Shock Horror! Wigan doesn't seem to have any native white kids.

When Wigan Council wanted to make its website more appealing to young people the first thing it did was call in a couple of experts.
[ … ]
The aim of the project was to make sure that the views of young people were listened to and taken seriously.
[ … ]
Two eager volunteers Joe Mulenda and Ahmed Younis, who are both members of the Rafiki Motswako youth group, spent the day with Equality and Diversity Team members Andrew McCorkle and Catherine Martin, supported by Garry Miller looking at the web pages and exploring how they could be improved.
[ … ]
Andrew says: “ … We got some fairly frank opinions from Joe and Ahmed who told us the pages were difficult to find on the council’s website and once you did find them they were boring and too full of numbers. … They told us we should make the web pages a bit more fun by adding things like quizzes on different topics such as religion. “

Go read it all. Please do:

http://www.wigan.gov.uk/News/WebWonders.htm

I’d just like to add that in a secular country religion and government are kept separate. I for one certainly don’t want to read about religion on council web pages, any more than I want to hear about government in church. And which religion exactly, do we suppose they have in mind? Something tells me they, and the Equality and Diversity Team, weren’t thinking of Judaism or Buddhism, for examples.

And the pages were boring and too full of numbers were they? It’s because we as a culture learned to work right through information regardless of boredom; and because we also recognised the importance of numbers, our Western culture became superior to all other cultures on the planet, and came to dominate the world. Other cultures that are growing increasingly successful, such as China, India, Japan, Korea for examples, are those that have adopted our ways, kept religion and government apart and recognised the importance of data, statistics … numbers!

Trevor Philips himself, Chairman of the Race Equality Council, has said it: multiculturalism is dead. Incomers should adopt our ways, and not expect to come here but keep to the ways of the countries they left. Do they just want to reproduce what they are trying to escape from? No, I’m not having a pop at what are obviously two very bright little boys: I’m taking a pop at the Equality and Diversity Team. You should not be encouraging incomers to keep to their old ways because that is building up nothing but grief for them, and the indigenous population, in the future. They should be adopting our ways. Indeed, there should be nothing but our ways available to them.

And where were the white native Wigan kids? Isn’t the council interested in their views too?

Perhaps they are all incapable of this kind of thing due to imbecility? Anything to add Mr Elliot Brown?

Note to readers: I'm more than happy to argue about this in the comments section.

Wigan BNP Candidates for W.M.B.C. Elections, May 1st 2008

ASHTON
Jones. Adrian Dilwyn
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

I am a 49 year old engineer who moved to the area from South Wales 8 years ago to obtain work and because, having myself come from a mining area, I liked the area.

Owing to government policies which are replacing British manufacturing staff by immigrants , I was soon made redundant and now must travel to Chester to work. I thus realise from personal experience how we have been let down by Central Government in the jobs market with lower wages and fewer opportunities locally and having to travel on increasingly crowded roads and pay for excessively taxed petrol.

Locally services deteriorate while taxes rise.
Government, dominated by the other parties has let us down.
WE NEED A CHANGE!


BRYN
Haslam. Ken
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

I am a 67 year old retired haulier. Since I contested this ward last year nothing has changed apart from a few minor cosmetic gestures .The same attitude of apathy to the decline of the area has continued and the same old failed policies have been recycled. We have ever more crowded roads and run down areas. They debate and discuss but,
THEY NEVER DO ANYTHING.

We need a completely new vision for the area energetically pursued if we are to halt this decline.
I have the experience--
TO MAKE IT HAPPEN!


GOLBORNE LOWTON WEST
McEllenborough. Steven
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

Dear Voter

I am Steve McEllenborough. I am 35 years of age, and the British National Party candidate for Golborne Lowton West. If you believe , as I do, that our culture, its heritage, history and independence is worth fighting to protect and preserve, then I invite you to consider lending me your vote.

As your representative I will fight for the rights of local residents. I will fight against 'positive discrimination' against british people. We should come first, we deserve to come first.

