tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post5636651134495702260..comments2023-10-08T14:18:02.273+01:00Comments on WIGAN PATRIOT: CAMPAIGNING IN SUPPORT OF THE BRITISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. FIGHTING FOR OUR BIRTHRIGHT: PARTY TRAITORS AND A FOOL OF A JUDGELanky Patriothttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15999507941723423672noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post-56537846639565008762009-09-04T11:43:44.943+01:002009-09-04T11:43:44.943+01:00Dear BritishLady (16:19 hrs)
Once again that'...Dear BritishLady (16:19 hrs)<br /><br />Once again that's trial by speculation,and I want no part in it. The presumption of innocence is one of the fundamental concepts of a free society. <br /><br />I don't know what happened to make Matt Single do such a terrible thing (not to Griffin but to decent grass-roots membership), and neither do you. <br /><br />Matt Single's released the membership list, an act I totally condemn. But I refuse to have any part in attributing guilt by association. <br /><br />From<br />Chris Hill<br />(Lancaster)Dr Chris Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16091680341352996729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post-61615193283560268202009-09-04T00:19:15.203+01:002009-09-04T00:19:15.203+01:00Anti-gag
SINGLE'S
LIVED WITH SADIE IF YOU ...Anti-gag<br /><br />SINGLE'S <br /><br />LIVED WITH SADIE IF YOU THINK HE <br /><br />DID THIS ACTION WITHOUT HER <br /><br />KNOWING YOU LIVE IN CUCKOO LAND.<br /><br />OR A MAN WITH NO WIFE.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post-57151001737321778962009-09-03T21:19:14.987+01:002009-09-03T21:19:14.987+01:00Hi Charles,
Yes, you make a lot of sense when you...Hi Charles,<br /><br />Yes, you make a lot of sense when you say the party must come first. But these purges have been going on intermittently and for a lot longer than just the last two years. The leadership must learn from the last two years or history will be doomed to repeat itself.Dr Chris Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16091680341352996729noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post-35721736959878458212009-09-03T20:59:41.694+01:002009-09-03T20:59:41.694+01:00I am not commenting on this case further as I thin...I am not commenting on this case further as I think we have had too much washing dirty linnen in public.<br />I am aware of the sequence of events and what should have been a storm in a teacup was fanned into a major dispute over a matter initially of little importance.<br />I know details which you are not aware of which could have led to a solution but these options were not taken up.<br />But as I said ALWAYS THE PARTY COMES FIRSTLanky Patriothttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15999507941723423672noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1053405856464872035.post-20570028374863943882009-09-03T14:35:18.960+01:002009-09-03T14:35:18.960+01:00Hi charles:
You said:
"makes me wonder wheth...Hi charles:<br /><br />You said:<br />"makes me wonder whether they ever had the Party's interests at heart."<br /><br />I say:<br />The use of the word 'they' suggests that Sadie condoned the release, what proof do you have that this is in fact the case?<br /><br /><br />Matt Single's actions were criminal, and I have not and will not try to justify them. However your analysis of the original Dec 2007 expulsions is also somewhat off the mark. <br /><br />Sadie did try to resolve the situation in private, and only when all appeals (from several senior party officials) to Griffin had failed, did a number of those involved feel it their duty to inform the grass-roots membership about the damage being done to the party by Collett and co. Surely any party official's first duty must be to the membership, even before that of loyalty to the National Chairman? <br /><br />Trying to use this criminal act (which occurred 12 months after the expulsions)to justify the National Chairman's actions in Dec 2007 is obviously invalid. <br /><br />Sadie Graham worked long hours for the party, for very little pay. She took abuse from the media and attacks from ANaL thugs (remember the incident where she was spat on on TV) and was a great asset to the party. Nothing that happened a year after she was wrongly expelled can justify her treatment. Neither is it justice to find her guilty of an offence without a trial. <br /><br />I'm sorry but I want no part of guilt by association. <br /><br />From<br />Chris Hill<br />(Lancaster)Dr Chris Hillhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16091680341352996729noreply@blogger.com