THE RESIGNATION OF MC CARTNEY

I am disappointed that Ian Mc Cartney has decided to retire "on health grounds" It can ONLY be co incidental that this announcement was made in the middle of the expenses scandle in which he of course not involved in spite of paying money back he had erroneously claimed.

I wanted to stand against him on a Real Wiganer ticket who would stick up for the people of Wigan and ensure we got what we needed and deserved.
What have we got while Mc Cartney has been the Makerfield MP? Zilch.

He has been the holder of one of the safest seats and thus had no real incentive to push hard for the people of Wigan. Yes he has opened a few health centres and such like but the big schemes which could bring so much prosperity to Wigan have been shelved.

He did not stop the Bickershaw/Golborne pit complex being closed. He promised Billinge Hospital would not be closed not long before it was and sold off for housing thus a good building with land to expand was lost, against the wishes of the people.

From his point of view promotion to the cabinet has been more important than kicking up against the party line for his adopted town. He voted against disclosure of MPs expenses,for the Iraq war and toed the party line on the vast majority of issues. Just lobby fodder.

A Labour robot would have been just as effective and at the end of this illustrious career he leaves with a large pension and a cushy job advising on de commissioning Sellafield nuclear plant on £114,000 per year.

Does anybody think he knows the first thing about this task? Does anybody think he would have got the job if he had no contacts with people in government?
Does anybody think he will give up that job "for health reasons"?--not likely.

When he first became MP there was a Tory government but they would always ignore Wigan as a Labour town.

What these feather bedded MPs fail to understand is that they are supposed to be our servants and represent US and not their party. Government should be bottom up, not top down and an MP who believed that would have fought our corner harder.

What we need in Wigan (and Makerfield and Leigh) are MPs who will fight our corner even against their party and to do that the MP must not just pretend to represent the town he happens to end up in but a man who lives and breaths the place and whose loyalty to the town trancends all other considerations.

The town must be like a religion to him and he must not have his interests deflected by third world issues such as schools in India, nor cushy non jobs in industry. In other words he must be a Wiganer first and a party member second and work at it full time.

Hopefully we will get somebody of better calibre now, but unfortunately he or she will be from the same incompetent sleazy party, although with people at last seeing through them by a much reduced majority.
Perhaps then even a Labour MP will represent local people with more vigour.

IAN McCARTNEY

Standing down at the next election due to "ill health".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/23/police-labour

DEDICATED TO MR (R)ED AND OTHERS WHO MAY DETEST OUR LANDS

MORE FROM THE COAL FACE

Another hectic day. Much of mine was spent in planning and distribution while teams of leafletters were out in the local areas to a generally enthusiastic response.

There was one incident when a young helper was punched in the face by an opponent, presumably of the fascist left.

The incident of course has been reported to the police as the boy has neck pains and was shaken by the incident. We know the name and address of the perpetrator, and hopefully will see her in court.

The reaction of this attacker shows the lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy reminiscent of the Stalinist states these people so admire.

I can understand that she may not agree with our policies but we are entitled to promote them.

I find the way the big three parties have sold our country off while feathering their own nests very offensive but I would never dream of violently assaulting someone distributing their literature, and nor would any of our members.

When you have lost the argument--lash out, that's the tactic of the Left.
They must be really fearful of the voters verdict.

On a more positive note here's the link to our EU broadcast as shown on Channel 5 last night. I can add nothing to it. It says it all and shows the reason why we are the only hope for our country.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7f8lprxiOFc&feature=email

MASSIVE INCREASE IN SUPPORT.

An excellent inspiring EU broadcast by Nick Griffin tonight put our party's case to the voters. It nailed the lie that we are racist and demonstrated the truth that we are in effect a conservative party (with a little c).

The party with the big C has shown no interest in conserving anything British, while the much hyped UKIP has foreign candidates, so not much British sentiment there. Labour is of course engaged in securing the immigrant vote.