The election is important. Its outcome will not effect the governance of the council but it will enable you to register a strong protest in favour of a party which will cause those who govern our affairs from a distance to sit up and take note.


LEIGH SOUTH
Chadwick. Gary Charles
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

I am 42 years old, born and bred in LEIGH SOUTH, and work for a local engineering firm. I have always lived in this borough and have seen the rapid decline in standards and discipline under this government. To my shame I was a member of the Labour Party until I saw that its priorities did not lie with its core supporters, but, with wealthy “businessmen” who sold our assets abroad or employed cheap foreign labour here at the expense of British workers.

I have been made redundant twice in the last 4 years as a result of this. Jobs paying a living wage are increasingly hard to find. Housing shortage is acute and our town is ever more crowded and congested. We can not accommodate this increase in numbers.
WE ARE FULL UP.

I fear for the future of my family in this crowded multicultural country which is being given away
WITHOUT OUR CONSENT!
A vote for me is a vote for the future generation. It will also send a powerful message to Westminster that the people HAVE HAD ENOUGH of their lies and deceit and that
WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK!

ORRELL
Mather. Charles Edward
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

I am 68 years old and have lived and worked in Orrell all my life, first as a GP and then as a farmer.

I intend spending the rest of my life here and am therefore concerned at the way the district has gone “downhill” over the past years with increased building, crowding and deterioration of services in spite of higher taxes with little regard for the wishes of the people.


PEMBERTON
Hilton. Chris
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

I am a 52 year old Wiganer, brought up in Kitt Green. I have worked most of my life in Wigan, but also for a spell on a kibbutz in Israel in my youth.

In the past I have stood as a Liberal candidate in the Winstanley ward. I am aware of the problems of low pay and poor conditions which are endured by many in this area and the difficulties faced by small businesses and farms.

I am a committed Christian who feels the values of Christianity, Pemberton, Marsh Green and Kitt Green have been played down in the interests of political correctness.


WIGAN WEST
Mather. Susan Jacquetta
BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY

SUSAN MATHER.(nee Green)

I am a 63 year old former civil servant who was brought up in Gidlow Lane,where my father was a newsagent, but now live in Billinge. I was educated at Beech Hill junior school and Wigan Girls High School. I have one daughter and a grandson and have seen the deterioration in education standards since my grandson started school.

I am proud to be a “Wiganer” but have become increasingly dismayed by the lack of coherent planning, the general congestion and the downgrading of our local traditions while “Diversity” events seem to be promoted. We seem to be losing our sense of community and proud past, encouraged by the local council.

I have stood in two previous elections, feeling it my duty to do my bit to help preserve Wigan and help its people.

WE ARE NOT A RACIST PARTY!
We are not against anyone regardless of colour or creed.
WE ARE JUST FOR …
THE BRITISH PEOPLE.
SOMEONE MUST STAND UP FOR THEM
THE BNP WILL!

A complete list of all candidates for all wards can be accessed here:

http://www.wigan.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3492C212-57DF-4200-9439-4BA0F5E83895/0/RepLocalStatNom.pdf

Top cop's terror warning

A TOP counter terrorism cop has warned a Manchester conference `the aim of the game now is mass murder'. Chief Supt Tony Porter, head of the GMP-based Counter Terrorism Unit, painted a bleak picture of the threat from Muslim extremists when he addressed business leaders at a security conference.
But he also spoke of his `optimism for the future' and his desire to make the region `the most hostile environment you can imagine' for terrorists.
He warned delegates at the start of his speech he would outline `the scary bits' of the terror threat. "Al-Qaida have re-written the manual of attack," he said, explaining that the historic threat from the IRA was `somewhat easier to manage' because its targets were focused, warnings were issued before bombings and Republicans wanted to escape alive afterwards.
"They didn't want to commit suicide. The aim of the game now is mass murder," he said. The current threat level is graded as `severe', which means an attack is `highly likely'.
Please go and read it all:

http://www.theasiannews.co.uk/news/s/1044507_top_cops_terror_warning


Morg

In defence of the British people and culture

From the desk of Robert Fjordman (a Norwegian writing in a Belgian web journal).

