Last Thursday we held our usual monthly meeting of our Wigan group. It was in my opinion a very successful meeting with a good attendance and possibly 3 new members signing up.
What distinguishes our meetings from the meetings of other parties is the social aspect with people staying long after the political part of the meeting has finished. These occasions are therapeutic in that one feels invigorated after especially after meeting so many solid decent people from all walks of life who are united in the love of our country and people.
A pleasing aspect of late is the increasing numbers of people attending indicating a growing support for our position and a realisation that our party speaks for "people like them". We have some politics (we after all are a political party) and generally socialise afterwards. All in all enjoyable evenings in a convivial atmosphere.
That is not to say the political speeches are unimportant. They are a vital part of any political meeting. In this aspect we are fortunate in having some of the best speakers in politics with serious presentations given in a "fun" way which often has the audience asking for more, a far cry from the turgid offerings of other parties.
Last week we had Paul Rimmer who always informs and amuses as he gives his talks "from the heart" and who can draw on a wealth of experience of inner city life in Liverpool and London and the effects of the "enrichment" of those two great cities.
A DVD has been made of Paul's speech which I will forward to anyone if you phone the number on the top of this blog.
Thanks to all who attended but I'm sure you don't need my thanks as you all seemed to enjoy it.
Look forward to seeing you next month or perhaps before at the RWB.
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
Monday, 28 July 2008
A CALL FOR INFORMATION
I live in the southern third of Wigan West. This is the area - or one of the areas - where Wigan MBC are offloading lots of immigrants.
It's Labour opinion that this enriches us all. Many of us disagree - but whatever, Labour seem to think it, or they at least say it.
Now then, Neil Turner, our Wigan MP lives around here - not far from me actually - right here where all the enrichment is being carried out.
I'm not fully confident about what follows, but I've been told it separately by two different people, so I'm putting out a call for confirmation or denial.
One of his near neighbours, and a different woman who is a near neighbour of mine, have both told me that Neil Turner is moving out and going to live elsewhere.
If that is so then it just about sums up everything we in the BNP - and many not in the BNP - think about all those in favour of enrichment: i.e. that they are in favour of it only so long as it's not happening where they and their families live. It's happening where Mr. Turner lives so he's moving out; he loads the enrichment onto us, but doesn't like it for himself even though he and his kind tell us it's good for us. And no doubt good for Wigan too, eh?
Now then: can anyone confirm or deny for me that he actually is moving out? I would be grateful for information. Say what you think, or what you know, in the comments. If he actually is moving out then I have a great deal more to say on this topic.
It's Labour opinion that this enriches us all. Many of us disagree - but whatever, Labour seem to think it, or they at least say it.
Now then, Neil Turner, our Wigan MP lives around here - not far from me actually - right here where all the enrichment is being carried out.
I'm not fully confident about what follows, but I've been told it separately by two different people, so I'm putting out a call for confirmation or denial.
One of his near neighbours, and a different woman who is a near neighbour of mine, have both told me that Neil Turner is moving out and going to live elsewhere.
If that is so then it just about sums up everything we in the BNP - and many not in the BNP - think about all those in favour of enrichment: i.e. that they are in favour of it only so long as it's not happening where they and their families live. It's happening where Mr. Turner lives so he's moving out; he loads the enrichment onto us, but doesn't like it for himself even though he and his kind tell us it's good for us. And no doubt good for Wigan too, eh?
Now then: can anyone confirm or deny for me that he actually is moving out? I would be grateful for information. Say what you think, or what you know, in the comments. If he actually is moving out then I have a great deal more to say on this topic.
Friday, 18 July 2008
INCOMPETENCE,GREED AND VINDICTIVENES CAUSING FUEL PRICE RISES
Electricity and gas prices are set to rise by 60% while road fuel is at record levels. Gordon Brown, our "prudent "prime minister scurries round Arab countries asking them to cut oil prices and blames world conditions.
This fuel crisis could and should have been forseen, and our troubles have been caused by the short sighted policies of both Labour and Tory administrations with added vindictiveness by the latter.
When Noth Sea oil and gas was discovered it caused the pound to rise to such an extent that our industry could not compete abroad causing us to lose much of our manufacturing base.