We want to preserve our country, its culture and freedoms from foreign invaders and influences such as the EU. Our forebears fought ruthless European tyrants twice in the last century to preserve our independence and freedom and our party will not stand by and see them given away.

I attended a meeting last night with Nick Griffin as guest speaker. The main topic was the incredible response we had had to our campaigning and leaflets, far in excess of what we expected. I knew the broadcast would be good as I was present at one of the early planning stages, but our new call centre specially set up to deal with new enquiries has struggled to cope (32,000 calls in 2 days)

We have of course been helped by the expenses scandles of MPs which lays bare their contempt for the people who so foolishly elected them.

This week our advertising hoardings have been put up, to the expected dismay of the other parties who will use every trick in the book to have them taken down.
It does not seem to occur to them that just as they are entitled to advertise, so are we. Any attempt to stifle our adverts shows their fascist methods and portrays us as victims of injustice, thus shooting themselves in the foot and gaining votes for us.

Predictably in "enriched" areas there has been trouble, with muslims in Luton protesting and threatening to burn them. The police respond that we should take them down to avoid trouble. So much for democratic debate.

What they can object to is beyond me as the adverts only say "British Jobs for British Workers" but evidently these people do not consider themselves as British. It also shows their lack of understanding of the meaning of democracy and the increasing threat to our freedoms by the continuing immigration of people who do not respect our values.

Activists in all areas speak of a surge in support for us.
I hope it translates into votes.

For a DVD of Nick Griffin's talk on our progress please ring me on the above phone numbers.

IMMIGRATION AND INTELLIGENCE - AN OXYMORON

Now if you aren't already aware of the internal intricacies of our wonderful Borders and Immigration Agency, let me enlighten you. In summary - the agency is not fit for fucking purpose. Having worked there (and resigned in disgust) I can give you a tour de force of the colossal shortcomings and mind numbing idiocracy that it is.
…
Many of these people have been able to extend their stay for a sufficient period of time to apply for citizenship. All on the basis of some incredibly shoddy fraudulent documents.

And it only takes one batch of these documents to get you in. After that, you're laughing.

As the Times articles details, one of the hucksters who set up one of these institutions wrote letters and documents to give himself qualifications. Its even more of a breeze to write fake attendance records and glowing references for your pals from Swat Valley.

Oh, didn't I mention that bit? That's right, through this secure system of assessment hundreds of applicants have arrived, and remained, in the UK who originated in the Taleban and Al Queda hotbeds of North Western Pakistan. And these are just hundreds from this one network of scams that the Times has exposed.

So here's one of the points I really really want to drive home: These kind of institutions, scams and applications were (and probably still are) the norm at the Home Office.
…
I don't think many people (especially those mentalist "no borders" people) really, truly, realise just how utterly shoddy and mind numbingly incompetent the nation's border control is. I laughed hard when I realised that many people labour under the illusion that the Home Office keeps track of all these applicants. It doesn't. Very often no one even realises someone has overstayed unless that put in a fresh application.
…
That's right folks. For years and years, the number of dodgy institutions providing a magic carpet for equally dodgy individuals to fly into the country has been approximately 13,460.

Thirteen thousand, four hundred and sixty!!

Go read it all and get angry:

http://i-squared.blogspot.com/2009/05/immigration-and-intelligence-view-from.html

Then consider who is doing the vetting at the Borders agency … and know you that these days it’s not usually Saxons or Celts.

Arrived at passport control at Heathrow Terminal Three in recent years? (which is only the outward face of a huge Home Office Immigration bureaucracy – and who’s been getting all those hidden bureaucratic jobs? Can you guess?)

Give it a try sometime. Last time my brother came visiting from Australia only one control desk had a whitey on it. And as he used one of the other desks, he couldn’t even be sure that at least that one whitey was a natural Briton.

Morg
.

THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE DOG THAT LEFT NO TRACKS IN THE NIGHT

Tony Blair claimed more than £10,600 for a new kitchen for his home in his one-time Sedgefield constituency. It emerged that the former Premier was warned that he and his wife Cherie could face the bailiffs over an unpaid water bill. Northumbrian Water informed them that they had fallen £147.11 into arrears. A letter from the company to Mrs Blair said: 'We appreciate that you may be experiencing some financial difficulties.'

