national character, which made it fairly improbable that Great Britain would come to terms …
If Hitler really believed he had already won the war after the defeat of France and that it was now merely a matter of bringing this home to Britain, he could not have been more wrong. The icy indifference of the British to his peace offer - which was anyway an extremely vague one - showed that neither the Government nor the nation were open to persuasion. And so Hitler and O.K.W. found themselves wondering 'What next?'
Certainly no war goes off according to a firm programme set by one side or the other. But
since Hitler accepted the risks of war with France and Britain in September 1939, it was his duty to consider beforehand how he should cope with these powers in various contingencies. It is quite obvious that prior to - or even during - the offensive in France, Germany's supreme command had no kind of 'war plan' to determine what measures should be taken once the victories it hoped for had been won. Hitler's hope was that Britain would give in. …
… the German Supreme Command had two facts to contend with: First, the existence of an unbeaten Britain which was palpably unwilling to come to terms.
… On the other hand, though, it may be that the British national character, so impressively incorporated in the person of Winston Churchill, prevented Britain from entertaining any serious thought of a rational settlement at that or indeed any later stage of the war. There was that admirable tenacity of the British which impels them to go through with any struggle they have once embarked on, however threatening the situation of the moment may be.
… In addition to all this, Churchill was probably too much of a fighter. His mind was too exclusively concerned with battle and ultimate victory to see beyond this military goal into the political future.
… Painful though the loss of Gibraltar, Malta and her positions in Egypt and the Near East might well have been for Britain, it would certainly not have been fatal. Indeed, the British being as they are, it would presumably have served only to stiffen their national will. The British nation would have refused to accept these losses as final and would have gone on fighting all the more bitterly. In all probability it would have given the lie to the slogan about the Mediterranean being the life-line of the Empire. It is also most unlikely that the Dominions would have withdrawn their support.
I wonder what today’s scumbaggy enemies think of us … given that we can’t even deport foreign nonces and murderers ?
Sad isn’t it, what successive governments have been doing to the British character.
A fascinating account of one man’s war, and he wrote it for easy reading. Read it all, or just pick out the bits that interest you. Whatever – you’ll read a new perspective written by our then enemy, and it really will make you seriously consider what you thought happened, in places. Hold your friends close; hold your enemies closer.
Check the comment for how to get the book for free.
Morg
.
Morg
.
Sunday, 26 July 2009
FIGHTING WIGAN'S CORNER?
Our illustrious Wigan MP pictured above, (I bet you have never heard of anything he has done for Wigan) is doing his best to combat global warming by flying to the South Pacific on a £ 3,400 business class trip to "exotic spots around the region"
The purpose of the trip it is stated is to "promote the advancement of Parliamentary democracy and understanding of democratic governance".
They will fly to Fiji from where they will take connecting flights to Kiribati (no I have never heard of it either) and then on to Tonga where older people remember at the Queen's coronation they sent their pleasant queen to the ceremonies. I believe they are a happy race, possibly a bit overweight owing to their love of pig meat, in many ways a suitable refuelling stop for our MP.
From there on to Tuvalu and then to Vanuatu before returning to London.
I would have thought that these exotic island communities would have worked out a political system suitable to their needs without advice from people such as Mr Turner, a member of a party which refuses to condemn hammer attacks against political opponents. They have surely nothing to learn from the anti democratic Labour Party which has all but abolished the right to free speech in this country.
I am sure the people of Wigan, stuck in traffic jams,unable to get housing owing to immigrants being given preference, or waiting in Brocol House for their dole, having been made unemployed by the policies of his government, appreciate Mr Turner's efforts on their behalf.
BTW the picture above was taken from the website "They work for you",
It's good to know Mr Turner is always "working for Wiganers".
We are indeed fortunate in having an MP who works for us 12 months a year,(and it's all "within the rules").
THANK GOD FOR BRITISH DEMOCRACY AND PROBITY.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)