After Thatcher beat the miners the Tories put the boot in them saying they would not be held to ransom again. They did this by building gas power stations run on North Sea gas. Unfortunately in a particularly vindictive move they shut many profitable mines and others which although they did not pay at the time held vast reserves of coal, and which could have been mothballed until the price of coal went up as it has done now.
Labour, supposedly the party of the miners shut most of the other pits including the giant Selby complex, only opened 20 years previously and locally the Bickershaw/Golborne compex. To be politically correct and in order "to cut carbon emissions" they said that gas was the thing for the future.
Why were these pits not mothballed? Hundred of millions of tons have been steriised by subsequent developement and we are now dependant on countries such as Russia for much of our coal.
At the same time they sold gas and oil cheaply to Europe which helped plug the balance of payments deficit resulting from the demise of our manufacturing industry and increasing imports.
They could not see that this was a wasting asset and would run out at a time when global prices were rising.
Meanwhile a false sense of prosperity was created on the back of cheap credit and Chinese imports and the increased government revenues squandered.
Now the chancellor has no savings to cushion the blow that they in part have created and we are dependent on Russia for much of our gas and coal.
How very secure. They don't need to attack us, just turn off the tap. Even during the war we could guarantee power and gas from our own resources.
Governments Tory and Labour should have seen this coming years ago and refrained from selling our gas and oil at knock down prices and saved it for times of shortage. Similarly they should not have sterilised our coal.
If the treasury had saved rather than wasted our taxes when times were good they would have been able to reduce them now times are hard.
Is it incompetence or greed for power or both? I think both.
Gordon Brown as a "son of the manse" should have remembered his Bible.
The seven years of plenty followed by seven years of famine in Egypt and also the parable of the prodigal son.
Only this time there is no happy ending as we have no fatted calf--we ate it last year.
The other parties were happy to govern for the short term even if that meant destroying our assets, AND NOW WE ARE PAYING THE PRICE.
THE BNP WOULD ALWAYS THINK OF THE LONG TERM IN PRESERVING OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND JOBS FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
This fuel crisis could and should have been forseen, and our troubles have been caused by the short sighted policies of both Labour and Tory administrations with added vindictiveness by the latter.
When Noth Sea oil and gas was discovered it caused the pound to rise to such an extent that our industry could not compete abroad causing us to lose much of our manufacturing base.
After Thatcher beat the miners the Tories put the boot in them saying they would not be held to ransom again. They did this by building gas power stations run on North Sea gas. Unfortunately in a particularly vindictive move they shut many profitable mines and others which although they did not pay at the time held vast reserves of coal, and which could have been mothballed until the price of coal went up as it has done now.
Labour, supposedly the party of the miners shut most of the other pits including the giant Selby complex, only opened 20 years previously and locally the Bickershaw/Golborne compex. To be politically correct and in order "to cut carbon emissions" they said that gas was the thing for the future.
Why were these pits not mothballed? Hundred of millions of tons have been steriised by subsequent developement and we are now dependant on countries such as Russia for much of our coal.
At the same time they sold gas and oil cheaply to Europe which helped plug the balance of payments deficit resulting from the demise of our manufacturing industry and increasing imports.
They could not see that this was a wasting asset and would run out at a time when global prices were rising.
Meanwhile a false sense of prosperity was created on the back of cheap credit and Chinese imports and the increased government revenues squandered.
Now the chancellor has no savings to cushion the blow that they in part have created and we are dependent on Russia for much of our gas and coal.
How very secure. They don't need to attack us, just turn off the tap. Even during the war we could guarantee power and gas from our own resources.
Governments Tory and Labour should have seen this coming years ago and refrained from selling our gas and oil at knock down prices and saved it for times of shortage. Similarly they should not have sterilised our coal.
If the treasury had saved rather than wasted our taxes when times were good they would have been able to reduce them now times are hard.
Is it incompetence or greed for power or both? I think both.
Gordon Brown as a "son of the manse" should have remembered his Bible.
The seven years of plenty followed by seven years of famine in Egypt and also the parable of the prodigal son.
Only this time there is no happy ending as we have no fatted calf--we ate it last year.