Prime Minister Tony Blair's former constituency home in Trimdon where he had a new kitchen worth £10,600 fitted

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1021534/Blair-Brown-new-kitchens-taxpayer-John-Lewis-list-expense-claims-reveal.html

I see … something costing nearly 11 grand that YOU are paying for, is paid no problem; but something costing less than £150 that HE has to pay for … a warning for non-payment.

That article’s a good one – well worth a visit, and Blair isn’t the only one it has information about.

But let’s take a closer look at the financial shenanigans surrounding that house and that Prime Minister shall we? Shall we? Oh yes, I think we shall indeedy…

Tony Blair took out a mortgage of almost £300,000 on his constituency house – double its estimated value – to help fund his growing property empire.

The unusually generous arrangement, revealed in a breakdown of MPs’ expenses, was last night condemned by critics who said it highlighted how politicians could use their taxpayer-funded second homes as ‘cash machines’.

I have to ask – could YOU get a 200% mortgage?

Mr Blair bought Myrobella, in Trimdon, County Durham, when he won his Sedgefield seat in the 1983 General Election.

In her recently published memoirs, Cherie Blair said they bought it for £30,000 ‘and then spent the same again doing what was absolutely necessary’.

But documents released this weekend under freedom of information legislation show that in 2004 the pair were claiming back interest payments on a mortgage totalling £90,449.73, indicating they were claiming for a loan in excess of the £60,000 cost of buying and fitting out the property.

More than merely “in excess” – that’s a full 50% "in excess". If YOU tried that you’d be done for FRAUD; and as it’s taxpayer money we’re talking about, you WOULD do some serious indoors time. 30 grand’s worth of Benefits cheating, or tax evasion – what would that get you? After all, it all comes out of that pot marked “Taxpayer Money”. YOUR money.

Let’s sum that up: he buys a house for 30 grand, spends another 30 doing it up. Total – 60 grand. Fair enough so far, I suppose … but then he claims – out of YOUR money – for a mortgage of 90 grand. Over the years, the house increases in value to 150 grand (well, it increases in price – but is that the same thing as value? Never mind: that is, as they say, a whole other argument to be saved for another day). Then to fund another step in his property empire he takes out a mortgage on this 150 grand house for … 300 grand.

I think we are looking at a major criminal here (and that’s before taking a million murdered Iraqis into consideration).

At the time of the remortgage, Mr Blair was negotiating the £3.6million purchase of the five-bedroom Georgian house in Connaught Square, Central London, which has become his main base since leaving Downing Street.

Financial experts were puzzled at how he managed to secure financing on his Prime Ministerial salary.

Apart from the Trimdon home, which is still registered in his name, his property portfolio also includes two Bristol flats bought in 2002 for £260,000 each and a stately home in Buckinghamshire that cost him £4million this year. (and the Connaught Square house)

Go read it all here:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1021668/Tony-Blair-took-300-000-mortgage-constituency-house-worth-just-150-000.html

Now then – shall we take a closer look at Blair’s property empire? Yes we shall. It all starts with that house in County Durham, pictured above …

Not only has the property increased in value ten-fold, it has provided the bedrock collateral for a property portfolio of which a Russian oligarch would not be ashamed. This includes the Blairs' £4million mansion in London's Connaught Square with its £800,000 mews cottage, two flats in Bristol and Sir John Gielgud's former country estate in Buckinghamshire, recently bought for around £5million. (and don’t forget the original house in County Durham, which he still owns)

You may wonder how on earth Blair arranged this. After all, while the former Prime Minister can now earn £500,000 a month from international speaking engagements, until a year ago he existed on his salary as an MP and then Premier - as well as on Cherie's legal work.

However, the truth is that the couple's ability to build up their property portfolio is thanks partly to Parliament's scandalously ill-policed generosity towards our public representatives.