These are extracts (emphases mine); follow the link at the end to read it all (recommended - and especially recommended for the Elliot Browns amongst us). Do take the time to follow the links posted within the original article.

We in the BNP are not anti-European. What we are is anti-EU. Despite what our politicians and the media might like you to think, these two are not the same thing.

Neither are we anti anyone else. We fully support the right of all nations and cultures to exist and thrive within their own secure borders - and it isn't the BNP that sends our army to invade other peoples' lands, and for our young people to kill and die for no discernible British interest. What we are is pro-British, and we demand for ourselves that same right to exist and thrive within our own secure borders. We have two issues over immigration: culture - if you wish to immigrate into Britain you must wholly and unconditionally adopt the culture you find here; and numbers: this land is already overcrowded, and the number of people living here is unsustainable. To be allowed in on a permanent basis you must provably be able to contribute to the well-being of our nation in ways that we cannot provide from our own indigenous resources.


Fjordman (Norwegian, remember - but from everything he says, he could well be British; or Dutch, German, French, Danish ... etc. Ironic, isn't it: Wigan BNP using an article written by a Norwegian and published in a Belgian web publication, in order to lay out a defence of British culture):-

" ... in more and more European cities, the native population is being pushed out of their own neighborhoods by immigrant gangs. The natives receive little or no aid from their authorities, sometimes blatant hostility [are you still with us, young Elliot?], when faced with immigrant violence. In an age where the global population increases with billions of people in a few decades, it is entirely plausible, indeed likely, that the West could soon become demographically overwhelmed. Not a few of our intellectuals seem to derive pleasure from this thought.
[...]
In decadent societies of the past, the authorities didn't open the gates to hostile nations and ban opposition to this as intolerance and barbarophobia. What we are dealing with in the modern West is not merely decadence; it's one of the greatest betrayals in history. Our so-called leaders pass laws banning the opposition to our dispossession as "racism and hate speech." To native Europeans, when listening to our media and our leaders, it's as if we don't even exist, as if it were normal for them to put the interests of other nations over their own.
[...]
At the Daily Telegraph, Simon Heffer suggests that the mass immigration encouraged in particular by the Labour governments of Blair and Brown in Britain is not happening out of incompetence, but is part of "a doctrinally driven determination by the new Government in 1997 to destroy our national identity and to advance multiculturalism." I agree, but this policy of state-sponsored population replacement is far from limited to Britain.
[...]
... a Scottish councillor, Sandy Aitchison, was chastised for using the term "indigenous" about native Brits. Why is it considered ridiculous or evil if Europeans assert our rights? Is it because we are white?
[...]
Western Europeans have in recent years accepted more immigration in a shorter period of time than any society has ever done peacefully in human history. If we want a break we have the right to do so. What we are dealing with is not "immigration" but colonization, and in the case of Muslims, internationally organized attempts to conquer our countries. ... There are hardly any Britons in Pakistan today, so why should the Brits allow huge numbers of Pakistanis to settle in Britain?
[...]
For simply suggesting that I would not enjoy being turned into a persecuted minority in my own country, I have been accused of being a "white nationalist," which says a great deal about how demonized people of European ancestry have become. What about Koreans or Japanese? If they were gradually being displaced by, say, Nigerians and Pakistanis and were harassed in their cities by people who moved there out of their own free will, would they be denounced as yellow nationalists if they objected to this? In fact, why do the terms yellow nationalist, brown nationalist and black nationalist hardly exist, whereas the term white nationalist does? Isn't that by itself an indication of a double standard?
[...]
The one thing I will not do is surrender my land, which is not mine to give. I do not see anybody else quietly accept being turned into a minority in the country where their ancestors have lived since the end of the last Ice Age, and I cannot see why I should have to do so, either. I don't care if white Westerners are "scared of being called a racist." I will not leave a ruined land behind to my descendants because I was afraid of being called bad names. If you think it is "racist" for Europeans to preserve their heritage and protect their children from abuse, then I'm not the bigot here. You are.
[...]
We do not wish harm or ill-feeling toward any other peoples on earth, but we assert the right to maintain our own majorities in our own lands without being accused of "racism." We reject current trends which preach that we have no right to oppose, control or lessen unlimited immigration from non-indigenous cultures.
[...]
We reject educational trends which encourage our children to forget or despise their culture, traditions, religious practices and history in order to avoid offense to non-indigenous European residents or citizens.
[...]
We reject out of hand current trends which preach that traditional indigenous European religious or cultural celebrations such as Christmas are somehow "racist" or "non-inclusive" and therefore must be "downgraded," "renamed" or otherwise de-emphasized or eliminated in order to avoid offending non-indigenous European residents or citizens. We reject current policies which establish that our indigenous cultures are somehow deficient and therefore are not complete until they are "enriched" by other, non-indigenous cultures.
[...]
We reject out of hand current trends or policies which preach that our national flags or ethnic symbols of centuries standing are somehow "racist" or "non-inclusive" in order to avoid offense to non-indigenous European residents or citizens.
[...]
We reject out of hand current trends or policies which preach that indigenous European cultural expressions such as statues of boars, folkloric tales about pigs or dogs, paintings with Christian or Classical pagan themes, war memorials with a Christian theme, etc., should be removed from public view, banned, destroyed, modified or otherwise threatened in order to avoid offense to non-indigenous European residents or citizens.
[...]
Mr. Franco Frattini of the EU Commission, the unelected and unaccountable government for nearly half a billion people, has stated that Europeans should accept further tens of millions of immigrants within a generation. The British Foreign Minister Milliband stated late in 2007 that the EU should expand to include Muslim nations in North Africa and the Middle East. The French President Sarkozy and the German Chancellor Angela Merkel confirmed this early in 2008. This is part of an organized attempt to surrender Europe to Islamization that has been going on for decades. Since the European Union involves the free movement of people across borders, European leaders are opening the floodgates to tens of millions of Muslims and other non-indigenous peoples at a time when native Europeans fear for the survival of their civilization and feel like aliens in their own cities. Meanwhile, Ernst Uhrlau, the president of Germany's foreign intelligence agency, warned about the rising assertiveness of violent Jihadist organizations in North Africa.