The other parties were happy to govern for the short term even if that meant destroying our assets, AND NOW WE ARE PAYING THE PRICE.
THE BNP WOULD ALWAYS THINK OF THE LONG TERM IN PRESERVING OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND JOBS FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
Thursday, 17 July 2008
JULY MEETING
Here is the back page of the bulletin for the Wigan group meeting to be held next Thursday at 8 pm at the usual venue.The speaker will be Paul Rimmer who is well worth hearing for his take on the problems we face and our future.
I hope to see as many as possible there.
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
THE STUPIDITY OF BROWN AND MILLIBAND
Gordon Brown and his puppet Milliband are "shocked and disappointed" that Russia and China have not backed sanctions against Zimbabwe.
Did bungling Brown and meddlesome Milliband really think China and Russia would back the proposals ? (I notice when white farmers were being murdered they did not show any concern).
Russia has trouble with states such as Chechnya and does not want outside interference in these regions and is thus hardly likely to be in favour of interference elsewhere.
China is hardly a democracy so they are not going to be in favour of any attempt to force democracy on other countries especially after the trouble in Tibet. Also they are investing millions in Zimbabwe and other failing African states to secure access to the rich mineral wealth of Africa. If they secure these vital raw materials they don't care what the regimes in Africa do.
Meanwhile we are becoming denied business opportunities in Africa by our meddlesome attitudes to governance in Africa.
Let's face it, all African states are failed states and if we want access to minerals we should mind our own business, keep out of African politics, and deal with the despots as China does. Giving aid which only ends up in dictator's Swiss bank accounts does no good and the African people still hate us.
Much better for all concerned is for us to put our money into mineral exploitation in Africa. This would give some local employment and improve infrastructure but most importantly secure our supplies before China has the monopoly. But then none in our government has any business sense and are too short sighted to see.
We are losing our future trying to be the world's policeman while the Chinese and Russian governments are doing what they should do--looking after the interests of their own country.
Our government should likewise, do what it is supposed to do --look after our interests at home and abroad.
Why does this matter to the people of Wigan? Because if the British government continues on its meddlesome path,
OUR CHILDREN WILL BE AMONGST THE WORLD'S POOR IN FUTURE
That's why we need the BNP to stop these stupid policies and thus prevent future poverty here, for when disaster strikes--
NO ONE WILL HELP US!
Did bungling Brown and meddlesome Milliband really think China and Russia would back the proposals ? (I notice when white farmers were being murdered they did not show any concern).
Russia has trouble with states such as Chechnya and does not want outside interference in these regions and is thus hardly likely to be in favour of interference elsewhere.
China is hardly a democracy so they are not going to be in favour of any attempt to force democracy on other countries especially after the trouble in Tibet. Also they are investing millions in Zimbabwe and other failing African states to secure access to the rich mineral wealth of Africa. If they secure these vital raw materials they don't care what the regimes in Africa do.
Meanwhile we are becoming denied business opportunities in Africa by our meddlesome attitudes to governance in Africa.
Let's face it, all African states are failed states and if we want access to minerals we should mind our own business, keep out of African politics, and deal with the despots as China does. Giving aid which only ends up in dictator's Swiss bank accounts does no good and the African people still hate us.
Much better for all concerned is for us to put our money into mineral exploitation in Africa. This would give some local employment and improve infrastructure but most importantly secure our supplies before China has the monopoly. But then none in our government has any business sense and are too short sighted to see.
We are losing our future trying to be the world's policeman while the Chinese and Russian governments are doing what they should do--looking after the interests of their own country.
Our government should likewise, do what it is supposed to do --look after our interests at home and abroad.
Why does this matter to the people of Wigan? Because if the British government continues on its meddlesome path,
OUR CHILDREN WILL BE AMONGST THE WORLD'S POOR IN FUTURE
That's why we need the BNP to stop these stupid policies and thus prevent future poverty here, for when disaster strikes--
NO ONE WILL HELP US!
Sunday, 13 July 2008
AN ANSWER TO CHRIS HILL
Chris I share you disappointment at the expulsions from the party last December which I did not agree with. I supported Colin Auty's right to stand and would have voted for him, knowing he could not possibly win. My vote would have been a protest at things I did not agree with. However I would never do anything to jeapordise the future of the Party.