So YOU bought his property empire for him. That was good of you. Could you see yourselves free to buying a property empire for me too, please? No, didn’t think so.

Country pile: Sir John Gielgud's former residence, now home to the Blairs

…Mr Blair received tens of thousands of pounds tax-free, in the form of mortgage expenses payments over 20 years.

The unpalatable fact is that when the Blairs sell Myrobella - as it is assumed they soon will, given the fact he is no longer Sedgefield MP and the property market is falling - taxpayers won't be getting back a penny of that subsidy.

The Financial details concerning Myrobella are not complete. Only fragments of the Blairs' expenses were to be found in the three cardboard boxes of MPs' documents which were made public. Other Blair receipts, it has been revealed, were long ago shredded by a Westminster official - allegedly 'by mistake'. (which we’ll get back to a little further on. Oh yes we shall you know)

But enough details are in the public domain - to be set alongside comments in Cherie Blair's recent memoirs - to pose some disturbing questions about the size and legitimacy of the large mortgages taken out on the Trimdon home.

In fact, as this investigation shows, Mr Blair has claimed anything up to £200,000 of public expenses for the mortgage interest paid on his second home.

But the most worrying question is why those claims - made during the 24 years he was an MP - were based on a mortgage figure much higher than the property's purchase price.

(a purchase price which was initially, at best 60 grand, as we have already seen)

Connaught Square: £4 million mansion

Unsurprisingly, there is little criticism from within Westminster - and leading Tories such as David Cameron have been silent on the issue.

Perhaps it's no surprise, since the newly released expenses claims showed that the Tory leader - who is a millionaire in his own right - received £1,741.83 a month for the mortgage on his cottage in Oxfordshire.

But what of Myrobella? According to Mrs Blair's memoirs: 'We bought it for about £30,000 and then spent about the same again doing what was absolutely necessary. . . we moved in the following year.'

… But there is another benefit. For when the Blairs sell Myrobella, the profit will not be shared with the public purse, which helped fund the mortgage payments for so long, but will go directly to the Blairs.

Mike Warburton, senior tax partner at City accountancy firm Grant Thornton, points out that the Green Book says: 'Honourable members are expected to act honourably.'

'This is fine, but not everyone will. People will always stretch boundaries. MPs are treated very favourably, but the general public are just not aware of how much. They need to be made aware of this,' he says.

'MPs can claim mortgage interest for their second homes from the public purse, but the profit from rising property value accrues to them personally.'

So even if we ignore the mystery of why the Blairs' original mortgage was £90,000 rather than £60,000, they have reaped a handsome tax-free financial benefit from taxpayers due to the rising value of Myrobella.

So you paid the costs (and more, much more), but Blair gets the profit. Nice work if you can get it.

However, thanks to that shredder, we seem to have been denied much of the evidence concerning the Blairs' financial affairs at Myrobella …

Read it all:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1024574/Revealed-Blair-built-property-portfolio-mortgage-expenses-paid-taxpayers.html

Now shall we take a look at the case of the mysterious shredding and the criminal who covered his tracks? Hmmm … yes I think we shall.

Tony Blair dodged possible fire over his housing deals after hundreds of expenses claims were 'accidentally' shredded.

Documents itemising some of the then Prime Minister's receipts for 2001-02 were destroyed by Commons officials 'by mistake'.

It covered a period when he claimed for Myrobella, his Sedgefield constituency home.

It was already known that Mr Blair claimed £43,029 over a three-year period up to 2003-04.But it was not known what the money was spent on.


Can anyone please explain to me how three years’ worth of receipts can be “accidentally” shredded? It’s quite beyond my capacity to imagine. Any suggestions Red?

I’m pretty sure that in any comparable case involving me, or any other member of the public - that's YOU - we’d be looking at serious down-time for perverting the course of justice.

… the 'black hole' in Mr Blair expenses claims raise questions over what details the destroyed documents might have contained.
To increase suspicions, Westminster officials shredded the files even though they were the subject to an ongoing legal challenge.