Based on this evidence, the European Union can hardly be seen as anything other than a criminal organization dedicated to the demographic dispossession and cultural marginalization of the indigenous peoples of an entire continent. Consequently, the EU should be immediately and totally dissolved. Native Europeans should demand that we have an interim period with public de-Eurabification, where the lies propagated by pro-Islamic Multiculturalists should be removed from our history books, and a proper respect for European cultural traditions should be restored. Those officials on senior levels who have participated in the creation of Eurabia should stand trial for crimes against their civilization. "

Read it all.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/3153

Is this a "Hate Crime" Mr Elliot Brown? If so, send your heavies around to get me; you know where I live. It wont make any difference though: we are not going to stop.

ALL THE NOMINATIONS ACCEPTED

All our nominations have been accepted. Perhaps not as many as we would have liked but owing to activists moving and being away on holiday not as many as we would have liked.
Getting the nomination papers I was cheered by the enthusiasm I received from everybody.
The increasing decline of our country and the governments insistence that all is well is having an effect and the people are realising that they are being lied to almost daily, while our British institutions are being consigned to history (or until we have more influence)
Britannia on our coinage is disappearing after hundreds of years. Why? to downplay anything that is British and to turn us into an unrelated mass of disunited people who inhabit this tiny island. The powers that be seem intent on destroying the unity we had in World War 2 when we united to save our nation and the world from Fascism.
Now we have it by stealth,---so far.
At last the people are awakening and realising it is not a waste of time to vote.
A vote for the BNP is worth 10 for any other party as we are the only party dedicated to a change from the rapid decline of our culture and the corruption of government at all levels.
The other parties will note our increasing support and who knows will start reflecting the will of the people and put BRITISH people first.