If I thought he had any chance of winning there is no way I would have voted for him or supported his leadership bid.
Whatever you say about Nick Griffin he is head and shoulders above anybody else and the loss of him as leader would put the Party back years and be a source of gloating by our enemies.
We would all like the Party to gain more votes and in future we will. Any lack of progress now is certainly not the fault fo Nick.
We should stick together and not let personal disagreements stand in our way. We have the right policies and eventually sense will prevail, but all this carping from the sidelines portrays us as disunited which we are not and certainly will not win us votes.
All parties have their personality and doctrinal issues, but the ones which put them to one side and unite are eventually the winners.
So come on----UNITED WE STAND!
If I thought he had any chance of winning there is no way I would have voted for him or supported his leadership bid.
Whatever you say about Nick Griffin he is head and shoulders above anybody else and the loss of him as leader would put the Party back years and be a source of gloating by our enemies.
We would all like the Party to gain more votes and in future we will. Any lack of progress now is certainly not the fault fo Nick.
We should stick together and not let personal disagreements stand in our way. We have the right policies and eventually sense will prevail, but all this carping from the sidelines portrays us as disunited which we are not and certainly will not win us votes.
All parties have their personality and doctrinal issues, but the ones which put them to one side and unite are eventually the winners.
So come on----UNITED WE STAND!
Saturday, 12 July 2008
SWISS REACTION TO MILITANT ISLAM
Switzerland is to hold a referendum on whether to ban minarets on mosques.
Swiss patriots feel that the building of minarets is a sign of political Islam.
There is no necessity for mosques to have minarets but their presence is a sign of Islamic presence. Like the Muslim clothes, beards worn by the men in this country and the burkas worn by the women minarets are an in your face symbol of a growing Muslim presence,a political gesture of Muslim influence. They are a sign of separateness and an unwillingness to integrate.
They are not necessary for those of the Muslim faith and those who wear them demonstrate their militancy.
The significance of Muslim dress is demonstrated in Turkey where it has been banned for over 50 years in public buildings even though Turkey is a Muslim country. The powers of medieval reaction are rearing their ugly head with the Islamic party wanting to restore Muslim clothes, especially for women while the moderates are resisting this.
At present the Islamic parties are gaining strength as they are in many countries.
Switzerland however has advantages denied to us. They are not part of the EU and thus do not need to abide by the politically correct laws passed in Brussels.
Secondly they decide most laws by referenda (take note Gordon), so that the will of the people is better represented. The ordinary people can thus act to prevent the islamificationof their country, unlike here where most of our laws are not even made in our country.
So, being the most democratic country in Europe and denied the "benefits" of EU membership, how has Switzerland fared?
It has the highest standard of living in Europe.
There must be a lesson there somewhere
Swiss patriots feel that the building of minarets is a sign of political Islam.
There is no necessity for mosques to have minarets but their presence is a sign of Islamic presence. Like the Muslim clothes, beards worn by the men in this country and the burkas worn by the women minarets are an in your face symbol of a growing Muslim presence,a political gesture of Muslim influence. They are a sign of separateness and an unwillingness to integrate.
They are not necessary for those of the Muslim faith and those who wear them demonstrate their militancy.
The significance of Muslim dress is demonstrated in Turkey where it has been banned for over 50 years in public buildings even though Turkey is a Muslim country. The powers of medieval reaction are rearing their ugly head with the Islamic party wanting to restore Muslim clothes, especially for women while the moderates are resisting this.
At present the Islamic parties are gaining strength as they are in many countries.
Switzerland however has advantages denied to us. They are not part of the EU and thus do not need to abide by the politically correct laws passed in Brussels.
Secondly they decide most laws by referenda (take note Gordon), so that the will of the people is better represented. The ordinary people can thus act to prevent the islamificationof their country, unlike here where most of our laws are not even made in our country.
So, being the most democratic country in Europe and denied the "benefits" of EU membership, how has Switzerland fared?
It has the highest standard of living in Europe.
There must be a lesson there somewhere
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)