Beyond question then – perverting the course of justice. Where are you constable Constable?

Here is a photofit of the suspected robber. If you see him do not approach - call constable Constable, or Crimestoppers.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1181415/MPs-EXPENSES-Blairs-43-000-expenses-shredded-incompetence.html

The claims and receipts, relating to Mr Blair's final year in office, were destroyed even though there was an ongoing legal bid to have them published.
Westminster officials say the documents were destroyed by mistake, as they did not realise they were the subject of a legal challenge.


Well Mr Westminster Officials sir, I believe you, but I’m sure there are millions who don’t. Those pesky British have become so cynical haven’t they. I wonder why?

It is already known that Mr Blair claimed £43,029 over a three-year period. But it was not known what the money was spent on.
Court papers have now revealed that files covering claims of Myrobella, his Sedgefield constituency home, were destroyed by Commons officials after they rejected a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

Expenses campaigner Norman Baker MP said: "How convenient that some of Tony Blair's expenses have been shredded. "

Very convenient indeed.

Speaker Michael Martin squandered almost £200,000 of taxpayers cash in his failed attempt to keep the accounts secret.

In the judgment, Sir Igor Judge, Lord Justice Latham and Mr Justice Blake said: "We are not here dealing with idle gossip, or public curiosity about what are in truth trivialities.

(That’d be judge Judge then – should work well with constable Constable)

"The expenditure of public money through the payment of MPs' salaries and allowances is a matter of direct and reasonable interest to taxpayers."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-567121/Tony-Blairs-expenses-shredded-mistake--just-public.html

They do say a fish rots from the head …

Here we have something that, taken in the round from its beginnings up to the present day should be subject to a CRIMINAL investigation. And what is constable Constable doing? You tell me – because I can’t see that he’s doing very much at all. How very much unlike the time the Chairman of the British National Party was put on trial TWICE, on the same charges each time, with a potential penalty of seven years in jail – and who can doubt he’d have been given every last minute of that seven years? – all for the heinous crime of … what? Stealing tens or hundreds of thousands of pounds of YOUR money? Ordering the cold-blooded murder of a million innocent Iraqis in their own country?

No – he uttered seven words at a private meeting – “Islam is a wicked and vicious faith”.

Go figure. It’s beyond me.

We now hear stories that it is feared some M.P.s are contemplating suicide – no, not out of remorse for their crimes of the kind detailed here, but because we the public have found out about them. Further to those suicide fears a psychiatrist has been retained for “counselling”, should the individuals concerned feel the need to talk about it. MORE expense to you the taxpayer.

There has been a fair bit of discussion in recent years over what to do with the spare plinth in Trafalgar Square. I have a suggestion: we should build a gallows on it, then make it freely available to any public official with suicidal tendencies. Sell tickets to watch.

Once those so inclined have disposed of themselves, and the rest of the corrupt crew think that they are free and clear, and the worst that can happen to them is that they might get slung out on their ear by the electorate at the next election, at which point they can live out their days on their million pounds+ publicly-funded index-linked pensions, we should dismantle the gallows on the spare plinth … and replace it with a de-luxe version of la Madame so we can work our way through the rest of them. Sell tickets to watch that too.

Ok, we couldn’t do that in real life, but I can daydream can’t I? Join me in that daydream – it’s a wonderful one when you hate them as much as I hate them.

And as a final word – let’s mention hate. Our opponents have a slogan: “Hope not Hate”. Well I’m a former serviceman and I can tell you for an absolute hard fact that when you’re up against it, if you’re reduced to hope, then you are finished, kaput. Hate is much better; at the very least it gives you direction and inspiration to action. A little bit of hate can get you a lot further than a whole lot of hope. Hope generally gets you no further than about six feet … down.

Hate may not change much in the end – you may still end up skewered – but you’ll have felt a lot better in those moments beforehand. Hope is just a counsel of despair.

Here, go and pick a little extra light reading for yourselves. There’s a good selection to choose from:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?searchPhrase=Blair+expenses+receipts

Morg
.