WE WILL LISTEN TO THE PEOPLE , ROOT OUT CORRUPTION, AND RESTORE THE GREAT IN GREAT BRITAIN

The Times on the BNP

I am posting this article in its entirety as a public service to ensure it doesn’t disappear. It will be interesting for you if you go to the actual Times article and also read the comments attached to it. It has a larger number of comments than any other article in today’s Times, and is one of the
“Times recommends” articles for today.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/tim_hames/article3648815.ece

The BNP has increased its average vote per candidate at every election it has stood in since 1982. It will do so again this May. The big story of the upcoming elections in May will be the BNP performance in London. As a provincial town we may slightly resent that, but that’s the country as it is, not as we might like to see it. The media is almost entirely London based, so to the media, that’s where the big story is.

You will read in the article below that wherever the BNP stands candidates it averages 10% - 20%. Here in Wigan we last year averaged a little over 15% across all the candidates we stood. Do vote to increase that. It would be even better if you gave the Labour, Conservative and Liberal-Democrat parties a real shock to the system by electing some or all of our candidates. Contrary to the story put out by the other political parties and by the mainstream media, you will not be placing yourselves in any danger by doing this. Even if all our candidates in May were elected to the council, you would still be electing only seven councillors. That is hardly a controlling bloc. But my goodness me you would be sending out a powerful message of discontent to the major parties; and to the Elliot Browns of Wigan that their game is up, and it’s only a matter of time before they are out on their ear.

Our vote increases election after election not because of anything we do, but because of what is done by the major parties – and they are all essentially the same; you all know that. You will never change them other than by voting for us. We know you want THEM to change; to do that you must vote for US. They are in need of a severe shock. And you may even find that you actually like us.

And you may get a pleasant surprise if you elect us: you just might find that we are not monsters, not the knuckle-dragging Nazis we are made out to be: just ordinary people like you. In the Wigan BNP we have six former Labour Party members and activists (that would be the old Labour Party, of course); Three former Conservative Party members (again, the old Conservative Party); and one former member of the Liberal Democrat Party.
_________________________________________________________________

From The Times
March 31, 2008

Prepare for a shock BNP victory
Forget Ken vs Boris - the real action is on the far Right
Tim Hames

I cannot claim to have been to Redwell in Wellingborough, Northamptonshire, although on paper it would seem a pretty pleasant place, rather more prosperous than average. I have been through Yapton, in Arun, West Sussex, and that is distinctly desirable territory. I think I have cut across Lawford and New Bilton, in Warwickshire, too and while it was not quite the Cotswolds it was hardly a centre of deprivation or tense race relations either.

All of which makes a recent pattern in local council by-elections more unexpected. A by-election was held in Redwell West last Thursday. The Conservatives easily retained the seat but there in second place, eight votes ahead of Labour and with four times the strength of the Liberal Democrats was the British National Party candidate. At Yapton, seven days beforehand, the BNP had come third, a mere seven votes behind the Liberal Democrats, and with almost a fifth of the vote. A fortnight earlier Lawford and New Bilton had witnessed a cracking contest with Labour hanging on by a single vote over the Tories and with the BNP securely third on 15 per cent, well ahead of Nick Clegg's contender.

It is being said that the local elections on May 1 are a rather boring affair with the obvious exception of the battle between Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson to be the mayor of London. The BNP, however, will be more interested in the Greater London Assembly than whether Red Ken or the Blue Blond wins control of the capital city. For the complex electoral method - the additional member system - used for the assembly means that any political party has a decent chance of winning one of the 25 seats at stake if it can accumulate 6 per cent or so of the vote in the party list section of the ballot paper.

This is far from an impossible target for the BNP. The last local by-election conducted in London was on March 20 at Gooshays in the Borough of Havering. The BNP had narrowly won it in May 2006 in something close to a statistical fluke but now had to defend it after the departure of its councillor. It was assumed that this might be a challenge for the BNP. Far from it. Its share of the vote went up from 28 per cent to 38 per cent. The Liberal Democrats, for the record, managed the singularly strange feat of finishing sixth.

The ward of Gooshays is striking for the lack of immigrants who live there. The ward is 96.4 per cent white, making it one of the least ethnically diverse in London. The place, however, is polarised by age (disproportionately large numbers of very young and very old voters), has comparatively high unemployment and very low levels of educational attainment. It is ideal terrain for the BNP and there are other Gooshays in London. That being so, the stealth success of the BNP could be the real story of the local elections.

This is surprising in many ways. Not least because the BNP has been through a period of fratricidal factionalism. There have been purges, resignations and attempts to establish rival nationalist parties. Some within its ranks have accused the leader, Nick Griffin, of “dictatorial tendencies” (fancy joining a neo-fascist party and then discovering that the führerprinzip reigns there) while others consider him a bit of a pinko for wanting to play down race in an effort to become more respectable.

None of this internal anguish appears to matter much at polling stations. Stick a BNP champion up in a local by-election and he will accomplish 10-20 per cent in swaths of England. On that evidence, the BNP will have its triumph in London.

So why do I expect the BNP to do well? There seem to me to be three factors that might prove important.

The first relates specifically to the forthcoming local elections. The last time that this set of seats were fought was in June 2004 when the tussle in London and councils elsewhere were combined with elections for the European Parliament vote in an attempt to raise the turnout. It did, but it was the UK Independence Party that benefited from these joint elections, not only doing very well in the battle for the European Parliament but in the locals too - it seized two Greater London Assembly seats, for example. The typical UKIP and BNP supporters are by no means identical but there is a degree of overlap between them and the surge for the former did diminish the prospects of the latter. On May 1 there will be no European Parliament poll to help UKIP - which too has suffered from schisms of late - by pushing Europe towards the top of the agenda.

The second factor is that the BNP has improved its organisation. The in-house feuding has not prevented the BNP from honing a much more sophisticated approach to campaigning. The quality of its leaflets has improved, there have been instances of it engaging in telephone canvassing and reports of more “mystery shopping” where its activists blitz an area to market test the public reaction to the party and then determine whether it is worth fielding a candidate.

The final dimension is the most significant. The optimal conditions for the BNP are where there are substantial numbers of disillusioned ex-Labour supporters and a Conservative Party that is wary of concentrating on subjects such as asylum-seekers because it wants to appeal to mainstream metropolitan opinion. It is also a bonus for the BNP if the Liberal Democrats look more centrist and are not indulging in populism to chase the protest vote. These are precisely the political circumstances that will be at play in the local elections of 2008, especially in London.

The main constraint on the BNP in London is how well it can stretch its limited resources. It won 4.8 per cent of the assembly vote in 2004 even with UKIP in the frame. If it can win anything close to double that this time, then regardless of whether it is Mayor Ken or Mayor Boris, it will be the BNP that provides the shock of this election.

Morg

Letter to Mr. Ian McCartney M.P.

My Lanky colleague is currently having connection difficulties with Blogger, and has asked me to post this on his behalf. It is an email he has sent to Ian McCartney MP via the Write to Them website. Apparently, emails written directly to Mr McCartney are being returned unopened.The advantage of using Write to Them as your route for emailing your MP is that Write to Them keeps files - and publishes the data - on which MPs do and don't reply promptly to their electors. MPs are aware of this and so are more likely to respond to you. Here again is the address for Write to Them:

http://www.writetothem.com/

And here is the address for They Work for You, which provides information about your MP:

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/

Here is Lanky Patriots letter to Mr McCartney
Mr Mc Cartney,

Below is the address of the new Wigan BNP weblog. I know you will not agree with much or anything we say but I assure you it represents the views of thousands of Wiganers. I thought it right to let you know about it, although up to now you have declined my invitation to a public debate on issues worrying many people.

I am prepared to put my reputation on the line to further and defend my point of view in a debate. I hope as our democratically elected representative you will accept this invitation to a civilised debate.

The Internet is affording us a vehicle to disseminate our point of view which has until now been controlled by the media barons and the government. Rest assured we shall use it!

This letter and invitation will be published on our Wigan BNP blog.

http://wiganbnp.blogspot.com/

Morg